Trump wins 60 percent approval in rural areas of key states

[jc456]

link!!!!

Link to what? You bing a whiny ***** boy who uses 'personal struggles' as an excuse to be a racist douche? This thread covers that.

a link that says saying injuns is the same as the N word. come on big guy back up your fking claim. useless.

more made up junk from the likes of you

It's not the same as the N word, one is a slur against black people way back when they were slaves, it's often censored now. The other is a racial slur against Native Americans first used by people who apparently couldn't be bothered to pronounce 'indian' correctly. It is offensive none the less.

Injun definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
1. US a dated or offensive informal word for (American) Indian
2. honest Injun

injun refers to American Indian. I just posted the link. so fk off.

Yes, of course indian refers to Native and/or American Indians, idiot.

well there are other indians in the world. hence the term you fking idiot.

 

[toobfreak]

Well no. I've joked about before but to seriously think people in rural or urban communities are smarter or dumber than the other is kind of lame.

Yet many(most?) Lefties here make that claim very seriously.

Urbanites, at least those that have the ability to make the choice of where to live probably have more money than those in rural communities

Or maybe not. It costs money to own land and owning land is a good way to make a lot of money. You won't find many rural people living in small, cramped 1-2 bedroom apartments. I kinda tend to believe that all those people living in city slums and public housing or city folk commuting to the big city with both working to pay the bills can't have too much money.

My post however is about polling and to simply claim that Trump is popular with 19% of the country

When did his base shrink to only 19%? It has always been around 33-36%.

that should be his base in no way is a good argument that Trump overall is popular. Then to double down and actually throw a map up that has nothing to do with population just further demonstrates the insincerity of the OP.

Population is irrelevant. The map showed counties won. Counties add up to districts and districts add up to states, and presidential elections are 50 small STATE elections. So to argue whether Trump is "popular" or not, I saved some very interesting figures which puts things into better perspective, then you tell me Trump wasn't "popular" in 2016:

View attachment 278688

The only thing I would take issue with is that the 1.5 million figure was either premature or a typo. It actually came out to be 2.8 million, but again, irrelevant because once you win a state, you've won the state, you cannot win a state MORE. The Founders were wise in their vision to design a system limiting a local mob from taking the voice and representation from vast districts of the country so that ALL parts of the nation have a voice.

Here we go confusing empty land for population when the topic of the OP is a poll taken of the population and not acreage.

So Trump won 60% of the vote in the vast area of the country. The only one confused is apparently you. 60% of anything is still 60% and polls may be nice to think about and look at but polls do not DECIDE anything------ if you think about it, ACREAGE does. Because winning voting districts is how you win a state. You could put 50 million people in one district, it will only win you a small AREA in one state. It might win you the whole state. But it is the STATES you win and the Electoral votes each state tallies up which decides the election, NOT polls. Polls ain't worth shit neither are popular head counts. If you think you want that you better go back to Merry Ol' England and kiss the Queen's feet.

No, doesn't confuse me at all, I'm not the one confusing acreage for popularity. Acres don't vote, people do. Acres have nothing to do with the popular vote or the electoral college. Did you ever go to school?

I must have. I learned to read. You still apparently can't. Or maybe like the chicken you see but fail to comprehend.

 

[HappyJoy]

Correct, I'm not deflecting.

I can only take you at your word when you call Native Americans 'injun'.

Really? As you denigrate a whole people your excuse is your own personal struggles? What a whiny ***** boy you are. Take responsibility for your choice of words.

She's actually spoken to them and apologized. You on the other hand probably have never had a conversation with one about the racist words you call them by. No, not you, you're to busy with your 'personal struggles'. What a total little baby.

denigrate how? Injun? hmmmmmm so white guys can be called all kinds of things by you and you are ok with it. but injuns sparks fire in your ass? dude, sympathy isn't what an indian is looking for from you. how morally pathetic.

There you go again. Someone called you a cracker once and since you're such a whiny little boy you think that excuses your own behavior.

Tell ya' what. I don't call black people the N word because I'm not black, I don't care what they call each other. Same with Native Americans. I am white however and that gives me the right to call you a whining little ***** boy.

link!!!!

Link to what? You bing a whiny ***** boy who uses 'personal struggles' as an excuse to be a racist douche? This thread covers that.

