What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

U.S. Allow Ukraine To Hit Russian Artillery Sites in Russia!

JimofPennsylvan

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2007
Messages
751
Reaction score
353
Points
180
The United States and allied countries that are helping Ukraine by providing them heavy weapons in their war to stop the Russian invasion should amend the restriction on the use of those weapons that prohibits the firing of those weapons into Russia. Specifically, the restriction should be amended so that it allows Ukraine to fire those weapons up to fifty miles within the borders of the country of Russia as long as it is firing at a legitimate military target! The Russian President Vladimir Putin's behavior in regards to how he has used the Russian military in this war doesn't warrant the consideration heretofore shown to him by the allies in prohibiting the use of donated weapons to Ukraine from being used on Russian soil.

I think that focusing on specific incidents of the almost countless occurrences of bombing of Ukrainian civilians warrants this amendment to policy. One incident cited yesterday in The Philadelphia Inquirer by their principle foreign affairs journalist Trudy Rubin is an example that makes the case for reversing the policy for me. Trudy wrote about a Russian bombing this past Friday in Mykolaiv one of Ukrainian's major cities in the south located on the Black Sea. The Russians bombed a residential neighborhood in the city with cluster munitions, bombs that are designed to breakup into multiple smaller bombs for the purpose of killing and wounding a lot of personnel at minimum more than a singular bomb would, which had the effect of killing seven civilians and wounding seventeen. One of the wounded was a twenty year old young women Viktoria who was out walking her dog with her father; Viktoria was severely wounded in the leg which her Doctors tell her it will take many months and more surgeries for her to walk again. When the shelling started Viktoria's father used his body to cover his daughter and shield her from the bombs and in the process was wounded himself and the injuries ended up being fatal. In the hospital, Trudy said that Viktoria's mother was at her daughters side and was incredibly distraught. So what has Vladimir Putin did with his army here, this young women Viktoria when she thinks of her father which human nature being what it is will be often will have to live with the sadness that he died protecting her and Viktoria's mother will have to live with the sadness of having lost a great husband. All this sadness brought on this Ukrainian family for a completely unjust war instigated by a brutal and immoral dictator, Vladimir. And there is millions of other innocent Ukrainian families that are and will experience great sadness throughout their lives because of this epically immoral behavior of Vladimir Putin using his military to target civilians. If Vladimir Putin is ever brought to the Hague and tried for war crimes and if the case is competently prosecuted the panel of Judges will have to find Mr. Putin guilty and the court will have to say something like this in their ruling, that in this war there were so many cases of Ukrainian civilians being killed by Russian bombings when no reasonable person could conclude the target was a legitimate military target and these incident were reported in the world-wide media that the President of Russia has no legitimate grounds to deny lack of knowledge that civilians were being targeted by the Russian military and because he did not stop this criminal behavior he is fully liable!

The United States and the Free World must stop giving Vladimir Putin this consideration that their weapons will not be used to bomb Russian soil even when that soil is being used to fire rockets and shells deliberately aimed at Ukrainian civilians and killing them. Universal law recognizes the right of self-defense and this principle warrants the allies changing their policy here and allowing Ukraine to defend its people!

