Trump Regimes Amazing List Of Crimes Keeps Getting Longer, But We Can't Afford To Look Away

[Stuartbirdan2]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

Read Attorney General Barr's letter to Congress announcing end of Mueller's Russia probe

Read the full letter: Attorney General William Barr says he could share Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation by the end of the weekend.

www.usatoday.com

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with "a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General" or acting Attorney General "concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued." 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) 9. There were no such instances during the Special Counsel's investigation

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Facebook post blurs the facts about Clinton’s ties to Russia

Hillary Clinton’s comments about Jill Stein and Tulsi Gabbard inspired a raft of Facebook posts that revived misleading

www.politifact.com

Fusion GPS was originally hired by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative media website. The Democratic National Committee, through its law firm Perkins Coie and for the benefit of the Clinton campaign, hired the opposition research firm to collect information after Trump won the Republican nomination. Then, Fusion GPS hired Steele to produce memos on Trump’s ties to Russia

Ohhh look, the Nazi is lying through his fucking teeth - repeating a conspiracy theory debunked YEARS ago.

Such is the way of you Nazi fucks.

{
Since its launch in February of 2012, the Washington Free Beacon has retained third party firms to conduct research on many individuals and institutions of interest to us and our readers. In that capacity, during the 2016 election cycle we retained Fusion GPS to provide research on multiple candidates in the Republican presidential primary, just as we retained other firms to assist in our research into Hillary Clinton.

All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to the Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier. The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele. Nor did we have any knowledge of the relationship between Fusion GPS and the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton campaign.

Representatives of the Free Beacon approached the House Intelligence Committee today and offered to answer what questions we can in their ongoing probe of Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier. But to be clear: We stand by our reporting, and we do not apologize for our methods. We consider it our duty to report verifiable information, not falsehoods or slander, and we believe that commitment has been well demonstrated by the quality of the journalism that we produce.}

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

legalinsurrection.com

Hey, you're a fucking liar - such is the way of Nazis.

US President Donald Trump’s path to re-election requires maximising the support of his oft-mentioned “base” — white voters without college degrees — in the key battleground states where he eked out victory in 2016.

This is because Trump’s support among other voters has slipped. According to the Pew Research Centre, he still holds a 60-34% lead over Democratic challenger Joe Biden among whites without a college degree, but Biden has substantial leads among college-educated white voters, as well as Black, Hispanic and Asian voters

View attachment 504985

The History Place - Rise of Hitler: The 25 Points of Hitler's Nazi Party

 

[Auld Phart]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

Read Attorney General Barr's letter to Congress announcing end of Mueller's Russia probe

Read the full letter: Attorney General William Barr says he could share Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation by the end of the weekend.

www.usatoday.com

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with "a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General" or acting Attorney General "concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued." 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) 9. There were no such instances during the Special Counsel's investigation

Thats nice.

but it needs to be in the first post you make.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Facebook post blurs the facts about Clinton’s ties to Russia

Hillary Clinton’s comments about Jill Stein and Tulsi Gabbard inspired a raft of Facebook posts that revived misleading

www.politifact.com

Fusion GPS was originally hired by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative media website. The Democratic National Committee, through its law firm Perkins Coie and for the benefit of the Clinton campaign, hired the opposition research firm to collect information after Trump won the Republican nomination. Then, Fusion GPS hired Steele to produce memos on Trump’s ties to Russia

Ohhh look, the Nazi is lying through his fucking teeth - repeating a conspiracy theory debunked YEARS ago.

Such is the way of you Nazi fucks.

{
Since its launch in February of 2012, the Washington Free Beacon has retained third party firms to conduct research on many individuals and institutions of interest to us and our readers. In that capacity, during the 2016 election cycle we retained Fusion GPS to provide research on multiple candidates in the Republican presidential primary, just as we retained other firms to assist in our research into Hillary Clinton.

All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to the Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier. The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele. Nor did we have any knowledge of the relationship between Fusion GPS and the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton campaign.

