Twitter isn't backing down

[martybegan]

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

Right, pinhead, that's exactly what happened. Show me where I implied LBJ shouldn't have federalized the guard, ya yammering fuckstick.

Marty, you only have a retard-level game.

You made a broad generalization, got called for it, and are now slinking back to your hole.

Loser.

 

[martybegan]

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

It took you 2-1/2 hours to come up with that nonsense? You ignored Trump's tweet about MAGA at the White House to query if I were holding Trump to an impossible standard. What standard was that?

wow, calling out timing on a message board? What a pathetic loser you are.

 

[martybegan]

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

C'mon, Marty, how many hours will it take you to come up with something else as clever as 'soi boi'? You must be outright stupid.

Again, assuming someone is on this board constantly in real time.

LOL, is that all you got beta-bitch?

 

[joaquinmiller]

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

Right, pinhead, that's exactly what happened. Show me where I implied LBJ shouldn't have federalized the guard, ya yammering fuckstick.

Marty, you only have a retard-level game.

You made a broad generalization, got called for it, and are now slinking back to your hole.

Loser.

I made no generalization at all. You, OTOH, tried to put words in my mouth, although you weaselled back to 'implication' (even tho I came nowhere close to doing that). I don't care if you were here or not - 2-1/2 hours was enough time to come up with more than a limp insult.

Once more (LOL), where did I say or imply LBJ shouldn't have federalized the NG. It was your claim, knothead. Back it up, if you can.

 

[martybegan]

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

Right, pinhead, that's exactly what happened. Show me where I implied LBJ shouldn't have federalized the guard, ya yammering fuckstick.

Marty, you only have a retard-level game.

You made a broad generalization, got called for it, and are now slinking back to your hole.

Loser.

I made no generalization at all. You, OTOH, tried to put words in my mouth, although you weaselled back to 'implication' (even tho I came nowhere close to doing that). I don't care if you were here or not - 2-1/2 hours was enough time to come up with more than a limp insult.

Once more (LOL), where did I say or imply LBJ shouldn't have federalized the NG. It was your claim, knothead. Back it up, if you can.

keep trying to weasel your way out of your generalization.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

C'mon, Marty, how many hours will it take you to come up with something else as clever as 'soi boi'? You must be outright stupid.

Again, assuming someone is on this board constantly in real time.

LOL, is that all you got beta-bitch?

Yeah, Marty, right after you show where I said LBJ shouldn't have federalized the NG, I'll get right on addressing your fictional generalization.

 

[martybegan]

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

C'mon, Marty, how many hours will it take you to come up with something else as clever as 'soi boi'? You must be outright stupid.

Again, assuming someone is on this board constantly in real time.

LOL, is that all you got beta-bitch?

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

Right, pinhead, that's exactly what happened. Show me where I implied LBJ shouldn't have federalized the guard, ya yammering fuckstick.

Marty, you only have a retard-level game.

You made a broad generalization, got called for it, and are now slinking back to your hole.

Loser.

I made no generalization at all. You, OTOH, tried to put words in my mouth, although you weaselled back to 'implication' (even tho I came nowhere close to doing that). I don't care if you were here or not - 2-1/2 hours was enough time to come up with more than a limp insult.

Once more (LOL), where did I say or imply LBJ shouldn't have federalized the NG. It was your claim, knothead. Back it up, if you can.

keep trying to weasel your way out of your generalization.

any actual response, or are you stupid as well and can't quote and respond properly?

 

[citygator]

They covered up a tRump tweet glorifying violence with a warning.

I bet he's spraying spittle all over the west wing. Well, if he's awake yet.

Twitter slapped a 'glorifying violence' label on a Trump tweet that threatened George Floyd protesters in Minneapolis with getting shot

Twitter placed a clickthrough block on a tweet by President Donald Trump. The tweet said "when the looting starts, the shooting starts."

www.businessinsider.com

It appears YOU never read his tweet since he never "glorified violence" in it at all!

View attachment 342491

LINK

You are so easy to snooker, that is easy when you let others tell you what to believe.

Twitter screws up again.....

Trump called them thugs. That's a dog whistle and Trump knows it. I hope blacks show up this November.

When the looting starts the shooting starts? So looting is a death sentence? What have we become? The worst part of America is in the White House.

