Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
IF ANY OF WHAT YOU SAY WAS A CONCERN, SHE WOULD HAVE BEEN OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED BY THE CAPITOL POLICE STANDING NEXT TO HER WITH THEIR THUMBS UP THEIR ASSES."She had Fucking Animal Crackers in her Backpack,"
That is the first I have heard that.
But, you know, I'm 700 miles or so from Washington DC.
How could I know what she had in her back pack?
I wonder if the uniformed officer who shot her knew it was animal crackers?
Or did he suspect it contained 3lbs of C-4 explosive?
Or an M-18 Claymore?
M-67 Grendade?
Or a cut-down Armsel Striker?
Gotta make a quick decision when criminals have busted down doors and screamed deadly threats, and still keep coming after you point your police pistol at 'em.
Hard to say, ain't it?
But your concern over her animal crackers is duly noted.
Like the peaceful protesters during the summer of love.You have animal crackers in your skullShe had Fucking Animal Crackers in her Backpack, you imbecile.An unarmed rioter is still a riotor and can still pose a threat to an officer by sheer numbersWe will burn every city down unless they win!n unarmed
At least we’ll learn the name of the murderer.
U.S. Capitol Police to Be Sued for $10 Million for Killing Unarmed Rioter
The family of Ashli Babbitt—the only person shot during the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol—plans to sue the U.S. Capitol Police department, and the officer who shot her, for at least $10 million.www.newsweek.com
They were just in a hurry to get to the congressional gift shop.What was the dangerous weapon ?"Charged with Insurrection?
---------------------------------------------------That number is ZERO!
OK, zero charged with insurrection to date. Got it.
So let's imagineer that you are the attorney for, say, Zachary Alam (arrested for acts during the January 6th Capitol breach)..... and you see that some of the federal charges are:
So, do you meet with your shackled client in the detention center visitor's room and cheer him up by declaring ----
- 'Assaulting officers with a dangerous weapon;
- Destruction of Government Property;
- Engaging in physical violence with a deadly weapon'.
"Good News Zach, you ain't exactly home free, but they didn't get you on 'Insurrection'. "
--------------------------------------------------------
Or maybe you represent John Anderson.
"All good news, John.... 'cause they haven't charged you yet with sedition or insurrection"
- Assaulting officers
- Theft of Government Property
------------------------------------
Or maybe you've been retained by Chris Albert...
"Don't worry, Chris.....they haven't charge you yet with Insurrection."
- charged with unlawful possession of a firearm on Capitol Grounds and Building.
--------------------------------------------
My avatar is confident you will be able to put some good cheer and sunshine into your clients lives, counselor Blair.
Officers were assaulted with various weapons - flag poles, night sticks, bear spray.
It would seem to me the law would allow anyone to use or do what the police use or do, as long as they do not use or do it first?
So these are only illegal if the police did not use them first.
And I don't think you will find that is the case.
I think then it is the police who are guilty.
But I do not believe the election was stolen.
However that does not alter the rights of those who think it was.
Video clearly shows the mob attacking the police. There was no excuse for these attacks. 150 officers were injured some seriously.
For the complete set of Biden Administration voodoo dollsThey were just in a hurry to get to the congressional gift shop.What was the dangerous weapon ?"Charged with Insurrection?
---------------------------------------------------That number is ZERO!
OK, zero charged with insurrection to date. Got it.
So let's imagineer that you are the attorney for, say, Zachary Alam (arrested for acts during the January 6th Capitol breach)..... and you see that some of the federal charges are:
So, do you meet with your shackled client in the detention center visitor's room and cheer him up by declaring ----
- 'Assaulting officers with a dangerous weapon;
- Destruction of Government Property;
- Engaging in physical violence with a deadly weapon'.
"Good News Zach, you ain't exactly home free, but they didn't get you on 'Insurrection'. "
--------------------------------------------------------
Or maybe you represent John Anderson.
"All good news, John.... 'cause they haven't charged you yet with sedition or insurrection"
- Assaulting officers
- Theft of Government Property
------------------------------------
Or maybe you've been retained by Chris Albert...
"Don't worry, Chris.....they haven't charge you yet with Insurrection."
- charged with unlawful possession of a firearm on Capitol Grounds and Building.
--------------------------------------------
My avatar is confident you will be able to put some good cheer and sunshine into your clients lives, counselor Blair.
Officers were assaulted with various weapons - flag poles, night sticks, bear spray.
It would seem to me the law would allow anyone to use or do what the police use or do, as long as they do not use or do it first?