Representatives of the Free Beacon approached the House Intelligence Committee today and offered to answer what questions we can in their ongoing probe of Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier. But to be clear: We stand by our reporting, and we do not apologize for our methods. We consider it our duty to report verifiable information, not falsehoods or slander, and we believe that commitment has been well demonstrated by the quality of the journalism that we produce.}

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

legalinsurrection.com

Hey, you're a fucking liar - such is the way of Nazis.

7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately

Are you on drugs? Drunk?

You are a rambling fool who can't seem to focus on the subject.

You FLAT OUT LIED about the WFB. A lie that has been dispelled dozens, if not hundreds of time on this board. You are a Nazi - you have not a shred or hint of integrity - it's expected that you'll lie for your Reich, and lie you do. But you got busted.

Since its launch in February of 2012, the Washington Free Beacon has retained third party firms to conduct research on many individuals and institutions of interest to us and our readers. In that capacity, during the 2016 election cycle we retained Fusion GPS to provide research on multiple candidates in the Republican presidential primary, just as we retained other firms to assist in our research into Hillary Clinton.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

Read Attorney General Barr's letter to Congress announcing end of Mueller's Russia probe

Read the full letter: Attorney General William Barr says he could share Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation by the end of the weekend.

www.usatoday.com

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with "a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General" or acting Attorney General "concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued." 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) 9. There were no such instances during the Special Counsel's investigation

Thats nice.

but it needs to be in the first post you make.

Do you have a rule against vulgar posts?

 

[Auld Phart]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

Read Attorney General Barr's letter to Congress announcing end of Mueller's Russia probe

Read the full letter: Attorney General William Barr says he could share Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation by the end of the weekend.

www.usatoday.com

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with "a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General" or acting Attorney General "concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued." 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) 9. There were no such instances during the Special Counsel's investigation

Thats nice.

but it needs to be in the first post you make.

Do you have a rule against vulgar posts?

USMB Rules and Guidelines

USMB Site Guidelines and Regulations List of Current Active Moderators: AyeCantSeeYou Dont Taz Me Bro Coyote katsteve2012 White 6 Registration Guidelines: Individuals are allowed only one (1) account. Anyone found to be in violation risk having all accounts banned. Site Wide Rules And...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Facebook post blurs the facts about Clinton’s ties to Russia

Hillary Clinton’s comments about Jill Stein and Tulsi Gabbard inspired a raft of Facebook posts that revived misleading

www.politifact.com

Fusion GPS was originally hired by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative media website. The Democratic National Committee, through its law firm Perkins Coie and for the benefit of the Clinton campaign, hired the opposition research firm to collect information after Trump won the Republican nomination. Then, Fusion GPS hired Steele to produce memos on Trump’s ties to Russia

Ohhh look, the Nazi is lying through his fucking teeth - repeating a conspiracy theory debunked YEARS ago.

Such is the way of you Nazi fucks.

{
Since its launch in February of 2012, the Washington Free Beacon has retained third party firms to conduct research on many individuals and institutions of interest to us and our readers. In that capacity, during the 2016 election cycle we retained Fusion GPS to provide research on multiple candidates in the Republican presidential primary, just as we retained other firms to assist in our research into Hillary Clinton.

All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to the Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier. The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele. Nor did we have any knowledge of the relationship between Fusion GPS and the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton campaign.

Representatives of the Free Beacon approached the House Intelligence Committee today and offered to answer what questions we can in their ongoing probe of Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier. But to be clear: We stand by our reporting, and we do not apologize for our methods. We consider it our duty to report verifiable information, not falsehoods or slander, and we believe that commitment has been well demonstrated by the quality of the journalism that we produce.}

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

legalinsurrection.com

Hey, you're a fucking liar - such is the way of Nazis.

7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately

Are you on drugs? Drunk?

You are a rambling fool who can't seem to focus on the subject.

