Tulsi Gabbard defends Steve Bannon…

[jc456]

Just because the president claims executive privilege doesn’t mean they get it.

no one has it. One must go to court to get it.

 

[Lastamender]

That’s not what Biden is doing at all. Biden respects the country and it’s foundations.

Trump does not.

What? Biden has been peddling influence ever since he started in politics. His family and he are filthy rich from taking advantage of his elected position for their own good. Biden does not give one **** about America. He (his keepers) are systematically destroying this country. Idiots like you are enabling it.

 

[Marener]

the demofks have been doing that since the presence of the dossier. You remain confused.

Who was prosecuted who shouldn’t have been?

 

[pknopp]

There was no reason to charge her. As Secretary of State, she had the proper clearances to have the information.

Destroying information is a prosecutable act even if you only use a rag or something.

 

[Marener]

no one has it. One must go to court to get it.

That’s not true. Congress has to go to court to challenge the claim.

 

[Marener]

What? Biden has been peddling influence ever since he started in politics. His family and he are filthy rich from taking advantage of his elected position for their own good. Biden does not give one **** about America. He (his keepers) are systematically destroying this country. Idiots like you are enabling it.

You’re changing the subject, loser.

 

[Marener]

Destroying information is a prosecutable act even if you only use a rag or something.

Not necessarily.

 

[Independent thinker]

Has the statute of limitations expired for Obama's A.G. Eric Holder who was charged with the same thing and merely walked away or have we regressed into a Banana Republic that imprisons it's political enemies?

Unfortunately, you have answered your own question.

 

[pknopp]

Not necessarily.

Yes it is here. Anyone other than Hillary would have been charged. Anyway, people dodged that one.

 

[Marener]

Yes it is here. Anyone other than Hillary would have been charged. Anyway, people dodged that one.

Charged with what exactly?

 

[pknopp]

Charged with what exactly?

Well to me she should have been charged with Treason for arming the enemy out of Libya.

 

[jc456]

Who was prosecuted who shouldn’t have been?

you missed two impeachments huh?

 

[jc456]

Not necessarily.

only if you are hitlery

 

[jc456]

That’s not what Biden is doing at all. Biden respects the country and it’s foundations.

Trump does not.

name one thing xiden's done for your country? 50 years in office and still zippola.

 

[Marener]

Well to me she should have been charged with Treason for arming the enemy out of Libya.

So charged with engaging in foreign policy as the sedentary of state.

Pretty weird charge but okay.

 

[pknopp]

you missed two impeachments huh?

The first one will go down as a sad episode in American political history. The second one had some validity. In the end neither Trump nor the Democrats will fair much better than someone like Benedict Arnold when history is written.

 

[pknopp]

So charged with engaging in foreign policy as the sedentary of state.

Pretty weird charge but okay.

Arming the enemy is what I said. Treason.

 

[Marener]

you missed two impeachments huh?

We are talking about criminal prosecutions

 

[jc456]

So charged with engaging in foreign policy as the sedentary of state.

Pretty weird charge but okay.

since when can a sedentary of state arm foreign countries?

 

[Marener]

The first one will go down as a sad episode in American political history. The second one had some validity. In the end neither Trump nor the Democrats will fair much better than someone like Benedict Arnold when history is written.

The first impeachment was an example of the type of corruption that impeachment was specifically intended for.