"Ukrainian forces “annihilated” two NATO battalions during exercises" - WSJ

Litwin

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2017
Messages
56,429
Reaction score
8,308
Points
1,915
Location
GDL&Sweden
Who's going to train who actually? Ukrainians used their Delta battlefield-management system, which integrates drone feeds, satellite data, AI analysis, and real-time intelligence to compress the "kill chain" (from detection to strike) into minutes—sometimes as fast as 2.2 seconds for target detection. It’s abundantly obvious that NATO armies need to learn from Ukrainians battle experience and abilities- fast.

"
What we know:16,000 soldiers from 12 NATO countries participated in the exercises. The training combat involved drones.Ten Ukrainian soldiers destroyed 17 armored vehicle units and carried out 30 attacks on other targets in half a day. Had the battle continued, NATO would have lost two battalions within a day.The British brigade and the Estonian division attacked the Ukrainian positions.The Ukrainian forces quickly eliminated the enemy: The NATO units lost their combat capability.There was no rapid exchange of information during the battle—information was limited, and tactics remained outdated.One of the European commanders emotionally admitted: “We’re finished. We’re screwed.”
"

 
Who's going to train who actually? Ukrainians used their Delta battlefield-management system, which integrates drone feeds, satellite data, AI analysis, and real-time intelligence to compress the "kill chain" (from detection to strike) into minutes—sometimes as fast as 2.2 seconds for target detection. It’s abundantly obvious that NATO armies need to learn from Ukrainians battle experience and abilities- fast.

"
What we know:16,000 soldiers from 12 NATO countries participated in the exercises. The training combat involved drones.Ten Ukrainian soldiers destroyed 17 armored vehicle units and carried out 30 attacks on other targets in half a day. Had the battle continued, NATO would have lost two battalions within a day.The British brigade and the Estonian division attacked the Ukrainian positions.The Ukrainian forces quickly eliminated the enemy: The NATO units lost their combat capability.There was no rapid exchange of information during the battle—information was limited, and tactics remained outdated.One of the European commanders emotionally admitted: “We’re finished. We’re screwed.”
"


Well NATO troops don't exactly have recent battle experience unless they are US troops. We have been at war for ever. Excuse me we called them policing actions. That being said we have been at war in deserts and jungles. We are good at that. Your ear is a different climate. I am sure there is much we could learn from you about modern cold climate warfare.
 
Well NATO troops don't exactly have recent battle experience unless they are US troops. We have been at war for ever. Excuse me we called them policing actions. That being said we have been at war in deserts and jungles. We are good at that. Your ear is a different climate. I am sure there is much we could learn from you about modern cold climate warfare.
A good post. Who do you think Moscow endangers the most today (besides Ukraine)?

top 10 countries on 🇷🇺 moscow imperialistic menu, 1) Estonia 2) Latvia 3) Spitsbergen (Norway) 4) Moldova 5) Georgia 6) Armenia 7) Lietuvas 8) Qazaqstan (Kazakhstan) 9) Bielarus´ 10) Poland
 
A good post. Who do you think Moscow endangers the most today (besides Ukraine)?

top 10 countries on 🇷🇺 moscow imperialistic menu, 1) Estonia 2) Latvia 3) Spitsbergen (Norway) 4) Moldova 5) Georgia 6) Armenia 7) Lietuvas 8) Qazaqstan (Kazakhstan) 9) Bielarus´ 10) Poland
This I would have to think about. I have not thought militarily for a while. I know the USSR had nine defense corridors they were widely concerned about. As well as areas where nuclear infrastructure was located. If I were Putin I would would want these corridors back. Many of the countries where those corridors were are now NATO countries. With my current limited knowledge I guess my next move would be Qazaqstan(Kazakhstan). Reclaim nuclear infrastructure with least likelyhood of triggering a larger conflict.
 
A good post. Who do you think Moscow endangers the most today (besides Ukraine)?
top 10 countries on 🇷🇺 moscow imperialistic menu, 1) Estonia 2) Latvia 3) Spitsbergen (Norway) 4) Moldova 5) Georgia 6) Armenia 7) Lietuvas 8) Qazaqstan (Kazakhstan) 9) Bielarus´ 10) Poland
Putin may make a play to get Kaliningrad connected to Russia by force.

1771073803484.webp
 
Who's going to train who actually? Ukrainians used their Delta battlefield-management system, which integrates drone feeds, satellite data, AI analysis, and real-time intelligence to compress the "kill chain" (from detection to strike) into minutes—sometimes as fast as 2.2 seconds for target detection. It’s abundantly obvious that NATO armies need to learn from Ukrainians battle experience and abilities- fast.

"
What we know:16,000 soldiers from 12 NATO countries participated in the exercises. The training combat involved drones.Ten Ukrainian soldiers destroyed 17 armored vehicle units and carried out 30 attacks on other targets in half a day. Had the battle continued, NATO would have lost two battalions within a day.The British brigade and the Estonian division attacked the Ukrainian positions.The Ukrainian forces quickly eliminated the enemy: The NATO units lost their combat capability.There was no rapid exchange of information during the battle—information was limited, and tactics remained outdated.One of the European commanders emotionally admitted: “We’re finished. We’re screwed.”
"



Why do we need NATO?
 
Putin may make a play to get Kaliningrad connected to Russia by force.

View attachment 1218967

evenflow1969

They would have to occupy Belarus first. The Belarusian dictator is not as weak today as he was in 2021. He has strong relations with Trump, Turkey, and communist China. Also, the Suwałki region is a very difficult place to fight a war. What would be Putin’s ultimate geostrategic goal — negotiations with NATO? Why not Narva or southern Latvia, which are much easier to take?


1771076516260.webp
 
Why do we need NATO?

SOMETHING WHAT OUR WESTERN KIDS DONT LEARN IN THE SCHOOLS ....​



 
This I would have to think about. I have not thought militarily for a while. I know the USSR had nine defense corridors they were widely concerned about. As well as areas where nuclear infrastructure was located. If I were Putin I would would want these corridors back. Many of the countries where those corridors were are now NATO countries. With my current limited knowledge I guess my next move would be Qazaqstan(Kazakhstan). Reclaim nuclear infrastructure with least likelyhood of triggering a larger conflict.
These corridors have a larger GDP and a bigger male population nowadays. Do you think the Moscow empire — with an economy the size of Spain’s — can still pull it off today?



 
These corridors have a larger GDP and a bigger male population nowadays. Do you think the Moscow empire — with an economy the size of Spain’s — can still pull it off today?


Continued control of all the corridors. Unlikely. How ever that is not going to stop Putin's want. He may view that gdp as being his once taken and a. Way to kick start the economy to be able to control it long term. Wether realistic long term or not Putin wants it.
 
Continued control of all the corridors. Unlikely. How ever that is not going to stop Putin's want. He may view that gdp as being his once taken and a. Way to kick start the economy to be able to control it long term. Wether realistic long term or not Putin wants it.


yes, putin’s qazaliq — the campaigns in Chechnya, Moldova, Georgia, Belarus (hybrid war), Azerbaijan, and Ukraine — serve to legitimize his claimed Mongol right to rule for the Mongol - Moscow imperialists. Each of these violent expeditions functions not only as conquest but as a ritual of political validation, echoing the old steppe tradition where raids established authority. Successful qazaliq does more than secure territory; it provides ideological justification for the existence of the 🇷🇺 Moscow ulus (empire) itself. This is especially powerful in regions of Afro‑Asia where democracy is weak or absent, allowing Moscow to present itself as a rightful imperial center, sustained by force and myth rather than consent.

1771080507844.webp

"🇷🇺Tsarev ulus"
-Charles J. Halperin


 
Last edited:
Titty Titlose has seen four Ukey armies destroyed
And the massacre continues .

But now Mr Clueless wants to tell us about exercises and drills .

The old fool is really a very silly old fool .
 
Back
Top Bottom