i dont think it is a clear right left and democrat-republican issue.
I think though it does help to understand most of the democrats vs the republicans in terms of education and background. I would be interested to see numbers as to most of their childhood socio-economic backgrounds. This goes beyond simply bush vs obama.
What I find with most democrats and liberals is they are intelligent, go to excellent universities, but they fail to see the commonsense and review the data.
Ivy league education is great - take olberman, cornell guy, very smart but is a guy who went to prep schools all the way up and comes from a fairly affluent background. O'Reilly while I disagree withi his candor most of the time, is middle class, worked his way up, then attended an ivy league school while teaching in public schools. He has more real world exposure than olberman - this is simply one example.
But where you stand depends on where you sit, on issues. I come from a low middle class back ground, single parent, and payed my way through college at a State University because I couldn't afford a school like NYU or Carnegie Mellon. I picked a major that would enable me to get a job and be consistently employed on my own accord and got a solid paying consulting position out of school to help repay the debt I acrrued. I didn't whine and cry like many others did, I knew I needed to educate myself rather than rely on the govt. Most fiscal conservatives, who understand the economics, are that way because they see first hand the waste in our neighborhoods and schools. Throwing money at schools does nothing whens students in catholic schools outperform their public school counterparts (of which I am one), despite receiving far less $ per student, mainly because the teachers can teach and the parents care. At the root of all of this mess is accountability whether it is personal, local, state, or federal. Those that got houses they couldn't afford are guilty, and the govt on both sides enabled it. "We didn't know any better" is the same excuse cig execs used and mothers smoking up used up till the 70's to justify their lack of self control - here its just an excess fed doing it without us holding them accountable, when someone does, we decry them as a monster.
I don't mean to oversimplify this issue because republicans have butchered this as well under bush - but the reality is we need to cut our spending immediately and reign in all spending that doesn't generate a useful return. We need to first focus on energy since it is at the root of our entire economy, not from a green position, but price fluctuations create extreme volitility. Focus on this and the education to support, create a new infrastructure with new reactors, new cars, new fueling stations, that generate the ROI, mandate 35-40mpg cars that will drive new manufacturing and engineering standards. A lot of other elements will fall in line. It isn't the free market that sorts things out, it is basic human nature to do what is in their own best interest. We are acting against our own interests at the moment because we want our politicians to take care of things for us and the govt to handle it. They harldy have been up to this task throughout history - why do we think they will be now?