Trump would be correct to assert a national emergency in order to build the wall

[danielpalos]

a wall does Nothing for the general welfare.
.....

Sure it does. It keeps out Third World immigrants of which we already have WAY too many.


That is good for America and Americans.

we have a commerce clause; why not make money with a commercial way instead of lose money like Bad capitalists.

Because money is not everything. Because although we are a capitalistic nation, we are not solely a nation of capitalists, and everyone has a right to have their interests considered in national policy.


Much like you are loyal to ALL Mexicans, and not just the rich ones.

If it is not about money, it must be about our Constitution, not right wing fantasy.

There is no express immigration clause or express wall building clause.

Our welfare clause is General, we have a commerce clause. Why are we losing money on border policy?

And now the Dump spends 2 trillion on a tax cut that has a 28% approval Damn republican fools

Why are right wingers such lousy capitalists? We should be generating revenue from foreign nationals not losing money with a non-existent from Inception, immigration clause.

 

[K9Buck]

I told no lie and I don’t support pedophilia or pedophilia rings, ya sick ****.

Nor did I make any claims about collusion, a lie that you fabricated.

 

[Faun]

I told no lie and I don’t support pedophilia or pedophilia rings, ya sick ****.

Nor did I make any claims about collusion, a lie that you fabricated.

Dumbfuck, you asserted just being investigated for something is evidence the matter of the investigation is illegal. Now apply that moronic thought to the investigation into collusion with Russia.

Dayum, you’re slow. Even moreso than most conservatives.

 

[K9Buck]

I told no lie and I don’t support pedophilia or pedophilia rings, ya sick ****.

Nor did I make any claims about collusion, a lie that you fabricated.

Dumbfuck, you asserted just being investigated for something is evidence the matter of the investigation is illegal. Now apply that moronic thought to the investigation into collusion with Russia.

Dayum, you’re slow. Even moreso than most conservatives.

What crime did Trump commit? Cue the **** act.

 

[edward37]

Sure it does. It keeps out Third World immigrants of which we already have WAY too many.


That is good for America and Americans.

we have a commerce clause; why not make money with a commercial way instead of lose money like Bad capitalists.

Because money is not everything. Because although we are a capitalistic nation, we are not solely a nation of capitalists, and everyone has a right to have their interests considered in national policy.


Much like you are loyal to ALL Mexicans, and not just the rich ones.

If it is not about money, it must be about our Constitution, not right wing fantasy.

There is no express immigration clause or express wall building clause.

Our welfare clause is General, we have a commerce clause. Why are we losing money on border policy?

And now the Dump spends 2 trillion on a tax cut that has a 28% approval Damn republican fools

Why are right wingers such lousy capitalists? We should be generating revenue from foreign nationals not losing money with a non-existent from Inception, immigration clause.

You dare have something bad to say about our LOL fiscal conservative republican friends?

 

[Faun]

I told no lie and I don’t support pedophilia or pedophilia rings, ya sick ****.

Nor did I make any claims about collusion, a lie that you fabricated.

Dumbfuck, you asserted just being investigated for something is evidence the matter of the investigation is illegal. Now apply that moronic thought to the investigation into collusion with Russia.

Dayum, you’re slow. Even moreso than most conservatives.

What crime did Trump commit? Cue the **** act.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, what crime did Hillary commit?

Meanwhile, it was you who asserted the bullshit that transmitting classified material from a private server is a crime because the FBI investigated Hillary for that. I’m merely applying your [il]logic to trump and his campaign which like Hillary, was investigated by the FBI — for colluding with Russians.

So according to you, that means collusion is s crime.

 

[candycorn]

Our Founding Fathers already provided an express solution. The right wing has no better solutions at lower cost. See the problem?

Speed is not what we want. We want a good solution. BUILD THE ******* WALL, you mexican.

As soon as Mexico sends the pesos. Oy!

Why do you want the world to have unfettered access to our community and citizens?

Capitalism: What is That, Sayeth the Right Wing.

Why do you feel that you have a right to expect an answer to my question, when you did not give me the same respect?

Why do you hate America?

