This is true, but not nearly as much.
But still why lower standards? Makes no sense at all.
Let me explain this: Every time you save the world, it costs us consumers more money. You may not know about it because the costs are intrinsic, but it's costing more money.
It's just like the pollution crap we have to deal with in the transportation industry. My employer has to pass those costs to our customers. Our customers are who make the products you and I buy in the store every day. And yes, they include those costs in the products they sell to us.
So now, every little thing you buy in the store has a green cost to it. Your lawnmower, your hedge trimmer, your gloves, your can of peaches or gallons of milk. It all costs more money just with the transportation costs alone.
I really think the reason they use the word "green" is because that's what every new pollution regulation costs us.
Regardless of that, Trump wants to lower the mpg of ALL diesel or gas powered cars... And that has a green cost as well. I'd prefer to live in a greener world, or at least a world that heading in the less polluting direction. Let's face it, it's a dumb idea to go backwards like that.
I don't think there is anything dumb about not wasting money. Yes, any new CAFE standards will cost more money no matter who's they are. But the stricter the standards, the more money it's going to cost.
Years ago when my truck broke down, a mechanic would come out and fix it in most cases. Now they have to be towed back to the shop, because thanks to all the pollution crap on them, it's difficult to figure out the problem.
As one mechanic told me, trucks not only have computers in them for pollution, they have three, and they all have to sync with each other. Not too bad in the summer, but when it gets to single digit highs for the day, electronic stuff doesn't always work very well.