Two Reasons that Pam Bondi is a 101% FAILURE

[BackAgain]

Bondi failed to comply with a law (signed by Trump).

You can’t even establish that she didn’t faithfully comply with that law.

That means she broke the law.

No. It doesn’t. You still don’t grasp (among many other things) See Public Law 119-38(c).

No amount of twisting will change the fact. Bondi is a criminal. End of story.

Your syllogism is faulty. Factually and logically. You remain fully wrong.

End of story.

 

[jc456]

Not according to Massie and not according to the DOJ, themselves:

he's got 3 million records, so there's nothing in them? huh, kind of odd.

 

[jc456]

Thanks for finally admitting the truth. See how easy that was? Massie will do his job when Bondi finishes doing hers.

what hasn't she complied with exactly. the record stated to protect the victims, how do you suppose they do that?

 

[mudwhistle]

If her client was Trump she would have raided every Demorat's homes by now.

 

[BackAgain]

Nope.

By faithfully serving the President, our AG is fulfilling her Constitutional obligations on behalf of all Americans.

If the discussion was about how well she serves as AG, there can be debate. But the smear that she sees the President as “the” client is specious — at best.

 

[Care4all]

No. You don’t.

Whether or not breaking a law is criminal depends (a whole lot) on how the law addresses it.

A recent historical example. The Act which declares that an outgoing President’s “papers” belong to the US Government. First off, that law is far from a model of clarity.

More importantly, there is not one single solitary provision in that law which criminalizes a former President’s conduct of retaining some such alleged “presidential papers.” Thus, it is not a criminal law.

If ex President Potato kept some of his papers from his one miserably failed term in Office, you could not prosecute him for breaking the Presidential Records Act.

Here’s another example you’re likely too stupid to comprehend: say the speed limit on some highway is 55 MPH. You are the driver and a cop measures your car’s speed as being 66 MPH.

You might get pulled over. You might get a ticket. You might go to court to fight the charge. But the laser device which measures your speed is proved to be accurate. So, you’re found guilty. Newsflash: that still wouldn’t make you a criminal.

Come back later and fail harder.

Taking classified defense documents and keeping them in your bathroom in your resort or on a stage in the resort ballroom, is a criminal offense.

Lying about having the documents and having employees hide them from the fbi, is obstruction of justice, and a criminal offense.

Telling book writers what is in highly classified documents you have in front of you, is a criminal offense....

 

[BackAgain]

Taking classified defense documents and keeping them in your bathroom in your resort or on a stage in the resort ballroom, is a criminal offense.

You stupidly assume that President Trump ever did any such thing.

Poor assumption. Very poor.

Lying about having the documents and having employees hide them from the fbi, is obstruction of justice, and a criminal offense.

You don’t know that he lied about any documents or that he had anyone else lie about documents or that he did anything (by any means) to “hide” them. You ignorantly just accept the bullshit narrative crafted by leftist propagandist assholes.

Telling book writers what is in highly classified documents you have in front of you, is a criminal offense....

No. It isn’t.

 

[SaxonJackson]

what hasn't she complied with exactly. the record stated to protect the victims, how do you suppose they do that?

There are 3 million pages that haven't been released. If all three million pages contain "victim redactions" then we have a MUCH bigger problem on our hands that we first thought.

 

[OldFlame]

Thanks for finally admitting the truth. See how easy that was? Massie will do his job when Bondi finishes doing hers.

Thanks for admitting that he's not doing his job. He knows the redacted names of the emails he used at the hearing, but now he's keeping it to himself because of Bondi? Give me a ******* break.

 

[MisterBeale]

Never help a Prog. Let them and their families wither in pain and suffering when the time comes. Go past them and trust your own.

Well, that's a wholly unAmerican attitude.

John Dickinson's Hit Single: Liberty Song - Journal of the American Revolution

By 1768, Pennsylvania political activist John Dickinson became a true triple threat. He was already one of the most successful lawyers and businessmen in all of Pennsylvania and Delaware, and was the author of the “Letter from a Farmer” essays, one of the most widely admired and reprinted...

allthingsliberty.com

 

[MisterBeale]

Nope.