 

[Flopper]

So what you're saying is if congress won't give the president what he wants, he claims he needs it to protect America so then it's his responsibility to declare a national emergency and just take it. I'm sure the next democrat president is going just love this.

Illegal immigration is a MASSIVE problem for the U.S. American citizens are victimized in terms of crime and higher taxes and medical care as a direct result of many millions of illegals in America. These are undeniable facts. What's also clear is that he U.S. Congress has abdicated its responsibility to protect Americans and to protect our nation's immigration laws. Therefore, Trump is wholly within his right, and responsibility, to declare the emergency.

By the way, Obama also avoided obtaining congressional approval for his horrific deal with Iran, the Paris Accord, etc. Trump taking unilateral action is not unprecedented, as evidenced by the community organizer that preceded him. At least in Trump's case, he is working for the interests of the American people, as opposed to the detriment of the American people, as Obama habitually did.

I never claimed illegal immigration was not a problem but it's not an emergency. There is certainly nothing unforeseen, sudden, nor urgent about it. Just because you and Mr. Trump are sick and tired on it, doesn't make it an emergency. It has been going on for over 70 years. Border crossings under Trump are significant lower than in the past.

In 2000, there was estimated 1.6 million border crosser and 1.3 million in 2003. by the end of the decade the number had feel to 554,000. By 2011, crossers had fallen to 340,000 in 2011. By 2017 we had reached a record low of 311,000. According to the CBP in 2018, there 396,000 apprehension but that included 124,000 presenting themselves at the border to ask for asylum. The number actually caught illegal entering the US was at an astounding low figure of only 278,000, the lowest number ever recorded and you say that's an emergency. I say, BULL SHIT!
Is the US in an 'illegal' immigration crisis? Border patrol data suggests otherwise

 

[Flopper]

I am most concerned with "Americans" like yourself, that want to imprison your political enemies on trumped up bullshit.


But the fact that you see yourself as allied with the Mexican instead of your fellow Americans, is noted and not surprising at all.

We have a First Amendment; your moral bigotry is worthless. Besides, it takes morals to have moral forms of indignation.

It is not moral bigotry to distinguish between wanting to imprison people for political reasons, and wanting to see them imprisoned for criminal reasons.


It takes a dim mind to not see that.

right wing kettles calling less fortunate pots, black; gibberish, like usual for the Right Wing.

I take it you are completely ignorant of how Hillary was given a pass for a crime that less powerful people have done time for.

politics must not be as easy as it seems. usually, career politicians take care of the political stuff.

One of hardest things to get done in politics is getting a bill passed through the US congress which has any significant impact on the American people. There is nothing easy about being successful in national political office. I think even Donald Trump would agree with this. It's all about relationships, trust, and honesty with your peers. That takes years to develop and most congressmen are never able to do it.

 

[edward37]

We have a First Amendment; your moral bigotry is worthless. Besides, it takes morals to have moral forms of indignation.

It is not moral bigotry to distinguish between wanting to imprison people for political reasons, and wanting to see them imprisoned for criminal reasons.


It takes a dim mind to not see that.

right wing kettles calling less fortunate pots, black; gibberish, like usual for the Right Wing.

I take it you are completely ignorant of how Hillary was given a pass for a crime that less powerful people have done time for.

politics must not be as easy as it seems. usually, career politicians take care of the political stuff.

One of hardest things to get done in politics is getting a bill passed through the US congress which has any significant impact on the American people. There is nothing easy about being successful in national political office. I think even Donald Trump would agree with this. It's all about relationships, trust, and honesty with your peers. That takes years to develop and most congressmen are never able to do it.

He IS going to sign the bill AND declare a national emergency I'm at a loss for words bad enough to call this POS

 

[Flopper]

It is not moral bigotry to distinguish between wanting to imprison people for political reasons, and wanting to see them imprisoned for criminal reasons.


It takes a dim mind to not see that.

right wing kettles calling less fortunate pots, black; gibberish, like usual for the Right Wing.

I take it you are completely ignorant of how Hillary was given a pass for a crime that less powerful people have done time for.

politics must not be as easy as it seems. usually, career politicians take care of the political stuff.

