Trump's Explanation of Why He Fired Yevgeny (Eugene) Vindman

[Nostra]

Trump violated the law.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

Vindman served at the pleasure of the President. Do you know what that means?

That means Trump can fire him because he doesn't like his tie, moron.

He can't fire in in retaliation for testifying, which is what he did. And he really can't fire someone because he doesn't like his tie. BFOQ. Know what that means?

Yes, he can. He doesn't need a reason, and he certainly doesn't need to explain the situation to dumbfucks like you.

 

[IM2]

And trumpers, posting a list of people Obama fired is just not going to cut it. Trump fired this guy in retaliation to his testimony. He has fired several people and no one has said anything.

 

[jc456]

Trump violated the law.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

Vindman served at the pleasure of the President. Do you know what that means?

That means Trump can fire him because he doesn't like his tie, moron.

He can't fire in in retaliation for testifying, which is what he did. And he really can't fire someone because he doesn't like his tie. BFOQ. Know what that means?

why not? if the dude isn't doing his job, he's fired. even though he was just reassigned and not fired. you're lost.

 

[jc456]

And trumpers, posting a list of people Obama fired is just not going to cut it. Trump fired this guy in retaliation to his testimony. He has fired several people and no one has said anything.

says you? too fking funny.

 

[IM2]

"says the vindictive side doing all this crap because they don't like the politics of people.

trump - since the day he took office
kavanaugh - cause he may be conservative on issues

so don't give me that shit. tired of asswhipes on either side bitching about shit then going out and doing it just the same."

Trump violated laws. Kavanaugh did also. Gorsuch was conservative and confirmed, so your claim about Kavanaugh has no merit.

Link to the specific statutes they violated, and the acts that violated those statutes.

Watch this.............your demented lies are too easy to expose.

Funny how you never can do it.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

"Serves at the pleasure of the President".

Go get an education on what that means, Moron.

I know what that means but the law applies to the president. Maybe you need to understand that.

 

[jc456]

"says the vindictive side doing all this crap because they don't like the politics of people.

trump - since the day he took office
kavanaugh - cause he may be conservative on issues

so don't give me that shit. tired of asswhipes on either side bitching about shit then going out and doing it just the same."

Trump violated laws. Kavanaugh did also. Gorsuch was conservative and confirmed, so your claim about Kavanaugh has no merit.

Link to the specific statutes they violated, and the acts that violated those statutes.

Watch this.............your demented lies are too easy to expose.

Funny how you never can do it.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

"Serves at the pleasure of the President".

Go get an education on what that means, Moron.

I know what that means but the law applies to the president. Maybe you need to understand that.

or not.

 

[IM2]

Trump violated the law.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

Vindman served at the pleasure of the President. Do you know what that means?

That means Trump can fire him because he doesn't like his tie, moron.

He can't fire in in retaliation for testifying, which is what he did. And he really can't fire someone because he doesn't like his tie. BFOQ. Know what that means?

why not? if the dude isn't doing his job, he's fired. even though he was just reassigned and not fired. you're lost.

The guy was doing his job.

 

[Polishprince]

Oh, he doesn't have one.

That's because he didn't fire him at all.

He was reassigned to other duties off of the WH property, President Trump doesn't want to see him around any more. Further, since he came to work carpooling with his brother, they can carpool and go to the Pentagon instead.

The Vindman brothers are advisors and experts that the President has no confidence in and would never consult under any circumstance.

 

[IM2]

And trumpers, posting a list of people Obama fired is just not going to cut it. Trump fired this guy in retaliation to his testimony. He has fired several people and no one has said anything.

says you? too fking funny.

Well you'll look kinda stupid for posting lists of people who weren't fired in retaliation to testifying in congress against Obama for violating the law.

 

[IM2]

Oh, he doesn't have one.

That's because he didn't fire him at all.

He was reassigned to other duties off of the WH property, President Trump doesn't want to see him around any more. Further, since he came to work carpooling with his brother, they can carpool and go to the Pentagon instead.

The Vindman brothers are advisors and experts that the President has no confidence in and would never consult under any circumstance.

Any action taken in retaliation against this guy is illegal.

 

[Nostra]

"says the vindictive side doing all this crap because they don't like the politics of people.

trump - since the day he took office
kavanaugh - cause he may be conservative on issues

so don't give me that shit. tired of asswhipes on either side bitching about shit then going out and doing it just the same."