You are truly blind, since the word "thug" isn't in this tweet, that Twitter responded to, here it is again:

View attachment 342494

Trump said the thugs rioting/looting should be shot. Spin all you want. Black people know you are fos.

Stop manspaining what trump said/meant. Racist fuckers.

You didn't post the evidence at all.

Snicker....

you apparently cannot click view, and read the post that was masked. it is too difficult for you.

You are too stupid to realize twitter has HIDDEN the rest of it, I just posted a link to the full tweet, of which twitter hides part of it.

of course you could not admit that you were wrong and instead lash out like a 12 year old so called president. shocker.

the masked tweet contains the glorifiying violence part, duh.

you idiot posted repeatedly the unchanged preceding tweet, and stated that the word "thug" is not in this tweet.

reroll idiody:
"You are truly blind, since the word "thug" isn't in this tweet, that Twitter responded to, here it is again:"

I didn't realize you can see invisible parts of a tweet, why didn't you say so....



No he didn't "glorify violence" here are his actual words:

“These THUGS are dishonoring the memory of George Floyd, and I won’t let that happen. Just spoke to Governor Tim Walz and told him that the Military is with him all the way. Any difficulty and we will assume control but, when the looting starts, the shooting starts. Thank you!”

LINK

Twitter and you thinks he is glorifying violence, Merriam-Webster thinks it means something else:

"to make glorious by bestowing honor, praise, or admiration"

He didn't do anything of the kind.

by the way those "thugs" are committing a lot of serious crimes, but that doesn't bother you at all as you are too busy hating Trump.

Wrote this earlier on another thread about this. My first reaction was, how is that glorifying violence?
lol
Jack is slapping him back. Since Trump was talking about the "military" (National Guard), I question if he was "glorifying violence." Twitter's policy has an exception for "state actors" and looters are not a "protected group."

I don't understand why the looting is the big concern for Trump when the police station was burned. To me that seems the more serious situation. If the NG can be brought in, what is Trump waiting for?

No, I don't think the NG will come out with guns blazing. They've been trained to deal with unarmed civilians. That remark by Trump was ..... well, maybe it was "glorifying violence." Didn't need to be mentioned.

It didn't need to be mentioned. Besides, Minnesota had already activated 500 NG when Trump rolled out of bed and made his offer to play tough guy. These are citizens, NOT carrying guns, who are angry about police brutality. This situation is not helped by shooting at these people. I promise you.

Trump tends to talk too much, sometime goes way across the line, offending people in the process, sometimes stupidly offensive, it is why I cringe when he uses Twitter.

But he wasn't "glorifying" violence, that is a media fabrication.

Imagine if Obama said and did all the shit trump has said and did

Would definitely have been worse because Obama had black skin and that’s what most of these posters hated about him. That and he was uppity.

 

[joaquinmiller]

BTW, liar, what was the "impossible standard" you inquired about?

 

[joaquinmiller]

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

C'mon, Marty, how many hours will it take you to come up with something else as clever as 'soi boi'? You must be outright stupid.

Again, assuming someone is on this board constantly in real time.

LOL, is that all you got beta-bitch?

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

Right, pinhead, that's exactly what happened. Show me where I implied LBJ shouldn't have federalized the guard, ya yammering fuckstick.

Marty, you only have a retard-level game.

You made a broad generalization, got called for it, and are now slinking back to your hole.

Loser.

I made no generalization at all. You, OTOH, tried to put words in my mouth, although you weaselled back to 'implication' (even tho I came nowhere close to doing that). I don't care if you were here or not - 2-1/2 hours was enough time to come up with more than a limp insult.

Once more (LOL), where did I say or imply LBJ shouldn't have federalized the NG. It was your claim, knothead. Back it up, if you can.

keep trying to weasel your way out of your generalization.

any actual response, or are you stupid as well and can't quote and respond properly?

Oh, I edited it, but it doesn't matter, since you can't answer a question.

 

[martybegan]

BTW, liar, what was the "impossible standard" you inquired about?

Nice job trying to make me miss responding by not quoting me.

The impossible standard is that Trump can do nothing right in your addled wibble mind, even when he called for a federal JD investigation into the death of floyd you morons can't say anything good about it.

Your TDS overrides everything, and it's quite frankly, pathetic.

 

[martybegan]

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

C'mon, Marty, how many hours will it take you to come up with something else as clever as 'soi boi'? You must be outright stupid.

Again, assuming someone is on this board constantly in real time.

LOL, is that all you got beta-bitch?

Look at this circle jerk of SJW losers.

So rioters should be allowed to continue rioting with no response?

Maybe they should be firmly told to stop, and then more firmly told, like the wussy cops in Demolition man do.

Adding "or else" will surely make them stop.

Strawman.

Let the Mayor and the Governor handle it.

So LBJ should have let the mayor and governor handle it when those black kids couldn't get into college?

So you are comparing a national situation with a local one. Way to go. Got anything better?

just saying there is precedent for the Feds to involve themselves when the locals aren't up to snuff. Federalizing the guard is something that's been done before.

By God, we need a government crackdown! We need to make the country safe so rightwing nutjobs can go back to pretending they want a civil war.

The government is already "cracking down", the State government, although it seems they are being soft on purpose.

Anti-fa is probably behind a large part of the violence, it fits their desire to get the populace enraged to start their desired revolution.

The WP idiots are just sitting back drinking beer and laughing.

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:

“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”

If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?

Did I say that?

It's your implication, or you are just as usual holding Trump to an impossible standard because ORANGE MAN BAD.

Nowhere did I imply that. When you have to distort or create a position for me with the use of "so", it's not an intelligent response.

Sorry if your progspeak got called out and you can't man up and take it.

Soi boi.

Right, pinhead, that's exactly what happened. Show me where I implied LBJ shouldn't have federalized the guard, ya yammering fuckstick.

Marty, you only have a retard-level game.

You made a broad generalization, got called for it, and are now slinking back to your hole.

Loser.

I made no generalization at all. You, OTOH, tried to put words in my mouth, although you weaselled back to 'implication' (even tho I came nowhere close to doing that). I don't care if you were here or not - 2-1/2 hours was enough time to come up with more than a limp insult.

Once more (LOL), where did I say or imply LBJ shouldn't have federalized the NG. It was your claim, knothead. Back it up, if you can.

keep trying to weasel your way out of your generalization.

any actual response, or are you stupid as well and can't quote and respond properly?

Oh, I edited it, but it doesn't matter, since you can't answer a question.

You just keep digging yourself a bigger and bigger hole, soy boy.

Go eat some kale.

 

[citygator]

BTW, liar, what was the "impossible standard" you inquired about?

Nice job trying to make me miss responding by not quoting me.

The impossible standard is that Trump can do nothing right in your addled wibble mind, even when he called for a federal JD investigation into the death of floyd you morons can't say anything good about it.

Your TDS overrides everything, and it's quite frankly, pathetic.

Are you familiar with the Newton's third law? For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Trump has spent 4 years creating an equal and opposite reaction to his lunacy.

 

[joaquinmiller]

We both knew who I was talking to, MARTY.

When I posted this:

That's the spirit! Invoke the precedent of fed involvement (if the state is too soft). Trump went you one better yesterday. He tweeted:


“Tonight, I understand, is MAGA NIGHT AT THE WHITE HOUSE???”


If that's not an invitation to outsiders, what is?

You replied:

"So you think LBJ should not have federalized those guardsmen back then?"

Then you claimed I implied it. Lies both times. Not only dishonest, but stupid. No number of TDS or soi boi deflections change that.

 

[martybegan]

BTW, liar, what was the "impossible standard" you inquired about?

Nice job trying to make me miss responding by not quoting me.

The impossible standard is that Trump can do nothing right in your addled wibble mind, even when he called for a federal JD investigation into the death of floyd you morons can't say anything good about it.

Your TDS overrides everything, and it's quite frankly, pathetic.

Are you familiar with the Newton's third law? For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Trump has spent 4 years creating an equal and opposite reaction to his lunacy.

The only force I see is the force of your inability to see anything else but your own skewed view of Trump and those who voted for him. You hate, and your hate has only one outlet. it's a sad pathetic existence.

 

[joaquinmiller]

BTW, liar, what was the "impossible standard" you inquired about?

Nice job trying to make me miss responding by not quoting me.

The impossible standard is that Trump can do nothing right in your addled wibble mind, even when he called for a federal JD investigation into the death of floyd you morons can't say anything good about it.