Russian immorality in this war has many standout examples. One is the killing of fifty Ukrainian POW's at Olenivka prison in eastern Ukraine at the end of July; the camp had mostly Azov regiment, Ukrainian soldiers that fought at the Azov steel plant in Mariupol. The Russians say that Ukraine is responsible that they fired HIMARS precision guided rocket into the POW prison building. The Russian story has too many holes in it. First, they said that the Ukrainian government bomber the camp because they wanted to create a deterrent against other Ukrainian soldiers surrendering to the Russians; but that doesn't make any sense because President Zelensky himself ordered the Azov regiment to stop defending the steel plant because it facilitated a lot of the wounded Ukrainian fighters being evacuated to the Ukrainian government controlled area. Then the Russians said the Ukrainian bombed the camp to stop the POW from disclosing the war crimes they committed at the direction of the Ukrainian government; that is stupid because the Ukrainian fighters at the Mariupol steel plant conducted heroic actions defending the plant and by so doing tying up Russian forces that couldn't be used to attack Ukrainian forces at other locations in the country. During the Russian Supreme court case where the azov regiment were declared terrorists so they can be tried at terrorists the Russian government concocted evidence that said Azov regiment sniper shot Ukrainian civilians fleeing Mariupol; but that doesn't make any sense from the long hold out of the Azov regiment fighters at the steel plant the media conducted countless interviews with the fighters families many who had evacuated or long ago moved away from Mariupol it wouldn't make sense for these fighters to kill Ukrainian civilians for doing what their family members had done evacuate to safety in the Western part of Ukraine. The Russian story doesn't make any sense; the camp building looks largely structurally intact; HIMARS rockets called GMLRS have a 200lb warhead if such hit the camp building one or more of the building walls would not be structurally intact. Further, fifty Ukrainian POW's were killed in the attack but no Donbas separatist prison guards were killed or wounded in the attack that doesn't pass the smell test on smelling legitimate. The Donbas separatist, Russia allies in this war killed these POW's they hate this unit of the Ukrainian national guard because this regiment beat them in 2014 and kept Mariupol as part of Ukraine; this incident is a shocking scandal that is one more compelling reason the Free World should bring about the Russians not ending up with one centimeter of Ukrainian soil from this invasion!

Another reason why the U.S. and her allies should amend the policy and allow Ukraine to target artillery coming from inside Russia is what is happening in Kharkiv in the north. The Russian's bomb that city from inside Russia every week sometimes two to three times a week. Russia is approaching implementing on the city of Kharkiv what Russia implemented on the city of Grozny during the Chechen war in 1999. Essentially on that strategy the Russians just leveled the city of Grozny which made it easier for their troops to take the city. Kharkiv still has a lot of civilians in it if Russia carries out its Grozny strategy on Kharkiv the civilian death toll will be an embarrassment on the Free World for the Free World should have done more to stop this barbaric behavior of the Russians by at least allowing the Ukrainian military to fire at the incoming artillery sites hitting Kharkiv.
 

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
43,782
Reaction score
38,228
Points
3,605
Location
Arizona
Yes, war profiteers love it.

That’s the whole point, to make people rich off government defense contracts. But also to disrupt the world food supply chain.
 

ESay

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2015
Messages
6,490
Reaction score
1,110
Points
140
In this story one thing can be claimed for sure - if Ukraine wants to secure Kharkiv and prevent the city from being shelled, it should attack Russian military targets and artillery positions inside Russian territory in Belgorod oblast. There is no any choice.
 

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
1,630
Points
208
Location
Over there
Amnesty International saw through almost half a year of the conflict, they saw that the Armed Forces of Ukraine uses civilians of Donbass as a human shield.
In Ukraine, of course, this will cause a seething shit against "human rights defenders", but the Free world only cares about the right Ukrainians
 

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
1,630
Points
208
Location
Over there
UAF struck the Antonovsky railway bridge in Kherson.. The ''logic'' They waste so much expenisve ammo on a bridge that can be repaired cheap and quickly, but military-industrial complex loves that HIMARS shorter range missile cost 150 000 USD a full salvo 1 000 000 USD
 

mamooth

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
27,998
Reaction score
10,090
Points
910
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
UAF struck the Antonovsky railway bridge in Kherson.. The ''logic''
.. is to demonstrate that Ukraine can wipe out the bridges any time they want to. That's not good for Russian morale, knowing that they're sitting ducks about to be cut off.
 

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
1,630
Points
208
Location
Over there

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
1,630
Points
208
Location
Over there
.. is to demonstrate that Ukraine can wipe out the bridges any time they want to. That's not good for Russian morale, knowing that they're sitting ducks about to be cut off.
In Hemingway's novel "For Whom the Bell Tolls", the main character was given a similar task - to destroy a strategically important bridge. Moreover, the general who set the task formulated it something like this: "if the bridge is blown up an hour earlier or an hour later, it will be a failure. It must be blown up exactly at the hour of the beginning of the offensive."
In our case, we see an attempt to destroy the bridge of a long-advertised offensive. During this time, three alternative crossings were provided, the air defense was tightened and the bridge itself was restored. It is not difficult to conclude that no one is seriously going to attack. Pure ukro PR action.
 

mamooth

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
27,998
Reaction score
10,090
Points
910
Location
Indianapolis, Indiana
In our case, we see an attempt to destroy the bridge of a long-advertised offensive.
U advertised everywhere that they'd attack towards Kherson. R rushed troops there. U then promptly attacked towards Izyum instead, and gained a lot of ground there.

