Two Nations: One State?

Do I really need to continue with the so called Greatness of this region before Israel..............

Do I really need to tell the story about the Waffen SS again.....................

Spare me it was a great place of peace before Israel BS.
 
"...There is even an option for those who don't like it... Emigration."
Indeed, Tinny.

That's what the Israelis have been saying about the current Muslim-Arab residents of the West Bank and Gaza for some years now.
tongue_smile.gif


Sounds like you're finally coming-around to the Israeli way of thinking, with respect to resolving the issues plaguing disaffected populations.
wink_smile.gif


==============================

However, both sides want it all, and, despite occasional sorties into compromise talks, in truth, and in the final analysis, (1) they cannot peacefully coexist alongside each other over the long term, (2) too much blood has been spilled in the past 65-70 years for them ever to reconcile sufficiently for this to happen, (3) neither side will ever relent in its desire to have it all, (4) only one side or the other can have it all, (5) Israel is already very close to achieving the goal of having it all, and (6) Israel has far more muscle and is the Projected Winner.

There has been posturing about a Two-State Solution in the past. There is posturing about it at-present. There will be posturing about it in future. But my own half-assed amateurish Spidey-Sense tells me that nothing is ever going to come of such aspirations. Time will tell.
 
Last edited:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VcjNJacDvPo]Rabbis for Palestine: a one state solution for all - YouTube[/ame]
 
Rather than putting-up video sound-bytes of Person A or B or fringe-group C or D who want a Two-State Solution, which only give us insight into those particular persons or fringe-groups and are not necessarily reflective of the population at-large, how about solid polling numbers from ALL of Israel and from ALL of Rump-Palestine - a recent survey-caliber referendum on the matter - on which an argument could be based, to hold a Plebiscite or not? Do such numbers exist, stemming from reliable, impartial, credible sources?
 
Last edited:
If a two-state solution in historical Palestine is dead, is it possible for Jew and Arab to live as equals between the River and the sea?

"On Thursday, Nov 14 the two chief negotiators of the Palestinian Authority handed their resignation from the talks with Israel, mediated by the US. Appointed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says the resignations do not affect the PA's commitment to this round which began in July and is scheduled to complete in April.

"But many on the ground see no hope in the negotiations, and have long ago turned to a different option.

"As Michel Warschawski, author of The Bi-National Challenge says 'treating this geographical space from the river to the sea as one unit does not necessitate treating the people who live here as a collection of individuals.'

"While the fruitless negotiations drudge, various proposals for alternative solutions grounded in equality from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea emerge on both sides of the West Bank segregation wall."

Israelis and Palestinians Turn to One-State Solution

Or are some Semites more equal than others?

Woops, I thought this was a thread about dividing the US between right and left.

I should have known better, no one ever talks about dividing a nation unless it involves Zionists.
 
"If a two-state solution in historical Palestine is dead, is it possible for Jew and Arab to live as equals between the River and the sea?..."
IMHO, 'No'.

For the same reason that several pro-Palestinian bloggers have threatened on this board system over and over in recent months.

Namely: the likelihood that in a Single State, the Palestinians will proceed to out-breed the Jews and soon come to dominate the State and wrest control from the Jews.

Now that the Jews have recaptured their spiritual and ancestral homeland after so many centuries, and in light of the 6,000,000 of their own slaughtered in the Holocaust within living memory, there is not a snowball's chance in hell that the Jews will risk that control of the land ever again.

A Single State solution - with a large embedded Muslim-Arab population - carries within it the unstoppable seeds of the Death of Jewish Israel, if allowed to take-root and thrive.

That cannot and will not be allowed to materialize; not unless the Jews of Israel have suddenly lost all of the backbone they rediscovered after WWII and lost every ounce of logic and common sense that they possess.

It seems too late for a Two-State Solution, and a One-State Solution seems to be a no-brainer non-starter from the Israeli side of the fence (as perceived by this outsider).


"...Or are some Semites more equal than others?"
Yes, probably.

Some are more cultured and industrious and civilized than others.

Some have a history of being slaughtered in the millions, driving them forward.

