shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 43,961
- 42,999
- 3,605
The jury has spoken indeed.The jury has spoken, he's guilty.
Be fair though, that doesn't make him guilty.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The jury has spoken indeed.The jury has spoken, he's guilty.
It doesn't?The jury has spoken indeed.
Be fair though, that doesn't make him guilty.

Imagine that, democrat judges ruling against Trump.His attempt to appeal against the sexual abuse verdict has failed. Maybe his new buddy will pay his fines for him.
View attachment 1059501
Republican judges have also ruled against trump in the past.Imagine that, democrat judges ruling against Trump.
Why do people feel the need to constantly wave the US flag around and put it in their signature? No other country has this fanatical need to keep parading the flag, I even see pickup trucks around here with two flags, we know what country where in, no need for silly flag waving.Oh, ok.
![]()
No, it doesn't.
Why feed this troll?Trump will probably instruct the DOJ to arrest and prosecute Carroll under some made up bullshit law and then seek the death penalty for her as well.
The fact that this chief trumpanzee even cares about this is beyond ridiculous, just pay the fines and get on with business. What's 83 million anyway, surely he can fund that with his various lucrative industrial enter
Where Trump's the defendant, yes.No, it doesn't.
The court may have ruled against him. Courts have ruled against millions of people.
In every case, were the people the courts ruled against always guilty?
Nah, on to the scotus. Paying it now would be like admitting it…like what Clinton did. Trump maintains his innocence and will take it all the way to the scotusBecause he doesn't need the money and his appeals have failed abysmally and he has better things to do.
Rude.Where Trump's the defendant, yes.
Read the news:Nah, on to the scotus. Paying it now would be like admitting it…like what Clinton did. Trump maintains his innocence and will take it all the way to the scotus
So, you're deflecting from this argument in this thread?Republican judges have also ruled against trump in the past.
I only cited the DM for novelty value, the story is factual and reported all over the world.More "Daily Mail" propaganda from a left leaning British news source? The Brits have such a convoluted government that they don't recognize politics as usual.
It does.The jury has spoken indeed.
Be fair though, that doesn't make him guilty.
The statement is true, if you think discussing the Judge's impartiality is off topic why did you mention it?So, you're deflecting from this argument in this thread?
So it is accurate to say that Donald Trump was liable for battery and defamation, but not that he was found guilty of battery and defamation."
Read the news:
View attachment 1059525
The law is the law, it's done, case closed, get the checkbook out and write the check and move on.
It does.