Over the same time frame, R gained no ground anywhere.

Meanwhile, the Ukrainians are happy to let more Russians stream into Kherson, where they can easily be cut off and trapped later.
 

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
1,630
Points
208
Location
Over there
After the last shelling of Donetsk by ukrainian fascists, 6 civilians were killed. The number of those who were blown up by the banned "Petal" mines has reached 29, one of them is a child.
 

para bellum

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2022
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
543
Points
918
Location
PacNW
After the last shelling of Donetsk by ukrainian fascists, 6 civilians were killed. The number of those who were blown up by the banned "Petal" mines has reached 29, one of them is a child.
Those mines were used by Russians in Kiev and Kharkiv, documented.

Whatever you accuse Ukraine of doing, I know it's Russia actually doing it.

Now you're clutching your pearls about so-called bombing of Donetsk, when Russia has been indiscriminately bombing Ukrainian cities for over 5 months. Nonstop. With incindiaries and cluster munitions, which are both banned for use against urban areas.

And it was Russia that shelled the Zaporizhzhia NPP, not Ukraine. And it's not the first time either. They also killed a diver there after he refused to drain the cooling ponds.

The IAEA has raised "grave concerns" about Russia's takeover of the NPP in Zaporizhzhia, inspectors are not allowed, and Russian troops are using the plant as a nuclear shield.

Get the fuck out of Ukraine or die there. Those are the options.
 

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
131,535
Reaction score
50,574
Points
2,290
The United States and allied countries that are helping Ukraine by providing them heavy weapons in their war to stop the Russian invasion should amend the restriction on the use of those weapons that prohibits the firing of those weapons into Russia. Specifically, the restriction should be amended so that it allows Ukraine to fire those weapons up to fifty miles within the borders of the country of Russia as long as it is firing at a legitimate military target! The Russian President Vladimir Putin's behavior in regards to how he has used the Russian military in this war doesn't warrant the consideration heretofore shown to him by the allies in prohibiting the use of donated weapons to Ukraine from being used on Russian soil.

I think that focusing on specific incidents of the almost countless occurrences of bombing of Ukrainian civilians warrants this amendment to policy. One incident cited yesterday in The Philadelphia Inquirer by their principle foreign affairs journalist Trudy Rubin is an example that makes the case for reversing the policy for me. Trudy wrote about a Russian bombing this past Friday in Mykolaiv one of Ukrainian's major cities in the south located on the Black Sea. The Russians bombed a residential neighborhood in the city with cluster munitions, bombs that are designed to breakup into multiple smaller bombs for the purpose of killing and wounding a lot of personnel at minimum more than a singular bomb would, which had the effect of killing seven civilians and wounding seventeen. One of the wounded was a twenty year old young women Viktoria who was out walking her dog with her father; Viktoria was severely wounded in the leg which her Doctors tell her it will take many months and more surgeries for her to walk again. When the shelling started Viktoria's father used his body to cover his daughter and shield her from the bombs and in the process was wounded himself and the injuries ended up being fatal. In the hospital, Trudy said that Viktoria's mother was at her daughters side and was incredibly distraught. So what has Vladimir Putin did with his army here, this young women Viktoria when she thinks of her father which human nature being what it is will be often will have to live with the sadness that he died protecting her and Viktoria's mother will have to live with the sadness of having lost a great husband. All this sadness brought on this Ukrainian family for a completely unjust war instigated by a brutal and immoral dictator, Vladimir. And there is millions of other innocent Ukrainian families that are and will experience great sadness throughout their lives because of this epically immoral behavior of Vladimir Putin using his military to target civilians. If Vladimir Putin is ever brought to the Hague and tried for war crimes and if the case is competently prosecuted the panel of Judges will have to find Mr. Putin guilty and the court will have to say something like this in their ruling, that in this war there were so many cases of Ukrainian civilians being killed by Russian bombings when no reasonable person could conclude the target was a legitimate military target and these incident were reported in the world-wide media that the President of Russia has no legitimate grounds to deny lack of knowledge that civilians were being targeted by the Russian military and because he did not stop this criminal behavior he is fully liable!