Some have no place else nearby to go, to live amongst their ethnic kin and co-religionists.

Some have been repeatedly threatened with annihilation and being driven into the sea.

Some foolishly and routinely barrage civilians with rocketry, while others merely counterattack.

Some have tremendous military muscle to defend themselves and to enforce their will.

So, yes, apparently, some Semites ARE 'more equal' than others.
 
No, quite impossible. Hundreds of millions of Arabs want to exterminate the Jews. The idea that Islamic fanatics could be trusted to live peacefully alongside Jewish neighbours deserves some sort of prize for scaling the summit of silliness.
Roughly equal numbers of Jews and Arabs currently live between the River and the sea. Why shouldn't each human being living there enjoy equal protection under the law?

Why can't arabs stop killing Jews? That's all it would take. As Golda Meir said "The conflict will end when arabs love their children more than they hate Jews".

Prior to Arafat's declaring the first intifada, Jews and Palestinians did live together pretty peacefully. Many arabs worked in Israel, they shopped in Israel. Many were friends. Then came a resurrection of Jew hate and it went away.
 
If a two-state solution in historical Palestine is dead, is it possible for Jew and Arab to live as equals between the River and the sea?

"On Thursday, Nov 14 the two chief negotiators of the Palestinian Authority handed their resignation from the talks with Israel, mediated by the US. Appointed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says the resignations do not affect the PA's commitment to this round which began in July and is scheduled to complete in April.

"But many on the ground see no hope in the negotiations, and have long ago turned to a different option.

"As Michel Warschawski, author of The Bi-National Challenge says 'treating this geographical space from the river to the sea as one unit does not necessitate treating the people who live here as a collection of individuals.'

"While the fruitless negotiations drudge, various proposals for alternative solutions grounded in equality from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea emerge on both sides of the West Bank segregation wall."

Israelis and Palestinians Turn to One-State Solution

Or are some Semites more equal than others?

Woops, I thought this was a thread about dividing the US between right and left.

I should have known better, no one ever talks about dividing a nation unless it involves Zionists.
Whoops...
You're getting ahead of this story.


READ: Thom Hartmann, "The Crash of 2016: The Plot to Destroy America?and What We Can Do to Stop It" | Democracy Now!

"Death by Bankster

"Norman Rousseau and his wife did everything they were supposed to do. They were responsible homeowners who did business with Wachovia and Wells Fargo (which acquired Wachovia) and put a 30 percent down payment on a home in California back in 2000, and they made every payment from then on, never missing even one single month.

"But in 2007, the bank began to exhibit its psychopathic nature. According to a complaint filed by the Rousseaus, the bank approached them about changing their mortgage to an adjustable-rate mortgage. The Rousseaus stressed they were interested only in a fixed-​rate loan and that they wanted to pay the same payments throughout the life of the loan.

"But they trusted the bank—which was a big mistake. So when Wells Fargo told them that the 'new industry standard' is adjustable-​rate mortgages, that they could save more than $600 a month in mortgage payments, and that the 'worst-​case scenario' would be an increase of only a few dollars on their monthly payments, the Rousseaus gave in to the salespeople and took the new mortgage."
 
"If a two-state solution in historical Palestine is dead, is it possible for Jew and Arab to live as equals between the River and the sea?..."
IMHO, 'No'.

For the same reason that several pro-Palestinian bloggers have threatened on this board system over and over in recent months.

Namely: the likelihood that in a Single State, the Palestinians will proceed to out-breed the Jews and soon come to dominate the State and wrest control from the Jews.

Now that the Jews have recaptured their spiritual and ancestral homeland after so many centuries, and in light of the 6,000,000 of their own slaughtered in the Holocaust within living memory, there is not a snowball's chance in hell that the Jews will risk that control of the land ever again.

A Single State solution - with a large embedded Muslim-Arab population - carries within it the unstoppable seeds of the Death of Jewish Israel, if allowed to take-root and thrive.

That cannot and will not be allowed to materialize; not unless the Jews of Israel have suddenly lost all of the backbone they rediscovered after WWII and lost every ounce of logic and common sense that they possess.

