gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 79,174
- 43,563
- 2,605
Lol. Not a chance dumb ass.Known it probably longer than you been alive.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol. Not a chance dumb ass.Known it probably longer than you been alive.
Most were trafficked between palm beach and New York and New Mexico. It was not limited to the island.Do we even know how many of the girls that were on his island were actually under 18?
No. You’re just a dumbass repeating information already out there as if it were breaking news.One would have to have their eyes open to notice how spectacular the information is.
You don’t know whether the young women victims knew or could identify any of the individuals who engaged in any sex acts with them. In fact, as far as you know (or any of the rest of us know), you don’t know much beyond the propriety of charging just those two. Maybe no further prosecutions could be developed for all you know.A huge child sex trafficking ring is exposed; the two ring leaders are arrested; tried; and convicted. Then the whole thing is swept under the rug by both Parties while Epstein's rich, pedo clients walk free as if nothing ever happened. In most people's book, that would be considered scandalous. But it's a nothing burger within the Trump cult.
Mike Johnson just said many of the files are covered by “national security” and will never be released![]()
Trump Backs Vote to Release Epstein Files in Sharp Reversal — The Wall Street Journal
President had urged House Republicans to reject the proposal but faced defections within the GOPapple.news
Trump reverses course on the Epstein files.
He is asking the GOP congresspersons to RELEASE the Epstein files.
Now what will his detractors say?
Probably the most specific info is the fact that Epstein and Maxwell were both convicted of "child sex trafficking." National news. They would not have been convicted unless there was plenty of evidence to prove the case. It goes without saying that if there is a "trafficker" then there must be a "traffickee."
To date, I don't know that a single individual has been arrested for receiving Epstein's "goods." But, according to Pam Bondi, there are "tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children or child porn."
According to the book, "Trance Formation of America" by Cathy O'Brien (a long time victim of child sex trafficking) there are lots of politicians involved in the dark and evil "industry" of child sex trafficking. And yes ... many very young kids fall victim.
One would have to have their eyes open to notice how spectacular the information is.
A huge child sex trafficking ring is exposed; the two ring leaders are arrested; tried; and convicted. Then the whole thing is swept under the rug by both Parties while Epstein's rich, pedo clients walk free as if nothing ever happened. In most people's book, that would be considered scandalous. But it's a nothing burger within the Trump cult.
Great post.I think this is being way over blown for the purpose of politics, and I think once the files are released everyone is going to finally realize that. Or they'll continue to support the conspiracy that information was withheld because they just can't let it go.
Why were there only 4 victims as part of her conviction? I honestly believe that most of the women, particularly the ones that went to his island were over 18, and I think they were well compensated for their time.
Their main 'spokeswoman' back in September that said they were going to release their own 'list', which has never happened, was over 18 when she met Epstein on the island, she kept voluntarily going back to his mansion in NY over a period of years, he paid for her university, he got her into the Ford modeling agency, got her connections for roles in Hollywood, and I'm sure paid her well for her time. She is no victim, yet I'm sure she's now wealthy from suing his estate.
Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of recruiting and trafficking four teenage girls for sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein. The charges in her trial related to the testimony of these four women who were minors at the time of the abuse.
The specific charges for which she was found guilty were related to:
Maxwell's crimes took place over a decade, between 1994 and 2004. At her sentencing, several victims gave powerful statements describing the long-term impact of the abuse.
- Conspiracy to entice minors to travel to engage in illegal sex acts
- Conspiracy to transport minors with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity
- Sex trafficking of a minor
While other women made accusations against Maxwell and Epstein outside of this specific trial, the conviction and 20-year sentence focused on the four victims whose testimony was part of the federal case.
No. It’s a dumb post.Great post.
Also, two of the victims named in the documents, both under oath, testified that both Trump and Clinton did nothing inappropriate.
Also, from the victims attorney interview by ABC, the sexual abuse of minors was entirely for Epsteins personal sexual appetite, with only a few possibly entertaining other men.
Again no mention of Trump or Clinton.
From what I've read, the dreaded Epstein Files isn't going to shed much more light on the subject than what's already known.
Why is he going back and forth in this?![]()
Trump Backs Vote to Release Epstein Files in Sharp Reversal — The Wall Street Journal
President had urged House Republicans to reject the proposal but faced defections within the GOPapple.news
Trump reverses course on the Epstein files.
He is asking the GOP congresspersons to RELEASE the Epstein files.
Now what will his detractors say?
You think? Lol.Why is he going back and forth in this?
Seems pretty weak and wishy washy
Funny no mention of that in the post I responded to.No. It’s a dumb post.
Thinking our political class being blackmailed by an Israeli agent is a story way over blown, is an example of someone dumber than a box of rocks.
Yeah, with all that gotcha hoopla about Trump's name is in several emails, Democrats got what again?Yes, the Democrats are very upset. Their bill to compel the DOJ to release the PedoFiles passed with all hands voting in favor. The Republicans completely collapsed. Even Trump collapsed.
A total Republican mutiny against Captain Cankles.
The Dems are really butt hurt.
![]()
![]()
![]()

That won't stop Democrats from declaring that Trump did it. Those emails released were very telling about their nefarious intent.Great post.
Also, two of the victims named in the documents, both under oath, testified that both Trump and Clinton did nothing inappropriate.
Also, from the victims attorney interview by ABC, the sexual abuse of minors was entirely for Epsteins personal sexual appetite, with only a few possibly entertaining other men.
Again no mention of Trump or Clinton.
From what I've read, the dreaded Epstein Files isn't going to shed much more light on the subject than what's already known.
I was going to mention that in my post but it's already a foregone conclusion.That won't stop Democrats from declaring that Trump did it. Those emails released were very telling about their nefarious intent.
Yeah imagine that…lmfao.Funny no mention of that in the post I responded to.
No, it was stated I thought Obama liked old white guys. I was wrong, sorry, he liked young white boys.
Your party's penchant to expose Trump has shown dems were hanging out with Epstein after his first time..... you know Epstein the pedo.
The issue will be Trump not doing it.Great!
What's the problem? If some Democrats want to hang out with known sex traffickers they SHOULD catch that flack, maybe next time they will think twice about associating with people just because they happen to make donation$.
The issue will be Trump not doing it.