Twitter locks out Trump

[HappyJoy]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

I guess you missed the seige of the Capitol building today. No one likes censorship but someone died today because of Trump and who knows how much in property damage was done to our Capitol building because of Trump’s incitement to riot.

First of all, jackass, the First Amendment does not apply to private property, and Twitter is private property. The word censorship is a red herring. Second, what Trump said does not constitute incitement to riot. He did not encourage any violence. It is moronic to blame Donald Trump because someone shot someone at the demonstration. That would never fly in court. John Law is a silly name for someone who does not know jackshit about law.

Twitter is a government protected monopoly. As such, it's required to observe all the rules that the government is required to observe.

How is twitter a monopoly? And no, twitter is allowed to ban people from it's platform that it feels does not follow it's TOS. Trump agreed to that when he signed on.

 

[HappyJoy]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.

They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.

Should, but wont.

But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER

Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.

I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.

Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,


suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.

Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.

I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.

When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?

Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.

I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.

Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.

Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.

El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)

If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.

www.nytimes.com

Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.

Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.

Meets the definition.

That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.


Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?

I'm not interesting and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.

Destroyed property? They broke one window. Who are you trying to kid?

Your ilk defended rioters in SEattle and Portland who burned down the entire downtown, looted all the stores, asaulted people and even committed murder. You're scumbags who have to right to comment on this. None.

They broke multiple windows, doors, trashed offices, stole government property, cracked a cops head with a fire extinguisher and killed him, injured multiple others, brought handcuffs and nooses and obstructed the business of Congress in the process of peacefully transferring power.

Basically they tried to overturn an election and lost and Trump saving his own skin called them and their actions heinous and not representing America.

Sorry turd, but no cops were killed. The protesters may have broken a few doors. "trashed offices" means they left some empty water bottles laying around. The cops are the only ones who injured anyone. They killed 4 people. They killed an unarmed white woman.

Only a douchebag would defend the behavior of the D.C. cops. Watching you hypocrites screech about this would be positively comical if it wasn't so tragic and scary.

No cops were killed?

Capitol Police Officer Dies From Injuries in Pro-Trump Rampage (Published 2021)

The death of the officer, Brian D. Sicknick, appeared likely to lead to calls for profound changes to the Capitol Police, a centuries-old force.

www.nytimes.com

First it was a single door, now it's "a few". What the insurrections did is destroy the barriers protecting Congress from a rabid cult. They rifled through offices, throwing folders and papers everywhere. The cops only killed 1, the others died of medical issues, probably overweight slobs like you.

And Trump basically called them un-American and their actions heinous after the fact. What do you think about Trump throwing them under the bus?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

What the insurrections did is destroy the barriers protecting Congress from a rabid cult

Antifa

 

[HappyJoy]

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps. His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

Can't beat the message, so you have to try to gag the messenger, eh, Slaw? That's how Red China, North Korea and Russia suppress THEIR political dissidents who oppose and try to expose their heinous autocratic power.

Doesn't surprise me at all you'd be 100% FOR that.

Here in America people have the RIGHT to free speech. The BACKBONE of this country is PROTECTION of unpopular opinions, even if they are only unpopular with thugs like you. I can just imagine how you'd be screaming if Trump were censoring Biden, Nancy and blocking them from speaking out! Your gestapo tactics won't work. You manufactured this mess. You've wrecked this country for pure craven political power. You're just making the bear angrier and angrier and he is coming to eat you.

You can't win. America will not stand by while you Marxists try to hide what you are doing.

Trump still has his first amendment rights fully intact. I believe yesterday he tried to exercise that right and may have gone a little too far. I don't blame twitter for not wanting to be forced to carry his propaganda.

EDIT: Does anyone else find he thumbs down to be kind of weak?

Twitter should be disbanded. It's a Stalinist propaganda organ.

Sure, it's totally normal for someone from the alleged pro-business party to want to regulate a company to not follow it's own TOS that Trump agreed to.