By faithfully serving the President, our AG is fulfilling her Constitutional obligations on behalf of all Americans.

If the discussion was about how well she serves as AG, there can be debate. But the smear that she sees the President as “the” client is specious — at best.

 

[jc456]

There are 3 million pages that haven't been released. If all three million pages contain "victim redactions" then we have a MUCH bigger problem on our hands that we first thought.

yeah and how long do you think it takes to redact names in that many files? especially the victim names.

 

[MisterBeale]

If her client was Trump she would have raided every Demorat's homes by now.

I imagine that would be true, given how incompetent and unqualified she is.

 

[MisterBeale]

If her client was Trump she would have raided every Demorat's homes by now.

Well, her client is essentially the entire Epstein class, that includes many leftists. It is clear, they are all on the same side now, and that side isn't the side of Americans.

Kevin Warsh, new Fed chair pick, named in Epstein Files, sparks backlash: 'Why did Trump choose him?'

The Justice Department released a new tranche of files related to Jeffrey Epstein and new Fed chair pick Kevin Warsh's name was among those mentioned.

www.hindustantimes.com

Epstein files: Trump, Howard Lutnick, Steve Tisch among prominent names that appear in latest Justice Department release

Emails released by the DOJ showed Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick apparently visited Epstein's island for lunch years after he claimed to have cut off ties.

www.cnbc.com

Trump’s Fed pick appears in Epstein files

Kevin Warsh’s nomination collides with a fresh release of Jeffrey Epstein records

www.mpamag.com

At least half a dozen top Trump administration officials appear in the Jeffrey Epstein files

The degree to which each person was connected to Epstein varies significantly, from a single email to years of communications.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I'm not ready to join the Black Pill Brigade just yet, but there's nothing in the OP to argue against.
It is indeed very frustrating and frankly ******* sad.

.

Blackpilling NOT ALLOWED.

.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Well, her client is essentially the entire Epstein class, that includes many leftists. It is clear, they are all on the same side now, and that side isn't the side of Americans.

Kevin Warsh, new Fed chair pick, named in Epstein Files, sparks backlash: 'Why did Trump choose him?'

The Justice Department released a new tranche of files related to Jeffrey Epstein and new Fed chair pick Kevin Warsh's name was among those mentioned.

www.hindustantimes.com

Epstein files: Trump, Howard Lutnick, Steve Tisch among prominent names that appear in latest Justice Department release

Emails released by the DOJ showed Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick apparently visited Epstein's island for lunch years after he claimed to have cut off ties.

www.cnbc.com

Trump’s Fed pick appears in Epstein files

Kevin Warsh’s nomination collides with a fresh release of Jeffrey Epstein records

www.mpamag.com

At least half a dozen top Trump administration officials appear in the Jeffrey Epstein files

The degree to which each person was connected to Epstein varies significantly, from a single email to years of communications.

www.nbcnews.com

.

All one had to do to get on the "Epstein Files" was to email Epstein once.






.

 

[jc456]

.

All one had to do to get on the "Epstein Files" was to email Epstein once.






.

monday morning quarterbacking is futile.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Thanks for admitting that he's not doing his job. He knows the redacted names of the emails he used at the hearing, but now he's keeping it to himself because of Bondi? Give me a ******* break.

Thanks for admitting that Bondi is a criminal for holding 3 million pages hostage. Must have some damning evidence that Trump doesn't want anyone to know about.

 

[SaxonJackson]

yeah and how long do you think it takes to redact names in that many files? especially the victim names.

Longer than it should if they weren't redacting names they SHOULDN'T be redacting. If they were as "transparent" as they say they are then nothing would be redacted. We already know that they willing to release files showing the victim's names so what's taking so long?

 

[jc456]

Not as long as it should if they weren't redacting names they SHOULDN'T be redacting. If they were as "transparent" as they say they are then nothing would be redacted. We already know that they willing to release files showing the victim's names so what's taking so long?

who decides that? why someone innocent to the thing mentioned in an email be included? Are you suggesting that you know how every email was written and all who were in it? my gd, the amount of stupid it takes to be these epstein geeks. I think you might be getting off on them yourself.