Trump plans to sign executive order on AI

Dont Taz Me Bro

Diamond Member
Staff member
Senior USMB Moderator
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2009
Messages
76,894
Reaction score
47,221
Points
2,645
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.

 
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.


If any state challenges this in the S.C I presume he will lose each case.
 
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.



This sounds like the same thing I would imagine some folks said in 1935, when Franklin D. Roosevelt through Executive Order 7037 created the Rural Electrification Administration to bring power to rural areas.
 
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.


Absolutely right. Trump wants to cede as much power to AI tech as he can: All at the expense of our privacy.

The states are the ones on the vanguard standing up for the rights of the people.

Since the MAGA cult have surrendered their spines to Trump I wouldn’t expect them to give a damn.
 
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.


Since states aren't executive branch agencies of the President, his EO will be as worthwhile as his tweet
 
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.


Too much states rights is like any other rights, he cannot control. He is against states rights. So, he will rule by Executive Order, as there is no way in hell, congress will pass a law, taking away the rights of their own state governments, certainly not for the (already) unpopular lame duck in the White House.
 
lol 'AI" is nothing more than input-output. It is being heavily marketed by your masters like Google. There are no recent breakthroughs in "AI," and everyone is getting bent of out shape.
 
Too much states rights is like any other rights, he cannot control. He is against states rights. So, he will rule by Executive Order, as there is no way in hell, congress will pass a law, taking away the rights of their own state governments, certainly not for the (already) unpopular lame duck in the White House.
State's rights stop when one state's laws contradict with those of another.

Trump is in no way a lame duck as you are using the wrong definition of the term. He can no longer be reelected, but he is not serving after being replaced by an election. You are using a liberal's lie to justify your TDS. Either that or you are just plain stupid!
 
You just proved he is doing it, and nowhere does it say that it is unconstitutional, dumbass! Nobody said he wasn't!
 
Trump says he’ll sign an EO this week to override state AI laws. That’s a direct attack on state sovereignty that hands even more power to the Big Tech oligarchs. This sounds more like EU style governance.



I keep telling my Republican friends that he's NOT the only thing standing between the Deep State and us
 
CNN! NYT! LMAO. You're losing it, six.

Which one was incorrect?
Is this one better?

Trump administration eyes sweeping federal power over AI, draft order shows​

Plan would override state authority and withhold broadband funds from non-compliant states
 
Which one was incorrect?
Is this one better?

Trump administration eyes sweeping federal power over AI, draft order shows​

Plan would override state authority and withhold broadband funds from non-compliant states
As much as I hate to use him as a source, I think Adm. R. Tory said it best. Interstate commerce negates the states rights argument. I'm sure the SCOTUS FTC-firing case will also be instrumental in settling this. AI definitely is NOT a states issue.
 
15th post
It goes beyond interstate commerce and into international commerce as well. When it comes foreign policy that falls directly to the Executive branch. Unless states are going to somehow limit AI to intrastate use only they have no leg to stand on in opposition to executive action.
 
Last edited:
As much as I hate to use him as a source, I think Adm. R. Tory said it best. Interstate commerce negates the states rights argument. I'm sure the SCOTUS FTC-firing case will also be instrumental in settling this. AI definitely is NOT a states issue.
You could, obviously, be right. Maybe it should not be a state right to regulate how it is used. On the other hand, that, equally, obviously depends on how trump regulates or deregulates and the uses it is allowed to be put to. Some AI models have already learned to lie, make things up whole cloth, and shown a tendency toward self-preservation when facing disconnection. Be careful what you ask for. You may get it.
 
Back
Top Bottom