Ukraine is a threat to the whole world.

During a war, and the Ukraine is at war with Russia solely because of the actions of Russia, warships stationed off your coast (whether in international waters or not) are certainly fair game. If there were nukes on the Moskva, that would only be because Putin is prepared to use them against the Ukraine.
 
No one is melting here but you and it seem you might go nuclear!

1247140047_mushroom-cloud.gif
It's pretty obvious you're melting down.
 
Yes, if it means giving Nuclear Weapons to Iran, Turkey, Terrorists, or anyone else. Yes.

Fuck Ukraine.
I don't care if Ukraine is corrupt or not. That doesn't give a hostile nation the go-ahead to kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians.

So, you surrender Ukraine and where does President Putin go next? He's already told us Finland and Sweden are next.

As you know too, President Biden, negotiating with RUSSIA about Iran will give them nuclear weapons. How is that a good thing for the world?
 
During a war, and the Ukraine is at war with Russia solely because of the actions of Russia, warships stationed off your coast (whether in international waters or not) are certainly fair game. If there were nukes on the Moskva, that would only be because Putin is prepared to use them against the Ukraine.
Lol moskva was not even in Ukrainian waters. It was hit at long range. But you don't know what you're talking about.

The nukes are stand off weapons against a carrier fleet. Which is what the Moskva was positioned against in the Med.
 
Somehow I just can't think of the destruction of a Russian missile cruiser carrying many nuclear weapons as a bad thing!
 
The fascists who both complained, and then deleted my post, fuck you both, understand weaklings, fuck you both! Fucking fascist democrat cowards, quaking in fear of truth, fuck you both! :fu:
 
I suspect Darthtrader is playing the fool and proud of his status as a troll.

EVEN he knows that a nuclear warhead cannot be detonated without the warheads being armed. They are only armed when the order to fire them has been given.

IF there are nuclear warheads on board, they would simply sink. After hostilities, divers can and would salvage the warheads.

Darthtrader, I'm curious why you support illegal adventurism by President Putin.
 
Look - you have to be retarded to think Ukraine are the good guys here.

When the US invades its countries, it doesn't threaten the stability of the entire world. It's now all but confirmed that Ukraine's RECKLESSNESS has put 16x 350kt Nuclear Warheads within recoverable depth due to the sinking of Moskva which was at the time it was sunk, coming from the Mediterranean on patrol against US forces (where nuclear armament is common place as a deterrence against Carrier Battle Groups).

So because Ukraine wants a "win", and US dumb ass civilians don't know any better.

Anyone with the capability to salvage shallow wrecks is now capable of getting their hands on Nuclear Weapons that can destroy entire cities.

Turkey and Iran are both in the black sea and have such capabilities and are Islamo-fascist states.



LOL

Loser
 
Look - you have to be retarded to think Ukraine are the good guys here.

When the US invades its countries, it doesn't threaten the stability of the entire world. It's now all but confirmed that Ukraine's RECKLESSNESS has put 16x 350kt Nuclear Warheads within recoverable depth due to the sinking of Moskva which was at the time it was sunk, coming from the Mediterranean on patrol against US forces (where nuclear armament is common place as a deterrence against Carrier Battle Groups).

So because Ukraine wants a "win", and US dumb ass civilians don't know any better.

Anyone with the capability to salvage shallow wrecks is now capable of getting their hands on Nuclear Weapons that can destroy entire cities.

Turkey and Iran are both in the black sea and have such capabilities and are Islamo-fascist states.



Russia's nuclear response would never START from that cruiser. Therefore- NOT LIKELY it was CARRYING nuclear weapons. IF IT WAS -- THAT is an indictment of the Russian MILITARY staff and nothing to do with ANY other nation. To take nuclear weapons into a HOT zone is very bad calculation UNLESS YOU'RE LOSING BADLY and feel you MIGHT NEED them.
 
Look - you have to be retarded to think Ukraine are the good guys here.

When the US invades its countries, it doesn't threaten the stability of the entire world. It's now all but confirmed that Ukraine's RECKLESSNESS has put 16x 350kt Nuclear Warheads within recoverable depth due to the sinking of Moskva which was at the time it was sunk, coming from the Mediterranean on patrol against US forces (where nuclear armament is common place as a deterrence against Carrier Battle Groups).

So because Ukraine wants a "win", and US dumb ass civilians don't know any better.

Anyone with the capability to salvage shallow wrecks is now capable of getting their hands on Nuclear Weapons that can destroy entire cities.

Turkey and Iran are both in the black sea and have such capabilities and are Islamo-fascist states.



:up_yours:
 
So, the Ukrainian defenders were supposed to not sink an invading country's nuclear-armed ship, because someone in the future might salvage the weapons that were being deployed against Ukraine? They were supposed to just ... let it go?
 

Forum List

Back
Top