We already regulate it, turd. It's a government protected monopoly.

You keep saying that. Twitter owns only twitter there are other social media vehicles. They are by definition not a monopoly. Trump was legally banned from the platform but rest assured after he called the insurrectionists un-American and committed heinous acts he's back in. What do you think of Trump throwing the freedumb fighters under the bus?

 

[HappyJoy]

What the insurrections did is destroy the barriers protecting Congress from a rabid cult

Antifa

Then you're an antifa fan, ok. Or are you now disapproving of the invasion?

 

[TheParser]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

View attachment 438345

Just read that Twitter's stock has dipped a bit because a lot of Trump supporters are boycotting it now. (Yea!)

On the other hand, the article said that Facebook's stock has gone up following its ban of President Trump. (Darn it!)

Why would it go up?

Darn if I know!

 

[HappyJoy]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

View attachment 438345

Just read that Twitter's stock has dipped a bit because a lot of Trump supporters are boycotting it now. (Yea!)

On the other hand, the article said that Facebook's stock has gone up following its ban of President Trump. (Darn it!)

Why would it go up?

Darn if I know!

Perhaps Trump's involvement with twitter is irrelevant since Trump's interaction with twitter is miniscule compared to the overall usage. There are 500 million tweets sent per day, the stock price doesn't hinge on Trump's tweets

 

[TheParser]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

View attachment 438345

Just read that Twitter's stock has dipped a bit because a lot of Trump supporters are boycotting it now. (Yea!)

On the other hand, the article said that Facebook's stock has gone up following its ban of President Trump. (Darn it!)

Why would it go up?

Darn if I know!

Perhaps Trump's involvement with twitter is irrelevant since Trump's interaction with twitter is miniscule compared to the overall usage. There are 500 million tweets sent per day, the stock price doesn't hinge on Trump's tweets

The article said Twitter's stock was apparently negatively affected by a boycott of Trump supporters.

But someone wanted to know why Facebook's stock went up even though it was also banning the President. Darn if I know.


Have a nice weekend!

 

[HappyJoy]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

View attachment 438345

Just read that Twitter's stock has dipped a bit because a lot of Trump supporters are boycotting it now. (Yea!)

On the other hand, the article said that Facebook's stock has gone up following its ban of President Trump. (Darn it!)

Why would it go up?

Darn if I know!

Perhaps Trump's involvement with twitter is irrelevant since Trump's interaction with twitter is miniscule compared to the overall usage. There are 500 million tweets sent per day, the stock price doesn't hinge on Trump's tweets

The article said Twitter's stock was apparently negatively affected by a boycott of Trump supporters.

But someone wanted to know why Facebook's stock went up even though it was also banning the President. Darn if I know.


Have a nice weekend!

Hey, maybe the article is wrong.

 

[bripat9643]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

I guess you missed the seige of the Capitol building today. No one likes censorship but someone died today because of Trump and who knows how much in property damage was done to our Capitol building because of Trump’s incitement to riot.

First of all, jackass, the First Amendment does not apply to private property, and Twitter is private property. The word censorship is a red herring. Second, what Trump said does not constitute incitement to riot. He did not encourage any violence. It is moronic to blame Donald Trump because someone shot someone at the demonstration. That would never fly in court. John Law is a silly name for someone who does not know jackshit about law.

Twitter is a government protected monopoly. As such, it's required to observe all the rules that the government is required to observe.

How is twitter a monopoly? And no, twitter is allowed to ban people from it's platform that it feels does not follow it's TOS. Trump agreed to that when he signed on.

ROFL! That doesn't mean Trump gave government approvat to Twitter's monopoly, moron. that doesn't mean Twitter is legally allowed to censor opinions it doesn't agree with.

According to the DOJ, simply having a certain percentage of a market makes a company guilty of violating the Sherman anti trust act. That's why they prosecuted Alcoa Aluminum. That's also why they prosecuted Standard Oil.

Twitter is a government protected monopoly. If it recieves government protection from lawsuits, then it's obligated to follow all the rules that government has to follow. That's the way it works for government contractors, moron.

You're just a clueless moron who will say anything to preserve your propaganda organ.

 

[bripat9643]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

View attachment 438345

Just read that Twitter's stock has dipped a bit because a lot of Trump supporters are boycotting it now. (Yea!)

On the other hand, the article said that Facebook's stock has gone up following its ban of President Trump. (Darn it!)

Why would it go up?

Darn if I know!

Perhaps Trump's involvement with twitter is irrelevant since Trump's interaction with twitter is miniscule compared to the overall usage. There are 500 million tweets sent per day, the stock price doesn't hinge on Trump's tweets

It certainly does hinge on the tweets of his followers, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps. His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

Can't beat the message, so you have to try to gag the messenger, eh, Slaw? That's how Red China, North Korea and Russia suppress THEIR political dissidents who oppose and try to expose their heinous autocratic power.

Doesn't surprise me at all you'd be 100% FOR that.

Here in America people have the RIGHT to free speech. The BACKBONE of this country is PROTECTION of unpopular opinions, even if they are only unpopular with thugs like you. I can just imagine how you'd be screaming if Trump were censoring Biden, Nancy and blocking them from speaking out! Your gestapo tactics won't work. You manufactured this mess. You've wrecked this country for pure craven political power. You're just making the bear angrier and angrier and he is coming to eat you.

You can't win. America will not stand by while you Marxists try to hide what you are doing.

Trump still has his first amendment rights fully intact. I believe yesterday he tried to exercise that right and may have gone a little too far. I don't blame twitter for not wanting to be forced to carry his propaganda.

EDIT: Does anyone else find he thumbs down to be kind of weak?

Twitter should be disbanded. It's a Stalinist propaganda organ.

Sure, it's totally normal for someone from the alleged pro-business party to want to regulate a company to not follow it's own TOS that Trump agreed to.

We already regulate it, turd. It's a government protected monopoly.

You keep saying that. Twitter owns only twitter there are other social media vehicles. They are by definition not a monopoly. Trump was legally banned from the platform but rest assured after he called the insurrectionists un-American and committed heinous acts he's back in. What do you think of Trump throwing the freedumb fighters under the bus?

According to the DOJ, they are a monopoly, moron.

 

[HappyJoy]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

I guess you missed the seige of the Capitol building today. No one likes censorship but someone died today because of Trump and who knows how much in property damage was done to our Capitol building because of Trump’s incitement to riot.

First of all, jackass, the First Amendment does not apply to private property, and Twitter is private property. The word censorship is a red herring. Second, what Trump said does not constitute incitement to riot. He did not encourage any violence. It is moronic to blame Donald Trump because someone shot someone at the demonstration. That would never fly in court. John Law is a silly name for someone who does not know jackshit about law.

Twitter is a government protected monopoly. As such, it's required to observe all the rules that the government is required to observe.

How is twitter a monopoly? And no, twitter is allowed to ban people from it's platform that it feels does not follow it's TOS. Trump agreed to that when he signed on.

ROFL! That doesn't mean Trump gave government approvat to Twitter's monopoly, moron. that doesn't mean Twitter is legally allowed to censor opinions it doesn't agree with.

You keep using that word.

In order to post on twitter you have to agree to their TOS. Twitter has the right to ban your ass if twitter feels you have broken their TOS as twitter defines them. I'm sorry you poor dumb idiot but twitter is not a democracy. Just like Burger King can make you wear a mask just as much as enforcing the no shirt, no shoes policy. Now if say twitter banned someone for their race well in that case there are laws in place to prevent that but you'll confuse it all and mix it up in your head and in the end you end up with a whiny snot nosed tub-o-lard fascist. Am I right Col. Klink?

According to the DOJ, simply having a certain percentage of a market makes a company guilty of violating the Sherman anti trust act. That's why they prosecuted Alcoa Aluminum. That's also why they prosecuted Standard Oil.

Certain market of what? Social media? You've got facebook, instagram, youtube, google, parlor, wikipedia, vimeo, Link'd-In and probably hundreds of others. Twitter has never been designated as a monopoly and you still haven't really stated why that would matter anyway.

Twitter is a government protected monopoly. If it recieves government protection from lawsuits, then it's obligated to follow all the rules that government has to follow. That's the way it works for government contractors, moron.

You need a link, like real bad right now. I don't know of any government rules that do not allow twitter to follow it's own TOS. So, post it.

You're just a clueless moron who will say anything to preserve your propaganda organ.

 

[bripat9643]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.

They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.

Should, but wont.

But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER

Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.

I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.

Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,


suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.

Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.

I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.

When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?

Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.

I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.

Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.

Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.

El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)

If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.

www.nytimes.com

Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.

Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.

Meets the definition.

That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.


Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?

I'm not interesting and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.

Destroyed property? They broke one window. Who are you trying to kid?

Your ilk defended rioters in SEattle and Portland who burned down the entire downtown, looted all the stores, asaulted people and even committed murder. You're scumbags who have to right to comment on this. None.

They broke multiple windows, doors, trashed offices, stole government property, cracked a cops head with a fire extinguisher and killed him, injured multiple others, brought handcuffs and nooses and obstructed the business of Congress in the process of peacefully transferring power.

Basically they tried to overturn an election and lost and Trump saving his own skin called them and their actions heinous and not representing America.

Sorry turd, but no cops were killed. The protesters may have broken a few doors. "trashed offices" means they left some empty water bottles laying around. The cops are the only ones who injured anyone. They killed 4 people. They killed an unarmed white woman.

Only a douchebag would defend the behavior of the D.C. cops. Watching you hypocrites screech about this would be positively comical if it wasn't so tragic and scary.

No cops were killed?

Capitol Police Officer Dies From Injuries in Pro-Trump Rampage (Published 2021)

The death of the officer, Brian D. Sicknick, appeared likely to lead to calls for profound changes to the Capitol Police, a centuries-old force.

www.nytimes.com

First it was a single door, now it's "a few". What the insurrections did is destroy the barriers protecting Congress from a rabid cult. They rifled through offices, throwing folders and papers everywhere. The cops only killed 1, the others died of medical issues, probably overweight slobs like you.

And Trump basically called them un-American and their actions heinous after the fact. What do you think about Trump throwing them under the bus?

That was reported 9:17 AM this morning, asshole, and it's not clear that any of the protesters were responsible.

It was a largely peaceful prostest, so why are you getting your panties in a wad?

 

[bripat9643]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

I guess you missed the seige of the Capitol building today. No one likes censorship but someone died today because of Trump and who knows how much in property damage was done to our Capitol building because of Trump’s incitement to riot.

First of all, jackass, the First Amendment does not apply to private property, and Twitter is private property. The word censorship is a red herring. Second, what Trump said does not constitute incitement to riot. He did not encourage any violence. It is moronic to blame Donald Trump because someone shot someone at the demonstration. That would never fly in court. John Law is a silly name for someone who does not know jackshit about law.

Twitter is a government protected monopoly. As such, it's required to observe all the rules that the government is required to observe.

How is twitter a monopoly? And no, twitter is allowed to ban people from it's platform that it feels does not follow it's TOS. Trump agreed to that when he signed on.

ROFL! That doesn't mean Trump gave government approvat to Twitter's monopoly, moron. that doesn't mean Twitter is legally allowed to censor opinions it doesn't agree with.

You keep using that word.

In order to post on twitter you have to agree to their TOS. Twitter has the right to ban your ass if twitter feels you have broken their TOS as twitter defines them. I'm sorry you poor dumb idiot but twitter is not a democracy. Just like Burger King can make you wear a mask just as much as enforcing the no shirt, no shoes policy. Now if say twitter banned someone for their race well in that case there are laws in place to prevent that but you'll confuse it all and mix it up in your head and in the end you end up with a whiny snot nosed tub-o-lard fascist. Am I right Col. Klink?

