Trump signals end to Iran negotiations with fiery Truth Social post

[TemplarKormac]

View attachment 1267610
View attachment 1267611

His military advisors can't afford to be that. Trump can. Important distinction.

 

[JoeB131]

Hmm... I'm on my phone right now. I'll say more here when I'm near a keyboard.

I'm getting ready to go to work, I look forward to it.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

...I had such hope too...fap. I have been saying it since day one. Prep your assholes kids.

This is the start of WW3.

Learn to can, start digging that shelter.

If it takes WWIII to end islam in the west, that's what it takes. The alternative is too horrific to contemplate.

 

[frigidweirdo]

We have the bigger guns. And for all that Trump may be in your eyes, he doesn't have a cadre of of religious theocratic zealots advising him.

Bigger guns, and yet, the US lost Vietnam with bigger guns and bigger dicks.

There's a reason why Iran hasn't been invaded by Dubya, Obama, Trump or Biden since 9/11.

 

[JoeB131]

His military advisors can't afford to be that. Trump can. Important distinction.

His military advisors include Hegseth, who is a religious fanatic who just declared Mormons as "Not Christian" and eliminated 130 faiths from the Military Faith list.

Trump has purged the military of people who will push back.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

The world and especially Iran know that Trump is not trustworthy and does not keep his word.

Why would any nation sign a deal with Trump?

The only leader dumb enough........................

 

[Nobody911]

President Trump seems to be signaling in a fiery Truth Social post that Iran has worn out his good graces at the negotiating table, and that he is about to resume the war. This all comes after Iran downed a US Apache helicopter over the Strait of Hormuz yesterday.

This appears to have been his plan all along.

Show the world he was giving peace a chance, then Iran miscalculates and shoots down one of our Apaches.

It gives Trump all the reason to say that Iran was never interested in peace.

1. Attack
2. Relent and negotiate for peace.
3. When other party fails to negotiate in good faith, miscalculates and shoots down a copter...
4. Attack again, once and for all.

I’m not buying the Apache story yet — here’s why in plain terms:

• No forensic proof: there’s been zero public wreckage analysis, radar/flight logs, or authenticated attacker video linking Iran to a strike.
• Official claims aren’t the same as evidence: governments and media have repeated statements and some imagery/assessments, but nothing independently verifiable has been released.
• Silence ≠ innocence, but it also ≠ proof: Iran’s lack of admission doesn’t prove anything either way.
• Bottom line: I’ll wait for hard, checkable stuff (wreckage, raw radar/data, verified satellite/video) before I accept this as fact.

Share if you think claims need proof before being treated as truth. Do you like Hollywood movies? What about Trump's movies? lol.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Problem is, you wrote an OP.

In that OP you stated "This appears to have been his plan all along." And you didn't prove it, you didn't even try. Now all of a sudden I'm expected to prove my point and you're not expected to prove yours.

And you made the claim Israel is controlling Trump.

Don't deflect this back on me. I've too much experience on this forum to be drawn in to that.

But you'll note that I used "this appears" to signify that my confidence in that was incomplete. A thorough understanding of the English language in that context would relay to the reader the lack of total confidence.

I'm not trying to insult you, just telling you what you're missing here.

 

[TemplarKormac]

His military advisors include Hegseth, who is a religious fanatic who just declared Mormons as "Not Christian" and eliminated 130 faiths from the Military Faith list.

Trump has purged the military of people who will push back.

I see.

So why haven't we nuked anyone in the name of God? Or launched religious crusades a la Knights Templar on the Eastern Hemisphere?

Because people who make that claim are given to fear of what they see in Islamic theocracies, or to hatred of Christianity, not our democracy, which in 250 years has been able to strike a clean balance between religion and government. The checks and balances have performed just fine there.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Bigger guns, and yet, the US lost Vietnam with bigger guns and bigger dicks.

There's a reason why Iran hasn't been invaded by Dubya, Obama, Trump or Biden since 9/11.

We lost because of political incompetence. And Antiwar sentiment.

Funny, we want America to win, until we don't.

 

[frigidweirdo]

And you made the claim Israel is controlling Trump.

Don't deflect this back on me. I've too much experience on this forum to be drawn in to that.

But you'll note that I used "this appears" to signify that my confidence in that was incomplete. A thorough understanding of the English language in that context would relay to the reader the lack of total confidence.

I'm not trying to insult you, just telling you what you're missing here.

Come back when you can prove your shit first.

 

[frigidweirdo]

We lost because of political incompetence. And Antiwar sentiment.

Funny, we want America to win, until we don't.

The US lost because of arrogance.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Come back when you can prove your shit first.

I'll be here waiting on you.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I'll be here waiting on you.

Great. I can't be bothered to do things, when others don't reciprocate.

 

[Oddball]

here we phuking go again....

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

His recent comments that "Iran" is ready to sign a "deal" are just bizarre. The World couldn't care less if Iran "signs a deal" because the World knows that Iran is not trustworthy - will not adhere to any deal that it signs. The only conclusion to this mess is to put Iran in a situation where it can no longer be a menace to other countries, and that requires military obliteration.

Why pretend otherwise?

Democrats and RINOs are already trying to invoke the War Powers Act. What do you think will happen if he goes "all in"?

 

[TemplarKormac]

The US lost because of arrogance.

No. We lost because a bureaucracy that got in the way of effective military leadership. If we could beat Germany and Japan, we had the ability to beat North Vietnam. But that's neither here nor there.

 

[TemplarKormac]

Great. I can't be bothered to do things, when others don't reciprocate.

Cop out if you must.

 

[frigidweirdo]

No. We lost because a bureaucracy that got in the way of effective military leadership. If we could beat Germany and Japan, we had the ability to beat North Vietnam. But that's neither here nor there.

Except... jungle... and the USSR.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I've been saying all along, at this point you either take over the Straits of Hormuz or take out the regime.

And since the later is not aided by public support or the ability monetarily, that only leaves controlling the Straits of Hormuz.

Can anyone tell me how the international community continues to allow Iran to hold hostage 1/5 of the oil reserves? They should form a coalition to take over the Straits of Hormuz.

The correct word is "latter".