You FLAT OUT LIED about the WFB. A lie that has been dispelled dozens, if not hundreds of time on this board. You are a Nazi - you have not a shred or hint of integrity - it's expected that you'll lie for your Reich, and lie you do. But you got busted.

Hillary pants on fire

Fact-checks | PolitiFact

PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.

www.politifact.com

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

Foul language (profanity) will be loosely tolerated and at the moderators discretion at any time within any forum and/or sub-forum

 

[Indeependent]

Facebook post blurs the facts about Clinton’s ties to Russia

Hillary Clinton’s comments about Jill Stein and Tulsi Gabbard inspired a raft of Facebook posts that revived misleading

www.politifact.com

Fusion GPS was originally hired by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative media website. The Democratic National Committee, through its law firm Perkins Coie and for the benefit of the Clinton campaign, hired the opposition research firm to collect information after Trump won the Republican nomination. Then, Fusion GPS hired Steele to produce memos on Trump’s ties to Russia

Ohhh look, the Nazi is lying through his fucking teeth - repeating a conspiracy theory debunked YEARS ago.

Such is the way of you Nazi fucks.

{
Since its launch in February of 2012, the Washington Free Beacon has retained third party firms to conduct research on many individuals and institutions of interest to us and our readers. In that capacity, during the 2016 election cycle we retained Fusion GPS to provide research on multiple candidates in the Republican presidential primary, just as we retained other firms to assist in our research into Hillary Clinton.

All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to the Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier. The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele. Nor did we have any knowledge of the relationship between Fusion GPS and the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton campaign.

Representatives of the Free Beacon approached the House Intelligence Committee today and offered to answer what questions we can in their ongoing probe of Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier. But to be clear: We stand by our reporting, and we do not apologize for our methods. We consider it our duty to report verifiable information, not falsehoods or slander, and we believe that commitment has been well demonstrated by the quality of the journalism that we produce.}

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

legalinsurrection.com

Hey, you're a fucking liar - such is the way of Nazis.

7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately

Are you on drugs? Drunk?

You are a rambling fool who can't seem to focus on the subject.

You FLAT OUT LIED about the WFB. A lie that has been dispelled dozens, if not hundreds of time on this board. You are a Nazi - you have not a shred or hint of integrity - it's expected that you'll lie for your Reich, and lie you do. But you got busted.

Birdbrain is an idiot.

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

Read Attorney General Barr's letter to Congress announcing end of Mueller's Russia probe

Read the full letter: Attorney General William Barr says he could share Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation by the end of the weekend.

www.usatoday.com

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with "a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General" or acting Attorney General "concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued." 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) 9. There were no such instances during the Special Counsel's investigation

Thats nice.

but it needs to be in the first post you make.

Do you have a rule against vulgar posts?

USMB Rules and Guidelines

USMB Site Guidelines and Regulations List of Current Active Moderators: AyeCantSeeYou Dont Taz Me Bro Coyote katsteve2012 White 6 Registration Guidelines: Individuals are allowed only one (1) account. Anyone found to be in violation risk having all accounts banned. Site Wide Rules And...

www.usmessageboard.com

So you tolerate name calling but not fair copyright use

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

Whatever...

 

[Stuartbirdan2]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

Read Attorney General Barr's letter to Congress announcing end of Mueller's Russia probe

Read the full letter: Attorney General William Barr says he could share Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation by the end of the weekend.

www.usatoday.com

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with "a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General" or acting Attorney General "concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued." 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) 9. There were no such instances during the Special Counsel's investigation

Thats nice.

but it needs to be in the first post you make.

Do you have a rule against vulgar posts?

USMB Rules and Guidelines

USMB Site Guidelines and Regulations List of Current Active Moderators: AyeCantSeeYou Dont Taz Me Bro Coyote katsteve2012 White 6 Registration Guidelines: Individuals are allowed only one (1) account. Anyone found to be in violation risk having all accounts banned. Site Wide Rules And...

www.usmessageboard.com

What about tattle tale snowflakes?

