Oddball
Unobtanium Member
How does that not make the restaurateur an uncompensated enforcer for The State?It was the restaurant who called the police and not the police who are just out patrolling restaurants asking people for papers?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How does that not make the restaurateur an uncompensated enforcer for The State?It was the restaurant who called the police and not the police who are just out patrolling restaurants asking people for papers?
Was Bill De Blasio elected through a legitimate democratic process? Is the government he runs not responsible for regulating businesses? Do you even know what fascism is?
You haven't formed a rational argument yet.You can't even form a rational argument that doesn't rest on a pejorative. Try a little harder and maybe I'll take you seriously.
I can see just fine thank you very much. What I don't see is the need to harp on it no end like you do.Better to light one candle than to curse the darkness.
Keep this post in mind when you believe you should ever question what I claim: I'm never wrong.
People with the big picture in mind don't cherry pick statistics to support their arguments.According to coronavirus data from the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, there have been more than 992,000 COVID-19 cases statewide since the pandemic's start. To date, there have been close to 13,000 coronavirus-related deaths.
That would make the percentage of infections resulting in survival close to 99%. However, doctors say that number does not tell the full story.
Dr. Katie Passaretti, an infectious disease specialist with Atrium Health, says that 99% contains a wide variety of unpleasant, and even near-fatal experiences, including long-term hospital stays, and lingering effects, even after mild infection.
Yes, the courts. You remember those?
Pointing out that laws, elected officials and courts are all part of a functioning democracy and not an example of fascism isn't a rational argument?You haven't formed a rational argument yet.
All you have belched up so far are the standard boilerplate appeals to authority, and the "you don't know what that means" argumentation of the committed ignoramus supplicant to The State.
You've earned the pejorative, dullard.
I can see just fine thank you very much. What I don't see is the need to harp on it no end like you do.
Screeching from the right no end is just as repugnant to me as screeching from the left. You don't have any better bead on things that matter than someone right-leaning that is more reserved.
Indeed those who screech the loudest are usually the ones that turn-out to be not much of a much in their actions to correct what they are screeching about.![]()
As though judges are entirely insulated from making rulings based upon their political biases.I'm not a Good German, like you.
I don't turn my understanding of right and wrong over to anyone else.
Jot this down:
" ... there’s a tendency among bureaucrats, politicians, academics, and other members of the New Class to convince the people to hand over the major decisions of their lives to the “experts.” These experts aren’t all in the government, but they all collude with government to convince people that the experts have all the answers and that the people need to hand the reins over to them. They will tell us what to eat, what to drive, what to think.
It’s an approach that puts politics before economics. Because it is an attempt to politicize peoples’ lives.”
Nazis: Still Socialists, by Jonah Goldberg, National Review
That includes 'judges.'
Fascism is the marriage of state and corporate interest--Benito Mussolini
Nice strawman. Morality and legality are not synonymous.I'm not a Good German, like you.
I don't turn my understanding of right and wrong over to anyone else.
Here's a little excerpt from your last link.
People with the big picture in mind don't cherry pick statistics to support their arguments.
Laws, elected officials, and the courts are also part of "functioning" fascism, dullard.Pointing out that laws, elected officials and courts are all part of a functioning democracy and not an example of fascism isn't a rational argument?
As though judges are entirely insulated from making rulings based upon their political biases.
The chump doesn't have the underlying understanding of civics and human nature that a high schooler shoutld.
You're as predictable as a Russian algorithm. Same shit, different posts. Over and over.
And here you are, running away as fast as you can declaring a non-existent victory.
Remember how you wondered how so many German could fall in line under evil orders?
1. What with year of government school training, and near total information dominance, the weakest of our citizenry has been cowed, trained to accept without question, the orders of the totalitarians…the Progressives.
Even when a stronger citizenry would have rebelled.
And even when the monarchs let the cat out of the bag:
“Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’” Dem Rep. Told Colleagues Coronavirus Bill Is ‘Tremendous Opportunity to Restructure Things to Fit Our Vision’ | National Review
2. “Are your papers in order????”
"Police Remove “Unvaccinated” Child From Restaurant, Threaten To Arrest Anyone Without Vaccination Cards
"Is this what justice looks like for you? Is this what you dreamed of when you wanted to be a cop?"
Police Remove "Unvaccinated" Child From Restaurant, Threaten To Arrest Anyone Without Vaccination Cards · Caldron Pool
3. In so very many ways the destruction of America by the European Party, the Democrats, is as though the Nazis, with whom the current Democrats share so many aims, and methods…..including that both parties are socialist and both put their own citizens in concentration camps, ...actually took over the major political party.
Let me explain why:
The Constitution was a distillation of the views of Madison, Jefferson and Franklin. Progressivism is from the views of Rousseau, Hegel and Marx.
Now, let's quote 'progressives,' also known as totalitarians.
a. The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).
b. The attitude of the FDR government can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”
From a speech delivered on the Senate floor
May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler's dangerous statism - The Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions
c. Jim Cramer, one of the Left's apparatchiks, say what Democrats believe, encourage.....but blames it on the other side.
“government has a right to force you to obey and has always exercised it especially under GOP”
Anyone think to question what the GOP has forced any to obey about?
Masks?
Injections?
Taxation?
See what I mean about the Left/Progressives lying about everything?
The Democrats are the European Party, the party of Obey.
And their voter are the new Good Germans.
You need medication for your paranoia.
There is no fascism in government now son. You're just another hate filled Republican.
Fuck off, Nazi Boy. You're boring me.And yet you still can't offer a single cogent argument of refutation, just the usual democrat refrain of "Nuhn Uhn"
Whether they are insulated from political bias or not, judges and courts are the arbiters of the law. It's the desire to disregard Democratic rule that is the mark of fascism. But if not the courts than who should be the arbiters of the rule of law?As though judges are entirely insulated from making rulings based upon their political biases.
The chump doesn't have the underlying understanding of civics and human nature that a high schooler shoutld.
It was the restaurant who called the police and not the police who are just out patrolling restaurants asking people for papers?