Trumps Lawyers Issue Legal Response Kicking House Democrats In The Balls

[mudwhistle]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

 

[mudwhistle]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

 

[Care4all]

It's a childish, and ridiculous statement and defense, written for kindergarteners imo.

Geez, I hope he has a better defense than that......??

 

[mudwhistle]

It's a childish, and ridiculous statement and defense, written for kindergarteners imo.

Geez, I hope he has a better defense than that......??

Obviously you don't understand it.....since it's at Kindergartner level.

 

[candycorn]

It's a childish, and ridiculous statement and defense, written for kindergarteners imo.

Geez, I hope he has a better defense than that......??

The smart thing to do would just ignore the action all together.

The blob thinks being constantly on the attack always serves him. Not the case

 

[Jitss617]

I hope there is a option to dismiss .. this is an embarrassment to America

 

[EvilCat Breath]

18 minutes.

18 minutes after the election results were in, democrats vowed to begin impeachment.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It's a childish, and ridiculous statement and defense, written for kindergarteners imo.

Geez, I hope he has a better defense than that......??

Canned response.

 

[kiwiman127]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each side's hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

 

[Jitss617]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each sides hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Alan is a democrat and won’t vote for trump,, he’s telling all of you democrats you have TDS.. get help

 

[mudwhistle]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each side's hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Those of us who can read English know the Democrats are wrong.

 

[RealDave]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

 

[Roudy]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

It was wrong when Republicans did it, and since there wasn't even a crime committed, even more wrong now when Democrats are doing it.

So when are you going to officially come out of the closet? You literally begin and end all your responses with "assfuck"?

 

[kiwiman127]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each sides hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Alan is a democrat and won’t vote for trump,, he’s telling all of you democrats you have TDS.. get help

My post is basically none partisan. But you are such a goose-stepping Little Trumpster, you think anyone who is not a Trunk butt-sniffer is a Democrat. Have you checked Trumpster's poll numbers with Independents & moderates?
My post takes neither side on who's approach is correct.
But your post clearly shows who really has "TDS".

de·range·ment
(dĕ-rānj'mĕnt)
1. A disturbance of the regular order or arrangement.
2. Older term for a mental disturbance or disorder.
derangement
You are highly obsessed with Trumpism, as demonstrated with your multiple posts in such a short period of time. If I am on here for fifteen years total,, I still won't reach your total post numbers for one year total. You are an obsessive, which is a mental health disorder. Fact.

 

[mudwhistle]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

My understanding is Republicans discovered Clinton had committed crimes in a sexual-harassment lawsuit and Clinton appointed a special prosecutor to investigate the crime. The impeachment was a result of the discovery of 11 crimes that Clinton committed including perjury during Grand Jury testimony, Obstruction of Justice, witness tampering, and Abuse of Presidential Power.

On the other hand Democrats decided even before the 2016 election that they would use a "Plan B" which included spying on a political opponent and a new president, setting Trump up for impeachment if he somehow won election. This Plan B included unending investigations and attempts to impeach and impeach and impeach Trump endlessly until he is forced out of office or leaves in shame.

 

[Roudy]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each sides hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Alan is a democrat and won’t vote for trump,, he’s telling all of you democrats you have TDS.. get help

My post is basically none partisan. But you are such a goose-stepping Little Trumpster, you think anyone who is not a Trunk butt-sniffer is a Democrat. Have you checked Trumpster's poll numbers with Independents & moderates?
My post takes neither side on who's approach is correct.
But your post clearly shows who really has "TDS".

de·range·ment
(dĕ-rānj'mĕnt)
1. A disturbance of the regular order or arrangement.
2. Older term for a mental disturbance or disorder.
derangement
You are highly obsessed with Trumpism, as demonstrated with your multiple posts in such a short period of time. If I am on here for fifteen years total,, I still won't reach your total post numbers for one year total. You are an obsessive, which is a mental health disorder. Fact.

Democrats always exhibit one form or another of various derangements and mentall illnesses when a republican president is in office, but it's never been so severe as it is now with Trump.

 

[kiwiman127]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each side's hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Those of us who can read English know the Democrats are wrong.

But then, that's your hyper-partisan opinion. Are you a Constitutional scholar? Even among Constitution scholars, there are difference of opinions. Have you never looked at the horizon, or do you just base your life on the small picture?

 

[mudwhistle]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

It was wrong when Republicans did it, and since there wasn't even a crime committed, even more wrong now when Democrats are doing it.

So when are you going to officially come out of the closet? You literally begin and end all your responses with "assfuck"?

The Republicans weren't wrong.....but the standards of conduct by presidents have sunk so low since Bill Clinton....it seems like he was a victim.
They had a genuine purpose to impeach him. Removing him from office was possibly another thing entirely.

 

[mudwhistle]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each side's hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Those of us who can read English know the Democrats are wrong.

But then, that's your hyper-partisan opinion. Are you a Constitutional scholar? Even among Constitution scholars, there are difference of opinions. Have you never looked at the horizon, or do you just base your life on the small picture?

Well....opinions are like assholes.
I think it's clear that impeaching someone thru deception is pretty much a bad thing in anyone's book.
Clearly Comey made a point of lying to Trump saying he was not under investigation when he first took office....and then it turns out he was being set up....that he was under investigation all along.
That's against the law.
If you take someone's statement in any investigation...according to the Constitution...you must read them their rights first. If you don't...it's textbook entrapment. Comey not only didn't read Trump his rights....but he claimed he was briefing Trump when in fact he was taking down his statement in an attempt to create a Constitutional crisis creating a need for a Special Council investigation.....which created the Mueller Investigation.

 

[daveman]

18 minutes.

18 minutes after the election results were in, democrats vowed to begin impeachment.

It's never been about justice. It's always been about revenge.