It seems too late for a Two-State Solution, and a One-State Solution seems to be a no-brainer non-starter from the Israeli side of the fence (as perceived by this outsider).


"...Or are some Semites more equal than others?"
Yes, probably.

Some are more cultured and industrious and civilized than others.

Some have a history of being slaughtered in the millions, driving them forward.

Some have no place else nearby to go, to live amongst their ethnic kin and co-religionists.

Some have been repeatedly threatened with annihilation and being driven into the sea.

Some foolishly and routinely barrage civilians with rocketry, while others merely counterattack.

Some have tremendous military muscle to defend themselves and to enforce their will.

So, yes, apparently, some Semites ARE 'more equal' than others.
You constantly rely on the Jew's recapture of "their spiritual and ancestral homeland after so many centuries" without once telling us why Jews alone, among all nations of the world, should be allowed to reconquer lands their ancestor's pillaged thousands of years ago; you also repeatedly fail to mention the fact that Arabs have been the majority in historical Palestine for the most recent millennium.

As far as birthrates are concerned, it seems likely there will be millions of Jews and millions of Arabs living between the River and the sea for generations to come. Neither nation will be able to impose radical politics via the ballot box, and the IDF isn't likely to become an equal opportunity employer any time soon.

There's less than a snowball's chance in hell that an apartheid state will be tolerated in Palestine in place of a one or two-state solution, and maybe some Jews are going to have to learn they are simply not that special or go back where they came from.
 
"...You constantly rely on the Jew's recapture of 'their spiritual and ancestral homeland after so many centuries'..."
Indeed I do, George; not as a Legal argument, but as an Emotional argument; designed to portray the visceral, emotional investment of Judaism in the recapture of the Holy Land.

"...without once telling us why Jews alone, among all nations of the world, should be allowed to reconquer lands their ancestor's pillaged thousands of years ago..."
Actually, George, I've done just that, time and again, over time, but, my own response is:

The Jews ruled the Holy Land for more than a thousand years, before they lost it.

The West has given Israel a 'free pass' pertaining to the recapture of the Holy Land as a penance for perpetrating and allowing the Holocaust - a collective purging of guilt.

The Muslim-Arabs of Palestine are simply in-the-way.

It is not strictly Legal in all respects.

It is not strictly Fair in all respects.

But 'Fair' and 'Legal' have very little to do with emotion-laden Western Penance and Guilt-Purging, and the realizing of 1900-year-old Jewish dreams of re-taking their old Homeland.

It is, however, strictly speaking, Reality.

A Reality that is not going to change.

Unlike a great many of our pro-Israeli colleagues, I do not bother to fuss overly-much about International Law, which is only sporadically and inconsistently applied over the globe and across the decades.

I focus upon Reality, and whether that Reality is likely to change or not in the foreseeable future.

Personally, I do not see 'change' in that context, within our own lifetimes, or well beyond.

"...you also repeatedly fail to mention the fact that Arabs have been the majority in historical Palestine for the most recent millennium..."
I am fairly certain that I have addressed this elsewhere, repeatedly, over time, but, just for grins-and-giggles, here it is again, my own amateurish, pissant opinion on the subject...

I do not 'fail to mention' prior Arab ownership... as a matter of fact, I'm perfectly comfortable acknowledging it without bias or excuses.

I acknowledge that the Jews of Palestine - both Sabra and immigrants - were buying-up land left-and-right from the Arabs for decades - and that eventually the Arabs grew alarmed at the large increases in land that the Jews controlled and the (by then) visibly shrinking amount of land that the Arabs controlled, and, at that point, The Troubles began.

I also freely acknowledge that the Muslim-Arabs of Palestine fled in huge numbers, and were also ejected in fairly sizable numbers, from their lands, at the time of the 1948 Declaration of Israeli Statehood and Independence, and that once the Muslim-Arabs had abandoned their lands, and sided with the invading Arab-neighbor armies, that the Jews had all the excuse they needed, to seize those Muslim-Arab lands as spoils of war, with their ownership permanently transferred to the Jews.