The United States and the Free World must stop giving Vladimir Putin this consideration that their weapons will not be used to bomb Russian soil even when that soil is being used to fire rockets and shells deliberately aimed at Ukrainian civilians and killing them. Universal law recognizes the right of self-defense and this principle warrants the allies changing their policy here and allowing Ukraine to defend its people!

Russian immorality in this war has many standout examples. One is the killing of fifty Ukrainian POW's at Olenivka prison in eastern Ukraine at the end of July; the camp had mostly Azov regiment, Ukrainian soldiers that fought at the Azov steel plant in Mariupol. The Russians say that Ukraine is responsible that they fired HIMARS precision guided rocket into the POW prison building. The Russian story has too many holes in it. First, they said that the Ukrainian government bomber the camp because they wanted to create a deterrent against other Ukrainian soldiers surrendering to the Russians; but that doesn't make any sense because President Zelensky himself ordered the Azov regiment to stop defending the steel plant because it facilitated a lot of the wounded Ukrainian fighters being evacuated to the Ukrainian government controlled area. Then the Russians said the Ukrainian bombed the camp to stop the POW from disclosing the war crimes they committed at the direction of the Ukrainian government; that is stupid because the Ukrainian fighters at the Mariupol steel plant conducted heroic actions defending the plant and by so doing tying up Russian forces that couldn't be used to attack Ukrainian forces at other locations in the country. During the Russian Supreme court case where the azov regiment were declared terrorists so they can be tried at terrorists the Russian government concocted evidence that said Azov regiment sniper shot Ukrainian civilians fleeing Mariupol; but that doesn't make any sense from the long hold out of the Azov regiment fighters at the steel plant the media conducted countless interviews with the fighters families many who had evacuated or long ago moved away from Mariupol it wouldn't make sense for these fighters to kill Ukrainian civilians for doing what their family members had done evacuate to safety in the Western part of Ukraine. The Russian story doesn't make any sense; the camp building looks largely structurally intact; HIMARS rockets called GMLRS have a 200lb warhead if such hit the camp building one or more of the building walls would not be structurally intact. Further, fifty Ukrainian POW's were killed in the attack but no Donbas separatist prison guards were killed or wounded in the attack that doesn't pass the smell test on smelling legitimate. The Donbas separatist, Russia allies in this war killed these POW's they hate this unit of the Ukrainian national guard because this regiment beat them in 2014 and kept Mariupol as part of Ukraine; this incident is a shocking scandal that is one more compelling reason the Free World should bring about the Russians not ending up with one centimeter of Ukrainian soil from this invasion!

Another reason why the U.S. and her allies should amend the policy and allow Ukraine to target artillery coming from inside Russia is what is happening in Kharkiv in the north. The Russian's bomb that city from inside Russia every week sometimes two to three times a week. Russia is approaching implementing on the city of Kharkiv what Russia implemented on the city of Grozny during the Chechen war in 1999. Essentially on that strategy the Russians just leveled the city of Grozny which made it easier for their troops to take the city. Kharkiv still has a lot of civilians in it if Russia carries out its Grozny strategy on Kharkiv the civilian death toll will be an embarrassment on the Free World for the Free World should have done more to stop this barbaric behavior of the Russians by at least allowing the Ukrainian military to fire at the incoming artillery sites hitting Kharkiv.
How else are they going to start WWIII? I mean Putin refuses to take the bait so far
 

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
1,630
Points
208
Location
Over there
Those mines were used by Russians in Kiev and Kharkiv, documented.
Documented by the fascist press of Ukraine and the "progressive West"? It is not by chance that it is called "fake news"
 

para bellum

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2022
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
543
Points
918
Location
PacNW
Documented by the fascist press of Ukraine and the "progressive West"? It is not by chance that it is called "fake news"
Documented by photographs and videos in countless examples. The very thing you claim Ukraine is doing is what Russia has been doing all along.


 

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
1,630
Points
208
Location
Over there

para bellum

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2022
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
543
Points
918
Location
PacNW
As nazi collaborator you suppose to say that.
No, I just recognize IRA propaganda trolls when I see them. And that's you.

