Trumpers try to act like every court DIDN'T rule against them...

Flash

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2014
Messages
41,052
Reaction score
19,670
Points
2,330
Location
Florida
What we have unfortunately found out in the last few weeks is that we can't trust the Judicial Branch to protect our Liberties any more than the Legislative or Executive branches.

Now we know why the Founding Fathers felt that it was of important to have the right to keep and bear arms. Sometimes our institutions fail us and it is up to the people to insure Liberty. They knew that.
 
OP
The Banker

The Banker

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2017
Messages
1,607
Reaction score
1,206
Points
1,940
Location
Boston
What we have unfortunately found out in the last few weeks is that we can't trust the Judicial Branch to protect our Liberties any more than the Legislative or Executive branches.

Now we know why the Founding Fathers felt that it was of important to have the right to keep and bear arms. Sometimes our institutions fail us and it is up to the people to insure Liberty. They knew that.
Keep believing that !

Trump appointed judges are in on the scam !!

You people are pathetic, all this just because you can't admit Biden won the election. Pathetic.

At least lose with dignity !
 
OP
The Banker

The Banker

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2017
Messages
1,607
Reaction score
1,206
Points
1,940
Location
Boston
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.
That so. How can they have ruled without ever seeing any of the proof or listening.
Obviously you haven't followed the court cases at all... figures.
If you would have bothered to actually follow the court cases then you'de know that Giuliani presented the fake and fabricated evidence of fraud before the courts.

Guess what happened???

The courts rejected Giuliani's fabricated claims of fraud, because it didn't happen and Trump is lying.
 

Lastamender

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
9,231
Reaction score
4,110
Points
385
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.
That so. How can they have ruled without ever seeing any of the proof or listening.
Obviously you haven't followed the court cases at all... figures.
If you would have bothered to actually follow the court cases then you'de know that Giuliani presented the fake and fabricated evidence of fraud before the courts.

Guess what happened???

The courts rejected Giuliani's fabricated claims of fraud, because it didn't happen and Trump is lying.
1. Witnesses in past contested elections
1611108652418.png
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
70,955
Reaction score
12,871
Points
2,180
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.
That so. How can they have ruled without ever seeing any of the proof or listening.
Obviously you haven't followed the court cases at all... figures.
If you would have bothered to actually follow the court cases then you'de know that Giuliani presented the fake and fabricated evidence of fraud before the courts.

Guess what happened???

The courts rejected Giuliani's fabricated claims of fraud, because it didn't happen and Trump is lying.
1. Witnesses in past contested elections
View attachment 445508
Any idea how many were credible witnesses?
 

Lastamender

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
9,231
Reaction score
4,110
Points
385
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.
That so. How can they have ruled without ever seeing any of the proof or listening.
Obviously you haven't followed the court cases at all... figures.
If you would have bothered to actually follow the court cases then you'de know that Giuliani presented the fake and fabricated evidence of fraud before the courts.

Guess what happened???

The courts rejected Giuliani's fabricated claims of fraud, because it didn't happen and Trump is lying.
1. Witnesses in past contested elections
View attachment 445508
Any idea how many were credible witnesses?
Most likely everyone of them. Why would they risk jail time for no reason? And there were very credible witnesses. Owners of companies, security and computer experts. There was massive fraud and the MSM and the Deep State hid it from the public.


Now censorship. Guilt written all over it.
 
OP
The Banker

The Banker

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2017
Messages
1,607
Reaction score
1,206
Points
1,940
Location
Boston
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.
That so. How can they have ruled without ever seeing any of the proof or listening.
Obviously you haven't followed the court cases at all... figures.
If you would have bothered to actually follow the court cases then you'de know that Giuliani presented the fake and fabricated evidence of fraud before the courts.

Guess what happened???

The courts rejected Giuliani's fabricated claims of fraud, because it didn't happen and Trump is lying.
1. Witnesses in past contested elections
View attachment 445508
Any idea how many were credible witnesses?
Most likely everyone of them. Why would they risk jail time for no reason? And there were very credible witnesses. Owners of companies, security and computer experts. There was massive fraud and the MSM and the Deep State hid it from the public.


Now censorship. Guilt written all over it.
Look at the extent of the lies you make up just because you can't admit Biden won.

You just make this stuff up. The majority of cases were rejected due to lack of evidence like this:

1)In a ruling late Saturday, U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann — a Republican and Federalist Society member in central Pennsylvania — compared the campaign’s legal arguments to “Frankenstein’s Monster,” concluding that Trump’s team offered only “speculative accusations,” not proof of rampant corruption.

2) Judge Robert Baldi wrote that most of the contested ballots contained “minor irregularities,” and that tossing them out is “not necessary to prevent fraud, and there would be no other significant interest undermined by allowing these ballots to be counted.”
In fact, in his order, Baldi took pains to point out that the parties in the case “specifically stipulated” that “there exists no evidence of any fraud, misconduct, or any impropriety with respect to the challenged ballots.”


3) “Charges of unfairness are serious,” Bibas wrote in the nonprecedential opinion. “But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.

I can provide many more examples if I have to... I can provide many many many many many more examples if I have to shut you up...
No proof of fraud. The judges saw the evidence, they heard the arguments and they ruled: No evidence of fraud, you are living in an alternate reality like all Trumpers.

If Trump told you the earth was flat you'd believe it.

At least lose with dignity.
 
Last edited:

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
70,955
Reaction score
12,871
Points
2,180
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.
That so. How can they have ruled without ever seeing any of the proof or listening.
Obviously you haven't followed the court cases at all... figures.
If you would have bothered to actually follow the court cases then you'de know that Giuliani presented the fake and fabricated evidence of fraud before the courts.