So these are only illegal if the police did not use them first.
And I don't think you will find that is the case.
I think then it is the police who are guilty.
But I do not believe the election was stolen.
However that does not alter the rights of those who think it was.
Video clearly shows the mob attacking the police. There was no excuse for these attacks. 150 officers were injured some seriously.
------------------------------------------------------------"GUILTY FOR NON PERFORMANCE OF THEIR JOB ALLOWING A PREVENTABLE DEATH..............They are responsible for her death as well as Pelosi ........."
Blaming the victim for the crimes committed upon her never goes out of style, looks like.But, just so y'all know----I kinda sorta thought that Ms. Babbitt didn't exactly have clean hands in this little gig.
So you also blame Ashley Babbitt for not thwarting the will of the angry mob behind her.After all, she did nothing to prevent her companions from violently bashing at the door with a helmet (despite the oath she took to protect the United States);
Perhaps that's why she was murdered by a cop with a bullet through her neck, from little moreand we can watch her shouting aggressively at the police through the broken window; and, importantly, we can see her jump into the window frame to illegally enter a restricted space......and she did it, rather foolishly I might add, totally clad in a Trump flag that obscured if she was armed, or wearing a suicide vest, or perhaps explosives in her backpack. Or even carrying a box of Barnum & Bailey animal crackers.
I'm sure she didn't have ANY inkling that the Capitol Cops would commit an extra judicial executionThat deluded suggestible woman paid an awful price for poor judgment. As can happen in life.
Per Captain Obvious.
I thought I read it had.Has the $10 Million lawsuit been filed yet?
We will burn every city down unless they win!
At least we’ll learn the name of the murderer.
U.S. Capitol Police to Be Sued for $10 Million for Killing Unarmed Rioter
The family of Ashli Babbitt—the only person shot during the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol—plans to sue the U.S. Capitol Police department, and the officer who shot her, for at least $10 million.
I need to watch that video again because I didn't see any of that.
I don't think ANY cop knows if anyone in the mob on 1/6 was packing C-4 explosives.I need to watch that video again because I didn't see any of that.
Sure. Watch it from several angles.
BellingCat has it in their feature, 'The Journey of Ashli Babbitt.'
ps......do you think the officer knew if she had animal crackers in her back pack?
Or C-4 explosives?
Notably: The shooting officer did perform to his sworn oath to protect the people's House and the legislators and staff within it.
It's a pity that Ms Babbitt didn't at least admonish her companions or tell 'em to not smash through that window in the people's house with that helmet.
She would have....I'd speculate......garnered a pinch more sympathy from folks other than the fringie MAGAcult.
Pelosi is always to blame. Her existence screams guilt, criminal,mentally ill and much more.------------------------------------------------------------"GUILTY FOR NON PERFORMANCE OF THEIR JOB ALLOWING A PREVENTABLE DEATH..............They are responsible for her death as well as Pelosi ........."
So now, per the poster Slapper, it is Speaker Pelosi and the uniformed police who are responsible for Babbitt's death.
OK, good to know.
However, in the version of Conservativism and Republicanism that I grew up within and practiced for much of my adult life, well, in that version personal responsibility and accountability for one's own actions played a rather prominent role.
Slapper's version seemingly relies on other people to be responsible for your decisions.
OK, I guess.
America is a big tent society and we can tolerate and accommodate a certain degree of that in the populace.
But, just so y'all know----I kinda sorta thought that Ms. Babbitt didn't exactly have clean hands in this little gig.
After all, she did nothing to prevent her companions from violently bashing at the door with a helmet (despite the oath she took to protect the United States); and we can watch her shouting aggressively at the police through the broken window; and, importantly, we can see her jump into the window frame to illegally enter a restricted space......and she did it, rather foolishly I might add, totally clad in a Trump flag that obscured if she was armed, or wearing a suicide vest, or perhaps explosives in her backpack. Or even carrying a box of Barnum & Bailey animal crackers.
That deluded suggestible woman paid an awful price for poor judgment. As can happen in life.
Per Captain Obvious.
IMHO
Applesauce brains is meeting with his boss to get further orders.We will burn every city down unless they win!
At least we’ll learn the name of the murderer.
U.S. Capitol Police to Be Sued for $10 Million for Killing Unarmed Rioter
The family of Ashli Babbitt—the only person shot during the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol—plans to sue the U.S. Capitol Police department, and the officer who shot her, for at least $10 million.
