Trump presented with assassination as solution to North Korea nuke threats

[shockedcanadian]

These types of situations either require strong diplomacy (with China), or, strong action. You get the feeling Jong-Un isn't one you roll the dice with in regards to your survival. Is there a situation in which such state sponsored assassination is acceptable?



http://nypost.com/2017/04/07/us-opt...north-korea-reportedly-include-assassination/

The National Security Council has told President Trump his options for dealing with North Korea’s nuclear threats include assassinating its dictator, Kim Jong-un, and placing US nukes in South Korea, according to a new report.

NBC, citing high ranking US military and intelligence officials, said the two scenarios were developed before Trump’s meetings this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

US officials are hoping the Chinese leaders will convince their ally — through sanctions or diplomacy — to back off.

If the rogue state continues on its present path, the Council’s much stronger options could be put into effect.

 

[ScienceRocks]

I'd say run a missile up Kims ass.

 

[Desperado]

But Trump said he was against regime change, and assassination is the most drastic method of regime change.

 

[baileyn45]

I'll never understand the idea of placing nukes in Korea. This country could damn near put a missile on the mans forehead from the middle of the atlantic. It reminds of people freaking out when there were rumors of Russia moving nukes closer to Europe. I guess somehow that extra 8 minutes is going to make a difference when the city you are living has been evaporated.

 

[pismoe]

But Trump said he was against regime change, and assassination is the most drastic method of regime change.

----------------------------------------- its over with , the best that i can say is the Trump is still better than 'hilary' but looks to me that Trump is following along behind 'mckain' , lindsey graham' and his other rino type advisers . Particularly 'mc master' but 'mc master' is just a guess but i think that he is also a rino type Desperado .

 

[KeiserC]

In the case of Kim... assassination is most expedient, humane, and non confrontational tact... It will leave a void to be filled but it's hard, in this case, to do worse than the 'devil we know'....

 

[Care4all]

But Trump said he was against regime change, and assassination is the most drastic method of regime change.

it's also against our law.

 

[debbiedowner]

I would have hoped Trump talked China into taking the fat little bastard out. I believe Gerald Ford signed a law back in the 70's not to assasinate foreign leaders.

 

[KeiserC]

But Trump said he was against regime change, and assassination is the most drastic method of regime change.

it's also against our law.

Nope... exigent circumstances... nuclear ICBM's pointed at the US and our allies... Congress will approve a declaration of war in a second. Assassinating a leader would be extremely palatable for all involved including N Korea... perhaps the exception being Kim fat phuck Un...

 

[Desperado]

Assassinations of foreign leaders used to be the job of the CIA. However they failed miserably.
Just look at their record number of failed attempts to take Castro out, Their only success might have been JFK.

 

[Lewdog]

They should send some American journalist to do an interview with him... and then poison him using a patch on the hand of one of the guys doing the interview...

 

[Desperado]

They should send some American journalist to do an interview with him... and then poison him using a patch on the hand of one of the guys doing the interview...

Since Dennis Rodman is such good friends with lil kim, send Rodman over there and have them party for the weekend, by Monday morning lil kim should be dead of alcohol poisoning

 

[Preacher]

These types of situations either require strong diplomacy (with China), or, strong action. You get the feeling Jong-Un isn't one you roll the dice with in regards to your survival. Is there a situation in which such state sponsored assassination is acceptable?



http://nypost.com/2017/04/07/us-opt...north-korea-reportedly-include-assassination/

The National Security Council has told President Trump his options for dealing with North Korea’s nuclear threats include assassinating its dictator, Kim Jong-un, and placing US nukes in South Korea, according to a new report.

NBC, citing high ranking US military and intelligence officials, said the two scenarios were developed before Trump’s meetings this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

US officials are hoping the Chinese leaders will convince their ally — through sanctions or diplomacy — to back off.

If the rogue state continues on its present path, the Council’s much stronger options could be put into effect.

Who takes over NK then? I think it would turn into a fucking blood bath. Several NK generals killing each other with nuclear weapons within their reach etc....yikes. Assassination is a good idea IF you have some way to insure a steady stable person takes over NK or even if SK takes over NK.

 

[Care4all]

does trump have a darn death wish? WHY are they even talking about assassinating a foreign leader in public? STUPID STUPID STUPID IDIOTS if this is true.....gawd almighty...

 

[pismoe]

But Trump said he was against regime change, and assassination is the most drastic method of regime change.

it's also against our law.

------------------------------------------------------------------ we may need a new and better law , one that allows assasination Care4 !!

 

[KeiserC]

But Trump said he was against regime change, and assassination is the most drastic method of regime change.

it's also against our law.

------------------------------------------------------------------ we may need a new and better law , one that allows assasination Care4 !!

With a Congressional declaration of war the 'rubric' changes... it's OK at that point... i.e. Bin Ladin, Saddam Hussein ... targeted strikes where the 'assassanee' is believed to be.

 

[esthermoon]

These types of situations either require strong diplomacy (with China), or, strong action. You get the feeling Jong-Un isn't one you roll the dice with in regards to your survival. Is there a situation in which such state sponsored assassination is acceptable?



http://nypost.com/2017/04/07/us-opt...north-korea-reportedly-include-assassination/

The National Security Council has told President Trump his options for dealing with North Korea’s nuclear threats include assassinating its dictator, Kim Jong-un, and placing US nukes in South Korea, according to a new report.

NBC, citing high ranking US military and intelligence officials, said the two scenarios were developed before Trump’s meetings this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

US officials are hoping the Chinese leaders will convince their ally — through sanctions or diplomacy — to back off.

If the rogue state continues on its present path, the Council’s much stronger options could be put into effect.

Kill Kim would lead in a war for sure! It's not a good idea! North Korea has nuclear weapons and has a big ally...China...

 

[KeiserC]

These types of situations either require strong diplomacy (with China), or, strong action. You get the feeling Jong-Un isn't one you roll the dice with in regards to your survival. Is there a situation in which such state sponsored assassination is acceptable?



http://nypost.com/2017/04/07/us-opt...north-korea-reportedly-include-assassination/

The National Security Council has told President Trump his options for dealing with North Korea’s nuclear threats include assassinating its dictator, Kim Jong-un, and placing US nukes in South Korea, according to a new report.

NBC, citing high ranking US military and intelligence officials, said the two scenarios were developed before Trump’s meetings this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

US officials are hoping the Chinese leaders will convince their ally — through sanctions or diplomacy — to back off.

If the rogue state continues on its present path, the Council’s much stronger options could be put into effect.

Kill Kim would lead in a war for sure! It's not a good idea! North Korea has nuclear weapons and has a big ally...China...

I'm repeating myself here... because it's applicable...

The most important strategic consequence of Thurs. night’s attack was the message that it sent to Xi Jinping, seated at dinner with Trump at Mar-a-Lago while the Tomahawks were flying. Trump let the Chinese know that he is capable of taking pre-emptive military action and that he keeps his word. If China does not reel in North Korea, in other words, Trump will follow through on his commitment to go to war there.

 

[pismoe]

These types of situations either require strong diplomacy (with China), or, strong action. You get the feeling Jong-Un isn't one you roll the dice with in regards to your survival. Is there a situation in which such state sponsored assassination is acceptable?



http://nypost.com/2017/04/07/us-opt...north-korea-reportedly-include-assassination/

The National Security Council has told President Trump his options for dealing with North Korea’s nuclear threats include assassinating its dictator, Kim Jong-un, and placing US nukes in South Korea, according to a new report.

NBC, citing high ranking US military and intelligence officials, said the two scenarios were developed before Trump’s meetings this week with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

US officials are hoping the Chinese leaders will convince their ally — through sanctions or diplomacy — to back off.

If the rogue state continues on its present path, the Council’s much stronger options could be put into effect.

Kill Kim would lead in a war for sure! It's not a good idea! North Korea has nuclear weapons and has a big ally...China...

------------------------------------------------------------- South Korea has a good military so might as well get the chinese and western worlds war done while the USA has the strength , is rebuilding its military and has a good American President like the TRUMP . I already said in a different thread that the 'SORK's' citizens should prepare for war Esther .

 

[Care4all]

But Trump said he was against regime change, and assassination is the most drastic method of regime change.

it's also against our law.

Nope... exigent circumstances... nuclear ICBM's pointed at the US and our allies... Congress will approve a declaration of war in a second. Assassinating a leader would be extremely palatable for all involved including N Korea... perhaps the exception being Kim fat phuck Un...

OH it certainly is EASIER to simply assassinate another nation's leader...But that opens the door to another Nation simply assassinating our leader...and we don't want that....

Congress would not declare War, it takes 2/3's of both houses and I doubt there is enough bipartisanship to declare war....just so we can assassinate another nation's leader...

regardless, talk and strategy on this should be CLASSIFIED and NOT out in the open....