Trump signs executive order allowing only attorney general or president to interpret meaning of laws

IMG_3014.webp
 

Trump signs executive order allowing only attorney general or president to interpret meaning of laws​


I thought we had courts to do that
The executive makes decisions and sets policy, the judicial then decided if the decision is constitutional. Congress passes laws, but the executive has to approve them and the courts rule on them.
 
Wham!

Another blow to the bureaucracy. And a victory for the People.


President Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order declaring that only the attorney general or the president, instead of federal regulators or bureaucrats, can speak for the U.S. when interpreting the meaning of laws carried out by the executive branch.
An aide talking about the order said it “reestablishes a long-standing norm” in the U.S. The order comes as Mr. Trump’s critics fight his agenda in court and raise accusations that he’ll ignore judicial orders.
“The President and the Attorney General’s opinions on questions of law are controlling on all employees in the conduct of their official duties,” the order states.
The document asserts that “previous administrations have allowed so-called ‘independent regulatory agencies’ to operate with minimal Presidential supervision.”
“These regulatory agencies currently exercise substantial executive authority without sufficient accountability to the President, and through him, to the American people,” the order said. “Moreover, these regulatory agencies have been permitted to promulgate significant regulations without review by the President.”
The president also signed a memorandum requiring federal agencies to report waste, fraud and abuse that’s uncovered and to detail programs that are eliminated. The aide described it as “imposing radical transparency requirements on government departments and agencies.”


Omg I said something like this when the Judges first tried to overrule the Executive Branch on how they should operate!

I said Trump should issue an EO basically saying Art II has no place for Judges directing the Executive Branch, therefore, Bite me
 
If you would give the matter at least thirty seconds of thought, you would consider that the President and the Attorney General swear an oath to abide by the Constitution.

Hmmm.

How should they do that? Ask the Supreme Court when something comes up? That won't work; the Supreme Court will only rule on actual cases, not hypotheticals.

So the President and the AG must make their own assessment of what the Constitution demands, right? How else can they act in accordance with the Constitution. Should they let their subordinates decide for themselves? What organization would have such a stupid policy?

If they make a choice that is questionable, then anyone who is harmed by it (who has legal STANDING) can challenge it in court, and if they are right...

Congressmen take the same ******* oath, eh? And yet they do unconstitutional shit day after day after day. The Democrats, I mean.
There is so much wrong with that interpretation that you couldn't possibly be serious, especially with Trump as President.

You're going to rely on HIM to interpret legal text?!?

If given a choice, he will always interpret things in the way that benefits him the most.
 
If this brings to a screeching halt the 6/7 precinct preselected judges who feel They run the USA then it’s absolute perfection
 
Donald's EOs are getting more and more preposterous because he's trying his damnest to create a Constitutional crisis. He feels that that will allow him to invoke martial law. Which will be our signal. No empire in history has ever fallen to such idiocy. But hey, there's a first time for everything.
 
Fundamentally altering independent executive agencies and ending their independence was a goal of Project 2025.

For a guy who claims he never heard of it, Trump is basically checking all the boxes and then some.
I didn't claim I never heard of it.
I don't object to it in the most part, if that is what you have distorted.
 
Donald's EOs are getting more and more preposterous because he's trying his damnest to create a Constitutional crisis. He feels that that will allow him to invoke martial law. Which will be our signal. No empire in history has ever fallen to such idiocy. But hey, there's a first time for everything.
Bullshit!

He's trying to destroy the foundation for tyranny the Leftist-wingnuts under Biden, Obama, and Clinton have been trying to establish. A "one-party" rule of the USA.
 
15th post
The administrative state is a term used to describe the phenomenon of executive branch administrative agencies exercising the power to create, adjudicate, and enforce their own rules
The administrative state is a term used to describe the phenomenon of executive branch administrative agencies exercising the power to create, adjudicate, and enforce their own rules. Five pillars are key to understanding the main areas of debate about the nature and scope of administrative agency action: nondelegation, judicial deference, executive control of agencies, procedural rights, and agency dynamics.


Five pillars of the administrative state

Which is operating outside of U.S. Constitutional authority.
 
If Trump's EOs are just "empty pieces of paper", why are the leftards losing their shit every time he signs one?
.

At least one of those "empty pieces of paper" has already become the very important Laken Riley Act.

 
Back
Top Bottom