Turning Point FLOODED With Chapter Requests After Erika Kirk’s Rally Cry!

Billiejeens

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2019
Messages
52,469
Reaction score
38,541
Points
3,545
Charlie Kirk’s assassination is the kind of tragedy that shakes a movement to its core. But in the days since his murder, it’s become crystal clear that the legacy of the Turning Point USA founder is not going anywhere. In fact, it’s exploding. What we’re witnessing is a classic case of the Left trying to silence a voice they couldn’t debate, only to end up fueling the very fire they wanted to extinguish.

Turning Point USA, the organization Kirk built from the ground up to challenge liberal indoctrination in America’s schools, has seen a record-breaking surge in chapter requests. Eighteen thousand new requests poured in within 24 hours after Erika Kirk, Charlie’s widow, delivered a deeply emotional and defiant nationwide address. Her message wasn’t just a tribute to her husband; it was a declaration of war against the forces that want conservative youth silenced. “The movement my husband built will not die,” Erika said, broadcasting from his own studio. And Americans responded in kind, proving that her words weren’t just rhetoric, they were a rallying cry.

1757942009154.webp




BJ - You all killed the least offensive yet most effective speaker for a cause, in the country.
I don't foresee good things happening for you.
 
Next year, all the vomit the left is regurgitating will be fed back to them in the mid terms. In 2028 they will get leftovers..
 
Erika Kirk publicly called for retribution against the liberals who had nothing to do with her husband's killing.

And yeah, I know, that's just part of the grieving process, to spend hours prepping for a TV appearance where you read from a script and call for violence against an innocent group.

Yeah, she's the type that would marry Charlie. The money men that backed Charlie no doubt told her that if she wanted the money to keep flowing, she had to play ball.

And before any Trump cult thugs throw some fake victimhood tantrums ... she started it. She politicized it. No one forced her to act in such a disgusting way in public. She freely chose to do it, so no one can use the "you can't criticize a grieving widow!" card. Well, at least no one with any sense of decency.
 
I wonder which bunch will try to co-opt it all. 😐

I remember when the Tea Party in my AO was co-opted by the weed loving Paul-Bots.

I went to a meeting at the fire hall before deer season and there was a lot of common sense spoken....I went back after deer season and first thing you smelled was stale weed with attendees to match.

I left when the first Paul-Bot started going on about The Weed.

One guy asked why I was leaving.....To escape the crazy was my retort.
 
Erika Kirk publicly called for retribution against the liberals who had nothing to do with her husband's killing.

And yeah, I know, that's just part of the grieving process, to spend hours prepping for a TV appearance where you read from a script and call for violence against an innocent group.

Yeah, she's the type that would marry Charlie. The money men that backed Charlie no doubt told her that if she wanted the money to keep flowing, she had to play ball.

And before any Trump cult thugs throw some fake victimhood tantrums ... she started it. She politicized it. No one forced her to act in such a disgusting way in public. She freely chose to do it, so no one can use the "you can't criticize a grieving widow!" card. Well, at least no one with any sense of decency.
Retribution? What kind of retribution?

If I were her, I would insist that people be held accountable for calling her husband a Nazi and a fascist, because this is what the shooter believed as evidence by the shell casings that said as much.

In fact, I bet you either believe it yourself or lie about believing it.
 
Erika Kirk publicly called for retribution against the liberals who had nothing to do with her husband's killing.
That would be a horrific statement if its true. You could understand why a crazy person might want to silence her with a bullet if they had read this ^. Is it true? Lets get a link for this claim.
 
Erika Kirk publicly called for retribution against the liberals who had nothing to do with her husband's killing.

And yeah, I know, that's just part of the grieving process, to spend hours prepping for a TV appearance where you read from a script and call for violence against an innocent group.

Yeah, she's the type that would marry Charlie. The money men that backed Charlie no doubt told her that if she wanted the money to keep flowing, she had to play ball.

And before any Trump cult thugs throw some fake victimhood tantrums ... she started it. She politicized it. No one forced her to act in such a disgusting way in public. She freely chose to do it, so no one can use the "you can't criticize a grieving widow!" card. Well, at least no one with any sense of decency.
Lies.
 
