Trump's crimes: It's just weird.

[Raynine]

I remember what I learned in school about totalitarian governments charging those who challenged them with crimes against the state. No one else remembers that? All they can see is that the US government charged Trump with crimes against the state so he must be guilty. That is just weird. It's like seeing smoke coming out of a volcano and ignoring it because the authorities say it's ok. You know, like Pompeii and Herculaneum? Government representatives have already overtly stated that freedom of speech has become dangerous because if the people use it then it makes it too hard to govern them.

This should be a red flag to the people but government brainwashing apparently makes it impossible for the people to see it. Did these people learn any history at all? It's just weird.

Totalitarianism | Definition, Characteristics, Examples, & Facts | Britannica

Totalitarianism, form of government that permits no individual freedom and seeks to subordinate all aspects of individual life to the authority of the state. Coined by the Italian dictator Benito Mussolini in the early 1920s, the term has become synonymous with absolute and oppressive...

www.britannica.com

The Terror of Totalitarianism Explained

Totalitarianism didn't just spring up out of a mystical vacuum. As Hannah Arendt explains in The Origins of Totalitarianism, it is, rather, just one possibility along a path that most countries are on at one time or another. And that is why it is so important to understand what it is.

fs.blog

Breaking Down Democracy

Goals, Strategies, and Methods of Modern Authoritarians

freedomhouse.org

 

[Skylar]

I remember what I learned in school about totalitarian governments charging those who challenged them with crimes against the state. No one else remembers that? All they can see is that the US government charged Trump with crimes against the state so he must be guilty. That is just weird. It's like seeing smoke coming out of a volcano and ignoring it because the authorities say it's ok. You know, like Pompeii and Herculaneum? Government representatives have already overtly stated that freedom of speech has become dangerous because if the people use it then it makes it too hard to govern them.

This should be a red flag to the people but government brainwashing apparently makes it impossible for the people to see it. Did these people learn any history at all? It's just weird.

Totalitarianism | Definition, Characteristics, Examples, & Facts | Britannica

Totalitarianism, form of government that permits no individual freedom and seeks to subordinate all aspects of individual life to the authority of the state. Coined by the Italian dictator Benito Mussolini in the early 1920s, the term has become synonymous with absolute and oppressive...

www.britannica.com

The Terror of Totalitarianism Explained

Totalitarianism didn't just spring up out of a mystical vacuum. As Hannah Arendt explains in The Origins of Totalitarianism, it is, rather, just one possibility along a path that most countries are on at one time or another. And that is why it is so important to understand what it is.

fs.blog

The problem with your theory Raynine is the evidence.

Trump is on tape admitting the goverment documents he was showing off were secret, that he could have declassified them when he was president, but now he can't.

Twice.

His own lawyer testified that Trump tried to convince him to lie to authorities about documents. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to pierce attorney client privilege? The only major exemption is seeking aid from your lawyer to commit or plan another crime.

Trump's IT guy has testified that he was ordered to destroy evidence.

The charges against Trump were more than justified in the evidence presented in the affidavit.

 

[Blisterfinger]

The problem with your theory Raynine is the evidence.

Trump is on tape admitting the goverment documents he was showing off were secret, that he could have declassified them when he was president, but now he can't.

Twice.

His own lawyer testified that Trump tried to convince him to lie to authorities about documents. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to pierce attorney client privilege? The only major exemption is seeking aid from your lawyer to commit or plan another crime.

Trump's IT guy has testified that he was ordered to destroy evidence.

The charges against Trump were more than justified in the evidence presented in the affidavit.

The authoritarians are in power now and they want the imbeciles to re-elect them. They have no respect for our laws and our customs openly practicing lawfare, ignoring the Supreme Court and opening our Southern border illegally.

 

[Raynine]

The problem with your theory Raynine is the evidence.

Trump is on tape admitting the goverment documents he was showing off were secret, that he could have declassified them when he was president, but now he can't.

Twice.

His own lawyer testified that Trump tried to convince him to lie to authorities about documents. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to pierce attorney client privilege? The only major exemption is seeking aid from your lawyer to commit or plan another crime.

Trump's IT guy has testified that he was ordered to destroy evidence.

The charges against Trump were more than justified in the evidence presented in the affidavit.

You can use the power of a totalitarian government to go after anyone for anything. Give me government resources and I will find you guilty of treason tomorrow!

 

[john doe 101]

The authoritarians are in power now and they want the imbeciles to re-elect them. They have no respect for our laws and our customs openly practicing lawfare, ignoring the Supreme Court and opening our Southern border illegally.