I further freely acknowledge that the displaced Muslim-Arabs of Palestine were never allowed to return to those lands, because the Jews realized that, once blood had been spilled on a grand scale (as it was in 1948-1949, and beyond) that the Arabs could never be trusted again, to live amongst the Jews, on newly-seized Jewish lands, in peace.

I do not pretend that the seizure of land was 'legal' or 'fair', and I do not burden myself with complex exercises in the applicability of international law precept A or B or C, or matters of precedence and jurisdiction, or any of that.

I merely contend that the Jews took those lands away from the Muslim-Arabs of Palestine by force of arms and sustained and expanded upon them by acquiring other spoils of war through victory on the battlefield after Muslim-Arab neighbor-states had threatened or attacked the Jews, and that the Jews are never, ever going to give them back.

Vae victus.

Woe to the vanquished.

Although it's far less demanding, intellectually, and although I, too, enjoy a good rumble over the legalities and jurisdiction, etc. in connection with The Troubles from time to time, I don't burden myself with an over-reliance upon something that isn't fully operative within the domain of Reality, as it pertains to Israel, given The West and its multi-decade, multi-generational 'Mea Culpa' being extended to the Jews. Maybe The West will grow tired of it in another 50 or 100 years and stop cutting Israel so much slack, but, by then, the Israelis will probably have recaptured all of Eretz Yisrael and it won't matter any longer.

"...As far as birthrates are concerned, it seems likely there will be millions of Jews and millions of Arabs living between the River and the sea for generations to come..."
And that is where we differ. I see the West Bank and Gaza being flushed of Muslim-Arabs within the next 20 years; pushed across the borders into Jordan and Lebanon.

From the Israelis' vantage point, it's the only thing left to do, in the long run; I don't think there are any other answers that can be sustained over time.

And, yes, we've all been through the 'that will never be allowed' point and counterpointing before; some folks hold that the Muslims would never permit that; I perceive that the Muslims won't be able to stop it, and, in the end, are tired of shedding blood for the Palestinians; call it Donor Exhaustion; they want this over as much as most others do.

"...Neither nation will be able to impose radical politics via the ballot box, and the IDF isn't likely to become an equal opportunity employer any time soon..."
That is why the Arabs won't have a crack at the Israeli ballot box. They will be held outside the borders (literal and figurative) of Israel and never attain a common citizenship. It's not fair, but that's the way it's going to play out, I believe.

"...There's less than a snowball's chance in hell that an apartheid state will be tolerated in Palestine in place of a one or two-state solution, and maybe some Jews are going to have to learn they are simply not that special or go back where they came from."
There will be no need for an Apartheid State if the Muslim-Arabs of Palestine are expelled across the borders into Jordan and Lebanon.

With no large-scale population other than Jews-Israelis within the borders of Eretz Yisrael, the internal barrier-walls come down, and all traces of Separation Between Warring Internal Factions disappears - goodbye, misplaced charges of Apartheid.

That solves all of the Israelis major Internal Problems and Future Prospects for internal tranquility.

It cuts the Gordian Knot.

With only minimal risk and blowback if done piecemeal, and for very little long-term cost and much long-term advantage, in the final analysis.

A lot of folks think that's a prediction that is entirely full of shit, or crackpot at best, and serve-up protestations of 'genocide' or - at the very least - ethnic cleansing of a geographic area - with this last bit (cleansing) closer to the truth than many other descriptions.

Can't say as I blame 'em for either discounting the possibility, or playing the 'cleansing' card during the course of an argument, or hoping-against-hope that it won't come to that, for humanitarian reasons.

It IS radical, isn't it, and doesn't 'sit well' with a lot of good people of all political persuasions, but, in the long run, Expulsion is NOT Extermination, and can be softened by providing Wergeld (pay-off money) and logistics and humanitarian assistance to the very people that they are Expelling.

Unfortunately for the Muslim-Arab Palestinians of the West Bank and Gaza, when you get right down to where the bear shits in the woods - when you get right down to the bottom line - Expulsion and Annexation is the ONLY Trump Card that the Israelis CAN use, in order to WIN the poker game.

And there's far too much at-stake, from the Jewish perspective, to contemplate losing the game.

Or so it seems, to this observer.

I could be entirely full of shit with this prediction, but, I gotta tell ya the truth, I think it's going to come to that, and sooner than most folks would believe possible.

It's the only answer that completes the recapture of Eretz Yisrael and makes the Jewish State sustainable and defensible in a long-term multi-generational sense.
 
Last edited:
If a two-state solution in historical Palestine is dead, is it possible for Jew and Arab to live as equals between the River and the sea?

"On Thursday, Nov 14 the two chief negotiators of the Palestinian Authority handed their resignation from the talks with Israel, mediated by the US. Appointed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says the resignations do not affect the PA's commitment to this round which began in July and is scheduled to complete in April.

"But many on the ground see no hope in the negotiations, and have long ago turned to a different option.

"As Michel Warschawski, author of The Bi-National Challenge says 'treating this geographical space from the river to the sea as one unit does not necessitate treating the people who live here as a collection of individuals.'

"While the fruitless negotiations drudge, various proposals for alternative solutions grounded in equality from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea emerge on both sides of the West Bank segregation wall."

Israelis and Palestinians Turn to One-State Solution

Or are some Semites more equal than others?

The males on both sides are circumcised, so I see no problems with that idea.
 
That was certainly the opinion of some of Israel's founders:

"In his Complete Diaries, Vol. II. p. 711, Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism, says that the area of
the Jewish State stretches: 'From the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.'

"Rabbi Fischmann, member of the Jewish Agency for Palestine, declared in his testimony to the U.N.
Special Committee of Enquiry on 9 July 1947: 'The Promised Land extends from the River of Egypt up
to the Euphrates, it includes parts of Syria and Lebanon.'"

http://syria360.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/the-zionist-plan-for-the-middle-east.pdf

Before laughing yourself hoarse, consider the borders of the "New Middle East" with Iraq fractured into Sunni and Shia sub-states and Baghdad situated as a 21st century "city state", and ask if Israel joins NATO will it not rule from the Nile to the Euphrates?
 
No, quite impossible. Hundreds of millions of Arabs want to exterminate the Jews. The idea that Islamic fanatics could be trusted to live peacefully alongside Jewish neighbours deserves some sort of prize for scaling the summit of silliness.
Roughly equal numbers of Jews and Arabs currently live between the River and the sea. Why shouldn't each human being living there enjoy equal protection under the law?

'Law' is not just words on paper. It requires general acceptance and an authority willing - and powerful enough - to enforce it impartially. Their are very few Israelis stupid enough to think they would enjoy 'equal protection under the law' in any Islamic dominated system.

Israel will not sign its own death warrant. I know you really, really want it to but you are doomed to disappointment.
 
If a two-state solution in historical Palestine is dead, is it possible for Jew and Arab to live as equals between the River and the sea?

"On Thursday, Nov 14 the two chief negotiators of the Palestinian Authority handed their resignation from the talks with Israel, mediated by the US. Appointed Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says the resignations do not affect the PA's commitment to this round which began in July and is scheduled to complete in April.

"But many on the ground see no hope in the negotiations, and have long ago turned to a different option.

"As Michel Warschawski, author of The Bi-National Challenge says 'treating this geographical space from the river to the sea as one unit does not necessitate treating the people who live here as a collection of individuals.'

"While the fruitless negotiations drudge, various proposals for alternative solutions grounded in equality from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea emerge on both sides of the West Bank segregation wall."

Israelis and Palestinians Turn to One-State Solution

Or are some Semites more equal than others?

A Confederation might actually work.

I think it woud work. To the entire satisfaction of the Arabs - Israel destroyed and the Jews dead.
 
No, quite impossible. Hundreds of millions of Arabs want to exterminate the Jews. The idea that Islamic fanatics could be trusted to live peacefully alongside Jewish neighbours deserves some sort of prize for scaling the summit of silliness.
Roughly equal numbers of Jews and Arabs currently live between the River and the sea. Why shouldn't each human being living there enjoy equal protection under the law?

