Two teens arrested in washington state for assault

It’s odd, that “violent behavior” only happens in a few deep blue states. Nonviolence in Texas, Florida, the mid-West or South. Just the places that demonize ICE and immigration laws in general.
Because a lot of you like authoritarianism and proto-fascism.

Not odd at all. Fascists often have popular support.
 
What I see anti ICE activists doing on TV is not speech

Its violence
Probably because your biased media doesn’t want to show you ICE engaging in violence.

You’re being fed propaganda.

We can find many, many, many videos of ICE choosing to initiate violence against people.

And the response amongst the right is to wish for more of it.
 
I dont think so

The video says otherwise
videos can be edited. Still no excuse for the assault.

But that ended when a non-local individual who identified himself as a “gonzo journalist” proceeded to enter a crowd of students and stood on a concrete block, filming and talking to the group. The scene was chaotic, and as the students yelled at him, the man yelled back something like “President Trump is the greatest president.”

Eventually the man stepped down started to blow an emergency whistle. However, it did not appear he made any attempt to exit the group.

The man began getting closer to a student, who appeared to yell “Back the **** up,” according to footage from the Enumclaw Courier-Herald newspaper, a sister publication of the Kent Reporter and part of Sound Publishing.

 
You can’t redefine speech as violence to justify your Brownshirt army’s brutality.

The constitution is there to prevent that kind of authoritarianism.

Unless we are just going to start ignoring the constitution, which is what you guys have been working towards.
.

No, we'll leave the redefining of words to your cult, right?







.
 
Probably because your biased media doesn’t want to show you ICE engaging in violence.

You’re being fed propaganda.

We can find many, many, many videos of ICE choosing to initiate violence against people.

And the response amongst the right is to wish for more of it.
.

Sure thing, sparky.

Sure thing.

 
Facts too Inconvenient for libs to deal with
How come the spin master Brandi Kruse doesn't mention the agitators in the crowd harassing the protesters?

Because that doesn't fit her narrative.
IF these punks stay back and just WATCH the peaceful protest, these is no confrontation, but we know the anti-protesters were looking to cause trouble, bait the protesters, film them, and they cry about violence from the protesters.

Fact, these punks don't interfere, there is no one to attack.

You know it happened, they were there filming, why doesn't Brandi tell TAHT side of the story too.
Because she is a right wing hack.
 
Let's discuss this PD and the "So-called Adult Independent reporter"

What is the role of this Adult Independent reporter.

Is it to report on the protests?
or
Is it to interject themself into the protestors space?

How about the PD, they said they were there the entire time, is it the PD job to keep the groups separate.
PD could have easily seen an escalation, and moved in to separate the 'independent reporter' from the protesters, but they didn't.

Do your job Brandi and ask that officer why he chose to just watch when the PD could have easily
de-escalated the situation.

BK won't do that though, she wants to blame parents and teachers.


Fair Question from BK to PD, WHY didn't you and your fellow officers step in before it got out of hand?
 
Marener to
videos can be edited. Still no excuse for the assault.

But that ended when a non-local individual who identified himself as a “gonzo journalist” proceeded to enter a crowd of students and stood on a concrete block, filming and talking to the group. The scene was chaotic, and as the students yelled at him, the man yelled back something like “President Trump is the greatest president.”

Eventually the man stepped down started to blow an emergency whistle. However, it did not appear he made any attempt to exit the group.

The man began getting closer to a student, who appeared to yell “Back the **** up,” according to footage from the Enumclaw Courier-Herald newspaper, a sister publication of the Kent Reporter and part of Sound Publishing.

your link does not claim that the person attacked any student

But they attacked him
 
Last edited:
How come the spin master Brandi Kruse doesn't mention the agitators in the crowd harassing the protesters?

Because that doesn't fit her narrative.
IF these punks stay back and just WATCH the peaceful protest, these is no confrontation, but we know the anti-protesters were looking to cause trouble, bait the protesters, film them, and they cry about violence from the protesters.

Fact, these punks don't interfere, there is no one to attack.

You know it happened, they were there filming, why doesn't Brandi tell TAHT side of the story too.
Because she is a right wing hack.
How come the spin master Brandi Kruse doesn't mention the agitators in the crowd harassing the protesters?

Becauseeven its true, which has not been verified, it does not excuse violence by the female students

They were engaging in a public protest that the photographer had a right to record
 
15th post
How come the spin master Brandi Kruse doesn't mention the agitators in the crowd harassing the protesters?

Because that doesn't fit her narrative.
IF these punks stay back and just WATCH the peaceful protest, these is no confrontation, but we know the anti-protesters were looking to cause trouble, bait the protesters, film them, and they cry about violence from the protesters.

Fact, these punks don't interfere, there is no one to attack.

You know it happened, they were there filming, why doesn't Brandi tell TAHT side of the story too.
Because she is a right wing hack.
.

Because it didn't happen.







.
 
How come the spin master Brandi Kruse doesn't mention the agitators in the crowd harassing the protesters?

Becauseeven its true, which has not been verified, it does not excuse violence by the female students

They were engaging in a public protest that the photographer had a right to record
Correct about the violence, I never mentioned it and didn't defend her actions.
That said, it, her hitting that kid, was wrong.

The photographer has no right to interfere.
If he's a 'photographer', he is there to take photos.....right. NOT get involved.....BUT he did get involved.
If he's an "Independent reporter' as BK says, he is there to report.......right......NOT get involved.

Why are we not questioning this agitator?
Because THAT is truly why he was there.
Does he share any of the blame?


Look how angry the right is about Don Lemon.
 
Back
Top Bottom