- Jun 9, 2013
- 1,619
- 1,334
- 1,928
Seems more like Trump and his attorneys will be sanctioned again for filing a frivolous lawsuit. That's good too. MAGAt donors can keep throwing their money into a sinkhole.This seems like a slam dunk to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Seems more like Trump and his attorneys will be sanctioned again for filing a frivolous lawsuit. That's good too. MAGAt donors can keep throwing their money into a sinkhole.This seems like a slam dunk to me.
Yep, and that judge should be disbarred, and, after scotus get done with this case, hopefully trump will sue to have him disbarred.The NY appeal is pending (hence the $8 million dollar bond Trump posted)
Trump jumped to federal court to try and have the judgement overturned, or a new trial ordered.
The judge concluded what Trump did was "rape"
Live with it.
CARROLL v. TRUMP (2023)
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
E. Jean CARROLL, Plaintiff, v. Donald J. TRUMP, Defendant.
22-cv-10016 (LAK)
Decided: July 19, 2023
He confessed to the very behavior Carol accused him of.He never admitted touching Caroll
Are you off your meds again?Yep, and I wouldn’t stop there. I’d go after cnn, msnbc, vox, salon, mother jones, Sirius Xm progress and urban view, slate…I’m sure there’s more. I’d have multiple concurrent billion dollar defamation suits running against everyone who lied about him and caused damage to his reputation and his campaign. Then I’d personally sue Letitia James for 15 million and then the state of New York for 10 billion. I mean, when your AG campaigns on the promise of suing someone, then goes on a search for a reason to sue them, and then does it, I’m sure there had to be some laws broken there.
SCOTUS won't take this case.Yep, and that judge should be disbarred, and, after scotus get done with this case, hopefully trump will sue to have him disbarred.
Hmm, no, it seems a lot of States agree with the judge. At the time, New York did not.The judge is a moron
He confessed to the very behavior Carol accused him of.
Wouldn't a logical person deduct that it is more probable than not that he actually did do the behavior he is caught on tape bragging about doing?
Or are you saying he lied about that too?
I don’t see why not, anyone who’s remotely objective can see the sham that took place there.SCOTUS won't take this case.
Guilt isn't determined in a civil trial only criminal trials. Defendants are either found to be "liable" for the harm alleged by the plaintiff(s) or not liable.Fact is, Trump was found guilty in a CIVIL trial for sexual assault, not rape. Georgie boy continually saying rape is defamation, pure and simple.
Hmm, no, it seems a lot of States agree with the judge. At the time, New York did not.
Now they do.
New York State Assembly Passes Rape is Rape Act, Clearing the Way for Governor Hochul's Signature
View Speaker Press Releases on the NYS Assembly website.nyassembly.gov
Seems pretty far fetched. Like, wild fantasy far fetched.And when that gets overturned by scotus, the counter lawsuit will be huge, and they had it coming.
That defense didn't work, in the Civil trial. Sorry. Surely you don't think the losers didn't attempt it.There was zero evidence…ZERO…that trump ever touched her.
The jury issued the verdict.The judge is a moron because he rules in favor of Carroll, who never had a shred of evidence that trump even touched her.
That's your fantasy, sick one.Thats his argument shittard.
You better hope, you're not in front of a jury. That wants you gone.The jury issued the verdict.
Say it with me.
There was no conviction for rape.for defamation for repeatedly saying on his program that Trump was found liable for rape when he was not. This seems like a slam dunk to me. If Trump can be found guilty of defamation against E Jean Carroll when she didn't even have any proof she was raped and even had a Swiss cheese memory about it, then surely Stephanopoulos is guilty of defamation. Trump should win millions and millions on this.
Trump is suing ABC News and George Stephanopoulos for defamation. Here's what to know about his claim.
Former President Donald Trump is suing ABC, ABC News and George Stephanopoulos, claiming defamation over comments by the ABC host during an interview.www.cbsnews.com
Seems pretty far fetched. Like, wild fantasy far fetched.
That defense didn't work, in the Civil trial. Sorry. Surely you don't think the losers didn't attempt it.
Funny thing is, Trump's own words in the deposition and in court and from old recordings went a long way to convincing the jury he was indeed a sexual predator.
Sorry. Surely you don't think the losers didn't attempt it.
Get this bad faith posting out of here.Oh, I know, that’s why it should be overturned.
The jury issued the verdict.I’m sure they did, and the moron judge allowed her to win with presenting zero physical evidence
Trump isn’t going to sue. He doesn’t have the money or the facts on his side.for defamation for repeatedly saying on his program that Trump was found liable for rape when he was not. This seems like a slam dunk to me. If Trump can be found guilty of defamation against E Jean Carroll when she didn't even have any proof she was raped and even had a Swiss cheese memory about it, then surely Stephanopoulos is guilty of defamation. Trump should win millions and millions on this.
Trump is suing ABC News and George Stephanopoulos for defamation. Here's what to know about his claim.
Former President Donald Trump is suing ABC, ABC News and George Stephanopoulos, claiming defamation over comments by the ABC host during an interview.www.cbsnews.com
Done.Just because trump SAID he grabs women by the pussy doesn’t mean he raped Carroll. You have to prove that. Even if he did “grab women by the pussy”, they still have to prove he did it.
He did more than deny it. He defamed her according to another jury of his peers.Again, this is likely to b me overturned in scotus because it’s not justice. The court ordered him to pay this woman 93 million, because he tried to defend himself, SHE made a claim, he denied it and then she smacks him with a defamation suit. That’s just all kinds of messed up especially when she never proved he ever touched HER.
How was the way she "used" the law fraudulent?Same with Letitia James, if she seizes his properties, and that case gets overturned by scotus based on the fraudulent way she used the law
Suddenly you hate The Constitution and due process?You better hope, you're not in front of a jury. That wants you gone.