Putin thanks you for your service, comrade!
news.trust.org
The police let the protesters inside.Pelosi is always to blame. Her existence screams guilt, criminal,mentally ill and much more.------------------------------------------------------------"GUILTY FOR NON PERFORMANCE OF THEIR JOB ALLOWING A PREVENTABLE DEATH..............They are responsible for her death as well as Pelosi ........."
So now, per the poster Slapper, it is Speaker Pelosi and the uniformed police who are responsible for Babbitt's death.
OK, good to know.
However, in the version of Conservativism and Republicanism that I grew up within and practiced for much of my adult life, well, in that version personal responsibility and accountability for one's own actions played a rather prominent role.
Slapper's version seemingly relies on other people to be responsible for your decisions.
OK, I guess.
America is a big tent society and we can tolerate and accommodate a certain degree of that in the populace.
But, just so y'all know----I kinda sorta thought that Ms. Babbitt didn't exactly have clean hands in this little gig.
After all, she did nothing to prevent her companions from violently bashing at the door with a helmet (despite the oath she took to protect the United States); and we can watch her shouting aggressively at the police through the broken window; and, importantly, we can see her jump into the window frame to illegally enter a restricted space......and she did it, rather foolishly I might add, totally clad in a Trump flag that obscured if she was armed, or wearing a suicide vest, or perhaps explosives in her backpack. Or even carrying a box of Barnum & Bailey animal crackers.
That deluded suggestible woman paid an awful price for poor judgment. As can happen in life.
Per Captain Obvious.
IMHO
She is totally in charge of the Security of the Capitol. With that piece of information comes the fact that she was versed a week prior to Jan.6 , that there would would be a demonstration or march with many thousands of people. The red flag didn't pop up in her mentally ill brain, that getting additional support would be a wise decision. No, instead she did nothing with intention to blame President Trump.
Had there been additional police or military presence, no one would have breached the building and no innocent human being would have been murdered.
--------------------------------------------------------------"The police let the protesters inside."
'Black Policeman shoots and kills unarmed white female veteran for TRESPASSING'When the police shoot and kill an unarmed person Democrats usually cheer on and bail out Antifa and BLM terrorists as they loot, burn, destroy, and perpetrate BILLIONS of dollars in damage to Democrat-run communities all over the US...We will burn every city down unless they win!
At least we’ll learn the name of the murderer.
U.S. Capitol Police to Be Sued for $10 Million for Killing Unarmed Rioter
The family of Ashli Babbitt—the only person shot during the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol—plans to sue the U.S. Capitol Police department, and the officer who shot her, for at least $10 million.
....but when a black Democrat cop shoots and kills an unarmed conservative female vet for the crime of trespassing, Democrats & their surrogate fake news media protect THIS cop and bury the story...
Go figure.
How do you know he is a Democrat? She was trying to break through the doors and enter the complex where the VP was presiding over the Senate.
- 'Capitol Police Warned In Advance By FBI of Violent Riot, Did Nothing To Prevent, Protect'
- 'Capitol Police Shown On Video Moving Barricades To Give Rioters Access To Capitol'
- 'Capitol Police Shown On Video Leading Trespassers Through The Capitol'
---- So technically Capitol Police LED Babbitt to the exact spot where she was executed by a fellow capitol policeman
Yeah, these are some of the potential headlines Democrats, Capitol Police, and Pelosi sought to avoid / prevented from being reported.....
Antifa looted, burned, & perpetrated several BILLIONS of dollars in damage in Democrat-run communities all over the US when a white policeman shot and killed armed blacks who opposed / fought the police, but the Democrats, fake news media, Antifa...and YOU... are ok with a black cop shooting and killing an unarmed, white, female veteran who was trespassing.
She was shot because she was storming the capitol and trying to break down the doors. That is more than trespassing.
That is why numerous officials were fired or resigned. Because they did not take the proper prdecautions to porotect the Capitol. That does not excuse what happened.
"A viral video does not show police allowing crowds to breach barricades during riots at the U.S. Capitol—as many have claimed on social media—the person who shot the clip has told Newsweek.
Footage captured by Marcus DiPaola, a freelance journalist working at TikTok, has been viewed more than 30 million times on Twitter and more than 1.7 million times on TikTok.
Many who have shared the clip have suggested it shows police letting people get close to the building. One Twitter post that featured the clip alongside the caption: "the police opened the f***ing gates" has been shared more than 200,000 times.