One of hardest things to get done in politics is getting a bill passed through the US congress which has any significant impact on the American people. There is nothing easy about being successful in national political office. I think even Donald Trump would agree with this. It's all about relationships, trust, and honesty with your peers. That takes years to develop and most congressmen are never able to do it.

He IS going to sign the bill AND declare a national emergency I'm at a loss for words bad enough to call this POS

He will declare a national emergency if thinks it will play well with his base and he can get it thru the courts, however it will cost him among republicans in congress and it may cost him the election. 64% of the people say he shouldn't call a national emergency and a surprisingly number of republicans agree

After his campaign promise of a big beautiful wall across our southern border paid for by Mexicans, a 55 mile slatted fence paid for by the US taxpayer is not going look very impressive.

 

[danielpalos]

we have a commerce clause; why not make money with a commercial way instead of lose money like Bad capitalists.

Because money is not everything. Because although we are a capitalistic nation, we are not solely a nation of capitalists, and everyone has a right to have their interests considered in national policy.


Much like you are loyal to ALL Mexicans, and not just the rich ones.

If it is not about money, it must be about our Constitution, not right wing fantasy.

There is no express immigration clause or express wall building clause.

Our welfare clause is General, we have a commerce clause. Why are we losing money on border policy?

And now the Dump spends 2 trillion on a tax cut that has a 28% approval Damn republican fools

Why are right wingers such lousy capitalists? We should be generating revenue from foreign nationals not losing money with a non-existent from Inception, immigration clause.

You dare have something bad to say about our LOL fiscal conservative republican friends?

the right wing alleges to subscribe to Capitalism in public venues.

 

[K9Buck]

...what crime did Hillary commit?

LOL. What crime hasn't she committed.

 

[K9Buck]

...it will cost him among republicans in congress and it may cost him the election.

Much of the Republican congress consists of a bunch of feckless cucks. Screw them. Secure the border.

 

[Correll]

I am most concerned with "Americans" like yourself, that want to imprison your political enemies on trumped up bullshit.


But the fact that you see yourself as allied with the Mexican instead of your fellow Americans, is noted and not surprising at all.

We have a First Amendment; your moral bigotry is worthless. Besides, it takes morals to have moral forms of indignation.

It is not moral bigotry to distinguish between wanting to imprison people for political reasons, and wanting to see them imprisoned for criminal reasons.


It takes a dim mind to not see that.

right wing kettles calling less fortunate pots, black; gibberish, like usual for the Right Wing.

I take it you are completely ignorant of how Hillary was given a pass for a crime that less powerful people have done time for.

politics must not be as easy as it seems. usually, career politicians take care of the political stuff.

A simple yes would have sufficed.

 

[Correll]

1. That is not a question.

2. The government is spending over four trillion dollars this budget year, with no complaint from you. YOur pretense that you are concerned about money is dismissed.

3. And you still have not answered my question, coward.

which question is that, brave guy?

Every sovereign people in the world, has the right to determine who enters and joins their community.


Except it seems, Americans.


Why is that? Why are we second class citizens in the eyes of the Left?

lol. Our Founding Fathers already Told us how it needs to be done. There is no express immigration clause in our federal Constitution. Our welfare clause is general and our commerce clause can cover this issue.

why be a lousy capitalist and lose money on border policy, but blame the Poor for not working hard enough.

And still no answer to my question, coward.

taking us to War in the Middle East and taking a tax cut for it is worse. The right wing is making a profit off of weapons of mass and micro destruction. Nobody seems to be going to jail for that Right Wing public policy.

In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people, personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore, we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.

I can understand why you would want to change the subject.



You can't justify your position of America and Americans having fewer rights than EVERY OTHER NATION IN THE ******* WORLD.



The reason is simple. YOu are a loyal Mexican who is loyal to your fellow Mexicans, and at best, you don't give a damn about your supposedly fellow Americans.


YOu lied when you swore loyalty to this nation.

 

[Correll]

It will promote the general welfare of AMERICANS, to build the Wall, and keep out Mexicans like you.


