toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
President Trump on Tuesday signed an executive order declaring that only the attorney general or the president, instead of federal regulators or bureaucrats, can speak for the U.S. when interpreting the meaning of laws carried out by the executive branch.
I'll have to think on this a while but Trump might have a point. Who other than the Exec himself or his AG can speak to the meaning or interpretation of his own laws and EOs as he intended?!
These other regulators and bureaucrats at best can only speak to how they view or interpret them, but how can that be any legal or binding official view unless these bureaucrats exceed or usurp the authority of the Executive Branch of the Federal government?
If this were anyone other than Trump, I'd be very worried, but I see what Trump is doing here and why. After all, he is fighting against the "Party of Democracy," who so far have recently:
- When their candidate didn't do so well in an election debate, just "switched" candidates.
- When they lost the election after numerous perversions and contortions of the law to insure a win, they tried to escape legal liability by pardoning themselves of all crimes past, present, charged and uncharged.
- And are now throwing up judicial roadblocks vehemently protesting the desire and attempt to audit the government to see how we are spending our money, whether we are wasting any, and how and where we can cut spending to lower taxes, improve efficiency, cut fraud and corruption, and to save SS, Medicare and the value of the dollar while we still can.