According to the DOJ, simply having a certain percentage of a market makes a company guilty of violating the Sherman anti trust act. That's why they prosecuted Alcoa Aluminum. That's also why they prosecuted Standard Oil.

Certain market of what? Social media? You've got facebook, instagram, youtube, google, parlor, wikipedia, vimeo, Link'd-In and probably hundreds of others. Twitter has never been designated as a monopoly and you still haven't really stated why that would matter anyway.

Twitter is a government protected monopoly. If it recieves government protection from lawsuits, then it's obligated to follow all the rules that government has to follow. That's the way it works for government contractors, moron.

You need a link, like real bad right now. I don't know of any government rules that do not allow twitter to follow it's own TOS. So, post it.

You're just a clueless moron who will say anything to preserve your propaganda organ.

Quit wasting my time, moron. Twitter is a government protected monopoly.

Case closed.

 

[bripat9643]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.

They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.

Should, but wont.

But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER

Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.

I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.

Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,


suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.

Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.

I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.

When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?

Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.

I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.

Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.

Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.

El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)

If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.

www.nytimes.com

Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.

Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.

Meets the definition.

That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.


Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?

I'm not interesting and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.

Yep. Supposedly, that's what Trump wants as well.

Sure he does. I think Trump wants whatever is best for Trump, he doesn't really care one way or the other for the insurrectionists, they were nothing more than a last attempt gambit, tools to help him steal the election and when they became inconvenient he dropped them.

I find these diatrabs about Trump so boring and worthless. Your theories about Trump are utterly baseless

Yeah, they're tied to his his own words, so probably baseless. If you're bored (or don't have a proper reply) then feel free to stop engaging, idiot. Nobody is forcing you to read my posts.

What words did Trump use that incited anyone to riot?

 

[bripat9643]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

I guess you missed the seige of the Capitol building today. No one likes censorship but someone died today because of Trump and who knows how much in property damage was done to our Capitol building because of Trump’s incitement to riot.

First of all, jackass, the First Amendment does not apply to private property, and Twitter is private property. The word censorship is a red herring. Second, what Trump said does not constitute incitement to riot. He did not encourage any violence. It is moronic to blame Donald Trump because someone shot someone at the demonstration. That would never fly in court. John Law is a silly name for someone who does not know jackshit about law.

Twitter is a government protected monopoly. As such, it's required to observe all the rules that the government is required to observe.

How is twitter a monopoly? And no, twitter is allowed to ban people from it's platform that it feels does not follow it's TOS. Trump agreed to that when he signed on.

Twitter controls over 90% of the market for it's segment, dumbass. According to the DOJ, that makes it a monopoly.

Trump did not agree that twitter can ban whoever it likes, idiot.

 

[HappyJoy]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.

They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.

Should, but wont.

But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER

Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.

I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.

Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,


suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.

Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.

I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.

When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?

Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.

I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.

Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.

Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.

El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)

If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.

www.nytimes.com

Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.

Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.

Meets the definition.

That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.


Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?

I'm not interesting and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.

Destroyed property? They broke one window. Who are you trying to kid?

Your ilk defended rioters in SEattle and Portland who burned down the entire downtown, looted all the stores, asaulted people and even committed murder. You're scumbags who have to right to comment on this. None.

They broke multiple windows, doors, trashed offices, stole government property, cracked a cops head with a fire extinguisher and killed him, injured multiple others, brought handcuffs and nooses and obstructed the business of Congress in the process of peacefully transferring power.

Basically they tried to overturn an election and lost and Trump saving his own skin called them and their actions heinous and not representing America.

Sorry turd, but no cops were killed. The protesters may have broken a few doors. "trashed offices" means they left some empty water bottles laying around. The cops are the only ones who injured anyone. They killed 4 people. They killed an unarmed white woman.

