Trump removes Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook from office, citing fraud allegations

[Marener]

There is nothing false about the charges against Lisa.

Why are you so slow you don't see that?

There aren’t any charges period.

 

[Robert W]

so these mortgages are both in good standing.

Seems like everyone is happy.

So was Deutch bank about the Trump loans.

 

[buckeye]

Then all despite party should be punished, yes.

Except Lisa Cook, according to you.

 

[Robert W]

There aren’t any charges period.

So, Trump did nothing wrong and did not charge her!!!

 

[Marener]

Attention for the forum.

Please notice the aggressive self-important style of the poster to the top.
Style rating: full blown attack
What did he listen to said by Foxfyre? NOTHING

Of course I listened to what Foxfyre said, which is why I was able to demonstrate her statement was consistent with my description.

Her response was to whine about "context" which does nothing to change the actual statement or it's meaning. She couldn't even actually defend her statement.

 

[Marener]

So, Trump did nothing wrong and did not charge her!!!

He removed her from office. That's wrong.

 

[buckeye]

Shutting down projects is authoritarianism.

Trump halts work on New England offshore wind project that's nearly complete

The Trump administration has halted construction on an offshore wind project near Rhode Island that is 80% complete.

apnews.com

Wind projects in the oceans are insanity. Do you enjoy killing and terrorizing whales, some to extinction?

 

[Marener]

So was Deutch bank about the Trump loans.

I'm told that means that there is not mortgage fraud. Is that correct?

You also said that 90% of mortgages have fraudulent information, so this really doesn't seem like a big deal anyway.

At least if we accept your framing.

 

[Marener]

Wind projects in the oceans are insanity. Do you enjoy killing and terrorizing whales, some to extinction?

Are whale strandings on the East Coast related to offshore wind development?​

At this point, there is no scientific evidence that noise resulting from offshore wind site characterization surveys could potentially cause whale deaths. There are no known links between large whale deaths and ongoing offshore wind activities.

Frequent Questions—Offshore Wind and Whales

Frequently asked questions about interactions between offshore wind energy projects and whales.

www.fisheries.noaa.gov

 

[Foxfyre]

Attention for the forum.

Please notice the aggressive self-important style of the poster to the top.
Style rating: full blown attack
What did he listen to said by Foxfyre? NOTHING

I referred to specific content from this thread. He (or she? I have no idea) refused to acknowledge any of it but continued to attack me personally but refuses to post anything I've said that he is attacking. Well there was that one line taken entirely out of context. . .

I'm done with that for today though. There's a limit to how much I'm willing to engage in an exercise of futility. I've already violated my resolution on that for some time today. I just didn't have anything else important to do for awhile, and couldn't resist goading them into digging a deep DEEP hole for themselves that they always do.

 

[Robert W]

Of course I listened to what Foxfyre said, which is why I was able to demonstrate her statement was consistent with my description.

Her response was to whine about "context" which does nothing to change the actual statement or it's meaning. She couldn't even actually defend her statement.

You attack primarily Republicans, and your idea of listening is to exclude remarks made by them in context. She chided you over that. Describing her discussion as whine is like me saying your post is pure whining.

 

[Marener]

You attack primarily Republicans, and your idea of listening is to exclude remarks made by them in context. She chided you over that. Describing her discussion as whine is like me saying your post is pure whining.

The context changed nothing about the statement she made.

She frequently does this to avoid having to deal with the statement in question. When complaining about taking something "out of context", she will refuse to provide any substantiation to explain how the statement is meaningfully different when taken in context.

It's lazy and dishonest.

 

[Robert W]

You also said that 90% of mortgages have fraudulent information, so this really doesn't seem like a big deal anyway.

If I said fraud, consider this a correction. Mistaken. Not precise

 

[buckeye]

“For cause”?

Allegations are not causes.

She'll get her day in court.

Mortgage cheaters should never serve on the Board of Governors for the Central bank that we use to set mortgage rates. It doesn't matter if she hasn't been convicted yet.

Her job requires impeccable standards and she clearly fails that test.

 

[buckeye]

So that we can be assured she's not being fired maliciously.

She cheated on two mortgage applications to get a better rate.

That disqualifies her from serving as a Governor of the Fed Reserve who is in charge of setting rates.

 

[Robert W]

The context changed nothing about the statement she made.

She frequently does this to avoid having to deal with the statement in question. When complaining about taking something "out of context", she will refuse to provide any substantiation to explain how the statement is meaningfully different when taken in context.

It's lazy and dishonest.

Worse than your whine is your constant attack against her.
I know for a fact she listens to me, does not whine I take her out of context. But you decided to attack her. Still attacking her.

 

[Delldude]

Beyond his threats against Powell for not doing what he wants, did you not realize that you’re in a thread about him firing a governor who didn’t do what he wants?

You extrapolate that from her being found to have been criminally referred for loan fraud?

 

[Marener]

Worse than your whine is your constant attack against her.
I know for a fact she listens to me, does not whine I take her out of context. But you decided to attack her. Still attacking her.

I don't see why she would, given you are politically and ideologically aligned. That's hardly exculpatory.

I attack her because she's extremely dishonest. I think she's earned it.

 

[Robert W]

The fish rots from the head. Trump sets the tone and MAGA follows. Everyone? No. Probably not. I haven’t talked to every MAGA. But in my experience it’s exceedingly common.

Republicans believe the fish was named Biden and not Wanda.

 

[Robert W]

I attack her because she's extremely dishonest. I think she's earned it.

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You truly believe you are the superior class.