You cannot get caught up in JC or even Flash's racist delusions. It's just senseless. I mean Fox is person, and I wouldn't diss her for the world, but message boards are great places to use race and creed as deflections, but capital flow amongst nations, and even in the EU, is something perhaps more for an economics board. if I'm not posting to her, I'm sure not getting into those two's shitlife.

But it brings up Warren's challenge. If she can't explain her positions to rural voters after she had to wait tables as a teenager after her father got sick in Oklahoma, she shouldn't win. Not that she'd carry Ok, but enough people in Minny Wisc and Pa outta get it, unless she's really horrible on the stump.

She won't win the rural vote. Just like Republicans won't win the urban vote. Obama didn't win the rural vote either but he still carried all those states as they are multi dimensional.

Biden won't win the rural vote either so I'm not sure why that burden should be put on any other candidate.

Completely agree about little ***** boy who is suffering from 'personal struggles'.

 

[jc456]

Well no. I've joked about before but to seriously think people in rural or urban communities are smarter or dumber than the other is kind of lame.

Yet many(most?) Lefties here make that claim very seriously.

Urbanites, at least those that have the ability to make the choice of where to live probably have more money than those in rural communities

Or maybe not. It costs money to own land and owning land is a good way to make a lot of money. You won't find many rural people living in small, cramped 1-2 bedroom apartments. I kinda tend to believe that all those people living in city slums and public housing or city folk commuting to the big city with both working to pay the bills can't have too much money.

My post however is about polling and to simply claim that Trump is popular with 19% of the country

When did his base shrink to only 19%? It has always been around 33-36%.

that should be his base in no way is a good argument that Trump overall is popular. Then to double down and actually throw a map up that has nothing to do with population just further demonstrates the insincerity of the OP.

Population is irrelevant. The map showed counties won. Counties add up to districts and districts add up to states, and presidential elections are 50 small STATE elections. So to argue whether Trump is "popular" or not, I saved some very interesting figures which puts things into better perspective, then you tell me Trump wasn't "popular" in 2016:

View attachment 278688

The only thing I would take issue with is that the 1.5 million figure was either premature or a typo. It actually came out to be 2.8 million, but again, irrelevant because once you win a state, you've won the state, you cannot win a state MORE. The Founders were wise in their vision to design a system limiting a local mob from taking the voice and representation from vast districts of the country so that ALL parts of the nation have a voice.

Here we go confusing empty land for population when the topic of the OP is a poll taken of the population and not acreage.

So Trump won 60% of the vote in the vast area of the country. The only one confused is apparently you. 60% of anything is still 60% and polls may be nice to think about and look at but polls do not DECIDE anything------ if you think about it, ACREAGE does. Because winning voting districts is how you win a state. You could put 50 million people in one district, it will only win you a small AREA in one state. It might win you the whole state. But it is the STATES you win and the Electoral votes each state tallies up which decides the election, NOT polls. Polls ain't worth shit neither are popular head counts. If you think you want that you better go back to Merry Ol' England and kiss the Queen's feet.

No, doesn't confuse me at all, I'm not the one confusing acreage for popularity. Acres don't vote, people do. Acres have nothing to do with the popular vote or the electoral college. Did you ever go to school?

I must have. I learned to read. You still apparently can't. Or maybe like the chicken you see but fail to comprehend.

or the head's chopped off.

 

[jc456]

denigrate how? Injun? hmmmmmm so white guys can be called all kinds of things by you and you are ok with it. but injuns sparks fire in your ass? dude, sympathy isn't what an indian is looking for from you. how morally pathetic.

There you go again. Someone called you a cracker once and since you're such a whiny little boy you think that excuses your own behavior.

Tell ya' what. I don't call black people the N word because I'm not black, I don't care what they call each other. Same with Native Americans. I am white however and that gives me the right to call you a whining little ***** boy.

link!!!!

Link to what? You bing a whiny ***** boy who uses 'personal struggles' as an excuse to be a racist douche? This thread covers that.

You cannot get caught up in JC or even Flash's racist delusions. It's just senseless. I mean Fox is person, and I wouldn't diss her for the world, but message boards are great places to use race and creed as deflections, but capital flow amongst nations, and even in the EU, is something perhaps more for an economics board. if I'm not posting to her, I'm sure not getting into those two's shitlife.

But it brings up Warren's challenge. If she can't explain her positions to rural voters after she had to wait tables as a teenager after her father got sick in Oklahoma, she shouldn't win. Not that she'd carry Ok, but enough people in Minny Wisc and Pa outta get it, unless she's really horrible on the stump.

She won't win the rural vote. Just like a Republicans won't win the urban vote. Obama didn't win the rural vote either but he still carried all those states as they are multi dimensional.

Biden won't win the rural vote either so I'm not sure why that burden should be put on any other candidate.

Completely agree about little ***** boy who is suffering from 'personal struggles'.

can't make it up. dude, did you proof this before you posted? surely you didn't.

 

[HappyJoy]

Well no. I've joked about before but to seriously think people in rural or urban communities are smarter or dumber than the other is kind of lame.

Yet many(most?) Lefties here make that claim very seriously.

Urbanites, at least those that have the ability to make the choice of where to live probably have more money than those in rural communities

Or maybe not. It costs money to own land and owning land is a good way to make a lot of money. You won't find many rural people living in small, cramped 1-2 bedroom apartments. I kinda tend to believe that all those people living in city slums and public housing or city folk commuting to the big city with both working to pay the bills can't have too much money.

My post however is about polling and to simply claim that Trump is popular with 19% of the country

When did his base shrink to only 19%? It has always been around 33-36%.

that should be his base in no way is a good argument that Trump overall is popular. Then to double down and actually throw a map up that has nothing to do with population just further demonstrates the insincerity of the OP.

Population is irrelevant. The map showed counties won. Counties add up to districts and districts add up to states, and presidential elections are 50 small STATE elections. So to argue whether Trump is "popular" or not, I saved some very interesting figures which puts things into better perspective, then you tell me Trump wasn't "popular" in 2016:

View attachment 278688

The only thing I would take issue with is that the 1.5 million figure was either premature or a typo. It actually came out to be 2.8 million, but again, irrelevant because once you win a state, you've won the state, you cannot win a state MORE. The Founders were wise in their vision to design a system limiting a local mob from taking the voice and representation from vast districts of the country so that ALL parts of the nation have a voice.

Here we go confusing empty land for population when the topic of the OP is a poll taken of the population and not acreage.

So Trump won 60% of the vote in the vast area of the country. The only one confused is apparently you. 60% of anything is still 60% and polls may be nice to think about and look at but polls do not DECIDE anything------ if you think about it, ACREAGE does. Because winning voting districts is how you win a state. You could put 50 million people in one district, it will only win you a small AREA in one state. It might win you the whole state. But it is the STATES you win and the Electoral votes each state tallies up which decides the election, NOT polls. Polls ain't worth shit neither are popular head counts. If you think you want that you better go back to Merry Ol' England and kiss the Queen's feet.

No, doesn't confuse me at all, I'm not the one confusing acreage for popularity. Acres don't vote, people do. Acres have nothing to do with the popular vote or the electoral college. Did you ever go to school?

I must have. I learned to read. You still apparently can't. Or maybe like the chicken you see but fail to comprehend.

You claimed that acreage decides elections. So, tell me, genius, how are acres counted in elections?

 

[JustAGuy1]

denigrate how? Injun? hmmmmmm so white guys can be called all kinds of things by you and you are ok with it. but injuns sparks fire in your ass? dude, sympathy isn't what an indian is looking for from you. how morally pathetic.

There you go again. Someone called you a cracker once and since you're such a whiny little boy you think that excuses your own behavior.

Tell ya' what. I don't call black people the N word because I'm not black, I don't care what they call each other. Same with Native Americans. I am white however and that gives me the right to call you a whining little ***** boy.

link!!!!

Link to what? You bing a whiny ***** boy who uses 'personal struggles' as an excuse to be a racist douche? This thread covers that.

a link that says saying injuns is the same as the N word. come on big guy back up your fking claim. useless.

more made up junk from the likes of you

It's not the same as the N word, one is a slur against black people way back when they were slaves, it's often censored now. The other is a racial slur against Native Americans first used by people who apparently couldn't be bothered to pronounce 'indian' correctly. It is offensive none the less.

Injun definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
1. US a dated or offensive informal word for (American) Indian
2. honest Injun

Tell us honey, do you have a "right" to not be offended?

 

[HappyJoy]

There you go again. Someone called you a cracker once and since you're such a whiny little boy you think that excuses your own behavior.

Tell ya' what. I don't call black people the N word because I'm not black, I don't care what they call each other. Same with Native Americans. I am white however and that gives me the right to call you a whining little ***** boy.

link!!!!