Only a douchebag would defend the behavior of the D.C. cops. Watching you hypocrites screech about this would be positively comical if it wasn't so tragic and scary.

No cops were killed?

Capitol Police Officer Dies From Injuries in Pro-Trump Rampage (Published 2021)

The death of the officer, Brian D. Sicknick, appeared likely to lead to calls for profound changes to the Capitol Police, a centuries-old force.

www.nytimes.com

First it was a single door, now it's "a few". What the insurrections did is destroy the barriers protecting Congress from a rabid cult. They rifled through offices, throwing folders and papers everywhere. The cops only killed 1, the others died of medical issues, probably overweight slobs like you.

And Trump basically called them un-American and their actions heinous after the fact. What do you think about Trump throwing them under the bus?

That was reported 9:17 AM this morning, asshole, and it's not clear that any of the protesters were responsible.

It was a largely peaceful prostest, so why are you getting your panties in a wad?

You previously blamed 4 deaths on police that they weren't responsible for them.

The very first sentence from the article:

A United States Capitol Police officer died on Thursday night from injuries sustained “while physically engaging” with pro-Trump rioters who descended on the U.S. Capitol.

The last sentence

The circumstances surrounding Mr. Sicknick's death were not immediately clear, and the Capitol Police said only that he had “passed away due to injuries sustained while on duty.” At some point in the chaos — with the mob rampaging through the halls of Congress while lawmakers were forced to hide under their desks — he was struck with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials.

Ouch. Wouldn't have happened if the 'heinous' crowd (Trump's word) didn't commit a crime by breaking into the capital.

Again, what are your thoughts on Trump calling the crowd's actions heinous and them un-American?

 

[HappyJoy]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.

They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.

Should, but wont.

But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER

Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.

I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.

Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,


suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.

Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.

I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.

When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?

Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.

I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.

Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.

Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.

El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)

If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.

www.nytimes.com

Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.

Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.

Meets the definition.

That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.


Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?

I'm not interesting and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.

Yep. Supposedly, that's what Trump wants as well.

Sure he does. I think Trump wants whatever is best for Trump, he doesn't really care one way or the other for the insurrectionists, they were nothing more than a last attempt gambit, tools to help him steal the election and when they became inconvenient he dropped them.

I find these diatrabs about Trump so boring and worthless. Your theories about Trump are utterly baseless

Yeah, they're tied to his his own words, so probably baseless. If you're bored (or don't have a proper reply) then feel free to stop engaging, idiot. Nobody is forcing you to read my posts.

What words did Trump use that incited anyone to riot?

He called those in the capital evil, told an enraged crowd to go to the capital and fight. Kind of like how a mob boss directs his traffic.

 

[bripat9643]

Link coming

They need to kept the seditionist-in-chief under wraps.

His main means of communication needs to be taken away.

They should have done this years ago and for longer than 12 hours.

It's just weird watching someone celebrate censorship

Maybe he shouldn't incite a mob riot on the Capital. I know, you don't think he did because you're illiterate between the lines.

They were mostly peaceful. The woman shot was unarmed. That cop should be arrested.

Should, but wont.

But if a drunk black woman in Detroit pounds on your door at 3 am and you tell her to leave but she refuses, and you shoot and kill her thru the door, YOU GET 50 YEARS IN PRISON FOR MURDER

Yeah, shooting a drunk black woman is murder.

I don't know yet what the circumstances were for the shooting of the woman at the capital but I guess she wasn't listening to police and was in the act of breaking the law and from what you guys seem to say that means she's a lawful target. For me, I'll wait to see more details before passing judgement.

Funny how suddenly being unarmed or a woman or not a threat or that the man was bigger, or blah, blah, blah,


suddenly doesn't mean shit to you lefties.

Suddenly someone committing a crime shouldn't be shot according to you numbnuts.

I'm willing to see the evidence, you've made up your mind.

When did any right winger say people should be shot for committing misdemeanors?

Anybody who wants to shoot people for crossing the border for starters.

