- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,654
- 27,996
- 2,180
What does that imply?But "Aid to Obstruction" is!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What does that imply?But "Aid to Obstruction" is!
I'm sorry, I meant Insurrection. Aid to Insurrection.What does that imply?
I'm sorry, I meant Insurrection. Aid to Insurrection.
Where is that evidence?I'm sorry, I meant Insurrection. Aid to Insurrection.
He was breathing?Whatever TF aid to insurrection means. How did Trump aid in any insurrection? He wasn't even near the Capitol.
He was within driving distance and the SS said no!Whatever TF aid to insurrection means. How did Trump aid in any insurrection? He wasn't even near the Capitol.
Read the referral, troll!Where is that evidence?
What referral? You said you didn’t read it!Read the referral, troll!
And neither did you, troll!What referral? You said you didn’t read it!
He was within driving distance and the SS said no!
So wait, you’re saying the SS said no? How’s that on trump?He was within driving distance and the SS said no!
Why should I read fictional documents? Post what they say that means anything to me?And neither did you, troll!
"Obstructing an official proceeding" is the charge you're thinking of, moron, which has noting to do with obstruction of justice.But "Aid to Obstruction" is!
Wrong! According to Hutchason's testimony, Trump physically attacked an SS agent because he couldn't go to the Capitol. That's prima facia evidence that he intended to lead the insurrection.Okay, so that's more evidence yet he couldn't have aided in any insurrection, right?
Because Trump's "desire" was to go.So wait, you’re saying the SS said no? How’s that on trump?
Because they are not fictional documents, troll, they exist.Why should I read fictional documents? Post what they say that means anything to me?
I misspoke. Aid to insurrection."Obstructing an official proceeding" is the charge you're thinking of, moron, which has noting to do with obstruction of justice.
What’s that have to do with your post?Because Trump's "desire" was to go.
I misspoke. Aid to insurrection.
My post was in response to yours.What’s that have to do with your post?