You're a psycho who belongs in a mental hospital.

 

[SaxonJackson]

The problem with your theory Raynine is the evidence.

Trump is on tape admitting the goverment documents he was showing off were secret, that he could have declassified them when he was president, but now he can't.

Twice.

His own lawyer testified that Trump tried to convince him to lie to authorities about documents. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to pierce attorney client privilege? The only major exemption is seeking aid from your lawyer to commit or plan another crime.

Trump's IT guy has testified that he was ordered to destroy evidence.

The charges against Trump were more than justified in the evidence presented in the affidavit.

^^Making a mountain out of a molehill^^

If you're going to go down this road you will have to include Biden and the classified documents he stole as Senator and Vice President. But, of course, you won't.

 

[Skylar]

^^Making a mountain out of a molehill^^

If you're going to go down this road you will have to include Biden and the classified documents he stole as Senator and Vice President. But, of course, you won't.

Biden never lied to authorities, ordered evidence destroyed, showed the documents to visitors to his home, or tried to compel his lawyer to lie to authorities.

There's evidence that Trump did all these things. And much more.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Biden never lied to authorities, ordered evidence destroyed, showed the documents to visitors to his home, or tried to compel his lawyer to lie to authorities.

There's evidence that Trump did all these things. And much more.

As expected. Step over a diamond to pick up a dime. Biden broke the law and had entire boxes of classified documents he wasn't authorized to have. But let's skip over that part.

Biden has made an entire career being an underhanded criminal, but he's a Democrat, so that's okay.

 

[Skylar]

As expected. Step over a diamond to pick up a dime. Biden broke the law and had entire boxes of classified documents he wasn't authorized to have. But let's skip over that part.

Biden has made an entire career being an underhanded criminal, but he's a Democrat, so that's okay.

Everything I've cited is a felony. These aren't dimes.

There was no criminal intent with Biden, as he didn't know he had the docs. There was absolutely evidence of criminal intent with Trump, has he bragged about how he had secret documents, showed them off to people, said he that he could have declassified them when he was president but now he couldn't.

He taped himself doing exactly this. Twice.

There's evidence Trump lied to authorities. There's evidence that Trump had the documents moved so that authorities wouldn't find them. There's evidence that Trump ordered the destruction of video tapes of his men moving the documents after the FBI demanded these videos be turned over. There's evidence that Trump tried to compel his lawyer to lie to authorities about those documents.

Which is why Trump was indicated on so many felonies. And neither Pence nor Biden were.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Everything I've cited is a felony. These aren't dimes.

There was no criminal intent with Biden, as he didn't know he had the docs. There was absolutely evidence of criminal intent with Trump, has he bragged about how he had secret documents, showed them off to people, said he that he could have declassified them when he was president but now he couldn't.

He taped himself doing exactly this. Twice.

There's evidence Trump lied to authorities. There's evidence that Trump had the documents moved so that authorities wouldn't find them. There's evidence that Trump ordered the destruction of video tapes of his men moving the documents after the FBI demanded these videos be turned over There's evidence that Trump tried to compel his lawyer to lie to authorities.

Which is why Trump was indicated on so many felonies.

These “felonies” are all based on trumped-up charges. The Dem politicians you worship have been committing literal felonies for decades, but the deep state has turned a blind eye. Political actions only become “crimes” if and when they don't fall in line with the plans and goals of the globalist, elite.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Biden never lied to authorities, ordered evidence destroyed, showed the documents to visitors to his home, or tried to compel his lawyer to lie to authorities.

There's evidence that Trump did all these things. And much more.

Biden has lied about his education. He's plagiarized speeches. He's lied about his accomplishments. He's lied to “We The People” as a matter of routine and “We The People” are the government.

 

[Skylar]

These “felonies” are all based on trumped-up charges.

What is 'trumped up' even mean? Its a meaningless descriptor arbitrarily applied so you can ignore the evidence. This is exactly the problem with Raynine's assessment, and the exact tell of Trump supporters that demonstrates they know the validity of the charges.

They avoid the evidence.

The audio tapes of Trump showing off secret documents, the testimony of his lawyer that Trump tried to compel him to lie to authorities, testimony that Trump ordered the documents moved, Trump's IT guy testifying that he was ordered to destroy video tape evidence of the documents being moved.

These are all serious, serious felonies. And each can act as an serious aggravating facts in assessing the aggravation and mitigation of what he's accused of. And can be used to establish criminal intent.

