Tulsi Gabbard defends Steve Bannon…

No, the lower court opinion is put on hold while it’s on appeal.

This isn’t complicated. This is what always happens because otherwise there’s no point to an appeal.
the court said no stay was requested

you are wrong
 
2012 was when obama said EP, and the civil case started

holder continued to refuse to turn docs over, even when order to in 2014, was given an extension and never asked for a stay of the order. He would of had to ask for a stay for the order to not be valid as the court highlights
You are so confused.

Why did you reference a 2016 decision and then start talking about a different 2014 decision?

You said they didn’t comply with a 2016 decision and then claimed they didn’t request a stay of that decision in 2014.

They released the documents in 2014 from that court case.

You’re just making shit up.
 
We hear no one is above the law by assorted blowholes who support this illegitimate administration. Why don't they demand the justice they claim Bannon deserves for the others Gabbard has named? The hypocritical bullshit is ridiculous and only lessens the almost 0 credibility they have.

In a tweet she said:
Steve Bannon has been charged with contempt of Congress & found guilty, while Brennan, Clapper & others who lied to Congress have never been charged or prosecuted. This just shows yet again how the DOJ has been weaponized by those in power to go after their political opponents.


The Trump DOJ found no evidence that they lied. Apparently Gabbard is a idiot and a right wing kook.
 
We hear no one is above the law by assorted blowholes who support this illegitimate administration. Why don't they demand the justice they claim Bannon deserves for the others Gabbard has named? The hypocritical bullshit is ridiculous and only lessens the almost 0 credibility they have.

In a tweet she said:
Steve Bannon has been charged with contempt of Congress & found guilty, while Brennan, Clapper & others who lied to Congress have never been charged or prosecuted. This just shows yet again how the DOJ has been weaponized by those in power to go after their political opponents.


Why wasn't Donald Trump Jr. indicted for lying to Congress?

Brennan and Clapper never lied to Congress.
 
The Trump DOJ found no evidence that they lied. Apparently Gabbard is a idiot and a right wing kook.
The DOJ was never run by Trump. If it was they would be in jail.
 
That is why people are charged and tried. That never happened to Comey and the others. Rand Paul made a criminal referral on Fauci. It was ignored.

You are saying the TRUMP DOJ was corrupt.
 
It is holding up in our courts. Look at the jail time given for trespassing. Do you comprehend anything you see or hear? It does not seem like it.

There was no trespassing. It was a seditious act.
 
You keep deflecting. 5 people who lied to Congress were never charged because their politics agreed with those in power. That is fascism, which you support, and therefore you are a fascist.

Trump was a Democrat?
 
comey overstepped his authority clearing hitlery of wrong doing. that wasn't his job. WTF?

In this case it was. The AG said she would abide by Comey's decision on whether to prosecute or not.
 
nope, demofks said trump had no legal authority. you guys can't keep your stories straight.

What they said was that executive privilege did not apply in this case. They have a right to have an opinion.
 
I don't disagree. I've said many times Hillary should have been charged. It would have saved the country a lot of grief.

There was no reason to charge her. As Secretary of State, she had the proper clearances to have the information.
 
no not at all. what she is saying is that if bannon is being punished then they all should get punished the same. That's all. funny you missed her point.

You have to prove they lied. Bannon clearly did not show up after being subpoenaed.
 
15th post
Gabbard is one of few who does not embrace the it’s only wrong when the other side does it mindset.

That is exactly what she is doing. The Trump DOJ and Trump AG found no evidence of perjury. She omits that fact.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom