Tulsi Gabbard - Worst Cabinet Pick in History - John Bolton

It is not MY story. All I am doing is presenting data, statistics and facts. How come you are addressing what I am doing and not actually able to debate the facts and prove THEM wrong?

Is it because you can't?


Yeah, according to you commies everyone including Trump are Russian assets, do you have any idea how insane that sounds. And your propaganda isn't facts, it's pure fiction and a continuing narrative from the last 8+ years. Americans elected despite your lies, deal with it.

.
 
Here we go again. Proven Trumper's attack option..............ignore the facts and insult and debase the messenger. It is the ONLY answer they have.

Unfortunately, there is one person that Trump or the Trumpers will NEVER beat (win against)

View attachment 1047247

She is a guaranteed winner..............in the end!

I LOVE the fact that Trump has lefties like you sucking up to the likes of Dick Cheney and John Bolton. Glorious!
 
Here we go again. Proven Trumper's attack option..............ignore the facts and insult and debase the messenger. It is the ONLY answer they have.

Unfortunately, there is one person that Trump or the Trumpers will NEVER beat (win against)

View attachment 1047247

She is a guaranteed winner..............in the end!


Not according to you commies who claim a man can become a woman. Projection much?

.
 
Thanks for the advice but "no", I enjoy it here. It is a place that gives me a reason to live, where I actually can do what I was put on this Earth to do...........attempt to educate. Results are not important as those are never under my control. Attempting where ignorance exists, is!
You got quite the education on November 5th.
 
You're conflating knowledge and competency with technical experience because the actual definitions don't fit the facsimile of an argument you're attempting to manufacture. Nice attempt at a straw man though.

You and John Bolton belong together, birds of a feather.
Instead of attacking me or John Bolton, can you actually prove that Tulsi Gabbard is knowledgeable and competent for the job? You do know that you can shut my mouth in a second if you prove that, don't you?

None of you (Trumpers) have yet been able to do that.......................it is always Bolton or me or both. The topic of the OP (Tulsi) is not important.........the reality is that if I am right............all of YOU (us) will suffer. Would you enjoy that?
 
Not according to you commies who claim a man can become a woman. Projection much?

.
First of all, address me with facts and not fantasies. I have at no moment mentioned anything about men becoming women. It is not an issue that I have an opinion on as that has never happened to me. In addition, I am not a doctor or a scientist, meaning I have no knowledge on the topic. I cannot comment except to say generally "We all have the right to do with our bodies what we want to".

If you do not agree with me on that, then why don't you address the suicide rate we have in the U.S. There are 100 times more suicides than men wanting to become women. Address how you (or Trump) will address that and STOP it. It is a much bigger problem. These people are doing with their bodies what they want and yet you do nothing about it?

Oh and by the way, you are again deflecting from the topic of the OP. Can't address it can you?
 
You got quite the education on November 5th.
Yes, you are right. I was educated on the fact that this country is going down the drain in a fast way

Downtrend.webp
 
Instead of attacking me or John Bolton, can you actually prove that Tulsi Gabbard is knowledgeable and competent for the job? You do know that you can shut my mouth in a second if you prove that, don't you?
She's a Lt. Colonel in the U.S Army Reserves, a combat veteran, served 4 terms in the HoR and served on the House Armed Services Committee including the Sub-Committee for Intelligence for 4 terms. Granted she doesn't have John Bolton's flair for being a cheerleader for going to war or wasting taxpayer money on unnecessary foreign entanglements, but I think she's qualified. However, it doesn't matter what I think (or what you and John Bolton think), what matters is the PRESIDENT-ELECT thinks she's qualified and I'm willing to bet so will a majority of U.S. Senators in the 119th Congress.

What qualifications do YOU think she needs to be DNI? I mean besides John Bolton's blessing of course.
 
I LOVE the fact that Trump has lefties like you sucking up to the likes of Dick Cheney and John Bolton. Glorious!
This is what Trump and Musk are doing

Pathtopowerusa.webp


This is no fantasy, given that what they are doing (doing what Putin did in Russia) is clear and defined (factual).

Is this the path YOU want to follow? If so, say so!!!
 
