Decisions are placed on hold when the appeal is going forward. Obviously. Otherwise there’d be no point to an appeal.
www.politico.com
So do I!! Congressional subpoena is a joke
Fn whiner postWe hear no one is above the law by assorted blowholes who support this illegitimate administration. Why don't they demand the justice they claim Bannon deserves for the others Gabbard has named? The hypocritical bullshit is ridiculous and only lessens the almost 0 credibility they have.
In a tweet she said:
Steve Bannon has been charged with contempt of Congress & found guilty, while Brennan, Clapper & others who lied to Congress have never been charged or prosecuted. This just shows yet again how the DOJ has been weaponized by those in power to go after their political opponents.
looks you got lost somewhere along the way
One can’t make up your kinda stupid
Um...that article doesn't say that the link I provided was overturned dumbass.Decisions are placed on hold when the appeal is going forward. Obviously. Otherwise there’d be no point to an appeal.
Judge upends settlement in Fast and Furious documents case
At issue: Whether a judge’s previous rulings should be wiped from the books to facilitate a settlement.
I never said it was overturned. I said it was appealed.
If you have proof that he was instructed to lie over it then you might have a case. But it seems you can’t help but fabricate allegations and get upset when the fabrications aren’t prosecuted.
I know a lot of Republicans who lied too, but I wasn’t throwing hissy fits about them not being prosecuted because I know the realities of doing so.
No, the lower court opinion is put on hold while it’s on appeal.
hahah was there a stay? Got a link to that? Oh no...she actually denied Holder's motion to stay...but was kind enough not to hold him in contempt of Court, and gave him a little longer to turn the documents over...which he never did
Your article is from 2014. How could she deny a motion in 2014 to stay the decision from 2016?hahah was there a stay? Got a link to that? Oh no...she actually denied Holder's motion to stay...but was kind enough not to hold him in contempt of Court, and gave him a little longer to turn the documents over...which he never did
Eric Holder won't be held in contempt over 'Fast and Furious' documents, rules judge
The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal profession from Wall Street to Main Street to Pennsylvania Avenue.www.abajournal.com
It wasn’t all good news for Holder, though. Now that she had a chance to consider Holder’s motion, Jackson denied it and made clear that Holder will still have to turn over the documents and gave him until Nov. 3 to do so.
“Though the Court has the discretion to grant a stay in the interests of judicial economy and efficiency, pending appeal or otherwise, there is no pending appeal here and the Court has already ruled that defendant has no legal basis to withhold non-deliberative documents,” wrote Jackson in her ruling.
Once again, another day, and another day of you simply making stuff up and not knowing what you are talking about
It’s not. Next time don’t compare apples and oranges. To make a claim that the same situations are being treated differently, you need the situations to actually be the same.
A what?
2012 was when obama said EP, and the civil case started