Your TDS overrides everything, and it's quite frankly, pathetic.

Are you familiar with the Newton's third law? For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Trump has spent 4 years creating an equal and opposite reaction to his lunacy.

The only force I see is the force of your inability to see anything else but your own skewed view of Trump and those who voted for him. You hate, and your hate has only one outlet. it's a sad pathetic existence.

Of course! The only possible explanation for opposition to, or criticism of, Trump is a defect of character on the part of the critic. Man, you're goofy.

 

[citygator]

BTW, liar, what was the "impossible standard" you inquired about?

Nice job trying to make me miss responding by not quoting me.

The impossible standard is that Trump can do nothing right in your addled wibble mind, even when he called for a federal JD investigation into the death of floyd you morons can't say anything good about it.

Your TDS overrides everything, and it's quite frankly, pathetic.

Are you familiar with the Newton's third law? For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Trump has spent 4 years creating an equal and opposite reaction to his lunacy.

The only force I see is the force of your inability to see anything else but your own skewed view of Trump and those who voted for him. You hate, and your hate has only one outlet. it's a sad pathetic existence.

No I’m open minded. I didn’t vote for Trump but gave him several chances. He squandered them. I’ve voted for both parties’ presidents in my life. Trump’s the only criminal disappointment. Bush missed in the weapons of mass destruction and launched trillion dollar wars but he wasn’t a turd. Orange man is a turd.

 

[martybegan]

BTW, liar, what was the "impossible standard" you inquired about?

Nice job trying to make me miss responding by not quoting me.

The impossible standard is that Trump can do nothing right in your addled wibble mind, even when he called for a federal JD investigation into the death of floyd you morons can't say anything good about it.

Your TDS overrides everything, and it's quite frankly, pathetic.

Are you familiar with the Newton's third law? For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Trump has spent 4 years creating an equal and opposite reaction to his lunacy.

The only force I see is the force of your inability to see anything else but your own skewed view of Trump and those who voted for him. You hate, and your hate has only one outlet. it's a sad pathetic existence.

Of course! The only possible explanation for opposition to, or criticism of, Trump is a defect of character on the part of the critic. Man, you're goofy.

No, but it's the one that applies to useless hacks such as yourself.

 

[martybegan]

BTW, liar, what was the "impossible standard" you inquired about?

Nice job trying to make me miss responding by not quoting me.

The impossible standard is that Trump can do nothing right in your addled wibble mind, even when he called for a federal JD investigation into the death of floyd you morons can't say anything good about it.

Your TDS overrides everything, and it's quite frankly, pathetic.

Are you familiar with the Newton's third law? For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Trump has spent 4 years creating an equal and opposite reaction to his lunacy.

The only force I see is the force of your inability to see anything else but your own skewed view of Trump and those who voted for him. You hate, and your hate has only one outlet. it's a sad pathetic existence.

No I’m open minded. I didn’t vote for Trump but gave him several chances. He squandered them. I’ve voted for both parties’ presidents in my life. Trump’s the only criminal disappointment. Bush missed in the weapons of mass destruction and launched trillion dollar wars but he wasn’t a turd. Orange man is a turd.

Bullshit.

I can tell by the standard progressive "the last guy was only slightly Hitler but THIS GUY REALLY IS HITLER" trope you used.

You are a squishy SJW moron, and always were, stop lying.

 

[joaquinmiller]

BTW, liar, what was the "impossible standard" you inquired about?

Nice job trying to make me miss responding by not quoting me.

The impossible standard is that Trump can do nothing right in your addled wibble mind, even when he called for a federal JD investigation into the death of floyd you morons can't say anything good about it.

Your TDS overrides everything, and it's quite frankly, pathetic.

Are you familiar with the Newton's third law? For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Trump has spent 4 years creating an equal and opposite reaction to his lunacy.

The only force I see is the force of your inability to see anything else but your own skewed view of Trump and those who voted for him. You hate, and your hate has only one outlet. it's a sad pathetic existence.

Of course! The only possible explanation for opposition to, or criticism of, Trump is a defect of character on the part of the critic. Man, you're goofy.

No, but it's the one that applies to useless hacks such as yourself.

TDS is a dimwitted deflection - making it totally appropriate in your case.