She's a Lt. Colonel in the U.S Army Reserves, a combat veteran, served 4 terms in the HoR and served on the House Armed Services Committee including the Sub-Committee for Intelligence for 4 terms. Granted she doesn't have John Bolton's flair for being a cheerleader for going to war or wasting taxpayer money on unnecessary foreign entanglements, but I think she's qualified. However, it doesn't matter what I think (or what you and John Bolton think), what matters is the PRESIDENT-ELECT thinks she's qualified and I'm willing to bet so will a majority of U.S. Senators in the 119th Congress.

What qualifications do YOU think she needs to be DNI? I mean besides John Bolton's blessing of course.
Her congressional committee assignments are the absolute minimum for that job.

The rest is zero for that job

What’s disqualifying is her parroting of Kremlin propaganda
 
She's a Lt. Colonel in the U.S Army Reserves, a combat veteran, served 4 terms in the HoR and served on the House Armed Services Committee including the Sub-Committee for Intelligence for 4 terms. Granted she doesn't have John Bolton's flair for being a cheerleader for going to war or wasting taxpayer money on unnecessary foreign entanglements, but I think she's qualified. However, it doesn't matter what I think (or what you and John Bolton think), what matters is the PRESIDENT-ELECT thinks she's qualified and I'm willing to bet so will a majority of U.S. Senators in the 119th Congress.

What qualifications do YOU think she needs to be DNI? I mean besides John Bolton's blessing of course.
This was addressed and answered in the OP. Here it is (without John Bolton's comment)

Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more

There Are Many Reasons to Oppose Tulsi Gabbard’s Trump Job. This Is a Pretty Big One.

Tulsi Gabbard’s pro-Russia political bent has been the cause of much alarm in the intelligence community ever since President-elect Donald Trump chose her to be his director of national intelligence. Because, sure, she lacks any relevant experience whatsoever for the job, a gargantuan responsibility that requires oversight of 18 intelligence agencies. But she also takes positions that make her seem, well, compromised by foreign governments.

For example, she has a tendency to espouse foreign-policy talking points that very much align with Kremlin propaganda, often with the help of her pal Tucker Carlson. She has blamed the U.S. for supposedly provoking Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and posited that the Biden administration is developing “biolabs” in the invaded territory. She is weirdly into Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, having once held a private meeting with the strongman and refusing to ever admit that he did, in fact, repeatedly attack and kill his own people with assistance from the Russians. (Rossiya-1, a Russian state television channel, recently called her a “comrade.”) She even spreads conspiracy theories about herself, claiming earlier this year that she’d been placed on a Transportation Security Administration “terror watchlist” for criticizing Kamala Harris.

Last but not least, you do know that 85% of the people that TRUMP CHOSE (Including John Bolton) were mistakes. What does that mean to you? to me, it means that the probabilities strongly favor Trump's picks being incompetent and wrong for the country.

Don't statistics mean anything to you?
 
NetJedi is making word salad.

Have as diverse a fascist cabinet as this, we will see infighting that will crack Trump's goals.
 
What about the worries/doubts felt by James Lankford, Susan Collins, John Cornyn and Mike Rounds (GOP members)? How does that qualify her?
The deep state RINOs are shaking in their boots.

Some of them realize their gravy train is about to stop.
 
Her congressional committee assignments are the absolute minimum for that job.

The rest is zero for that job

What’s disqualifying is her parroting of Kremlin propaganda
Yeah, you're right, it would be just dandy if she stuck to parroting Washington War Machine propaganda but NO, she's got to go off the reservation and channel her inner Vladmir Putin by publicly disagreeing with the career Warhawks, despicable.
 
According to John Bolton a few days ago:

‘Tulsi Gabbard is the worst cabinet-level appointment in history, much like Caliguala nominating his horse as a Roman council member"


Jamie Metzl (a national security expert) unpacked some of the “really concerning” ramifications of Donald Trump’s decision to nominate former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard as his director of national intelligence.“Tulsi Gabbard has never worked in intelligence. She has no real background for this job,” Metzl added, noting that Gabbard has been a “booster” for autocrats such as Russia’s Vladimir Putin, Syria’s Bashar al-Assad and Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Gabbard, a veteran and former Democratic House member, has promoted conspiracy theories about the U.S.’s involvement in Ukraine.

and one more


With all of these very obvious reasons for this woman to be not only totally unqualified for the job but also leaning to the "bad side" (such as Russia), how does Trump (supposedly an American patriot) choose her?
Every one should watch Barbara Walters interview with Bashar Assad in 2012.
 
Back
Top Bottom