Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,099
- 245
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What the fuck does "free speech" have to do with this?
Nothing.
Most conservatives are either ignorant of the fact that the First Amendment applies only to law-making entities and not private organizations or individuals, or aware of this they nonetheless attempt to create the illusion of some sort of free speech violation.
What the fuck does "free speech" have to do with this?
If I have to explain why they were both wrong I am pretty sure it won't help.
Although, I am annoyed by the fact that the spraypainting woman got arrested, but the camerawomen that assaulted her did not.
Although, I am annoyed by the fact that the spraypainting woman got arrested, but the camerawomen that assaulted her did not.
Keeping the other woman away from her with the end of her camera pole is not assault.
Neither woman committed an assault.
The one who got arrested was breaking the law of defacing a sign.
Although, I am annoyed by the fact that the spraypainting woman got arrested, but the camerawomen that assaulted her did not.
Although, I am annoyed by the fact that the spraypainting woman got arrested, but the camerawomen that assaulted her did not.
The camera woman was trying to stop a crime. She got her clothing spray painted which constitutes assault.
Although, I am annoyed by the fact that the spraypainting woman got arrested, but the camerawomen that assaulted her did not.
The camera woman was trying to stop a crime. She got her clothing spray painted which constitutes assault.
Although, I am annoyed by the fact that the spraypainting woman got arrested, but the camerawomen that assaulted her did not.
Keeping the other woman away from her with the end of her camera pole is not assault.
Neither woman committed an assault.
The one who got arrested was breaking the law of defacing a sign.
Except that the other woman didn't touch her, so yeah, jabbing her with the camera pole is assault. As was when she shoved her.
Although, I am annoyed by the fact that the spraypainting woman got arrested, but the camerawomen that assaulted her did not.
The camera woman was trying to stop a crime. She got her clothing spray painted which constitutes assault.
Agreed. How is it assault to attempt to stop a crime in progress?
Glad Eltahawy was charged. Of course she still doesn't get it. She thinks it is her right as an American to deface the property of others.
Keeping the other woman away from her with the end of her camera pole is not assault.
Neither woman committed an assault.
The one who got arrested was breaking the law of defacing a sign.
Except that the other woman didn't touch her, so yeah, jabbing her with the camera pole is assault. As was when she shoved her.
Jabbing means poking,she did not do that.
It is against the law to deface a sign.
She can just as easily get her own sign to put up.
Why would she be supporting a group violent people, who wants to kill all Jews and Christian's and anyone who will not conform to Islam?
It is against the law to deface a sign.
She can just as easily get her own sign to put up.
Why would she be supporting a group violent people, who wants to kill all Jews and Christian's and anyone who will not conform to Islam?
And what evidence is there she supports any group advocating violence?
However improper her method, she is correct to denounce a message portraying all Muslims as violent and hateful, as thats clearly not the case.
The camera woman was trying to stop a crime. She got her clothing spray painted which constitutes assault.
Agreed. How is it assault to attempt to stop a crime in progress?
Glad Eltahawy was charged. Of course she still doesn't get it. She thinks it is her right as an American to deface the property of others.
For starters, the camerawoman isn't a police officer. Additionally, saying she was assaulted is like saying I assaulted you if you ran in to me and fell down.
It is against the law to deface a sign.
She can just as easily get her own sign to put up.
Why would she be supporting a group violent people, who wants to kill all Jews and Christian's and anyone who will not conform to Islam?
And what evidence is there she supports any group advocating violence?
However improper her method, she is correct to denounce a message portraying all Muslims as violent and hateful, as that’s clearly not the case.