Trump wins again: Michigan judge denies effort to keep Trump off 2024 ballot

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I know that you know that I know it is real.
I wish the voters that put this Pedo in office would admit they voted for a Pedo

Being an embarrassing cultist comes with its downsides, I guess. Good luck.

 

[Tunafish]

Being an embarrassing cultist comes with its downsides, I guess. Good luck.

^^supports a Pedo in the White House
AMF

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

^^supports a Pedo in the White House
AMF

Haha, poor little one trick pony

 

[Dragonlady]

Michigan judge denies effort to keep Trump off 2024 ballot

The decision comes after a group of Michigan voters filed a legal challenge to Donald Trump’s candidacy, arguing that he had violated the 14th Amendment.

www.nbcnews.com

Trump has won numerous court rulings. This one among them.

Maybe instead of trying to get Trump off the ballot, Dems can be better. Dems can get more votes if they just do better. PERIOD.

Democrats have done that twice. The first time he took power on the EC technicality. The second time he tried to seize power by force.

The third time will not be the charm.

 

[Dagosa]

What I mean is this is not a win for Trump. Unless you consider going up against some liberal group that brought forth a case that no Democratic politician was supporting.

Same for bragging that he "WON AGAIN" in an all red state.

Hidden meaning ?

 

[Tunafish]

Haha, poor little one trick pony

AMF

 

[Dagosa]

What I mean is this is not a win for Trump. Unless you consider going up against some liberal group that brought forth a case that no Democratic politician was supporting.

Same for bragging that he "WON AGAIN" in an all red state.

Exactly...
There are some republicans who are PRO CHOICE OR MODERATE on abortion issue who will do well in red states. The polls aren’t showing the women’s votes.

 

[sealybobo]

Exactly...
There are some republicans who are PRO CHOICE OR MODERATE on abortion issue who will do well in red states. The polls aren’t showing the women’s votes.

Name a pro choice Republican.

And if they were in the House, would they go along with an abortion ban? Darn tootin they would.

 

[Dagosa]

Name a pro choice Republican.

And if they were in the House, would they go along with an abortion ban? Darn tootin they would.

Just one ? In the senate, Susan Collins.

 

[sealybobo]

Just one ? In the senate, Susan Collins.

“The Supreme Court has abandoned a fifty-year precedent at a time that the country is desperate for stability. This ill-considered action will further divide the country at a moment when, more than ever in modern times, we need the Court to show both consistency and restraint. Throwing out a precedent overnight that the country has relied upon for half a century is not conservative. It is a sudden and radical jolt to the country that will lead to political chaos, anger, and a further loss of confidence in our government.



“This decision is inconsistent with what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and their meetings with me, where they both were insistent on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents that the country has relied upon.



“Earlier this year, Senator Murkowski and I introduced the Reproductive Choice Act to codify the abortion rights established by Roe v. Wade and affirmed by Planned Parenthood v. Casey. I am also working with Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) on a bipartisan bill that would codify Roe, Casey, Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt, and Griswold v. Connecticut. Our legislation would enshrine important abortion protections into law without undercutting statutes that have been in place for decades and without eliminating basic conscience protections that are relied upon by health care providers who have religious objections to performing abortions.



“Our goal with this legislation is to do what the Court should have done — provide the consistency in our abortion laws that Americans have relied upon for 50 years.”

 

[Dagosa]

“The Supreme Court has abandoned a fifty-year precedent at a time that the country is desperate for stability. This ill-considered action will further divide the country at a moment when, more than ever in modern times, we need the Court to show both consistency and restraint. Throwing out a precedent overnight that the country has relied upon for half a century is not conservative. It is a sudden and radical jolt to the country that will lead to political chaos, anger, and a further loss of confidence in our government.



“This decision is inconsistent with what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and their meetings with me, where they both were insistent on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents that the country has relied upon.



“Earlier this year, Senator Murkowski and I introduced the Reproductive Choice Act to codify the abortion rights established by Roe v. Wade and affirmed by Planned Parenthood v. Casey. I am also working with Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) on a bipartisan bill that would codify Roe, Casey, Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt, and Griswold v. Connecticut. Our legislation would enshrine important abortion protections into law without undercutting statutes that have been in place for decades and without eliminating basic conscience protections that are relied upon by health care providers who have religious objections to performing abortions.



“Our goal with this legislation is to do what the Court should have done — provide the consistency in our abortion laws that Americans have relied upon for 50 years.”

Susan Collins IS pro choice.

Political positions of Susan Collins - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Dagosa]

And if they were in the House, would they go along with an abortion ban? Darn tootin they would.

Nope. You can’t say that. They would go along with their constituents. You couldn’t get 1/4 of the gop in either house to vote for a total abortion ban. It’s toxic. Most have seen the writing on the wall and are now talking “exceptions” which is much closer to pro choice than a total ban. Abortion in these exceptions and IS what Roe Wade had evolved into.

Why ? Simply because no one likes the govt telling anyone what the choices are.

 

[bripat9643]

Every time the Democrats fail in their attempts to interfere in the 2024 election, America wins.

How can they do better when the represent thugs who want to destroy America?

 

[bripat9643]

Democrats have done that twice. The first time he took power on the EC technicality. The second time he tried to seize power by force.

The third time will not be the charm.

The Constitution isn't a "technicality," dingbat.

 

[Dagosa]

How can they do better when the represent thugs who want to destroy America?

 

[WEATHER53]

“The Supreme Court has abandoned a fifty-year precedent at a time that the country is desperate for stability. This ill-considered action will further divide the country at a moment when, more than ever in modern times, we need the Court to show both consistency and restraint. Throwing out a precedent overnight that the country has relied upon for half a century is not conservative. It is a sudden and radical jolt to the country that will lead to political chaos, anger, and a further loss of confidence in our government.



“This decision is inconsistent with what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and their meetings with me, where they both were insistent on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents that the country has relied upon.



“Earlier this year, Senator Murkowski and I introduced the Reproductive Choice Act to codify the abortion rights established by Roe v. Wade and affirmed by Planned Parenthood v. Casey. I am also working with Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) on a bipartisan bill that would codify Roe, Casey, Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt, and Griswold v. Connecticut. Our legislation would enshrine important abortion protections into law without undercutting statutes that have been in place for decades and without eliminating basic conscience protections that are relied upon by health care providers who have religious objections to performing abortions.



“Our goal with this legislation is to do what the Court should have done — provide the consistency in our abortion laws that Americans have relied upon for 50 years.”

Quotes from whom?

 

[WEATHER53]

View attachment 859957

Fake
Your wheelhouse of wishes

 

[bripat9643]

View attachment 859957

 

[sealybobo]

Michigan judge denies effort to keep Trump off 2024 ballot

The decision comes after a group of Michigan voters filed a legal challenge to Donald Trump’s candidacy, arguing that he had violated the 14th Amendment.

www.nbcnews.com

Trump has won numerous court rulings. This one among them.

Maybe instead of trying to get Trump off the ballot, Dems can be better. Dems can get more votes if they just do better. PERIOD.

You were so happy about this. So I'm sure you are sad AF about this

Trump Ruled Ineligible For Presidency By Colorado Supreme Court, Disqualified From State Ballot

“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” the court wrote in its decision on Trump's 14th Amendment violations.

www.huffpost.com

 

[Billiejeens]

You were so happy about this. So I'm sure you are sad AF about this

Trump Ruled Ineligible For Presidency By Colorado Supreme Court, Disqualified From State Ballot

“We do not reach these conclusions lightly,” the court wrote in its decision on Trump's 14th Amendment violations.

www.huffpost.com

and we know that we will be overturned, but making a statement was important to us.