Which is why you are against it.

You are loyal to your fellow Mexicans, not your supposedly fellow Americans.

a wall does Nothing for the general welfare.
.....

Sure it does. It keeps out Third World immigrants of which we already have WAY too many.


That is good for America and Americans.

we have a commerce clause; why not make money with a commercial way instead of lose money like Bad capitalists.

Because money is not everything. Because although we are a capitalistic nation, we are not solely a nation of capitalists, and everyone has a right to have their interests considered in national policy.


Much like you are loyal to ALL Mexicans, and not just the rich ones.

If it is not about money, it must be about our Constitution, not right wing fantasy.

There is no express immigration clause or express wall building clause.

Our welfare clause is General, we have a commerce clause. Why are we losing money on border policy?

That is insanely stupid.


If it is not about money, it could be about the best interests of our citizens as a whole.


I clearly pointed out, that in my opinion at least, it is about the best interests of Americans.


We both know why you choose to spout idiocy instead of addressing what I actually said.


Because you are too cowardly and dishonest to admit that you are actively hostile to the interests of your supposedly fellow Americans.

 

[Correll]

Your desire to jail people, for political reasons, shows that the Left is fascist.

Oh, for ****'s sake ...



Did you vote for Trump?

Your idiocy is beyond words.


Hillary was guilty of actual crimes.

Liar. If she was guilty of actual crimes, Trump would make sure she was prosecuted. He even said so when was running for president.

So, now you're position is the anything and everything Trump says, should be regarded as the absolute Truth and nothing but the TRuth?


Interesting. YOu libs really will spew whatever shit you need to make your latest shit sort of hold together enough to give yourself a rationalization to be a shitty asshole, regardless of how much shit you have to spew from your face anus.

Meanwhile, while you’re calling folks on the left, “fascists,” for looking to lock up political opponents, you forgive folks on the right for doing the same.

And you cowardly avoid answering... did you vote for trump?

Funny, how you ignored the "for political reasons" which is obvious your motivation for EVERYONE, you fascist.

LOLOL

You freaks have been calling for her incarceration for decades now. Oh, that’s not political, is it?

Well, in the sense that we republicans support the rule of law, and you liberals don't, yes it is political.

 

[Correll]

Nice play on words. To an actual "simple mind" that word play, might look like a point.


There is nothing wrong with simple solutions. Sometimes that is what is called for.


BUILD THE ******* WALL.

Like throwing money down a well in order to fill it up so that nobody will drown in it.

The topic is simple enough that we don't need analogies to explain it.


Build a wall to keep out people and things that we don't want to enter our community.



As is our right. As is the right of EVERY sovereign nation.

We already have walls and fences.

Which you are against maintaining.


Because you don't believe that America has the same rights as other nations.



Because you hate America.

Nope, you’re lying again.

The issue is whether to build a Wall or not.


I interpreted your constant attacks on me for wanting a Wall, as opposition to the Wall.


In another post, you have finally revealed that you are for a Wall.


That is fairly insane of you, but ok.



So, what do you think of the asshole fucktards who think that America has fewer rights than ever other nation in the World?

 

[Correll]

The wall. A simple solution to simple minded people.

Nice play on words. To an actual "simple mind" that word play, might look like a point.


There is nothing wrong with simple solutions. Sometimes that is what is called for.


BUILD THE ******* WALL.

How much have you given...?

Click here to support We The People Will Build the Wall organized by Brian Kolfage

Correll doesn't get out much. He is not aware that Mexicans have ladders, shovels, airplanes, boats, rafts, and visas. Where the wall doesn't work, he is in favor of printing signs reading "no trespassing" to hang on it.

That was the words of a very simple mind.


Too simple to understand how walls work.

Oh, which of those tools can be defeated by a wall...?

Depends on how you define "defeat".


No one claims that the Wall will stop all invaders.



But if the need for a ladder or a tunnel, reduces border crossings by half,


that would be a huge "defeat" for the illegals, and a HUGE win for America.


And I hope for better.

AND, of course the Wall is only PART Of what we are doing.


You know that right?