You pose as an American, and speak nothing but lies, as if repeating them enough times will make them true.

Every war death in Ukraine- no matter whose weapon caused it, it is on Russia.

Your boss has destroyed Russia and Ukraine both. Ukraine can be rebuilt, but Russia is doomed to the dustbin of history. No one will ever do business with Russia again. That's why Russian media is cheering about the prospect of a new alliance with North Korea, lol.

You totally deserve each other. Birds of a feather flock together.

I used to think this was just the Russian elites who were so deranged, but I have seen enough Russian social media to know the entire country is degenerate and not deserving of a place in the civilized world.
 

para bellum

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2022
Messages
1,174
Reaction score
543
Points
918
Location
PacNW
Cluster bombs landing in Kharkiv 4 days into the invasion.


Piles of boosters and cluster bomb containers that were recovered around the end of April in the Kharkiv area.

 

Baron

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
11,677
Reaction score
5,620
Points
370
Location
Brooklyn, NYC
The United States and allied countries that are helping Ukraine by providing them heavy weapons in their war to stop the Russian invasion should amend the restriction on the use of those weapons that prohibits the firing of those weapons into Russia. Specifically, the restriction should be amended so that it allows Ukraine to fire those weapons up to fifty miles within the borders of the country of Russia as long as it is firing at a legitimate military target! The Russian President Vladimir Putin's behavior in regards to how he has used the Russian military in this war doesn't warrant the consideration heretofore shown to him by the allies in prohibiting the use of donated weapons to Ukraine from being used on Russian soil.

I think that focusing on specific incidents of the almost countless occurrences of bombing of Ukrainian civilians warrants this amendment to policy. One incident cited yesterday in The Philadelphia Inquirer by their principle foreign affairs journalist Trudy Rubin is an example that makes the case for reversing the policy for me. Trudy wrote about a Russian bombing this past Friday in Mykolaiv one of Ukrainian's major cities in the south located on the Black Sea. The Russians bombed a residential neighborhood in the city with cluster munitions, bombs that are designed to breakup into multiple smaller bombs for the purpose of killing and wounding a lot of personnel at minimum more than a singular bomb would, which had the effect of killing seven civilians and wounding seventeen. One of the wounded was a twenty year old young women Viktoria who was out walking her dog with her father; Viktoria was severely wounded in the leg which her Doctors tell her it will take many months and more surgeries for her to walk again. When the shelling started Viktoria's father used his body to cover his daughter and shield her from the bombs and in the process was wounded himself and the injuries ended up being fatal. In the hospital, Trudy said that Viktoria's mother was at her daughters side and was incredibly distraught. So what has Vladimir Putin did with his army here, this young women Viktoria when she thinks of her father which human nature being what it is will be often will have to live with the sadness that he died protecting her and Viktoria's mother will have to live with the sadness of having lost a great husband. All this sadness brought on this Ukrainian family for a completely unjust war instigated by a brutal and immoral dictator, Vladimir. And there is millions of other innocent Ukrainian families that are and will experience great sadness throughout their lives because of this epically immoral behavior of Vladimir Putin using his military to target civilians. If Vladimir Putin is ever brought to the Hague and tried for war crimes and if the case is competently prosecuted the panel of Judges will have to find Mr. Putin guilty and the court will have to say something like this in their ruling, that in this war there were so many cases of Ukrainian civilians being killed by Russian bombings when no reasonable person could conclude the target was a legitimate military target and these incident were reported in the world-wide media that the President of Russia has no legitimate grounds to deny lack of knowledge that civilians were being targeted by the Russian military and because he did not stop this criminal behavior he is fully liable!

The United States and the Free World must stop giving Vladimir Putin this consideration that their weapons will not be used to bomb Russian soil even when that soil is being used to fire rockets and shells deliberately aimed at Ukrainian civilians and killing them. Universal law recognizes the right of self-defense and this principle warrants the allies changing their policy here and allowing Ukraine to defend its people!

