Trump's "Spiritual Adviser"

Rawley

Okay, let's talk about how Trump's hand picked spiritual advisor was a child diddler.

His spiritual advisor.

Take a minute on that.
 
You lash out because Trump is a convicted felon, and you don't like it.
I "lashed out" because you asked me to refute your "facts." I did - Trump's appeal has not been rejected - and now you are being a dick because of it.

Have a blessed day.
 
I "lashed out" because you asked me to refute your "facts." I did - Trump's appeal has not been rejected - and now you are being a dick because of it.

Have a blessed day.
Ope, look who wants to talk about anything BUT the topic, after accusing others of changing the topic.
 
I "lashed out" because you asked me to refute your "facts." I did - Trump's appeal has not been rejected - and now you are being a dick because of it.

Have a blessed day.
If Trump has an appeal of his felony conviction pending, in what court, and where does it stand?

Please try to be mature and civil in your response,
 
So, your prejudice is based upon geography, and you have no information concerning the jury of the felon's peers who assessed the evidence and convicted him on 34 felony counts, other that they were all his fellow New Yorkers.
My assessment is based on experience and common sense
 
My assessment is based on experience and common sense
No it isnt. You know nothing about and have no experience with jury trials.

Defense lawyers do. And trump's defense lawyers go to pick the jurors every bit as much as the prosecutors did.

And "common sense" is what people say when they have no good evidence or argument.

Bleeding people with leeches to cure disease was "common sense", in 1860.
 
Which is a stupid thing to say, as the jury was unanimous, but the jury pool came from areas where uo to 30% voted Trump.

All it took was one, for a mistrial.

So no, your cult excuse isnt going to fly.
A corrupt lib jury pool that you assume contained trump voters

But you are just guessing
 
No it isnt. You know nothing about and have no experience with jury trials.

Defense lawyers do. And trump's defense lawyers go to pick the jurors every bit as much as the prosecutors did.

And "common sense" is what people say when they have no good evidence or argument.

Bleeding people with leeches to cure disease was "common sense", in 1860.
Defense lawyers do not pick the list of juriors

They only get to reject a very limited number of possibles
 
A corrupt lib jury pool that you assume contained trump voters
The much dumber assumption would be that it did not, for the reasons already mentioned.

Not much else to say. Your assumption to the contrary is not only very stupid, but is rooted in irrational cultism that a fat rapist charity thief could not possibly have committed the crimes he actually wrote down for everyone to find later.

So painfully stupid. Snap out of it, son.
 
Defense lawyers do not pick the list of juriors
The defense lawyers have as much say as the prosecutors.

All the math stands against you, sorry. The only reason you have for believing there were no Trump voting jurors is because it didnt turn out well for your cult leader, who you think can do no wrong. Nothing more.
 
My assessment is based on experience and common sense
aka, blind prejudice.

You have no awareness of the evidence presented, the identities of the jury members to whom it was presented, nor their deliberations that resulted in conviction on 34 felony counts.

You just need to condemn the judicial process because you are unable to deal with the blowhard's guilt.
 
Last edited:
So then he's a terrible judge of character, considering how many people he has had to fire. One might even wonder if this lack of spotting criminals and child diddlers is because Trump is also both of these things.
My statement stands. I don't argue opinions.

[ My original statement }

And FIRES them when and if any TRUE immoral or illegal nature or actions are revealed to President Trump.
 
Last edited:
So much ignorance, so little time.
Once again, if Trump has an appeal of his felony conviction pending, in what court, and where does it stand?

Please provide these particulars.

Thank you.
 
My statement stands.
Correct, and it shows what a terrible judge of characteter Trump is.

By the way, he also sometimes hires them back. Like, Corey Lewandowski.

How many friends have you had to unfriend, for diddling children?

Wasn't that number 4, for Trump?

This is a message board for opinions. And I think we can all be confident what yours is.
 
15th post
Doesn't the phrase "former spiritual advisor" mean anything to you?

Yeah, it means Trump chose him, another one of these people, and then discarded him when he no longer needed him to help Trump suck up to the religious right.
 
To someone with no morals or ethics.

Correct.

It's so much easier, when you guys just tell on yourselves.
Shaddup, you virtue signaling ninny. There’s nothing immoral about doing what’s required to accomplish your goals. You sound like a typical leftist loser.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom