1srelluc
Diamond Member
Not sure what to think on this one.
In before:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure what to think on this one.
In before:
Well that is what you would expect from Priti Patel and the Tory Party. If I had to find somewhere without whom this would have been impossible I would put it on other journalists and papers which used him when it suited them and turned their back on him when it suited them. They have now opened the way for any of them to be charged and for us, the UK and US to be as lacking of freedom of speech as Rusia and China. The general public don't really know anything is going on and if they have heard something is going on they have no idea what it is,“The UK government just ordered the extradition of Assange to the U.S. Biden’s administration could drop the charges, but instead they’re choosing to prosecute a journalist for exposing U.S. war crimes so I don’t ever want to hear again that Democrats believe in a free press.”
So true and the R Party is exactly the same. If no one stands up for justice for Assange from our ruling class, who will?
I get the broad strokes but yeah, that's about it.Well that is what you would expect from Priti Patel and the Tory Party. If I had to find somewhere without whom this would have been impossible I would put it on other journalists and papers which used him when it suited them and turned their back on him when it suited them. They have now opened the way for any of them to be charged and for us, the UK and US to be as lacking of freedom of speech as Rusia and China. The general public don't really know anything is going on and if they have heard something is going on they have no idea what it is,
His real crime was raping women in Sweden,Not sure what to think on this one.
So Assange can rape more women?#FreeJulian
I expect that our courts will strike down the US charges on First Amendment grounds.His imprisonment and now extradition is such a complete breech of the First Amendment, it’s further proof the constitution has become meaningless to the ruling class.
Lol. He isn’t being charged with rape. The rape charges are all made up.His real crime was raping women in Sweden,
But it wasn't cool the way Assange helped dictators purge democracy activists from their governments.
-------------------------------------------------------
So Assange can rape more women?
Or so Assange can help more dictators purge democracy activists from their governments?
Both?
-------------------------------------------------------
I expect that our courts will strike down the US charges on First Amendment grounds.
But maybe then the US will extradite him to Sweden so he can finally answer for raping those women.
He was being investigated for rape when he went into hiding.Lol. He isn’t being charged with rape.
No they aren't. The accusations are quite real.The rape charges are all made up.
What about the women he raped? Do they get a say?Think better and never accept what the State says.
It’s all bogus bull shit, conjured up by the establishment to protect the establishment.He was being investigated for rape when he went into hiding.
No they aren't. The accusations are quite real.
What about the women he raped? Do they get a say?
The rape accusations are real.It’s all bogus bull shit, conjured up by the establishment to protect the establishment.
If the rape charges were real, the US government would have had them prosecuted in Europe.
Yes the US isn’t in charge, but they have enormous power on Europe. Don’t you think they would have had them pursued the allegations to taint his reputation and put him in prison, rather than extradite him? If the rape allegations had any validity, the US would have had rape charges pursued. They didn’t. So not valid.The rape accusations are real.
The US is not in charge of prosecutions in Europe.
The allegations are valid. The victims are real people.Yes the US isn’t in charge, but they have enormous power on Europe. Don’t you think they would have had them pursued the allegations to taint his reputation and put him in prison, rather than extradite him? If the rape allegations had any validity, the US would have had rape charges pursued. They didn’t. So not valid.
Lol. Now you speak victimhood. I guess that is your point.The allegations are valid. The victims are real people.
The charges were in fact pursued up to a point. But Sweden ultimately could not bring charges against him unless they had him in their custody.
Rape is just as bad when it's committed by Assange as it is when it is committed by any other rapist.Lol. Now you speak victimhood. I guess that is your point.
Still not valid in Assange’s case.
The sex was consensual. The rape accusation came about whether he used a condom but it was all a facade to catch Assange. He was told he could leave Sweden and everything was dropped before he did. Then they started it up again when he got to London and he correctly saw it as a way to get him to the US so went to the Embassy and asked for help. I think both girls have admitted to being pushed into doing this. There is absolutely no way that any rape charges still exist. Once he was in Belmarsh on the way to the US they were dropped. It was a deliberate ploy to put people off him.Rape is just as bad when it's committed by Assange as it is when it is committed by any other rapist.
When a woman consents only to sex using a condom (and has made that clear), and someone then has sex with her without using a condom, the sex is most definitely NOT consensual.The sex was consensual. The rape accusation came about whether he used a condom
No one made him rape those women.but it was all a facade to catch Assange.
He went to the embassy because he was a fugitive from justice.He was told he could leave Sweden and everything was dropped before he did. Then they started it up again when he got to London and he correctly saw it as a way to get him to the US so went to the Embassy and asked for help.
They clearly stated that they did not consent to him having sex without a condom.I think both girls have admitted to being pushed into doing this.
They were dropped because Sweden gave up on ever getting custody of him. That just means that he got away with raping those women.There is absolutely no way that any rape charges still exist. Once he was in Belmarsh on the way to the US they were dropped.
No one made him rape those women.It was a deliberate ploy to put people off him.
When a woman consents only to sex using a condom (and has made that clear), and someone then has sex with her without using a condom, the sex is most definitely NOT consensual.
No one made him rape those women.
He went to the embassy because he was a fugitive from justice.
They clearly stated that they did not consent to him having sex without a condom.
They were dropped because Sweden gave up on ever getting custody of him. That just means that he got away with raping those women.
No one made him rape those women.
Yeah we must always believe rape accusations no matter what.Rape is just as bad when it's committed by Assange as it is when it is committed by any other rapist.