'Law' is not just words on paper. It requires general acceptance and an authority willing - and powerful enough - to enforce it impartially. Their are very few Israelis stupid enough to think they would enjoy 'equal protection under the law' in any Islamic dominated system.

Israel will not sign its own death warrant. I know you really, really want it to but you are doomed to disappointment.
There are currently about ten million Jews and Arabs living between the River and the sea with roughly equal numbers of voting age nationals. Why would you believe that free elections would result in an Islamic dominated system?"
 
15th post
Roughly equal numbers of Jews and Arabs currently live between the River and the sea. Why shouldn't each human being living there enjoy equal protection under the law?

'Law' is not just words on paper. It requires general acceptance and an authority willing - and powerful enough - to enforce it impartially. Their are very few Israelis stupid enough to think they would enjoy 'equal protection under the law' in any Islamic dominated system.

Israel will not sign its own death warrant. I know you really, really want it to but you are doomed to disappointment.
There are currently about ten million Jews and Arabs living between the River and the sea with roughly equal numbers of voting age nationals. Why would you believe that free elections would result in an Islamic dominated system?"

Don't forget the Christians. They hold an extraordinary influence in Palestine and very few Muslims are fanatics.

I don't see an Islamic state in the making.
 
'Law' is not just words on paper. It requires general acceptance and an authority willing - and powerful enough - to enforce it impartially. Their are very few Israelis stupid enough to think they would enjoy 'equal protection under the law' in any Islamic dominated system.

Israel will not sign its own death warrant. I know you really, really want it to but you are doomed to disappointment.
There are currently about ten million Jews and Arabs living between the River and the sea with roughly equal numbers of voting age nationals. Why would you believe that free elections would result in an Islamic dominated system?"

Don't forget the Christians. They hold an extraordinary influence in Palestine and very few Muslims are fanatics.

I don't see an Islamic state in the making.
I don't see one either in Palestine; however, the borders of the New Middle East that are currently being redrawn by the US and NATO speculate on expanding Israel/Palestine's northern border as far as Lebanon's Litani river; I'm not sure how Hezbollah will feel about that?
 
Roughly equal numbers of Jews and Arabs currently live between the River and the sea. Why shouldn't each human being living there enjoy equal protection under the law?

'Law' is not just words on paper. It requires general acceptance and an authority willing - and powerful enough - to enforce it impartially. Their are very few Israelis stupid enough to think they would enjoy 'equal protection under the law' in any Islamic dominated system.

Israel will not sign its own death warrant. I know you really, really want it to but you are doomed to disappointment.
There are currently about ten million Jews and Arabs living between the River and the sea with roughly equal numbers of voting age nationals. Why would you believe that free elections would result in an Islamic dominated system?"

Because the Israelis would vote for many different parties, as they always do. While the 'Palestinians' - or those among them reluctant to have their throats cut - would vote for Hamas. And within hours of the formation of the 'Confederation' Islamists would pour in weapons and 'fighters' to help the rights confederates murder the wrong confederates.

We both know this would happen. The difference is that I don't want it to, and you do.
 
'Law' is not just words on paper. It requires general acceptance and an authority willing - and powerful enough - to enforce it impartially. Their are very few Israelis stupid enough to think they would enjoy 'equal protection under the law' in any Islamic dominated system.

Israel will not sign its own death warrant. I know you really, really want it to but you are doomed to disappointment.
There are currently about ten million Jews and Arabs living between the River and the sea with roughly equal numbers of voting age nationals. Why would you believe that free elections would result in an Islamic dominated system?"

Because the Israelis would vote for many different parties, as they always do. While the 'Palestinians' - or those among them reluctant to have their throats cut - would vote for Hamas. And within hours of the formation of the 'Confederation' Islamists would pour in weapons and 'fighters' to help the rights confederates murder the wrong confederates.

We both know this would happen. The difference is that I don't want it to, and you do.
How do you imagine the IDF would respond to Islamist terror during the first hours of a Semitic Confederation in Israel/Palestine?

You seem to think the status quo should continue in Palestine; I don't.
 
Back
Top Bottom