U.S. Army should take control of American Govmnt, From President Obama.

[blu]

Its liberal whimps like you, that want to take us back to the pre 9/11 mindset that made
America vulnerable in the first place.

You stupid ass, Bush was repeatedly warned that the greatest threat his administration faced was terrorism. The Clinton administration made it clear that they considered the US in danger from Bin Laden. The Bush administration's reply was to state that they thought that "Clinton has a fixation concerning Bin Laden". On 9-11, they finally understood why Clinton had a fixation about Bin Laden.

But by then, 3000 American's paid with their lives for the lack of concern on the part of the Bush administration. It was not liberals that ignored all the warnings, but Conservatives.

and why didn't clinton kill bin laden when he had many chance to you stupid ****

why didn't bush when he had the chance? i see you add much to debates

 

[namvet]

You stupid ass, Bush was repeatedly warned that the greatest threat his administration faced was terrorism. The Clinton administration made it clear that they considered the US in danger from Bin Laden. The Bush administration's reply was to state that they thought that "Clinton has a fixation concerning Bin Laden". On 9-11, they finally understood why Clinton had a fixation about Bin Laden.

But by then, 3000 American's paid with their lives for the lack of concern on the part of the Bush administration. It was not liberals that ignored all the warnings, but Conservatives.

and why didn't clinton kill bin laden when he had many chance to you stupid ****

why didn't bush when he had the chance? i see you add much to debates

i see you subtract from it. bin laden was in Clintons cross hairs and he hit the chicken shit switch.

 

[blu]

and why didn't clinton kill bin laden when he had many chance to you stupid ****

why didn't bush when he had the chance? i see you add much to debates

i see you subtract from it. bin laden was in Clintons cross hairs and he hit the chicken shit switch.

which has what to do with bush's dealings with him before 9/11 and then quietly calling off the bin laden hunt shortly after/

 

[namvet]

why didn't bush when he had the chance? i see you add much to debates

i see you subtract from it. bin laden was in Clintons cross hairs and he hit the chicken shit switch.

which has what to do with bush's dealings with him before 9/11 and then quietly calling off the bin laden hunt shortly after/

kid when your space ship lands we'll fill you in.

 

[Contumacious]

With the recent decision of current attorney General ,Eric Holder to move the Sept 11 Terrorist to a New York City Federal civilian court, on U.S. soil, thus making New York City a Terrorists target again, I must suggest a U.S. Army temporary takeover of the United States government from the Obama administration.

OK, I am ready to vote.

You are the most retarded son of a ***** on this message board.

.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Hahahhaaaa.....what the **** are people smoking? Having a trial in NYC is concern to be attacked.....but invading and occupying two nations that never attacked us generates no threat? ******* hillbillies and the internet are not a good combination.

Fat and stupid is no way to go through life dumb ass.....educate yourself before making any more idiotic statements like the one above.

 

[PatekPhilippe]

Do you know how to read? I never said we were not attacked......read the post again and don't forget to somehow blame me for your inability to read. Should I have typed it slower?

And I never said mcintyre didn't hit her.....I said more information was needed before reaching a solid conclusion.

I know how to read and you know how to dance!

I said we invaded two nations that never attacked us. You responded by claiming I said we were never attacked. You probably realize you misread the post but there is way too much pride to admit it.

and here in this post lies your utter stupidity when it comes to world affairs.

Iraq continually attacked U.S. aircraft enforcing the U.N. mandated no fly zones
over northern and southern Iraq. An attack on the U.S. military is an attack on the United States. Did they shoot any down? No.

Afghanistan and their Taliban rulers were allied with Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. When the World Trade Center was attacked in 2001 this was an act of war committed by Afghanistan and Al Qaeda.

So saying that "we invaded 2 countrys that never attacked us" is actually quite a dumb thing to say since the preponderance of the actual facts outweigh the fantasy you seem to be caught up in.

 

[asaratis]

I understand how you feel about a government imposing socialism onto the people but has it ever occurred to you that some people like socialism. I think a better solution that would allow everyone to live under the society they want is sucession from the union. Its a hypothetical proposal but can you imagine another that yields the greatest overall happiness of each citizen and maintains every citizen's right to live under the government they want.

Lets now imagine something a little less destructive to the nation such as state nullification of unconstitutional laws that go outside its delegated powers. Every state can then simply nullify whatever law they don't like and states that do like the socialist stuff can not nullify those federal laws. This way everyone is happy.

Gee, then we could be just like Europe, or South America, or Africa, or the Middle East...Socialism here, Communism there, genocide, theocracies, ethnic cleansing, continual wars between the "states" and economic disasters sprinkled like a checkerboard across the land with check points at every "state" line. Just think, each little puny jurisdiction could have its own border patrol, form of government, currency, passport requirements...blah blah blah. And then there's the question of who would control the nuke launchers and the firing solutions.

Stupid idea...really stupid idea.