 

[Auld Phart]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with “a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General” or acting Attorney General “concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued.” 28 C.F.R. 600.9(a)(3). There were no such instances during the Special Counsel’s investigation

Copyright. Link Each "Copy & Paste" to It's Source. Only paste a small to medium section of the material.

Read Attorney General Barr's letter to Congress announcing end of Mueller's Russia probe

Read the full letter: Attorney General William Barr says he could share Robert Mueller's report on the Russia investigation by the end of the weekend.

www.usatoday.com

Bill barr:
Dear Chairman Graham, Chairman Nadler, Ranking Member Feinstein, and Ranking Member Collins:

I write to notify you pursuant to 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) that Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III has concluded his investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 election and related matters. In addition to this notification, the Special Counsel regulations require that I provide you with "a description and explanation of instances (if any) in which the Attorney General" or acting Attorney General "concluded that a proposed action by a Special Counsel was so inappropriate or unwarranted under established Departmental practices that it should not be pursued." 28 C.F.R. 8 600.9(a)(3) 9. There were no such instances during the Special Counsel's investigation

Thats nice.

but it needs to be in the first post you make.

Do you have a rule against vulgar posts?

USMB Rules and Guidelines

USMB Site Guidelines and Regulations List of Current Active Moderators: AyeCantSeeYou Dont Taz Me Bro Coyote katsteve2012 White 6 Registration Guidelines: Individuals are allowed only one (1) account. Anyone found to be in violation risk having all accounts banned. Site Wide Rules And...

www.usmessageboard.com

So you tolerate name calling but not fair copyright use

Fair copyright use?

if you don't post a link, it's not fair copyright use.

 

[Batcat]

Of course we also must ignore the crimes of the Biden family. As high level democrats they are totally above the rule of law.

How five members of Joe Biden’s family got rich through his connections

Political figures have long used their families to route power and benefits for their own self-enrichment. In my new book, “Profiles in Corruption: Abuse of Power by America’s Progressive Elite,” o…

nypost.com

 

[Uncensored2008]

Hillary pants on fire

Fact-checks | PolitiFact

PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.

www.politifact.com

What the fuck does that have to do with anything?

I ask again, are you on drugs?

 

[Indeependent]

Hillary pants on fire

Fact-checks | PolitiFact

PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.

www.politifact.com

What the fuck does that have to do with anything?

I ask again, are you on drugs?

I wasn't being facetious, BirdBrain is an idiot!

 

[bripat9643]

Obstruction of Justice in the Mueller Report: A Heat Map

The Mueller report describes numerous instances in which President Trump may have obstructed justice. A few days ago, I threw together a quick spreadsheet on Twitter to assess how Special Counsel Robert Mueller seemed to assess the evidence.

www.lawfareblog.com

So Nazi blog Lawfare, huh?

Funny that the Reich never tried to do anything more than defame and smear the president.

Not really, there was nothing credible to the Weissman defamation, and even in 2018 the courts were not quite as corrupt as they are now, and couldn't have gotten away with a raw show trial.

"duh pwesedunt dun tawked abut FIRING Mobbed Up Mewler - OBSTRUCTIFYING"

You Nazis are such fucking clowns.

These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes). The reporting is factual and usually sourced. These are the most credible media sources. See all Least Biased Sources.

Overall, we rate Lawfare Blog Least Biased based on evidence-based balanced reporting. We also rate them Very High for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and for being used as a resource for verified fact-checkers

Lawfare Blog

LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion

mediabiasfactcheck.com

You have to be joking. I've already unmasked your claims as fraudulent.

https://www.conservapedia.com/Lawfare_Group

Lawfare Group is a radical group of leftist lawyers in Washington, D.C. that, according to its website, operate in "that nebulous zone in which actions taken or contemplated to protect the nation interact with the nation’s laws and legal institutions."[1] Its founder is Benjamin Wittes and is associated with the Brookings Institution. It sends out a daily newsletter called the Lawfareblog.

