ThunderKiss1965
Platinum Member
Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
It seems to me that the point of his post was the blatant hypocrisy of the sycophants of the Prick-in-Chief trying to keep pace with their Shifty Shafter of the WH and his varying positions while conveniently discarding any of their former foundational political tenants in their rush to support and please while drinking up His piss!Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
All these stupid environmental wacko laws need to be overturned.
I take it you don't care about yourself or have children or grandchildren..
From Trump's own EPA.
Managing Air Quality - Human Health, Environmental and Economic Assessments | US EPA
plus:
https://www.quora.com/Water-pollution-is-a-major-health-hazard-Why-1
I care a lot about the environment.
I worked 30 years as an Environmental Engineer. I have a P.E. License in Environmental Engineering.
I have cleaned up more pollution than 100,000 environmental wackos will ever see in their life.
The difference between me knowing about environmental control technology and restoration and the stupid environmental wackos is I understand what is needed and what is bullshit.
So, approximately 200,00 early deaths (per MIT) just from air pollution, don't matter to you? Nice.
Study: Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S.
He knows a fuck whole lot more than those wackos at MIT. He stayed at a holiday inn express last nightAll these stupid environmental wacko laws need to be overturned.
I take it you don't care about yourself or have children or grandchildren..
From Trump's own EPA.
Managing Air Quality - Human Health, Environmental and Economic Assessments | US EPA
plus:
https://www.quora.com/Water-pollution-is-a-major-health-hazard-Why-1
I care a lot about the environment.
I worked 30 years as an Environmental Engineer. I have a P.E. License in Environmental Engineering.
I have cleaned up more pollution than 100,000 environmental wackos will ever see in their life.
The difference between me knowing about environmental control technology and restoration and the stupid environmental wackos is I understand what is needed and what is bullshit.
So, approximately 200,00 early deaths (per MIT) just from air pollution, don't matter to you? Nice.
Study: Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S.
Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
I'm a Constitutionalist so yes State rights are very important to me.Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
I do the same thing when conservatives bring them up as well. Neither of you give a rats ass about states rights.
only when it benefits them....Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
I do the same thing when conservatives bring them up as well. Neither of you give a rats ass about states rights.
I'm a Constitutionalist so yes State rights are very important to me.Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
I do the same thing when conservatives bring them up as well. Neither of you give a rats ass about states rights.
I'm a Constitutionalist so yes State rights are very important to me.Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
I do the same thing when conservatives bring them up as well. Neither of you give a rats ass about states rights.
I do not want the smog of the 50's back. I want my grandchildren to be able to breathe clean air and have clean water. Trumputin can shove his ignorance up putins ass.All these stupid environmental wacko laws need to be overturned.
I take it you don't care about yourself or have children or grandchildren..
From Trump's own EPA.
Managing Air Quality - Human Health, Environmental and Economic Assessments | US EPA
plus:
https://www.quora.com/Water-pollution-is-a-major-health-hazard-Why-1
I care a lot about the environment.
I worked 30 years as an Environmental Engineer. I have a P.E. License in Environmental Engineering.
I have cleaned up more pollution than 100,000 environmental wackos will ever see in their life.
The difference between me knowing about environmental control technology and restoration and the stupid environmental wackos is I understand what is needed and what is bullshit.
So, approximately 200,00 early deaths (per MIT) just from air pollution, don't matter to you? Nice.
Study: Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S.
Let me educate you a little bit because you seemed confused.
The first pollution laws (CAA, CWA, SDWA, RCRA etc) were needed.
The early implementation of the laws resulted in 80% pollution reduction for 20% of the cost. Good thing.
However, that wasn't good enough. In the late 1980s and 1990s there was a 15% cleanup for 40% of the cost.
Nowadays, mostly thanks to the idiot environmental wackos like Obama, the drive is to clean up the remaining 5% for another 40% of the cost and that is damaging our economy for very little gain. Bad thing.
People die because of pollution because there are so many people and they demand industrialized goods that creates pollution. If you want to stop pollution then reduce population, significantly. More people will die indirectly because of a damaged economy than will die because of the effects of pollution. Your stupid study doesn't look at all the economic factors.
The US spends as much money on the cleaning the environment than the rest of the world combined. Ever since the 1970s pollution in all categories has been decreasing every year. It use to be at an increasing rate but in the last decade the rate has been steady.
We don't need to destroy our economy for minimal gain. That is just stupid.
In my retirement I occasionally teach a university class in Environmental Science. Usually to freshmen. You really need to sign up for one of my classes because you are very ignorant in the subject. Let me guess, you get your information on the environment from Democratunderground, Rachael Maddow and Comedy Central?
Okay.I do not want the smog of the 50's back. I want my grandchildren to be able to breathe clean air and have clean water. Trumputin can shove his ignorance up putins ass.All these stupid environmental wacko laws need to be overturned.
I take it you don't care about yourself or have children or grandchildren..
From Trump's own EPA.
Managing Air Quality - Human Health, Environmental and Economic Assessments | US EPA
plus:
https://www.quora.com/Water-pollution-is-a-major-health-hazard-Why-1
I care a lot about the environment.
I worked 30 years as an Environmental Engineer. I have a P.E. License in Environmental Engineering.
I have cleaned up more pollution than 100,000 environmental wackos will ever see in their life.
The difference between me knowing about environmental control technology and restoration and the stupid environmental wackos is I understand what is needed and what is bullshit.
So, approximately 200,00 early deaths (per MIT) just from air pollution, don't matter to you? Nice.
Study: Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S.
Let me educate you a little bit because you seemed confused.
The first pollution laws (CAA, CWA, SDWA, RCRA etc) were needed.
The early implementation of the laws resulted in 80% pollution reduction for 20% of the cost. Good thing.
However, that wasn't good enough. In the late 1980s and 1990s there was a 15% cleanup for 40% of the cost.
Nowadays, mostly thanks to the idiot environmental wackos like Obama, the drive is to clean up the remaining 5% for another 40% of the cost and that is damaging our economy for very little gain. Bad thing.
People die because of pollution because there are so many people and they demand industrialized goods that creates pollution. If you want to stop pollution then reduce population, significantly. More people will die indirectly because of a damaged economy than will die because of the effects of pollution. Your stupid study doesn't look at all the economic factors.
The US spends as much money on the cleaning the environment than the rest of the world combined. Ever since the 1970s pollution in all categories has been decreasing every year. It use to be at an increasing rate but in the last decade the rate has been steady.
We don't need to destroy our economy for minimal gain. That is just stupid.
In my retirement I occasionally teach a university class in Environmental Science. Usually to freshmen. You really need to sign up for one of my classes because you are very ignorant in the subject. Let me guess, you get your information on the environment from Democratunderground, Rachael Maddow and Comedy Central?
I do not want the smog of the 50's back. I want my grandchildren to be able to breathe clean air and have clean water. Trumputin can shove his ignorance up putins ass.All these stupid environmental wacko laws need to be overturned.
I take it you don't care about yourself or have children or grandchildren..
From Trump's own EPA.
Managing Air Quality - Human Health, Environmental and Economic Assessments | US EPA
plus:
https://www.quora.com/Water-pollution-is-a-major-health-hazard-Why-1
I care a lot about the environment.
I worked 30 years as an Environmental Engineer. I have a P.E. License in Environmental Engineering.
I have cleaned up more pollution than 100,000 environmental wackos will ever see in their life.
The difference between me knowing about environmental control technology and restoration and the stupid environmental wackos is I understand what is needed and what is bullshit.
So, approximately 200,00 early deaths (per MIT) just from air pollution, don't matter to you? Nice.
Study: Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S.
Let me educate you a little bit because you seemed confused.
The first pollution laws (CAA, CWA, SDWA, RCRA etc) were needed.