Trump violated laws. Kavanaugh did also. Gorsuch was conservative and confirmed, so your claim about Kavanaugh has no merit.

Link to the specific statutes they violated, and the acts that violated those statutes.

Watch this.............your demented lies are too easy to expose.

Funny how you never can do it.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

"Serves at the pleasure of the President".

Go get an education on what that means, Moron.

I know what that means but the law applies to the president. Maybe you need to understand that.

Obviously,. you don't know what it means. Otherwise you wouldn't have started this thread and made yourself look like the idiot you are.

 

[Polishprince]

Oh, he doesn't have one.

That's because he didn't fire him at all.

He was reassigned to other duties off of the WH property, President Trump doesn't want to see him around any more. Further, since he came to work carpooling with his brother, they can carpool and go to the Pentagon instead.

The Vindman brothers are advisors and experts that the President has no confidence in and would never consult under any circumstance.

Any action taken in retaliation against this guy is illegal.

He isn't retaliating at all.

Neither Vindman brother will be losing 5 cents in pay or benefits.

 

[Nostra]

Trump violated the law.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

Vindman served at the pleasure of the President. Do you know what that means?

That means Trump can fire him because he doesn't like his tie, moron.

He can't fire in in retaliation for testifying, which is what he did. And he really can't fire someone because he doesn't like his tie. BFOQ. Know what that means?

why not? if the dude isn't doing his job, he's fired. even though he was just reassigned and not fired. you're lost.

The guy was doing his job.

LIes.

His job was to serve the President, not try to make foreign policy.

 

[Siete]

Goldilocks should fire his makeup artist -

 

[jc456]

Trump violated the law.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

Vindman served at the pleasure of the President. Do you know what that means?

That means Trump can fire him because he doesn't like his tie, moron.

He can't fire in in retaliation for testifying, which is what he did. And he really can't fire someone because he doesn't like his tie. BFOQ. Know what that means?

why not? if the dude isn't doing his job, he's fired. even though he was just reassigned and not fired. you're lost.

The guy was doing his job.

no he wasn't. you've been fooled. he took an oath to obey the president. not leak information without going to the chain of command.

 

[Polishprince]

Trump violated the law.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

Vindman served at the pleasure of the President. Do you know what that means?

That means Trump can fire him because he doesn't like his tie, moron.

He can't fire in in retaliation for testifying, which is what he did. And he really can't fire someone because he doesn't like his tie. BFOQ. Know what that means?

why not? if the dude isn't doing his job, he's fired. even though he was just reassigned and not fired. you're lost.

The guy was doing his job.

LIes.

His job was to serve the President, not try to make foreign policy.

Exactly. But of course, President Trump already recognized- even before Vindman's Fake Testimony- that he had to be kept out of the loop. That WAS Vindman's very testimony, triple hearsay and his supposed "opinions" about what he thought what the President's motives might be. It wasn't really false testimony or perjury, just fake testimony as the man basically admitted he was just shooting the shit

So it has been pointless to have Vindman around the WH for years, there was no real work that he could be entrusted with doing.

 

[jc456]

And trumpers, posting a list of people Obama fired is just not going to cut it. Trump fired this guy in retaliation to his testimony. He has fired several people and no one has said anything.

says you? too fking funny.

Well you'll look kinda stupid for posting lists of people who weren't fired in retaliation to testifying in congress against Obama for violating the law.

I'm merely laughing at you.

 

[WEATHER53]

Nothing like the underlings disobeying and backstabbing the boss then wailing about being held responsible.
Libs dislike personal responsibility So Much that they operate like it does not exist

 

[jc456]

Nothing like me the underlings disobeying and backstabbing the boss then wailing about being held responsible.
Libs dislike personal responsibility So Much that they operate like it does not exist

because they have no idea how businesses function.

 

[jc456]

Trump violated the law.

18 U.S. Code § 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant

Vindman served at the pleasure of the President. Do you know what that means?

That means Trump can fire him because he doesn't like his tie, moron.

He can't fire in in retaliation for testifying, which is what he did. And he really can't fire someone because he doesn't like his tie. BFOQ. Know what that means?

why not? if the dude isn't doing his job, he's fired. even though he was just reassigned and not fired. you're lost.

The guy was doing his job.

LIes.

His job was to serve the President, not try to make foreign policy.

making foreign policy is the president's job. the dude thought he was president. Impersonating an officer.