- Moderator
- #1
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.
State's rights stop when one state's laws contradict with those of another.Too much states rights is like any other rights, he cannot control. He is against states rights. So, he will rule by Executive Order, as there is no way in hell, congress will pass a law, taking away the rights of their own state governments, certainly not for the (already) unpopular lame duck in the White House.
You just proved he is doing it, and nowhere does it say that it is unconstitutional, dumbass! Nobody said he wasn't!
CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2025 › 12 › 08 › tech › trump-eo-blocking-ai-state-laws
Trump says he'll sign executive order blocking state AI ...
TodayPresident Donald Trump confirmed on Monday he plans to sign an executive order preempting artificial intelligence regulations at the state level with his more hands-off federal policy.
New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › 2025 › 12 › 08 › us › politics › trump-executive-order-ai-laws.html
Trump Promises Executive Order to Block State AI Regulati
Reuters
https://www.reuters.com › world › trump-says-he-will-sign-executive-order-this-week-ai-approval-process-2025-12-08
Trump says he will sign executive order this week on AI
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.
I wouldn't bet on that. Those justices are basically owned by the tRumplings.If any state challenges this in the S.C I presume he will lose each case.
CNN! NYT! LMAO. You're losing it, six.
CNN
https://www.cnn.com › 2025 › 12 › 08 › tech › trump-eo-blocking-ai-state-laws
Trump says he'll sign executive order blocking state AI ...
TodayPresident Donald Trump confirmed on Monday he plans to sign an executive order preempting artificial intelligence regulations at the state level with his more hands-off federal policy.
New York Times
https://www.nytimes.com › 2025 › 12 › 08 › us › politics › trump-executive-order-ai-laws.html
Trump Promises Executive Order to Block State AI Regulati
Reuters
https://www.reuters.com › world › trump-says-he-will-sign-executive-order-this-week-ai-approval-process-2025-12-08
Trump says he will sign executive order this week on AI
CNN! NYT! LMAO. You're losing it, six.
As much as I hate to use him as a source, I think Adm. R. Tory said it best. Interstate commerce negates the states rights argument. I'm sure the SCOTUS FTC-firing case will also be instrumental in settling this. AI definitely is NOT a states issue.Which one was incorrect?
Is this one better?
![]()
Trump administration eyes sweeping federal power over AI, draft order shows
Trump's sweeping AI executive order would block states from setting their own artificial intelligence rules, creating litigation task force.www.foxnews.com
Trump administration eyes sweeping federal power over AI, draft order shows
Plan would override state authority and withhold broadband funds from non-compliant states
You could, obviously, be right. Maybe it should not be a state right to regulate how it is used. On the other hand, that, equally, obviously depends on how trump regulates or deregulates and the uses it is allowed to be put to. Some AI models have already learned to lie, make things up whole cloth, and shown a tendency toward self-preservation when facing disconnection. Be careful what you ask for. You may get it.As much as I hate to use him as a source, I think Adm. R. Tory said it best. Interstate commerce negates the states rights argument. I'm sure the SCOTUS FTC-firing case will also be instrumental in settling this. AI definitely is NOT a states issue.
Auld Phart ...Did leftists complain when Biden, I mean Obama, did this?
![]()
Trump says he will repeal Biden-era fuel efficiency standards for cars and trucks
Move marks president’s latest effort to dismantle pollution regulations and support for cleaner-running vehicleswww.theguardian.com