That's just about as ridiculous as the OP. We are the United States of America and should stay that way.

We do not need any military take over or any splitting up. We need to vote and pay attention to the laws of the United States and the Constitution supported by them.

Likewise, we do not need a new civilian national police with powers equal to that of our military. I oppose the creation of a White House controlled police force any larger than the Capital Police that we now maintain.

All this discussion comes from the decision to hold civilian trials for alleged terrorists. My concerns for civilian trials are many, but trials must occur...and they might as well be done publicly. The trial lawyers will get richer, the taxpayers will get screwed no matter what the verdicts are and if those charged are convicted, they will not be executed and we will pay for keeping them alive 'til they die of other causes.

The media circus atmosphere will generate unending controversial rumors and revelations of facts that will serve no purpose other than promotion of extreme divisiveness between two sides of an argument that will not end.

 

[Montrovant]

I agree the trials will be divisive and controversial, even when there is little reason for them to be. Conspiracy theories will abound. So-called 'facts' will be tossed around places like this board as people try to score points in political arguments. Some lawyers will make money, few people will likely be satisfied, no matter the outcome, and eventually we will all move on.

 

[Diuretic]

Its liberal whimps like you, that want to take us back to the pre 9/11 mindset that made
America vulnerable in the first place.

You stupid ass, Bush was repeatedly warned that the greatest threat his administration faced was terrorism. The Clinton administration made it clear that they considered the US in danger from Bin Laden. The Bush administration's reply was to state that they thought that "Clinton has a fixation concerning Bin Laden". On 9-11, they finally understood why Clinton had a fixation about Bin Laden.

But by then, 3000 American's paid with their lives for the lack of concern on the part of the Bush administration. It was not liberals that ignored all the warnings, but Conservatives.

and why didn't clinton kill bin laden when he had many chance to you stupid ****

I think the knife fell out of his hand due to perspiration.

 

[editec]

With the recent decision of current attorney General ,Eric Holder to move the Sept 11 Terrorist to a New York City Federal civilian court, on U.S. soil, thus making New York City a Terrorists target again, I must suggest a U.S. Army temporary takeover of the United States government from the Obama administration. The U.S. Army could install a leadership tribunal of three Generals to run the country, and they could also appoint other
U.S. Army personell to run the other areas of the American government.

I feel the Obama Administration, and U.S. attorney Eric Holder, are jeopardizing
American safety and , and national security with their decision to bring Terrorists War combattants to American soil for prosecution, and their incorrect decision to close Guantanamo Bay Millitary dentention center in Cuba.

We need the U.S. Army to take over the America governement now. They must by means
of some emergency edict take control away from President Obama Now. The President
is endangering the lives of Americans, and people of the free world with his decisions, and the decisions of his Attorney general Eric Holder. They must both be removed from the America government, and detained by the U.S. Army.

We need an American milltary take over now before it is to late.
The Terrorists will target America again.

Of course you do , honey.

You're a goose-stepping brownshirt.

 

[CurveLight]

I know how to read and you know how to dance!

I said we invaded two nations that never attacked us. You responded by claiming I said we were never attacked. You probably realize you misread the post but there is way too much pride to admit it.

and here in this post lies your utter stupidity when it comes to world affairs.

Iraq continually attacked U.S. aircraft enforcing the U.N. mandated no fly zones
over northern and southern Iraq. An attack on the U.S. military is an attack on the United States. Did they shoot any down? No.

Afghanistan and their Taliban rulers were allied with Al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. When the World Trade Center was attacked in 2001 this was an act of war committed by Afghanistan and Al Qaeda.

So saying that "we invaded 2 countrys that never attacked us" is actually quite a dumb thing to say since the preponderance of the actual facts outweigh the fantasy you seem to be caught up in.

Dude. This is sweet. You accuse someone else of being stupid and you don't even know the no-fly zones were not specifically part of the cease fire.

"However, unlike the military campaign to expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait, the no-fly zones were not authorised by the UN and they are not specifically sanctioned by any Security Council resolution."
BBC News | MIDDLE EAST | No-fly zones: The legal position


So basically when we illegally entered iraq airspace it had a right to fire on unauthorized aircraft.


Got any links showing the Taliban were charged with anything on 9E?

How about bin laden? Got a link showing he was charged with anything regarding 9E?


You pro war freaks are constantly broadcasting your ignorance and are too damned arrogant to even realize your world is made of cotton candy propaganda.

 

[Immanuel]

With the recent decision of current attorney General ,Eric Holder to move the Sept 11 Terrorist to a New York City Federal civilian court, on U.S. soil, thus making New York City a Terrorists target again, I must suggest a U.S. Army temporary takeover of the United States government from the Obama administration. The U.S. Army could install a leadership tribunal of three Generals to run the country, and they could also appoint other
U.S. Army personell to run the other areas of the American government.