The early implementation of the laws resulted in 80% pollution reduction for 20% of the cost. Good thing.
However, that wasn't good enough. In the late 1980s and 1990s there was a 15% cleanup for 40% of the cost.
Nowadays, mostly thanks to the idiot environmental wackos like Obama, the drive is to clean up the remaining 5% for another 40% of the cost and that is damaging our economy for very little gain. Bad thing.
People die because of pollution because there are so many people and they demand industrialized goods that creates pollution. If you want to stop pollution then reduce population, significantly. More people will die indirectly because of a damaged economy than will die because of the effects of pollution. Your stupid study doesn't look at all the economic factors.
The US spends as much money on the cleaning the environment than the rest of the world combined. Ever since the 1970s pollution in all categories has been decreasing every year. It use to be at an increasing rate but in the last decade the rate has been steady.
We don't need to destroy our economy for minimal gain. That is just stupid.
In my retirement I occasionally teach a university class in Environmental Science. Usually to freshmen. You really need to sign up for one of my classes because you are very ignorant in the subject. Let me guess, you get your information on the environment from Democratunderground, Rachael Maddow and Comedy Central?
"The Trump administration will seek to revoke California’s authority to regulate automobile greenhouse gas emissions .....
Terms of Service Violation
He doesn't have the authority to take away Cali's right to do this. The Obama stuff he can as long as the State doesn't appropriate it.
If an issue isn't covered in the Constitution then it is a concern for the States to decide.I'm a Constitutionalist so yes State rights are very important to me.Liberal brings up States Rights and I just laugh and laugh.Well, well, well...Are we gonna see "conservatives" abandoning their "states rights" mantra too...now that there is a right wing authoritarian in office?
I do the same thing when conservatives bring them up as well. Neither of you give a rats ass about states rights.
All these stupid environmental wacko laws need to be overturned.
I take it you don't care about yourself or have children or grandchildren..
From Trump's own EPA.
Managing Air Quality - Human Health, Environmental and Economic Assessments | US EPA
plus:
https://www.quora.com/Water-pollution-is-a-major-health-hazard-Why-1
I care a lot about the environment.
I worked 30 years as an Environmental Engineer. I have a P.E. License in Environmental Engineering.
I have cleaned up more pollution than 100,000 environmental wackos will ever see in their life.
The difference between me knowing about environmental control technology and restoration and the stupid environmental wackos is I understand what is needed and what is bullshit.
So, approximately 200,00 early deaths (per MIT) just from air pollution, don't matter to you? Nice.
Study: Air pollution causes 200,000 early deaths each year in the U.S.
Let me educate you a little bit because you seemed confused.
The first pollution laws (CAA, CWA, SDWA, RCRA etc) were needed.
The early implementation of the laws resulted in 80% pollution reduction for 20% of the cost. Good thing.
However, that wasn't good enough. In the late 1980s and 1990s there was a 15% cleanup for 40% of the cost.
Nowadays, mostly thanks to the idiot environmental wackos like Obama, the drive is to clean up the remaining 5% for another 40% of the cost and that is damaging our economy for very little gain. Bad thing.
People die because of pollution because there are so many people and they demand industrialized goods that creates pollution. If you want to stop pollution then reduce population, significantly. More people will die indirectly because of a damaged economy than will die because of the effects of pollution. Your stupid study doesn't look at all the economic factors.
The US spends as much money on the cleaning the environment than the rest of the world combined. Ever since the 1970s pollution in all categories has been decreasing every year. It use to be at an increasing rate but in the last decade the rate has been steady.
We don't need to destroy our economy for minimal gain. That is just stupid.
In my retirement I occasionally teach a university class in Environmental Science. Usually to freshmen. You really need to sign up for one of my classes because you are very ignorant in the subject. Let me guess, you get your information on the environment from Democratunderground, Rachael Maddow and Comedy Central?