However, officers only backed away after being threatened while being vastly outnumbered, DiPaola said.":
Capitol Police Didn't Open Gates for Rioters, Says Man Behind Viral Video
Marcus DiPaola told Newsweek that outnumbered officers were being threatened and "didn't just open the barriers."
From PolitiFact: We didn’t find evidence of that. Instead, we discovered that some online video is getting misinterpreted. Many officers had to abandon their posts and barricades because they were far outnumbered and overwhelmed.
Ask PolitiFact: Did Capitol Police let mob of Trump supporte
Question: "Did Capitol Police let a mob of Trump supporters into the building?" Answer: We didn’t find evidence of that.www.politifact.com
No oine was lured anywhere. Clearly they were allowed into the rotunda which was a mistake. When she was shot, the video shows no one escorting anyone here. We see smashed windows and the doors barracaded as people tried to force their way in and officers telling them to stop.
Lidsay Graham said this: “I mean, these police officers had every right to use deadly force,” Graham said according to the report. “They should have used it. The people in charge of securing the Capitol let the country down.”
Lindsey Graham: Capitol police ‘let country down’ during attack
‘I mean, these police officers had every right to use deadly force,’ the senator said after viewing footage from the historic events. After viewing footage of the January insurrection at the Capitol, Senator Lindsey Graham had critique for the police officers who stood their ground. According...news.yahoo.com
Videos have been shown Trump Supporters asking Capitol Police why they were doing nothing as identified Antifa / BLM members were smashing windows and entering the Capitol....again, the Capitol Police guided them through the building....they facilitated this planned event.
Babbitt was caught up in the mob mentality after the riot was initiated by Antifa / BLM - she entered the Capitol, trespassing on federal property. She was unarmed, as they all were, she took selfies, as many did, she did not attack anyone, she was not a physical threat to anyone.
The officer who shot and killed her said he felt 'at that second' that his life was in danger. He shot through the door at a target he claimed he could not see - hitting Babbitt who was outside the door, Babbitt was surrounded by 2 other officers, who the shooter could not see. After Babbitt was shot and fell, this did not prevent others from entering the room the officer was in.
- If he thought someone outside the room was a threat to his life, why didn't he shoot anyone else who continued and were coming through the door?
Once inside the room, none of the people in the group Babbitt was with - none of the people who broke into the room attacked anyone. According to the reports they just milled around.
What the policeman inadvertently / unknowingly did was give every Police Officer n the country the legal justification for shooting and killing someone - all they have to do is claim that at the moment they shot they FELT their lives were in danger, whether the person they shot had a gun or not.
Democrats scrambled to this policeman's defense, declaring he was justified in shooting an unarmed, white, female vet because in that minute he FELT that his life was in danger. If HE is entitled to this defense, EVERY police officer across the country is / should be, too.
AQ right winger was arrested for firing shots into a Minneapolis police station. He was masquerading as a protestor. Several right wingers agitated the situation.
And yet that case is completely different than the 6 Jan event and has nothing to do with it, despite your desperate attempt to claim it does.
can't find something that doesn't exist as I already stated.Go look it up yourself you lazy ass.
What was the dangerous weapon ?"Charged with Insurrection?
---------------------------------------------------That number is ZERO!
OK, zero charged with insurrection to date. Got it.
So let's imagineer that you are the attorney for, say, Zachary Alam (arrested for acts during the January 6th Capitol breach)..... and you see that some of the federal charges are:
So, do you meet with your shackled client in the detention center visitor's room and cheer him up by declaring ----
- 'Assaulting officers with a dangerous weapon;
- Destruction of Government Property;
- Engaging in physical violence with a deadly weapon'.
"Good News Zach, you ain't exactly home free, but they didn't get you on 'Insurrection'. "
--------------------------------------------------------
Or maybe you represent John Anderson.
"All good news, John.... 'cause they haven't charged you yet with sedition or insurrection"
- Assaulting officers
- Theft of Government Property
------------------------------------
Or maybe you've been retained by Chris Albert...
"Don't worry, Chris.....they haven't charge you yet with Insurrection."
- charged with unlawful possession of a firearm on Capitol Grounds and Building.
--------------------------------------------
My avatar is confident you will be able to put some good cheer and sunshine into your clients lives, counselor Blair.
Officers were assaulted with various weapons - flag poles, night sticks, bear spray.
It would seem to me the law would allow anyone to use or do what the police use or do, as long as they do not use or do it first?
So these are only illegal if the police did not use them first.
And I don't think you will find that is the case.
I think then it is the police who are guilty.
But I do not believe the election was stolen.
However that does not alter the rights of those who think it was.
