U.S. Supreme Court Grants Review in Three LGBTQ Employment Discrimination Lawsuits

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Protected classes are institutional discrimination. You dont seem to be for equal rights. Not ACTUAL equal rights anyways. Just your biased version.
Yes, equal protection which goes AGAINST protected classes.

You have twisted yourself into a nice pretzel with that one. Metal gymnastics will not work. Protected classes are to insure equal protection, BECAUSE THEY have been discriminated against. Other have not been in the same way. The protected class will then enjoy protection equal to those who are not discriminated against. Let us know when a straight white guy is refused service for who he is and then maybe you'll have a case. Meanwhile , you so called argument is nothing more that a logical fallacy, specifically a Non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.

Protected classes are equality!
You heard it strait from a dumbfucks mouth!
Save the date! Lol

Calling me a dumb fuck does not make you sound smart. ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person") are the last refuge of the insecure and clueless.

 

[TNHarley]

Protected classes are institutional discrimination. You dont seem to be for equal rights. Not ACTUAL equal rights anyways. Just your biased version.
Yes, equal protection which goes AGAINST protected classes.

You have twisted yourself into a nice pretzel with that one. Metal gymnastics will not work. Protected classes are to insure equal protection, BECAUSE THEY have been discriminated against. Other have not been in the same way. The protected class will then enjoy protection equal to those who are not discriminated against. Let us know when a straight white guy is refused service for who he is and then maybe you'll have a case. Meanwhile , you so called argument is nothing more that a logical fallacy, specifically a Non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.

Protected classes are equality!
You heard it strait from a dumbfucks mouth!
Save the date! Lol

Calling me a dumb fuck does not make you sound smart. ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person") are the last refuge of the insecure and clueless.

Makes me sound smarter than saying protected classes are equality

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Protected classes are institutional discrimination. You dont seem to be for equal rights. Not ACTUAL equal rights anyways. Just your biased version.
Yes, equal protection which goes AGAINST protected classes.

You have twisted yourself into a nice pretzel with that one. Metal gymnastics will not work. Protected classes are to insure equal protection, BECAUSE THEY have been discriminated against. Other have not been in the same way. The protected class will then enjoy protection equal to those who are not discriminated against. Let us know when a straight white guy is refused service for who he is and then maybe you'll have a case. Meanwhile , you so called argument is nothing more that a logical fallacy, specifically a Non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.

Protected classes are equality!
You heard it strait from a dumbfucks mouth!
Save the date! Lol

Calling me a dumb fuck does not make you sound smart. ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person") are the last refuge of the insecure and clueless.

Makes me sound smarter than saying protected classes are equality

 

[TNHarley]

Protected classes are institutional discrimination. You dont seem to be for equal rights. Not ACTUAL equal rights anyways. Just your biased version.
Yes, equal protection which goes AGAINST protected classes.

You have twisted yourself into a nice pretzel with that one. Metal gymnastics will not work. Protected classes are to insure equal protection, BECAUSE THEY have been discriminated against. Other have not been in the same way. The protected class will then enjoy protection equal to those who are not discriminated against. Let us know when a straight white guy is refused service for who he is and then maybe you'll have a case. Meanwhile , you so called argument is nothing more that a logical fallacy, specifically a Non sequitur (Latin for "it does not follow"), in formal logic, is an argument in which its conclusion does not follow from its premises.

Protected classes are equality!
You heard it strait from a dumbfucks mouth!
Save the date! Lol

Calling me a dumb fuck does not make you sound smart. ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person") are the last refuge of the insecure and clueless.

Makes me sound smarter than saying protected classes are equality

View attachment 257672View attachment 257673

Memes are the last refuge of the insecure and clueless