Trump 'wont partake' in new investigation, 'worst politicization of justice', will talk at 8:30ET tonight:"been going through it for 6 years, no more"

[basquebromance]

Thing is, with prosecutors you don’t have to “partake.” They and the agents and the grand jurors go about their business without you having to “partake” at all. You even have a right not to “partake.”

Trump says he 'won't partake' in special counsel investigation, slams as 'worst politicization of justice'

Former President Donald Trump slammed the appointment of a special counsel to take over investigations related to records taken from his Mar-a-Lago home and Jan. 6.

www.foxnews.com

excerpt:

"Hunter Biden is a criminal many times over and nothing happens to him," Trump said. "Joe Biden is a criminal many times over — and nothing happens to them.

 

[pknopp]

Whose fault is it that nothing happened to Hunter? Trumps.

 

[shockedcanadian]

He is focusing on his 2024 campaign, after so many actions against him, only the most rabid anti-Trumpers would blame him for this stance.

The ancient Greeks really coined the term "civil disobedience" and it has been invoked countless times since.

 

[mamooth]

The ancient Greeks really coined the term "civil disobedience" and it has been invoked countless times since.

Contrary to what you're claiming "civil disobedience" does not mean "I'm going to ignore any laws I don't like."

"Civil disobedience" means deliberately breaking an unjust law, and then -- this is the important part -- willingly accepting the punishment for doing so.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[basquebromance]

 

[excalibur]

Trouble for what?

The PRA has no criminal penalty for a former POTUS, otherwise Øbama would be in trouble for keeping classified documents in an unsafe warehouse when his foundation had to pay NARA to emove them and place them is safe storage.

NARA has no right to determine what are personal records per a DC Circuit Court ten years ago, in a case in which the DoJ backed Bill Clinton's claims in a lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch.

NARA does not have the authority to designate materials as “Presidential records,” NARA does not have the tapes in question, and NARA lacks any right, duty, or means to seize control of them. In other words, there has been no showing that a remedy would be available to redress plaintiff's alleged injury even if the Court agreed with plaintiff's characterization of the materials. Since plaintiff is completely unable to identify anything the Court could order the agency to do that the agency has any power, much less, a mandatory duty, to do, the case must be dismissed.​

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288 | Casetext Search + Citator

Read Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Nat'l Archives & Records Admin., 845 F. Supp. 2d 288, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database

casetext.com

 

[JimH52]

No.need for him to "partake." He has screwed up enough.

 

[basquebromance]

 

[basquebromance]

 

[JustAGuy1]

Whose fault is it that nothing happened to Hunter? Trumps.

Bullshit. All of our 3 letter Agencies protected him.

 

[Clipper]

Nobody gives a rat's ass what Three Martini Lunch Larry thinks, says or does. That clown has never been right about anything.

 

[Care4all]

Trouble for what?

The PRA has no criminal penalty for a former POTUS, otherwise Øbama would be in trouble for keeping classified documents in an unsafe warehouse when his foundation had to pay NARA to emove them and place them is safe storage.

NARA has no right to determine what are personal records per a DC Circuit Court ten years ago, in a case in which the DoJ backed Bill Clinton's claims in a lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch.

​

NARA does not have the authority to designate materials as “Presidential records,” NARA does not have the tapes in question, and NARA lacks any right, duty, or means to seize control of them. In other words, there has been no showing that a remedy would be available to redress plaintiff's alleged injury even if the Court agreed with plaintiff's characterization of the materials. Since plaintiff is completely unable to identify anything the Court could order the agency to do that the agency has any power, much less, a mandatory duty, to do, the case must be dismissed.​

https://casetext.com/case/judicial-watch-inc-v-natl-archives-records-admand

http://

regardless, Clinton's records were personal and judicial watch had no right to them.
-----------
The PRA distinguishes Presidential records from “personal records,” defining personal records as “all documentary materials, or any reasonably segregable portion thereof, of a purely private or nonpublic character which do not relate to or have an effect upon the carrying out of the constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.” Id. § 2201(3). The PRA provides that “diaries, journals or other personal notes serving as the functional equivalent of a diary or journal which are not prepared or utilized for, or circulated or communicated in the course of, transacting Governmental business” should be treated as personal records[/URL]

 

[Moonglow]

Thing is, with prosecutors you don’t have to “partake.” They and the agents and the grand jurors go about their business without you having to “partake” at all. You even have a right not to “partake.”

Trump says he 'won't partake' in special counsel investigation, slams as 'worst politicization of justice'

Former President Donald Trump slammed the appointment of a special counsel to take over investigations related to records taken from his Mar-a-Lago home and Jan. 6.

www.foxnews.com

excerpt:

"Hunter Biden is a criminal many times over and nothing happens to him," Trump said. "Joe Biden is a criminal many times over — and nothing happens to them.

It was longer for Bill Clintoon and yet the GOP never bitched.

 

[Moonglow]

Thing is, with prosecutors you don’t have to “partake.” They and the agents and the grand jurors go about their business without you having to “partake” at all. You even have a right not to “partake.”

Trump says he 'won't partake' in special counsel investigation, slams as 'worst politicization of justice'

Former President Donald Trump slammed the appointment of a special counsel to take over investigations related to records taken from his Mar-a-Lago home and Jan. 6.

www.foxnews.com

excerpt:

"Hunter Biden is a criminal many times over and nothing happens to him," Trump said. "Joe Biden is a criminal many times over — and nothing happens to them.

You are wrong as per usual.​

​

​

​

Republican Inquiry Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by Biden​

https://www.nytimes.com › U.S. › Politics



Nov 7, 2020 — WASHINGTON — An election-year investigation by Senate Republicans into corruption allegations against Joseph R. Biden Jr. and his son, ...

 

[Dragonlady]

He is focusing on his 2024 campaign, after so many actions against him, only the most rabid anti-Trumpers would blame him for this stance.

The ancient Greeks really coined the term "civil disobedience" and it has been invoked countless times since.

Trump is scared shitless he's going to jail. That's why he announced he's running again. This isn't going to stop the prosecutions.

 

[scruffy]

Whose fault is it that nothing happened to Hunter? Trumps.

What a totally assholey thing to say. ^^^

Bet you blame the rape victim too.

Dimtards are total assholes. ^^^

 

[Leo123]

Trump is scared shitless he's going to jail. That's why he announced he's running again. This isn't going to stop the prosecutions.

I hate to tell you but, Trump is not scared shitless of you.

 

[Care4all]

I hate to tell you but, Trump is not scared shitless of you.

I think he is afraid of the Law this time.... This time he may not be as Teflon coated, as he thought? And he has only been making it worse for himself!

 

[Leo123]

I think he is afraid of the Law this time.... This time he may not be as Teflon coated, as he thought? And he has only been making it worse for himself!

Trump hasn't broken the law. Obviously.