AlexandrosTsolis
Senior Member
- Feb 1, 2022
- 248
- 19
- 46
Hi all,
What is this thread about?
when most are not having fun because of some, they don't waste time and effort with the amount of money some have, as
the amount of money people would invest on some for not being fun to them is zero, and
that is the money that someone makes next, from the rest ones no?
Why is it written this way?
When people work unproductively, people spend more time and effort to do, whatever they do, than when they work productively.
How do you say it then?
The human senses ,or the way that humans make sense of the world around them is one that works in a fun way for humans...or else it is one that works in a not fun way for humans...and then those humans don't know how to have fun and make sense of reality in a funny way.
Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.
Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?
Nah, we don't understand, we think it is nonsense, and yet we want to spend time and effort to reply to your nonsense on your thread, as if you are not telling us to not waste our time and effort with nonsense on the internet.
Two cases with the same amount of money, but different amounts of time and effort have to be spend.
Imagine first that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, using money to do it.
Imagine now that you are doing the same something, from its beginning to its end, using the same amount of money to do it, the only difference now than first is that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
In which of the two cases does the usage of money make more sense, regardless of what it is that you are doing?
For example,
imagine that you buy the same daily used product for the same price, but in one case that you have to travel further to do so.
Two cases where more money leads to less time and effort spend.
Imagine first that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, using money to do it.
Imagine now that you are doing the same something, from its beginning to its end, using more money to do it, and also a difference now than first is that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
In which of the two cases does the usage of money make more sense, regardless of what it is that you are doing?
For example,
imagine that you buy the same product to be delivered to you, but in one case that you spend more money for faster delivery.
Two cases where less money leads to less time and effort spend.
Imagine first that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, using money to do it.
Imagine now that you are doing the same something, from its beginning to its end, using less money to do it, and also another difference now than first is that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
In which of the two cases does the usage of money make more sense, regardless of what it is that you are doing?
For example,
imagine that you buy the same service in theory compared to another, but in practice one costs you less than the other, and that also the other takes you more time and effort to enjoy.
Two cases where money leads to more time and effort spend, than no money
First imagine that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, using money to do it.
Imagine now that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, without using money to do it, and also another difference now than first is that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
In which of the two cases does the usage of money make more sense, regardless of what it is that you are doing?
For example,
Imagine that you invest in a venture which in the end produces the opposite results than what you thought it approximately would, and now you have to spend more time and effort to deal with that, compared to you not doing that.
Two cases where money leads to less time and effort spend, than no money
First imagine that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, without using money to do it.
Then imagine that you are doing something from its beginning to its end, using money to do it, and also another difference now than first it that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
For example,
Imagine two human societies with large populations, one using money and one not using money for any case.
www.facebook.com
What is this thread about?
when most are not having fun because of some, they don't waste time and effort with the amount of money some have, as
the amount of money people would invest on some for not being fun to them is zero, and
that is the money that someone makes next, from the rest ones no?
Why is it written this way?
When people work unproductively, people spend more time and effort to do, whatever they do, than when they work productively.
How do you say it then?
The human senses ,or the way that humans make sense of the world around them is one that works in a fun way for humans...or else it is one that works in a not fun way for humans...and then those humans don't know how to have fun and make sense of reality in a funny way.
Imagine you do the same thing with the same amount of money twice from its beginning until its end , but one of the times that it takes you more time and effort.
Would you choose again and again to do it when it takes you more time and effort to do it with the same amount of money, doing the same thing?
Nah, we don't understand, we think it is nonsense, and yet we want to spend time and effort to reply to your nonsense on your thread, as if you are not telling us to not waste our time and effort with nonsense on the internet.
Two cases with the same amount of money, but different amounts of time and effort have to be spend.
Imagine first that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, using money to do it.
Imagine now that you are doing the same something, from its beginning to its end, using the same amount of money to do it, the only difference now than first is that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
In which of the two cases does the usage of money make more sense, regardless of what it is that you are doing?
For example,
imagine that you buy the same daily used product for the same price, but in one case that you have to travel further to do so.
Two cases where more money leads to less time and effort spend.
Imagine first that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, using money to do it.
Imagine now that you are doing the same something, from its beginning to its end, using more money to do it, and also a difference now than first is that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
In which of the two cases does the usage of money make more sense, regardless of what it is that you are doing?
For example,
imagine that you buy the same product to be delivered to you, but in one case that you spend more money for faster delivery.
Two cases where less money leads to less time and effort spend.
Imagine first that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, using money to do it.
Imagine now that you are doing the same something, from its beginning to its end, using less money to do it, and also another difference now than first is that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
In which of the two cases does the usage of money make more sense, regardless of what it is that you are doing?
For example,
imagine that you buy the same service in theory compared to another, but in practice one costs you less than the other, and that also the other takes you more time and effort to enjoy.
Two cases where money leads to more time and effort spend, than no money
First imagine that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, using money to do it.
Imagine now that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, without using money to do it, and also another difference now than first is that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
In which of the two cases does the usage of money make more sense, regardless of what it is that you are doing?
For example,
Imagine that you invest in a venture which in the end produces the opposite results than what you thought it approximately would, and now you have to spend more time and effort to deal with that, compared to you not doing that.
Two cases where money leads to less time and effort spend, than no money
First imagine that you are doing something, from its beginning to its end, without using money to do it.
Then imagine that you are doing something from its beginning to its end, using money to do it, and also another difference now than first it that now you have to spend less time and effort to do it.
For example,
Imagine two human societies with large populations, one using money and one not using money for any case.
Here's what the problem with money is.
Here's what the problem with money is. 34,366 likes · 1 talking about this. Money reduces the time and effort to trade… Or we are stuck with idiots wasting our time and effort, with their endless...
www.facebook.com
