Two Reasons that Pam Bondi is a 101% FAILURE

They have both answered your question. Breaking the law to bring law-breakers to justice is not the solution.

. . . and that, in conjunction with other means would be enough.

But they're calling for all names to to be unredacted, they have the ability to name names, so why aren't they? Why are they waiting for the DOJ to do it? They know who wrote all of those emails?
 
1) Tony Fauci.

2) John Brennan.

The litany of crimes committed by those two loathsome oxygen thieves are well documented, for anyone with a 4th grade education and a room temperature IQ to see in high relief.

Yet our reputed highest placed prosecutor in the nation has done zilch to roll up and prosecute these two miscreants, and gives us the "ongoing investigation" blather whenever queried about them.

If the two lowest of low hanging fruit haven't been put under hack, prosecuted, and imprisoned by now, you can forget about any of the demonic fiends that comprise Epstein's client list from ever receiving the justice they deserve.

And Mar-a-lago raid?...J6?...Russiagate?...Autopen?...DOGE fraud?...Somali fraud?

Yeah, you can forget them too....Trumpsters, you've been had.

That's my opinion and no link is necessary for this post qualify in this forum.

View attachment 1218174
It's all a show and nothing more. As far as Epstien's files go, Trump has too many on his staff that were island hopping with Jeffrey. Once you pick up a skunk the smell never leaves.
 
But your Massie and Ro Khanna have the ability to go in and view any unredacted information in the files they wish, but yet they're not naming any names? Why not?



I suggest you watch the video above. The majority of the files are still redacted.

Khanna named some names - the only ones that the DOJ has allowed to be released.

And those names are under heavy scrutiny. One of them resigned today after it was discovered that Epstein thanked him for the “torture” video. Seems pretty shady to me.


These were just the ones released. There’s still a lot they’re hiding. Bondi has not complied with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
 
Smith was loaded up and ready to go. Cannon cut him off. The same with other cases.

Hopefully at some point it will dawn on the Trumpsters that the REASON they're not getting any guilty verdicts is that the "facts" they're getting are just not true. Or they're distorted somehow. Or other facts are being left out by the voices they choose to trust. The "cases" are weak or fantasy. The hyperpartisan crap they're getting from their "news" doesn't fly when it enters an actual ******* courtroom.

Until and unless they figure that out, they'll just keep thinking that something is wrong and that they're somehow being victimized.
They're being victimized all right. By Fox News hacks like Hannity who on a daily basis present Trump's lackeys on air for a daily dose of lies & propoganda.

The fact that Fox settled a lawsuit for $780 million as a result of their lies is another example in their eyes of how the "deep state" is out to get them. You're better off trying to herd cats then to reason with that cult.
 
they have the ability to name names, so why aren't they?
Sure, if they want sink their careers and wind up in jail, of course they could do that.

They shouldn't have to destroy themselves to bring oversight.
 
Sure, if they want sink their careers and wind up in jail, of course they could do that.

They shouldn't have to destroy themselves to bring oversight.

So self preservation is okay for them, but not anyone else.
 
I imagine we will see some convictions, but this shit takes years. That said, the political culture at the FBI and DOJ will 100% change. You wont see them going after a political party again for a VERY long time. Certainly not at the level that they went after the Jan 6th protesters. They know it will end their career in just a few short years.

Doubtful
Sawry
 
But they're calling for all names to to be unredacted, they have the ability to name names, so why aren't they? Why are they waiting for the DOJ to do it? They know who wrote all of those emails?

Great look from Pam here.

She says you don't want to know, you can't handle the truth. :p
1771020764379.webp
 
The most important thing, in my view, was the fact that he demonstrated that you can get government to do its job when it intentionally and obtusely refuses to do so. When it intentionally impedes any effort to make it do so.

That and I really wanna know the extent of any foreign intent/operations to coerce our so-called representatives through blackmail operations for the purpose of influencing our laws for their benefit. Some of which are blatantly antithetical as well as repugnant to our Constitution/Bill of Rights. Some foreign nations in particular, given their lobbyist track record and widely recognized conniving nature and general self-indulging entitlement mindset.
Like Russia gate? Haaaaaaaaaahaha bullshit, no one charged yet

And where was he under Biden? Hack
 
It's all still hearsay from 20-30 years ago, the victims need to come forward and be willing to testify, when that happens with creditability, then we might have something. Until then it's just a bunch of accusations without any proof. It's as simple as that.

The only thing that is happening is that people were mentioned in the files as being associated back then to what is a now known sexual predator and being run through the coals, regardless of if there was any proof of their actual wrong doing. You claim to be an advocate of COTUS, yet are willing to see being hanged without any plausible proof of anything.
And if you ate lunch with your family you’re associated with Epstein and guilty of I have no fking idea. But the whackos have spoken
 
And if you ate lunch with your family you’re associated with Epstein and guilty of I have no fking idea. But the whackos have spoken
Yes, your cult has, Q-NUT.

You dumb asses were out for blood, for 9 years, when they thought only the democrats were involved.


The fake story that shows how conspiracy theories spread

1771059826988.webp
BBC
https://www.bbc.com › news › blogs-trending-38156985
Dec 2, 2016 — Thousands of people are spreading a false rumour about a Washington pizza restaurant and a child sex ring. But why?

Now that your dear leader is involved, your cult wants child molesters protected.

Bondi clashes with Democrats as she struggles to turn the ...​

1771060166788.webp
WVLT
https://www.wvlt.tv › 2026/02/11 › attorney-general-bo...
3 days ago — Attorney General Pam Bondi launched into a passionate defense of President Donald Trump Wednesday as she tried to turn the page from from relentless criticism of the Justice Department’s handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files, repeatedly shouting at Democrats during a combative hearing in which she postured herself as the Republican president’s chief protector.

Besieged by questions over Epstein and accusations of a weaponized Justice Department, Bondi aggressively pivoted in an extraordinary speech in which she mocked her Democratic questioners, praised Trump over the performance of the stock market and openly aligned herself as in sync with a president whom she painted as a victim of past impeachments and investigations.

“You sit here and you attack the president and I’m not going to have it,” Bondi told lawmakers on the House Judiciary Committee. ”I am not going to put up with it.”
 
Last edited:

Two Reasons that Pam Bondi is a 101% FAILURE​


I guess the real question is when is the last time we really had a crack AG of the country who really kicked ass?

It isn't that she sucks, but that she sucks too.

Obviously, somebody doesn't want these people prosecuted.

Now you know why people like Hillary walk around looking so smug and contemptible.
 
15th post
I'm not ready to join the Black Pill Brigade just yet, but there's nothing in the OP to argue against.
It is indeed very frustrating and frankly ******* sad.
Taking the black pill has been one of the most liberating things I've done in my life. And I have Trumpanyahu to thank for it.
 
But your Massie and Ro Khanna have the ability to go in and view any unredacted information in the files they wish, but yet they're not naming any names? Why not?

It wouldn't matter if they did, you still wouldn't be able to indict any of them over an email. :dunno: I guess you can bring public shame down upon them, regardless of whether or not they were actually guilty of anything. You are the pitchfork mob who wants your justice while throwing out the rule of law. I can't get on board with that, and in almost every other situation you claim to be the same.
Massie promised he would release the names as soon as everything was released.

We're still waiting........
 
Back
Top Bottom