I feel the Obama Administration, and U.S. attorney Eric Holder, are jeopardizing
American safety and , and national security with their decision to bring Terrorists War combattants to American soil for prosecution, and their incorrect decision to close Guantanamo Bay Millitary dentention center in Cuba.

We need the U.S. Army to take over the America governement now. They must by means
of some emergency edict take control away from President Obama Now. The President
is endangering the lives of Americans, and people of the free world with his decisions, and the decisions of his Attorney general Eric Holder. They must both be removed from the America government, and detained by the U.S. Army.

We need an American milltary take over now before it is to late.
The Terrorists will target America again.

Never thought I would hear you disrespect brothers like that! Although I think Eric Holder might be the worst AG the country has ever had and Obama's policies are hurting the country and making it safe calling for a coup is premature and illogical! Wait until 2012 and vote in Mitt Romney!

You have seen the incompetent policies of the Obama Administration and agree with me that the President and the attorney general are being derilict in their administration of
of the government of the United States. And are in fact endangering the lives of Americans
with their decisions.

Incompetent or not... you are calling for a military coup! Oh my how far we have fallen! Won't be long before we are looking up at third world nations.

The people of America voted Barack Obama into the Oval Office. Unless he does something that is worthy of impeachment then we are stuck with him until at least 2012. If you don't want to see him as President in 2013, then get out there and work to getting him replaced via legal elections. Until then... stand up for the Constitution of the United States of America or... I say this nicely, sit down and shut up, please!

Immie

 

[namvet]

You stupid ass, Bush was repeatedly warned that the greatest threat his administration faced was terrorism. The Clinton administration made it clear that they considered the US in danger from Bin Laden. The Bush administration's reply was to state that they thought that "Clinton has a fixation concerning Bin Laden". On 9-11, they finally understood why Clinton had a fixation about Bin Laden.

But by then, 3000 American's paid with their lives for the lack of concern on the part of the Bush administration. It was not liberals that ignored all the warnings, but Conservatives.

and why didn't clinton kill bin laden when he had many chance to you stupid ****

I think the knife fell out of his hand due to perspiration.

or the cigar !!!!

 

[Contumacious]

[Iraq continually attacked U.S. aircraft enforcing the U.N. mandated no fly zones over northern and southern Iraq. An attack on the U.S. military is an attack on the United States. Did they shoot any down? No.

Mr, Dumb ass Sir:


The "no-fly zones" were never authorized by the United Nations, nor was their 12 year patrol by American and British fighter planes sanctioned by the United Nations. Under UN Security Council Resolution 688 (April, 1991), Iraq's repression of the Kurds and Shi'ites was condemned, but there was no authorization for "no-fly zones," much less airstrikes. The resolution only calls for member states to "contribute to humanitarian relief" in the Kurd and Shi'ite areas. Yet the US and British have been bombing Iraq in the "no-fly zones" for 12 years. While one can only condemn any country firing on our pilots, isn't the real argument whether we should continue to bomb Iraq relentlessly? Just since 1998, some 40,000 sorties have been flown over Iraq."

.

 

[maineman]

Hahahhaaaa.....what the **** are people smoking? Having a trial in NYC is concern to be attacked.....but invading and occupying two nations that never attacked us generates no threat? ******* hillbillies and the internet are not a good combination.

yeah! that's right dipshit, we were never attacked, what the hell are you smoking?

we were never attacked by afghans or iraqis. what are YOU smoking?

 

[bodecea]

and why didn't clinton kill bin laden when he had many chance to you stupid ****

why didn't bush when he had the chance? i see you add much to debates

i see you subtract from it. bin laden was in Clintons cross hairs and he hit the chicken shit switch.

What had bin laden done to us AT THAT TIME? I would like an answer, Timothy.

 

[namvet]

why didn't bush when he had the chance? i see you add much to debates

i see you subtract from it. bin laden was in Clintons cross hairs and he hit the chicken shit switch.

What had bin laden done to us AT THAT TIME? I would like an answer, Timothy.

the bombings in the Marine barracks in Lebanon, the first World Trade Center attack, the killing of American soldiers in Somalia, the destruction of two U.S. embassies in Africa and the attack on the USS Cole," what rock have you been hiding under ????​

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

******* hillbillies

What does this even mean?

 

[Contumacious]

i see you subtract from it. bin laden was in Clintons cross hairs and he hit the chicken shit switch.

What had bin laden done to us AT THAT TIME? I would like an answer, Timothy.

the bombings in the Marine barracks in Lebanon, the first World Trade Center attack, the killing of American soldiers in Somalia, the destruction of two U.S. embassies in Africa and the attack on the USS Cole," what rock have you been hiding under ????​

1- The US support of the Palestinian Genocide since 1947;

2- The US Support of Zionists terrorist attacks on Lebanon

2- The US invasion of Iraq since 1990;

3- The US Invasion of Afpak for the 8 years

What rock have you been hiding under ????

.