- Mar 3, 2013
- 86,551
- 49,600
- 2,605
something else that didnt' happen.Trying to overthrow the government is still a crime, whether done by a foreign government, the domestic population or even those inside or formerly in the government.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
something else that didnt' happen.Trying to overthrow the government is still a crime, whether done by a foreign government, the domestic population or even those inside or formerly in the government.
For what? For saying he and his buddies in the GOP will pay a price for repealing Roe?Put Schumer in the cell next to him.
![]()
Schumer Telling Brett Kavanaugh He'll 'Pay the Price' for Roe Resurfaces
Conservatives criticized Schumer over his 2020 remarks on Wednesday after an armed man was arrested outside the Supreme Court justice's home in Maryland.www.newsweek.com
threatening 2 JusticesFor what?
You're right it didn't happen. But the crime is committed by trying, not by succeeding.something else that didnt' happen.
Let me remind you, Pence is saying such speech is protected by the speech and debate clause. Which certainly applies to Schumer, as opposed to Pence who is not a constitutional member of congress with debate privileges.threatening 2 Justices
Let me remind you, Pence is saying such speech is protected by the speech and debate clause. Which certainly applies to Schumer, as opposed to Pence who is not a constitutional member of congress with debate privileges.
": a clause in Article I, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution granting members of Congress a privilege from arrest and legislative immunity for any speech or debate made in either of the houses"speech and debate clause
I disagree. It's possible that the evidence we see leaking out, may stop THIS indictment, maybe. He WILL be indicted for something in DC and of course, that will guarantee a conviction. Then we get months of the media whores repeating a mantra about him being "disqualified". They are setting the stage for violence after the election, if he should win.Nothing is going to happen and he isn't going to be arrested.
And in 2016 and 2020....you did.You'd vote for a pile of dogshit if it had a D behind it's name.
No explicit threat of bodily harm or injury.threatening 2 Justices
Considering how much he would benefit from it, I'd imagine he fully understands what he's doing. Do you? You folks seem so obsessed to take him down, you keep falling into his traps for you while he laughs all the way to the bank.It is entirely possible that his rants and threats will induce the Grand Jury to actually vote for an indictment against him. He will continue to poke the bear until the bear bites back.
He may still have the football.![]()
Donald Trump warns of potential "death and destruction" if he's charged
Trump also suggested that there could be "years of hatred, chaos, and turmoil" if he is arrested as part of a probe into alleged hush money payments.www.newsweek.com
Obviously he is threatening the NY DA. How is he going to react when the Fulton County and DOJ begin to deliberate on a possible indictment? I have never seen anything like this man's reaction and desperation before.
The USSC already said that the clause applies both on and of the floor of congress.": a clause in Article I, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution granting members of Congress a privilege from arrest and legislative immunity for any speech or debate made in either of the houses"
doesn't' apply
He wasn't in Congress, he was on the steps of the Supreme Court.
I see no threats other than a political warningthreatening 2 Justices
Exactly, Schumer was threatening "legislative" activity against the judges, which is protected under the speech and debate clause.I see no threats other than a political warning
Did you read your link?The USSC already said that the clause applies both on and of the floor of congress.
That it covers legislative activity by both the member, and his aides, no matter where located.
![]()
Speech and Debate Clause
The speech and debate clause of the Constitution is more limited than the First Amendment. Only legislative speech by Congress members is protected from lawsuits under the clause.www.mtsu.edu
This comment , If correct , will come back to haunt in 24![]()
Donald Trump warns of potential "death and destruction" if he's charged
Trump also suggested that there could be "years of hatred, chaos, and turmoil" if he is arrested as part of a probe into alleged hush money payments.www.newsweek.com
Obviously he is threatening the NY DA. How is he going to react when the Fulton County and DOJ begin to deliberate on a possible indictment? I have never seen anything like this man's reaction and desperation before.
Schummer was threatening "legislative action" against Supreme Court members. which does constitute "legislative activity" and is protected no matter where such activity is presented.Did you read your link?
"The general purpose of the speech and debate clause is to protect members of Congress from having to worry that anything they say in the course of legislative activities will implicate them in a lawsuit."
A protest on the steps of the Supreme Court can hardly be considered ' legislative activities'
That's their problem. They pretend Schummer threatening them with congressional actions (legislative) against them, as opposed to taking physical (criminal) actions against them.I see no threats other than a political warning
Schummer was threatening "legislative action" against Supreme Court members. which does constitute "legislative activity" and is protected no matter where such activity is presented.
Your problem is trying to mischaracterize Schumers "legislative" threat, with a "criminal" threat.
Your problem is trying to mischaracterize Schumers "criminal" threat, with a "legislative" threat.Your problem is trying to mischaracterize Schumers "legislative" threat, with a "criminal" threat.