If Trump had simply returned the documents when they were subpoena'd he'd have been fine. But instead he lied to authorities, he tried to compel others to lie, his hid evidence, he tried to destroy evidence, and he admitted on tape, that he knew the documents were secret....and while he could have declassified them as president, he couldn't now.

That's a slam dunk.

Other special counsels have assessed Trump's case and found that if proven, would present serious aggravating facts that simply didn't exist in Biden's case. And this from a Trump nominee for United States Attorney.

 

[SaxonJackson]

What is 'trumped up' even mean? Its a meaningless descriptor arbitrarily applied so you can ignore the evidence. This is exactly the problem with Raynine's assessment, and the exact tell of Trump supporters that demonstrates they know the validity of the charges.

They avoid the evidence.

The audio tapes of Trump showing off secret documents, the testimony of his lawyer that Trump tried to compel him to lie to authorities, testimony that Trump ordered the documents moved, Trump's IT guy testifying that he was ordered to destroy video tape evidence of the documents being moved.

These are all serious, serious felonies. And each can act as an serious aggravating facts in assessing the aggravation and mitigation of what he's accused of. And can be used to establish criminal intent.

If Trump had simply returned the documents when they were subpoena'd he'd have been fine. But instead he lied to authorities, he tried to compel others to lie, his hid evidence, he tried to destroy evidence, and he admitted on tape, that he knew the documents were secret....and while he could have declassified them as president, he couldn't now.

That's a slam dunk.

Vote Trump. Save America from it's current downfall. Repair the economy. Seal the southern border. Bring jobs back to US soil and made gas and bread affordable again. Stop supporting foreign wars or fanning their flames. Stop caving to the military, industrial complex. End Marxist rule currently holding the reins of power in D.C. Vote Trump!!

 

[Skylar]

Vote Trump. Save America from it's current downfall. Repair the economy. Seal the southern border. Bring jobs back to US soil and made gas and bread affordable again. Stop supporting foreign wars or fanning their flames. Stop caving to the military, industrial complex. End Marxist rule currently holding the reins of power in D.C. Vote Trump!!

Yeah, you're committed to ignoring the evidence entirely. Now refusing to even discuss it.

That's how you demonstrate that you know that Trump is culpable and the charges are valid.

Its the same tell that Trump supporters usually exhibit when discussing the charges against him. If the charges were indeed 'trumped up', you wouldn't avoid any discussion of the evidence of crimes committed by Trump, as if they were on fire.

Other special counsels have assessed Trump's case and found that if proven, would present serious aggravating facts that simply didn't exist in Biden's case. And this from a Trump nominee for United States Attorney.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Yeah, you're committed to ignoring the evidence entirely. Now refusing to even discuss it.

That's how you demonstrate that you know that Trump is culpable and the charges are valid.

Its the same tell that Trump supporters usually exhibit when discussing the charges against him. If the charges were indeed 'trumped up', you wouldn't avoid any discussion of the evidence of crimes committed by Trump, as if they were on fire.

The “evidence” is skewed and all charges were and are “trumped-up” because Trump is a threat to the all-powerful, deep state. Everyone knows it. It's why Trump is winning. People see through the vale of “lawfare” and the weaponized DOJ.

 

[Skylar]

The “evidence” is skewed and all charges were and are “trumped-up” because Trump is a threat to the all-powerful, deep state.

How so? Please explain how the evidence is skewed.

The recordings of Trump showing off documents he admitted were secret, that he could have declassified when he was president, but he couldn't now?

How is that 'skewed'?

The testimony of Trump's lawyer that Trump tried to get him to lie to authorities?

How is that 'skewed'?

The testimony that Trump had documents moved before the DOJ arrived to collect them.

How is that 'skewed'.

The testimony of Trump's IT lead that he was ordered to destroy video evidence of the documents being moved.

How is that 'skewed'?

Please be specific.

 

[luiza]

I remember what I learned in school about totalitarian governments charging those who challenged them with crimes against the state. No one else remembers that? All they can see is that the US government charged Trump with crimes against the state so he must be guilty. That is just weird. It's like seeing smoke coming out of a volcano and ignoring it because the authorities say it's ok. You know, like Pompeii and Herculaneum? Government representatives have already overtly stated that freedom of speech has become dangerous because if the people use it then it makes it too hard to govern them.

This should be a red flag to the people but government brainwashing apparently makes it impossible for the people to see it. Did these people learn any history at all? It's just weird.

Not weird at all .
It is a basic Species disability --- 95% Stupid and 95% Gullible .

Of course Clever Lies is the number one Deep State weapon .
They would be morons not to use a Free "Gift from on high " .