Twitter, USMB & Facebook: Free Speech Under Fire

Two Thumbs' ideology says it is about freedom, but it is only freedom for the top.
Two Thumbs shows MORE smarts in one sentence then you do in one month.
Since you are the stupidest of us three, you do Two Thumbs no favor. :lol:

I believe the point is that you would create a fenced boundary for political and cultural speech and would punish those who would try to cut through it.
Just WHY have you said NOTHING about islamic terrorist rape?
Do YOU support it?
Why are democrats so silent on this?
Do they support it?
And now, you are engaged in "you must talk like me."

Do you think all rape is wrong? I do.

Why don't you?

We dealt with KKK terrorist rape, and we will deal with jihadist rape if it happens here.

And the system seems to working overseas in Europe. Or is not?
"If it happens here"? Try islamic cab drivers/New York/Rapes
"Europe working"Try islamic rapes/Germany".

So NO its NOT working.

 
What? That rape occurs in America? Of course it does. Are we not dealing with?
 
Two Thumbs' ideology says it is about freedom, but it is only freedom for the top.
So in your delusional skull void, you think I want free speech for our pols. and not free speech for everyone gaddamn your fucking ignorant, it baffles the mind to consider just how dumb you are and can still remember to breath.
No, those are your words. Not mine. You libertarians talk about freedom, but it will only be for those in power. Just like the USSR.
 
Two Thumbs' ideology says it is about freedom, but it is only freedom for the top.
Two Thumbs shows MORE smarts in one sentence then you do in one month.
Since you are the stupidest of us three, you do Two Thumbs no favor. :lol:

I believe the point is that you would create a fenced boundary for political and cultural speech and would punish those who would try to cut through it.
uhm, no.

germany is a socialist (leftist) country with a power government that turned water cannons on people protesting the rapes.

it's filth like you that supports the rapist by shutting down free speech
 
Two Thumbs' ideology says it is about freedom, but it is only freedom for the top.
So in your delusional skull void, you think I want free speech for our pols. and not free speech for everyone gaddamn your fucking ignorant, it baffles the mind to consider just how dumb you are and can still remember to breath.
No, those are your words. Not mine. You libertarians talk about freedom, but it will only be for those in power. Just like the USSR.
your the usmb equivalent of a child whose best arguments are;

nuhuh
I know you are but what am I?
I'm rubber and your glue...
 
Two Thumbs' ideology says it is about freedom, but it is only freedom for the top.
Two Thumbs shows MORE smarts in one sentence then you do in one month.
Since you are the stupidest of us three, you do Two Thumbs no favor. :lol:

I believe the point is that you would create a fenced boundary for political and cultural speech and would punish those who would try to cut through it.
uhm, no.

germany is a socialist (leftist) country with a power government that turned water cannons on people protesting the rapes.

it's filth like you that supports the rapist by shutting down free speech
Free speech does not include burning the city down or beating up cops or lying people you don't like.

Your type found that out in the South when the feds stepped in during the sixties.
 
Two Thumbs' ideology says it is about freedom, but it is only freedom for the top.
Two Thumbs shows MORE smarts in one sentence then you do in one month.
Since you are the stupidest of us three, you do Two Thumbs no favor. :lol:

I believe the point is that you would create a fenced boundary for political and cultural speech and would punish those who would try to cut through it.
uhm, no.

germany is a socialist (leftist) country with a power government that turned water cannons on people protesting the rapes.

it's filth like you that supports the rapist by shutting down free speech
Free speech does not include burning the city down or beating up cops or lying people you don't like.

Your type found that out in the South when the feds stepped in during the sixties.
free speech does cover lying, you again show how fucking ignorant you are.

you supported the riots

you support all that is wrong in the world
 
Two Thumbs' ideology says it is about freedom, but it is only freedom for the top.
Two Thumbs shows MORE smarts in one sentence then you do in one month.
Since you are the stupidest of us three, you do Two Thumbs no favor. :lol:

I believe the point is that you would create a fenced boundary for political and cultural speech and would punish those who would try to cut through it.
uhm, no.

germany is a socialist (leftist) country with a power government that turned water cannons on people protesting the rapes.

it's filth like you that supports the rapist by shutting down free speech
Free speech does not include burning the city down or beating up cops or lying people you don't like.

Your type found that out in the South when the feds stepped in during the sixties.
free speech does cover lying, you again show how fucking ignorant you are. you supported the riots you support all that is wrong in the world
I am talking about suppressing violence as you well know. Only you are talking about lying, which makes some sense. And lying should be outed and condemned.
 
Two Thumbs shows MORE smarts in one sentence then you do in one month.
Since you are the stupidest of us three, you do Two Thumbs no favor. :lol:

I believe the point is that you would create a fenced boundary for political and cultural speech and would punish those who would try to cut through it.
uhm, no.

germany is a socialist (leftist) country with a power government that turned water cannons on people protesting the rapes.

it's filth like you that supports the rapist by shutting down free speech
Free speech does not include burning the city down or beating up cops or lying people you don't like.

Your type found that out in the South when the feds stepped in during the sixties.
free speech does cover lying, you again show how fucking ignorant you are. you supported the riots you support all that is wrong in the world
I am talking about suppressing violence as you well know. Only you are talking about lying, which makes some sense. And lying should be outed and condemned.
:lol:

the irony

I'm not a libertarian and I'm not from the South.
 
Its a wonder to watch those like "Fake Jake" say anything in regards to freedom of speech when he was one of the VERY people who attacked the OP-ED section last week because he did NOT like a certain persons conservative slant.

The Simple fact is conservatives ARE winning the board not only here but nation wide. And in some cases like immigration global.
The OP-ED section WILL become hotter over the next few months as liberals CANNOT take it and we conservatives are NOT giving it up.

Oh and one more suggestion for you liberals who cannot stand a conservative OP-ED. Eat sh8t and die.
 
The neo-stasi are even in the police. And the male police are just dolts so they go along with these psycho commie, proxy rapist women.
 
There is a bit more heat than light generated on here. Free speech has always been exercised within certain boundaries that most of us would find reasonable. And also certain boundaries that most of us would find unreasonable.

For example that what is being said is truthful and can be backed up by facts.I dont think that anyone would find that unreasonable.

Personally I am struggling to think of an era where here was a greater level of free speech than there is today. Perhaps somebody could help me out ?
 
There is a bit more heat than light generated on here. Free speech has always been exercised within certain boundaries that most of us would find reasonable. And also certain boundaries that most of us would find unreasonable.

For example that what is being said is truthful and can be backed up by facts.I dont think that anyone would find that unreasonable.

Personally I am struggling to think of an era where here was a greater level of free speech than there is today. Perhaps somebody could help me out ?
a little over 7 years ago

then the year before the first pc nonsense started.


search for Founder era papers to see what pols said about each other.

hell, Lincoln got challenged to a duel for what he said about a man.
 
I doubt there was much free speech during Lincolns era. Certainly not for women who were not entited to vote. I think Gays had to keep their heads down as well.
 

Forum List

Back
Top