Under Progressives/Obama the riches got richer, poorest got poorer

[bedowin62]

Obama economy: Welfare dependency peaks as rich get ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../obama-economy-...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Jan 4, 2015 - But under Mr. Obama it has plummeted from 65.7 percent the month he ... rich got richer and the poor got poorer during the Obama economic

 

[bedowin62]

Incomes fell for most families in past three years, while top ...
www.washingtontimes.com/.../incomes-fell-most-...

• Cached
• Similar

The Washington Times
Loading...
Sep 4, 2014 - Under President Obama, the richest 10 percent were the only income ... economic team doesn't change, you are going get the same results.”.

 

[bedowin62]

the truth hurts doesnt it leftardz???


snicker

 

[NYcarbineer]

Try dealing with this:

The True US Poverty Rate Is 4.5%, Not 14.5%

 

[bedowin62]

here it is FROM PROGRESSIVES; OUCH!!!

Obamanomics: the rich get richer, the poor get poorer ...
humanevents.com/.../obamanomics-the-rich-get-richer-the...

• Cached
• Similar

Human Events
Loading...
Sep 4, 2014 - It's not surprising that the rich would get richer, while the poor got poorer. ... Oh, no, we're not going to start blaming Obama's failures on ATM machines again, are we? .... Bad Things Happen Under the 200-Day Average.

 

[occupied]

why are these trolls like the occupier and his ILK allowed to derail this thread in the politic forum?

You want to talk about income inequality and leave the republicans out of it? It's just not possible.

 

[bedowin62]

TRY DEALING with all of what i posted carbin-tard

snicker

 

[occupied]

Then why aren't conservatives praising Obama? Every economic policy conservatives support is designed to make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

i don't know why you arent kicked off these message boards; everything you post is an idiotic false narrative you cant back up

You would be gone first if that was the rule.

Really?

what part of what i posted isnt true?

thanks

The lie of omission where you failed to explain the causality of income inequality, which is a mostly conservative republican story.

except you cant say what part is a lie leftard?

I did you just do not know what a lie of omission is apparently.

 

[bedowin62]

Obamanomics: the rich get richer, the poor get poorer ...
humanevents.com/.../obamanomics-the-rich-get-richer-the...

• Cached
• Similar

Human Events
Loading...
Sep 4, 2014 - It's not surprising that the rich would get richer, while the poor got poorer. ... Oh, no, we're not going to start blaming Obama's failures on ATM machines again, are we? .... Bad Things Happen Under the 200-Day Average.

 

[bedowin62]

i don't know why you arent kicked off these message boards; everything you post is an idiotic false narrative you cant back up

You would be gone first if that was the rule.

Really?

what part of what i posted isnt true?

thanks

The lie of omission where you failed to explain the causality of income inequality, which is a mostly conservative republican story.

except you cant say what part is a lie leftard?

I did you just do not know what a lie of omission is apparently.

i know what a sin of ommission is leftard; you just have not explained what and where exactly i am guilty of it

try again

 

[NYcarbineer]

TRY DEALING with all of what i posted carbin-tard

snicker

Try posting like an adult.

The poorest in America get help from the government. Help that makes them less poor. That government help is constantly targeted by conservatives for reduction or elimination,

with the goal of making the poor poorer.

 

[bedowin62]

Obama admits 95% of income gains gone to top 1% - Sep ...
money.cnn.com/2013/09/15/.../income-inequality-obama/

• Cached
• Similar

CNNMoney
Loading...
Sep 15, 2013 - President Obama has been loud and clear about his fight against income inequality, but he admitted that the rich have fared far better than the poor ... announcement on September 9; NYPD to Disney and Marvel: Get Minnie ...

 

[NYcarbineer]

Obamanomics: the rich get richer, the poor get poorer ...
humanevents.com/.../obamanomics-the-rich-get-richer-the...

• Cached
• Similar

Human Events
Loading...
Sep 4, 2014 - It's not surprising that the rich would get richer, while the poor got poorer. ... Oh, no, we're not going to start blaming Obama's failures on ATM machines again, are we? .... Bad Things Happen Under the 200-Day Average.

Again, since conservatives want to make the rich richer and the poor poorer, what are you complaining about?

 

[bedowin62]

TRY DEALING with all of what i posted carbin-tard

snicker

Try posting like an adult.

The poorest in America get help from the government. Help that makes them less poor. That government help is constantly targeted by conservatives for reduction or elimination,

with the goal of making the poor poorer.

your position is that it doesnt matter how many people failed Progressive policies make POORER; as long as you got welfare for them?

and you say i'm not the adult here?

 

[bedowin62]

Obamanomics: the rich get richer, the poor get poorer ...
humanevents.com/.../obamanomics-the-rich-get-richer-the...

• Cached
• Similar

Human Events
Loading...
Sep 4, 2014 - It's not surprising that the rich would get richer, while the poor got poorer. ... Oh, no, we're not going to start blaming Obama's failures on ATM machines again, are we? .... Bad Things Happen Under the 200-Day Average.

Again, since conservatives want to make the rich richer and the poor poorer, what are you complaining about?

you are a small child; unable to debate without your straw man

 

[bedowin62]

WELL THERE YOU GO FOLKS

CARBINEER JUST ADMITTTED the Progressive plan for prosperity and to help the poorest is to give them welfare!

 

[bedowin62]

"the poorest get help in America..............................."

they USED to be middle class leftard.

you want a cookie for "helping" people you made poor???????

 

[occupied]

You would be gone first if that was the rule.

Really?

what part of what i posted isnt true?

thanks

The lie of omission where you failed to explain the causality of income inequality, which is a mostly conservative republican story.

except you cant say what part is a lie leftard?

I did you just do not know what a lie of omission is apparently.

i know what a sin of ommission is leftard; you just have not explained what and where exactly i am guilty of it

try again

You are one dense motherfucker, You want to talk about income inequality as if it does not involve republican policies or did not begin growing thirty or more years ago? Fuck that. You posted a pile of shit that "begged the question", a logical fallacy, if you still do not get it I can't help you.

 

[Wyatt earp]

One silly thread is too much on the subject. Your silly thread is a pile on of being silly

TRY DEALING with all of what i posted carbin-tard

snicker

Try posting like an adult.

The poorest in America get help from the government. Help that makes them less poor. That government help is constantly targeted by conservatives for reduction or elimination,

with the goal of making the poor poorer.

What is less poor?

The 99 weekers were not helped by the government it just gave them an almost a 2 year vacation, ask moonglow he admitted in a thread, once the program ended they got a job.

 

[bedowin62]

Really?

what part of what i posted isnt true?

thanks

The lie of omission where you failed to explain the causality of income inequality, which is a mostly conservative republican story.

except you cant say what part is a lie leftard?

I did you just do not know what a lie of omission is apparently.

i know what a sin of ommission is leftard; you just have not explained what and where exactly i am guilty of it

try again

You are one dense motherfucker, You want to talk about income inequality as if it does not involve republican policies or did not begin growing thirty or more years ago? Fuck that. You posted a pile of shit that "begged the question", a logical fallacy, if you still do not get it I can't help you.

...........................AAAAAAANNNND here comes your anger

because YOU KNOW YOU'RE LOSING