Link to what? You bing a whiny ***** boy who uses 'personal struggles' as an excuse to be a racist douche? This thread covers that.

a link that says saying injuns is the same as the N word. come on big guy back up your fking claim. useless.

more made up junk from the likes of you

It's not the same as the N word, one is a slur against black people way back when they were slaves, it's often censored now. The other is a racial slur against Native Americans first used by people who apparently couldn't be bothered to pronounce 'indian' correctly. It is offensive none the less.

Injun definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
1. US a dated or offensive informal word for (American) Indian
2. honest Injun

Tell us honey, do you have a "right" to not be offended?

I'm not offended. I'm calling out the hypocrisy of someone who claims Native Americans were offended and then uses a racial slur on those very same people. Keep up.

 

[toobfreak]

Yet many(most?) Lefties here make that claim very seriously.
Or maybe not. It costs money to own land and owning land is a good way to make a lot of money. You won't find many rural people living in small, cramped 1-2 bedroom apartments. I kinda tend to believe that all those people living in city slums and public housing or city folk commuting to the big city with both working to pay the bills can't have too much money.
When did his base shrink to only 19%? It has always been around 33-36%.
Population is irrelevant. The map showed counties won. Counties add up to districts and districts add up to states, and presidential elections are 50 small STATE elections. So to argue whether Trump is "popular" or not, I saved some very interesting figures which puts things into better perspective, then you tell me Trump wasn't "popular" in 2016:

View attachment 278688

The only thing I would take issue with is that the 1.5 million figure was either premature or a typo. It actually came out to be 2.8 million, but again, irrelevant because once you win a state, you've won the state, you cannot win a state MORE. The Founders were wise in their vision to design a system limiting a local mob from taking the voice and representation from vast districts of the country so that ALL parts of the nation have a voice.

Here we go confusing empty land for population when the topic of the OP is a poll taken of the population and not acreage.

So Trump won 60% of the vote in the vast area of the country. The only one confused is apparently you. 60% of anything is still 60% and polls may be nice to think about and look at but polls do not DECIDE anything------ if you think about it, ACREAGE does. Because winning voting districts is how you win a state. You could put 50 million people in one district, it will only win you a small AREA in one state. It might win you the whole state. But it is the STATES you win and the Electoral votes each state tallies up which decides the election, NOT polls. Polls ain't worth shit neither are popular head counts. If you think you want that you better go back to Merry Ol' England and kiss the Queen's feet.

No, doesn't confuse me at all, I'm not the one confusing acreage for popularity. Acres don't vote, people do. Acres have nothing to do with the popular vote or the electoral college. Did you ever go to school?

I must have. I learned to read. You still apparently can't. Or maybe like the chicken you see but fail to comprehend.

You claimed that acreage decides elections. So, tell me, genius, how are acres counted in elections?

Already did, dope. Learn to read what people SAY instead of what you THINK so others don't have to repeat stuff.

 

[HappyJoy]

Here we go confusing empty land for population when the topic of the OP is a poll taken of the population and not acreage.

So Trump won 60% of the vote in the vast area of the country. The only one confused is apparently you. 60% of anything is still 60% and polls may be nice to think about and look at but polls do not DECIDE anything------ if you think about it, ACREAGE does. Because winning voting districts is how you win a state. You could put 50 million people in one district, it will only win you a small AREA in one state. It might win you the whole state. But it is the STATES you win and the Electoral votes each state tallies up which decides the election, NOT polls. Polls ain't worth shit neither are popular head counts. If you think you want that you better go back to Merry Ol' England and kiss the Queen's feet.

No, doesn't confuse me at all, I'm not the one confusing acreage for popularity. Acres don't vote, people do. Acres have nothing to do with the popular vote or the electoral college. Did you ever go to school?

I must have. I learned to read. You still apparently can't. Or maybe like the chicken you see but fail to comprehend.

You claimed that acreage decides elections. So, tell me, genius, how are acres counted in elections?

Already did, dope. Learn to read what people SAY instead of what you THINK so others don't have to repeat stuff.

No, you didn't. You seem to think acres have something to do with the voting power of a congressional district. It doesn't. Why did you make that comparison?

 

[JustAGuy1]

link!!!!

Link to what? You bing a whiny ***** boy who uses 'personal struggles' as an excuse to be a racist douche? This thread covers that.

a link that says saying injuns is the same as the N word. come on big guy back up your fking claim. useless.

more made up junk from the likes of you

It's not the same as the N word, one is a slur against black people way back when they were slaves, it's often censored now. The other is a racial slur against Native Americans first used by people who apparently couldn't be bothered to pronounce 'indian' correctly. It is offensive none the less.

Injun definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
1. US a dated or offensive informal word for (American) Indian
2. honest Injun

Tell us honey, do you have a "right" to not be offended?

I'm not offended. I'm calling out the hypocrisy of someone who claims Native Americans were offended and then uses a racial slur on those very same people. Keep up.

LOL, ok then your point would be that blacks and native american's have the "right" to not be offended.

 

[HappyJoy]

Link to what? You bing a whiny ***** boy who uses 'personal struggles' as an excuse to be a racist douche? This thread covers that.

a link that says saying injuns is the same as the N word. come on big guy back up your fking claim. useless.

more made up junk from the likes of you

It's not the same as the N word, one is a slur against black people way back when they were slaves, it's often censored now. The other is a racial slur against Native Americans first used by people who apparently couldn't be bothered to pronounce 'indian' correctly. It is offensive none the less.

Injun definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
1. US a dated or offensive informal word for (American) Indian
2. honest Injun

Tell us honey, do you have a "right" to not be offended?

I'm not offended. I'm calling out the hypocrisy of someone who claims Native Americans were offended and then uses a racial slur on those very same people. Keep up.

LOL, ok then your point would be that blacks and native american's have the "right" to not be offended.

Everyone has a right to feel however they want. Still gonna' call out racists.

 

[jc456]

Yet many(most?) Lefties here make that claim very seriously.
Or maybe not. It costs money to own land and owning land is a good way to make a lot of money. You won't find many rural people living in small, cramped 1-2 bedroom apartments. I kinda tend to believe that all those people living in city slums and public housing or city folk commuting to the big city with both working to pay the bills can't have too much money.
When did his base shrink to only 19%? It has always been around 33-36%.
Population is irrelevant. The map showed counties won. Counties add up to districts and districts add up to states, and presidential elections are 50 small STATE elections. So to argue whether Trump is "popular" or not, I saved some very interesting figures which puts things into better perspective, then you tell me Trump wasn't "popular" in 2016:

View attachment 278688

The only thing I would take issue with is that the 1.5 million figure was either premature or a typo. It actually came out to be 2.8 million, but again, irrelevant because once you win a state, you've won the state, you cannot win a state MORE. The Founders were wise in their vision to design a system limiting a local mob from taking the voice and representation from vast districts of the country so that ALL parts of the nation have a voice.

Here we go confusing empty land for population when the topic of the OP is a poll taken of the population and not acreage.

So Trump won 60% of the vote in the vast area of the country. The only one confused is apparently you. 60% of anything is still 60% and polls may be nice to think about and look at but polls do not DECIDE anything------ if you think about it, ACREAGE does. Because winning voting districts is how you win a state. You could put 50 million people in one district, it will only win you a small AREA in one state. It might win you the whole state. But it is the STATES you win and the Electoral votes each state tallies up which decides the election, NOT polls. Polls ain't worth shit neither are popular head counts. If you think you want that you better go back to Merry Ol' England and kiss the Queen's feet.

No, doesn't confuse me at all, I'm not the one confusing acreage for popularity. Acres don't vote, people do. Acres have nothing to do with the popular vote or the electoral college. Did you ever go to school?

I must have. I learned to read. You still apparently can't. Or maybe like the chicken you see but fail to comprehend.

You claimed that acreage decides elections. So, tell me, genius, how are acres counted in elections?

 

[jc456]

a link that says saying injuns is the same as the N word. come on big guy back up your fking claim. useless.

more made up junk from the likes of you

It's not the same as the N word, one is a slur against black people way back when they were slaves, it's often censored now. The other is a racial slur against Native Americans first used by people who apparently couldn't be bothered to pronounce 'indian' correctly. It is offensive none the less.

Injun definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
1. US a dated or offensive informal word for (American) Indian
2. honest Injun

Tell us honey, do you have a "right" to not be offended?

I'm not offended. I'm calling out the hypocrisy of someone who claims Native Americans were offended and then uses a racial slur on those very same people. Keep up.

LOL, ok then your point would be that blacks and native american's have the "right" to not be offended.

Everyone has a right to feel however they want. Still gonna' call out racists.

all makie uppie shit.