I'm also not so sure committing insurrection is a misdemeanor either.

Only morons believe they committed insurrection, and I have never advocated shooting people for crossing the border illegally.

Wingnuts have and it was insurrection. There purpose was to hold up our elections and they brought handcuffs and nooses because that's fun.

El Paso Shooting Suspect’s Manifesto Echoes Trump’s Language (Published 2019)

If the president did not originally inspire the gunman, he has brought into the mainstream polarizing ideas and people once consigned to the fringes of American society.

www.nytimes.com

Sorry idiot. Learn a definition. Not insurrection. Just because your media pukes use a word they don’t know, you start spouting it too. Peaceful protest. By your sides definition, now shut up.

Insurrection
a violent uprising against an authority or government.

Meets the definition.

That's old speak. By newspeak rules, it was a mostly peaceful protest.


Your side made these rules and made them stick. Why are you now getting all dodgy?

I'm not interesting and I don't think anyone else is either of prosecuting anyone who remained outside to protest. It's those that invaded the capital, destroyed property, brought weapons and rioted inside the capital. They are picking them off now and I look forward to more being arrested, prosecuted and thrown in jail where they belong.

Destroyed property? They broke one window. Who are you trying to kid?

Your ilk defended rioters in SEattle and Portland who burned down the entire downtown, looted all the stores, asaulted people and even committed murder. You're scumbags who have to right to comment on this. None.

They broke multiple windows, doors, trashed offices, stole government property, cracked a cops head with a fire extinguisher and killed him, injured multiple others, brought handcuffs and nooses and obstructed the business of Congress in the process of peacefully transferring power.

Basically they tried to overturn an election and lost and Trump saving his own skin called them and their actions heinous and not representing America.

Sorry turd, but no cops were killed. The protesters may have broken a few doors. "trashed offices" means they left some empty water bottles laying around. The cops are the only ones who injured anyone. They killed 4 people. They killed an unarmed white woman.

Only a douchebag would defend the behavior of the D.C. cops. Watching you hypocrites screech about this would be positively comical if it wasn't so tragic and scary.

No cops were killed?

Capitol Police Officer Dies From Injuries in Pro-Trump Rampage (Published 2021)

The death of the officer, Brian D. Sicknick, appeared likely to lead to calls for profound changes to the Capitol Police, a centuries-old force.

www.nytimes.com

First it was a single door, now it's "a few". What the insurrections did is destroy the barriers protecting Congress from a rabid cult. They rifled through offices, throwing folders and papers everywhere. The cops only killed 1, the others died of medical issues, probably overweight slobs like you.

And Trump basically called them un-American and their actions heinous after the fact. What do you think about Trump throwing them under the bus?

That was reported 9:17 AM this morning, asshole, and it's not clear that any of the protesters were responsible.

It was a largely peaceful prostest, so why are you getting your panties in a wad?

You previously blamed 4 deaths on police that they weren't responsible for them.

The very first sentence from the article:

A United States Capitol Police officer died on Thursday night from injuries sustained “while physically engaging” with pro-Trump rioters who descended on the U.S. Capitol.

The last sentence

The circumstances surrounding Mr. Sicknick's death were not immediately clear, and the Capitol Police said only that he had “passed away due to injuries sustained while on duty.” At some point in the chaos — with the mob rampaging through the halls of Congress while lawmakers were forced to hide under their desks — he was struck with a fire extinguisher, according to two law enforcement officials.

Ouch. Wouldn't have happened if the 'heinous' crowd (Trump's word) didn't commit a crime by breaking into the capital.

Again, what are your thoughts on Trump calling the crowd's actions heinous and them un-American?

George Floyd would't have died if he hadn't committed a crime. You morons are all using the same arguments that you have pooh-poohed a million times.

The police were responsible for 4 deaths. One of them was a woman.

Your weaseling isn't fooling anyone.

You'll have to quote Trump saying "heinous crowd." I doubt if you are quoting him honestly.