Retribution? What kind of retribution?

If I were her, I would insist that people be held accountable for calling her husband a Nazi and a fascist, because this is what the shooter believed as evidence by the shell casings that said as much.
Yeah, that's standard Groyper talk, that Kirk was not conservative enough, a fake conservative, a liberal fascist in disguise.

Your side devoted years grooming him into thinking like that. You all must be so proud of training your little conservative protege to kill like that.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, that's standard Groyper talk, that Kirk was not conservative enough, a fake conservative, a liberal fascist in disguise.

Your side devoted years groomed him into thinking like that. You all must be so proud of training your little conservative protege to kill like that.
Lies.
 
Yeah, that's standard Groyper talk, that Kirk was not conservative enough, a fake conservative, a liberal fascist in disguise.

Your side devoted years groomed him into thinking like that. You all must be so proud of training your little conservative protege to kill like that.
Stop with the defamation and provide evidence.

This is why you people need to be taken to court.

Emptying your bank account is the only way to prevent this from continuing because money is all you care about.

1757944898195.webp



In fact, Kyle Rittenhouse should also have sued people for calling him a white supremacist and Nazi because there was ZERO evidence for that.
 
Erika Kirk publicly called for retribution against the liberals who had nothing to do with her husband's killing.

And yeah, I know, that's just part of the grieving process, to spend hours prepping for a TV appearance where you read from a script and call for violence against an innocent group.

Yeah, she's the type that would marry Charlie. The money men that backed Charlie no doubt told her that if she wanted the money to keep flowing, she had to play ball.

And before any Trump cult thugs throw some fake victimhood tantrums ... she started it. She politicized it. No one forced her to act in such a disgusting way in public. She freely chose to do it, so no one can use the "you can't criticize a grieving widow!" card. Well, at least no one with any sense of decency.
The left murdered her husband right in front of her and your upset over her reaction? What the hell did you expect from her?
 
15th post
That would be a horrific statement if its true. You could understand why a crazy person might want to silence her with a bullet if they had read this ^.
Why is it that every conservative instantly thinks about killing political opponents? You don't see a single liberal who thinks that way, but for every conservative here, it's the first thought that enters their crazy violent cult minds.

As is always the case, moral high ground to the liberals. Essentially no liberals fantasize about killing political opponents, but essentially every conservative does. Liberals all renounce violence, conservatives all embrace it.

Is it true? Lets get a link for this claim.
Let's start with the basics, to leave you less room to wriggle.

She raged at the "evildoers" who murdered her husband. She used that word specifically, plural.

She certainly wasn't referring to the Groypers, or to the right as a whole that groomed the groyper boi into killing.

She was referring to liberals as a whole.

Do you support her lying like that?
 
Why is it that every conservative instantly thinks about killing political opponents? You don't see a single liberal who thinks that way, but for every conservative here, it's the first thought that enters their crazy violent cult minds.

As is always the case, moral high ground to the liberals. Essentially no liberals fantasize about killing political opponents, but essentially every conservative does. Liberals all renounce violence, conservatives all embrace it.


Let's start with the basics, to leave you less room to wriggle.

She raged at the "evildoers" who murdered her husband. She used that word specifically, plural.

She certainly wasn't referring to the Groypers, or to the right as a whole that groomed the groyper boi into killing.

She was referring to liberals as a whole.

Do you support her lying like that?

OMG a leftist just killed a "political opponent".

You can't possibly be this stupid, it's not possible
 
Stop with the defamation and provide evidence.
Her speech is public.

Threatening people with censorship for telling the truth is hardcore fascist stuff, and essentally every Trump cultist is doing that now. All of you are fascist down to your souls.

Needless to say, no liberals are calling for censorship. As usual, the left holds the moral high ground.
 
OMG a leftist just killed a "political opponent".
No, a rightie did.

This isn't a debate. A right-wing Trump cult groyper killed Kirk. Anyone claiming otherwise is down on their knees pleasuring the Lord of Lies.

I wouldn't want to be in your shoes on judgement day. That's the most awesome thing about being a liberal, not roasting in Hell.
 
Back
Top Bottom