Russian immorality in this war has many standout examples. One is the killing of fifty Ukrainian POW's at Olenivka prison in eastern Ukraine at the end of July; the camp had mostly Azov regiment, Ukrainian soldiers that fought at the Azov steel plant in Mariupol. The Russians say that Ukraine is responsible that they fired HIMARS precision guided rocket into the POW prison building. The Russian story has too many holes in it. First, they said that the Ukrainian government bomber the camp because they wanted to create a deterrent against other Ukrainian soldiers surrendering to the Russians; but that doesn't make any sense because President Zelensky himself ordered the Azov regiment to stop defending the steel plant because it facilitated a lot of the wounded Ukrainian fighters being evacuated to the Ukrainian government controlled area. Then the Russians said the Ukrainian bombed the camp to stop the POW from disclosing the war crimes they committed at the direction of the Ukrainian government; that is stupid because the Ukrainian fighters at the Mariupol steel plant conducted heroic actions defending the plant and by so doing tying up Russian forces that couldn't be used to attack Ukrainian forces at other locations in the country. During the Russian Supreme court case where the azov regiment were declared terrorists so they can be tried at terrorists the Russian government concocted evidence that said Azov regiment sniper shot Ukrainian civilians fleeing Mariupol; but that doesn't make any sense from the long hold out of the Azov regiment fighters at the steel plant the media conducted countless interviews with the fighters families many who had evacuated or long ago moved away from Mariupol it wouldn't make sense for these fighters to kill Ukrainian civilians for doing what their family members had done evacuate to safety in the Western part of Ukraine. The Russian story doesn't make any sense; the camp building looks largely structurally intact; HIMARS rockets called GMLRS have a 200lb warhead if such hit the camp building one or more of the building walls would not be structurally intact. Further, fifty Ukrainian POW's were killed in the attack but no Donbas separatist prison guards were killed or wounded in the attack that doesn't pass the smell test on smelling legitimate. The Donbas separatist, Russia allies in this war killed these POW's they hate this unit of the Ukrainian national guard because this regiment beat them in 2014 and kept Mariupol as part of Ukraine; this incident is a shocking scandal that is one more compelling reason the Free World should bring about the Russians not ending up with one centimeter of Ukrainian soil from this invasion!

Another reason why the U.S. and her allies should amend the policy and allow Ukraine to target artillery coming from inside Russia is what is happening in Kharkiv in the north. The Russian's bomb that city from inside Russia every week sometimes two to three times a week. Russia is approaching implementing on the city of Kharkiv what Russia implemented on the city of Grozny during the Chechen war in 1999. Essentially on that strategy the Russians just leveled the city of Grozny which made it easier for their troops to take the city. Kharkiv still has a lot of civilians in it if Russia carries out its Grozny strategy on Kharkiv the civilian death toll will be an embarrassment on the Free World for the Free World should have done more to stop this barbaric behavior of the Russians by at least allowing the Ukrainian military to fire at the incoming artillery sites hitting Kharkiv.

The true goal of USA and NATO is nuclear war, insane neocons and 'progressives' gonna do anything possible to provoke it
 

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
1,630
Points
208
Location
Over there
Cluster bombs landing in Kharkiv 4 days into the invasion.
Piles of boosters and cluster bomb containers that were recovered around the end of April in the Kharkiv area.
There was such a representative of the Ukrainian ruling class Denisova, it was she who spread colorful stories about the rape of ukrainian women by russian soldiers at the beginning of hostilities, including in Bucha.
It turned out that she was making up all these stories and even the Goebbels ukrainian government was forced to dismiss her. A prostitute was fired from a brothel for licentiousness ...
But, of course, in the West this part of the story was kept silent.
Your "information" as usual, comes from a similarly stinking source.
 

Ringo

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2021
Messages
4,744
Reaction score
1,630
Points
208
Location
Over there
Twice the Ukrainian fascists fired artillery at the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant... The largest in Europe. Send more weapons to the fascists, americans and europeans!
The cynicism of the statements made from Kiev, including by president Zelensky, that the strike on the ZPP was inflicted by russian troops, is striking. It seems that the common sense of the current Ukrainian leaders has finally left. They are trying to convince that the russian military are firing on themselves, because it is they [Russian troops] who are now guarding the station," said a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, speaking at the Review Conference of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
 
Last edited:

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$55.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top