Guess what happened???

The courts rejected Giuliani's fabricated claims of fraud, because it didn't happen and Trump is lying.
1. Witnesses in past contested elections
View attachment 445508
Any idea how many were credible witnesses?
Most likely everyone of them. Why would they risk jail time for no reason? And there were very credible witnesses. Owners of companies, security and computer experts. There was massive fraud and the MSM and the Deep State hid it from the public.


Now censorship. Guilt written all over it.
Yes, we saw Rudy's star witness She claimed to be in charge of computer maintenance, but she was really hired to wipe down the display screens occasionally.
 

bear513

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2012
Messages
64,218
Reaction score
12,082
Points
2,180
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.

Trumpers still try to present proven lies as "evidence" of fraud.

They conveniently ignore the fact that their "evidence" has been completely debunked.

Please explain how voter fraud took place when all the fabricated examples of fraud have been fully debunked by the courts, MULTIPLE TIMES...

Basically now Trumpers are trying to concoct a lie to explain why every court has rejected them, but it can't be done.

**EDIT**
Rudy Giuliani and other Trump lawyers presented the supposed evidence of fraud before the courts. The courts unanimously rejected Giuliani's lies.




18padk.jpg
 

Lastamender

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
9,231
Reaction score
4,110
Points
385
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.
That so. How can they have ruled without ever seeing any of the proof or listening.
Obviously you haven't followed the court cases at all... figures.
If you would have bothered to actually follow the court cases then you'de know that Giuliani presented the fake and fabricated evidence of fraud before the courts.

Guess what happened???

The courts rejected Giuliani's fabricated claims of fraud, because it didn't happen and Trump is lying.
1. Witnesses in past contested elections
View attachment 445508
Any idea how many were credible witnesses?
Most likely everyone of them. Why would they risk jail time for no reason? And there were very credible witnesses. Owners of companies, security and computer experts. There was massive fraud and the MSM and the Deep State hid it from the public.


Now censorship. Guilt written all over it.
Yes, we saw Rudy's star witness She claimed to be in charge of computer maintenance, but she was really hired to wipe down the display screens occasionally.
Like the people hired to harass Republican poll watchers? Or the ones who put ballots under a table? It does not matter what she was there for, she saw the fraud.
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
70,955
Reaction score
12,871
Points
2,180
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.
That so. How can they have ruled without ever seeing any of the proof or listening.
Obviously you haven't followed the court cases at all... figures.
If you would have bothered to actually follow the court cases then you'de know that Giuliani presented the fake and fabricated evidence of fraud before the courts.

Guess what happened???

The courts rejected Giuliani's fabricated claims of fraud, because it didn't happen and Trump is lying.
1. Witnesses in past contested elections
View attachment 445508
Any idea how many were credible witnesses?
Most likely everyone of them. Why would they risk jail time for no reason? And there were very credible witnesses. Owners of companies, security and computer experts. There was massive fraud and the MSM and the Deep State hid it from the public.


Now censorship. Guilt written all over it.
Yes, we saw Rudy's star witness She claimed to be in charge of computer maintenance, but she was really hired to wipe down the display screens occasionally.
Like the people hired to harass Republican poll watchers? Or the ones who put ballots under a table? It does not matter what she was there for, she saw the fraud.
what ballots under the table. I know that was one of the crazy woman's claims, but the video doesn't show what she claimed.
 

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
22,634
Reaction score
15,896
Points
2,365
The judges Trump appointed didn't ignore the law like Hitler's judges did.
hitlers judges did not ignore unjust german laws

they enforced them

our judiciary are finger-wetting politicians in black robes

they are intimidated by the mob
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
70,955
Reaction score
12,871
Points
2,180
The judges Trump appointed didn't ignore the law like Hitler's judges did.
hitlers judges did not ignore unjust german laws

they enforced them

our judiciary are finger-wetting politicians in black robes

they are intimidated by the mob
Yet Trump appointed many of the ones who rejected rudy's crap
 

impuretrash

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Messages
10,917
Reaction score
2,762
Points
290
Was the evidence "debunked" or simply thrown out without even being looked at?
Of course it was thrown out. No Judge wants to get involved with over turning an Presidential election. There was plenty of proof they just didn't want to see any of it.

Thats exactly my thinking. Whether it's a true or false allegation doesn't matter. The judges simply wanted to avoid dirtying their hands with something as monumental as a fraudulent election and whatever repercussions might follow.
 
OP
The Banker

The Banker

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2017
Messages
1,607
Reaction score
1,206
Points
1,940
Location
Boston
The courts have spoken. Trump appointed judges have ruled. There is no evidence of election fraud.
That so. How can they have ruled without ever seeing any of the proof or listening.
Obviously you haven't followed the court cases at all... figures.
If you would have bothered to actually follow the court cases then you'de know that Giuliani presented the fake and fabricated evidence of fraud before the courts.

Guess what happened???

The courts rejected Giuliani's fabricated claims of fraud, because it didn't happen and Trump is lying.
1. Witnesses in past contested elections
View attachment 445508
Any idea how many were credible witnesses?
Most likely everyone of them. Why would they risk jail time for no reason? And there were very credible witnesses. Owners of companies, security and computer experts. There was massive fraud and the MSM and the Deep State hid it from the public.


Now censorship. Guilt written all over it.
Yes, we saw Rudy's star witness She claimed to be in charge of computer maintenance, but she was really hired to wipe down the display screens occasionally.
Like the people hired to harass Republican poll watchers? Or the ones who put ballots under a table? It does not matter what she was there for, she saw the fraud.
The judges saw the fabricated evidence of fraud and rejected it. It is over.

Look at the extent of your lies all because you can't admit Biden won
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top