During the Obama administration the Lawfare group:[2]

• (1) weaponized the IRS for political targeting;
• (2) weaponized the DOJ and FBI for political targeting;
• (3) weaponized the intelligence community for political activism;
• (4) created new legal theories around ‘disparate impact’ to weaponize the National Labor Relations Board; and generally used embedded officials to advance far-left political interests across the spectrum of government.

After the 2016 presidential election the Lawfare group immediately sought to:

• (1) delegitimize the presidency of Donald Trump;
• (2) delegitimize National Security Advisor General Michael Flynn;
• (3) target, disempower and isolate Attorney General Jeff Sessions;
• (4) delegitimize AG Bill Barr and the institution of the FBI outside their control;
• (5) delegitimize DHS, Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE);
• (6) delegitimize Justice Brett Kavanaugh and any institution or office that would now be removing or overturning their former Lawfare constructs;
• (7) hired on as staff to House Judiciary Committee chairman Jerry Nadler's impeachment probe.[3]

You debunked me by posting a biased source

Your source was biased, so you just debunked your own post.

 

[bripat9643]

Fascists don't trust the American justice system

You fascists have destroyed the American justice system and replaced it with a two tiered abortion of law.

Fascists don't trust the American justice system

Sure they do. You trust it, for example. Fascists are the only people who trust it.

 

[bripat9643]

Facebook post blurs the facts about Clinton’s ties to Russia

Hillary Clinton’s comments about Jill Stein and Tulsi Gabbard inspired a raft of Facebook posts that revived misleading

www.politifact.com

Fusion GPS was originally hired by the Washington Free Beacon, a conservative media website. The Democratic National Committee, through its law firm Perkins Coie and for the benefit of the Clinton campaign, hired the opposition research firm to collect information after Trump won the Republican nomination. Then, Fusion GPS hired Steele to produce memos on Trump’s ties to Russia

Ohhh look, the Nazi is lying through his fucking teeth - repeating a conspiracy theory debunked YEARS ago.

Such is the way of you Nazi fucks.

{
Since its launch in February of 2012, the Washington Free Beacon has retained third party firms to conduct research on many individuals and institutions of interest to us and our readers. In that capacity, during the 2016 election cycle we retained Fusion GPS to provide research on multiple candidates in the Republican presidential primary, just as we retained other firms to assist in our research into Hillary Clinton.

All of the work that Fusion GPS provided to the Free Beacon was based on public sources, and none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier. The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele. Nor did we have any knowledge of the relationship between Fusion GPS and the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, and the Clinton campaign.

Representatives of the Free Beacon approached the House Intelligence Committee today and offered to answer what questions we can in their ongoing probe of Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier. But to be clear: We stand by our reporting, and we do not apologize for our methods. We consider it our duty to report verifiable information, not falsehoods or slander, and we believe that commitment has been well demonstrated by the quality of the journalism that we produce.}

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

Washington Free Beacon Statement On Fusion GPS and the Trump Dossier

legalinsurrection.com

Hey, you're a fucking liar - such is the way of Nazis.

7. We demand that the State shall above all undertake to ensure that every citizen shall have the possibility of living decently and earning a livelihood. If it should not be possible to feed the whole population, then aliens (non-citizens) must be expelled from the Reich.

8. Any further immigration of non-Germans must be prevented. We demand that all non-Germans who have entered Germany since August 2, 1914, shall be compelled to leave the Reich immediately

Are you on drugs? Drunk?

You are a rambling fool who can't seem to focus on the subject.

You FLAT OUT LIED about the WFB. A lie that has been dispelled dozens, if not hundreds of time on this board. You are a Nazi - you have not a shred or hint of integrity - it's expected that you'll lie for your Reich, and lie you do. But you got busted.

Hillary pants on fire

Fact-checks | PolitiFact

PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.

www.politifact.com

Politifact is fake news.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I stopped reading at "reign of terror against non white migrants"

Well yeah. Of course you did. Bad news melts Magaturds down. Every. Single. Time.

You'll now go into denial mode because self reflection is for the peasants.