 

[HappyJoy]

It's not the same as the N word, one is a slur against black people way back when they were slaves, it's often censored now. The other is a racial slur against Native Americans first used by people who apparently couldn't be bothered to pronounce 'indian' correctly. It is offensive none the less.

Injun definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
1. US a dated or offensive informal word for (American) Indian
2. honest Injun

Tell us honey, do you have a "right" to not be offended?

I'm not offended. I'm calling out the hypocrisy of someone who claims Native Americans were offended and then uses a racial slur on those very same people. Keep up.

LOL, ok then your point would be that blacks and native american's have the "right" to not be offended.

Everyone has a right to feel however they want. Still gonna' call out racists.

all makie uppie shit.

Nope, when someone is showing a map of a bunch of empty space and tries to claim it demonstrates anything related to vote distribution then I'm going to ask them to demonstrate that.

 

[jc456]

Tell us honey, do you have a "right" to not be offended?

I'm not offended. I'm calling out the hypocrisy of someone who claims Native Americans were offended and then uses a racial slur on those very same people. Keep up.

LOL, ok then your point would be that blacks and native american's have the "right" to not be offended.

Everyone has a right to feel however they want. Still gonna' call out racists.

all makie uppie shit.

Nope, when someone is showing a map of a bunch of empty space and tries to claim it demonstrates anything related to vote distribution then I'm going to ask them to demonstrate that.

 

[HappyJoy]

I'm not offended. I'm calling out the hypocrisy of someone who claims Native Americans were offended and then uses a racial slur on those very same people. Keep up.

LOL, ok then your point would be that blacks and native american's have the "right" to not be offended.

Everyone has a right to feel however they want. Still gonna' call out racists.

all makie uppie shit.

Nope, when someone is showing a map of a bunch of empty space and tries to claim it demonstrates anything related to vote distribution then I'm going to ask them to demonstrate that.

What's the purpose of that map in this thread? I'll wait.

 

[jc456]

LOL, ok then your point would be that blacks and native american's have the "right" to not be offended.

Everyone has a right to feel however they want. Still gonna' call out racists.

all makie uppie shit.

Nope, when someone is showing a map of a bunch of empty space and tries to claim it demonstrates anything related to vote distribution then I'm going to ask them to demonstrate that.

What's the purpose of that map in this thread? I'll wait.

really, you don't understand how the electoral vote works?

 

[koshergrl]

Trump wins 60 percent approval in rural areas of key states
Trump wins 60 percent approval in rural areas of key states

President Trump’s job approval rating in rural areas of the Rust Belt and Great Plains states is at 60 percent, markedly higher than his job approval rating nationally, according to a new poll commissioned by Democrats
A Change Research survey sponsored by The American Federation of Teachers and One Country, a group with close ties to former Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), found that 60 percent of voters from non-metro counties in Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and West Virginia approve of the job Trump is doing.
All of those states voted for Trump in 2016 with the exception of Colorado and Minnesota. Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin went red in the 2016 election for the first time in decades, and Democrats believe that rebuilding that “blue wall” represents their likeliest path back to the White House.

ME: Yet another model showing why Trump will win.

So basically, Trump is loved by hillbillies. No surprise there.

Naw, he's loved by the normal, decent people.

He's despised by people like you...i.e., the enemies of decency, lovers of human traffickers and haters of freedom, liberty and human rights.

 

[Taz]

Trump wins 60 percent approval in rural areas of key states
Trump wins 60 percent approval in rural areas of key states

President Trump’s job approval rating in rural areas of the Rust Belt and Great Plains states is at 60 percent, markedly higher than his job approval rating nationally, according to a new poll commissioned by Democrats
A Change Research survey sponsored by The American Federation of Teachers and One Country, a group with close ties to former Sen. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.), found that 60 percent of voters from non-metro counties in Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and West Virginia approve of the job Trump is doing.
All of those states voted for Trump in 2016 with the exception of Colorado and Minnesota. Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin went red in the 2016 election for the first time in decades, and Democrats believe that rebuilding that “blue wall” represents their likeliest path back to the White House.

ME: Yet another model showing why Trump will win.

So basically, Trump is loved by hillbillies. No surprise there.

Naw, he's loved by the normal, decent people.

He's despised by people like you...i.e., the enemies of decency, lovers of human traffickers and haters of freedom, liberty and human rights.

Trump isn’t even decent, he’s a liar and cheats on his wife. Is that what you like?