trump organization CFO will be charged TOMORROW!

[Claudette]

TNHarley
I agree. Sounds like a whole lot of nothing to me. NY sure is excited about nothing. LOL

 

[toobfreak]

"Charges also could increase pressure on Weisselberg to cooperate with prosecutors, which he has resisted. Weisselberg is a close Trump confidant, making his cooperation potentially crucial to any future case against Trump himself.

Democrats desperate to bribe others to rat out their friend and boss Trump hoping to make another specious case against him.

"Court filings, public records and subpoenaed documents have shown that Weisselberg and his son Barry have received perks and gifts potentially worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, including many benefits related to real estate."

That puts Barry about 20X behind Hunter Biden in untaxed gifts received!

'Jennifer Weisselberg, the former wife of Barry Weisselberg, has met with prosecutors half a dozen times, and according to her lawyer has provided boxes of tax and bank records as well as financial statements.

So she followed the law as required?

"In an interview with MSNBC, Jennifer Weisselberg said she would be prepared to testify.

Yes but to what? Testify Trump is innocent all hate-charges?

We've heard of hate-crimes. Now democrats bring us Hate-Politics.

 

[toobfreak]

It also goes against everything our country stands for.......the party that wins the election ( by cheating no less ) then goes on to pursue the man they cheated and stole the office from?

As usual, their efforts are shortsighted. By opening the door to pursuing an ex president to get dirt on him at all costs, they of course will have the same done to one of theirs

AND AS USUAL, despite that, the GOP will do NOTHING to stop any of this and I'd fall over backwards if they then decided to pursue punitive investigations into Obumma or others! When is the last time an investigation spearheaded by the GOP of ANYONE ever resulted in a criminal conviction?

 

[toobfreak]

I find their glee at the prospect of an American president getting in legal trouble after he leaves office to be illustrative of a disturbing mental issue. Sad, really, they way they've held on so desperately all these years hoping against hope that this time they're going to "get" him.

Understandable really because the Left need a conviction to VALIDATE THEMSELVES. Trump popped their bubble reality and showed the GOP how to screw the Left. Now they must prove that no one defies them without paying, worse, they've staked all their self-worth in proving they WEREN'T wrong the 10,000 times they shrieked that Trump was a diabolical Nazi criminal dictator.

Alas, like the hollow election debunking hype, all they got to show for it is a strong right hand.

 

[toobfreak]

The MAGA crowd will stand by his side no matter what. They simply cannot accept that they have been grifted.

So what would YOU suggest? Name for us the past presidents who ostensibly did NOT have any questionable financial earnings in their past?

 

[Winco]

This news has been out for One Hour.
Still no RWI defense.

Talking Points haven't been delivered yet?

See post #7...

Yes, he posted that at the exact same time I posted my comment.
On Cue. LOLLOOOL

 

[Winco]

The MAGA crowd will stand by his side no matter what. They simply cannot accept that they have been grifted.

It's like "What are you afraid of?" If no crime was committed, what are you hiding?

1). AZ audit, what are you afraid of?
2). Trump Organization........Witch Hunt.

 

[JimH52]

More witch hunting.

How Tax Evasion Toppled Al Capone (+ The Tax Man Who Nailed Him)

Ever wonder how Capone finally got caught? While Elliot Ness gets the credit, here's the true story about the tax lawyer who nabbed Capone on tax evasion.

www.mightytaxes.com

This is just the beginning...or maybe the end of the repub party....

 

[JimH52]

So the hammer is about to come down on Allen Howard Weisselberg. And it is only the beginning. The charges will begin to ramp up.

This is real dude.

SO LET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT--- You're celebrating (from what we now know) because:

1. When Trump ran in 2016, Hillary and the democrats cheated trying to use a fake dossier and lies to the FISA court to start a fraudulent investigation.
2. The House Managers drew up two specious impeachments that failed because they were both based on fraudulent claims.
3. When Trump campaigned last year, Biden and the democrats pressured Facebook to censor Trump to impede his campaign while setting up numerous illicit rule changes in state laws to radically alter the election for your benefit.
4. When the American people didn't buy it and stormed the Capitol on 1/6 demanding accountability, you tried to label them insurrectionists even locking people away with no charges against them who did nothing other than being in or around the Capitol that day!
5. So now you're all jubilant because after 11,150 tries in five years, you might get one minor person charged with a slap on the wrist for not paying taxes on an employee gift that no company ever normally pays taxes on!

View attachment 507309

The American people didn't storm the Capitol.. some of the more rabid Trump groupies stormed the Capitol.. and most were losers to begin with.

Ass hole. They were warned for a time before. What would you do, have less security...........................lolololol

My God are you fucking stupid you gullible retard

They were warned that Trump supporters would storm the Capitol?

LOLOLOL..................2 weeks before.......What would you do???.Prepare it might happen, or not...........................LOLOLOLOL....................TDS

An investigation will show that trump was far more involved in the planning and funding that many believe.

 

[Winco]

they cheated and stole the office from?

Oh, just stop.

Russia, Russia, Russia.
Remember that?

This "Stop the Steal" is ridiculous and embarrassing.
You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

 

[toobfreak]

they cheated and stole the office from?

You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

The fraud was proven long ago! The only problem has been getting a court to look into the numerous cases and in time to find in their favor and overturn the state decision BEFORE being certified. The courts declined, too afraid of Antifa and BLM.

 

[Winco]

they cheated and stole the office from?

You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

The fraud was proven long ago! The only problem has been getting a court to look into the numerous cases and in time to find in their favor and overturn the state decision BEFORE being certified. The courts declined, too afraid of Antifa and BLM.

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Well Well.

On Dec. 1, then-Attorney General William Barr said that the Justice Department had found no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the election, even as President Trump kept up his legal efforts to reverse his defeat

“widespread fraud or election-changing conspiracy” the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.”

 

[L.K.Eder]

they cheated and stole the office from?

You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

The fraud was proven long ago! The only problem has been getting a court to look into the numerous cases and in time to find in their favor and overturn the state decision BEFORE being certified. The courts declined, too afraid of Antifa and BLM.

^^

 

[toobfreak]

they cheated and stole the office from?

You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

The fraud was proven long ago! The only problem has been getting a court to look into the numerous cases and in time to find in their favor and overturn the state decision BEFORE being certified. The courts declined, too afraid of Antifa and BLM.

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Well Well. On Dec. 1, then-Attorney General William Barr said that the Justice Department had found no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the election

Where did Barr say he looked? You haven't found any evidence either because YOU HAVEN'T LOOKED.

What process of vetting did he use?

How did he determine that in all the massive evidence, witnesses and testimony involved, and in so short a time?

Why is it that in the hundreds of statements that Barr made as AG, that this is the ONLY ONE you take seriously or believe?

 

[Winco]

they cheated and stole the office from?

You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

The fraud was proven long ago! The only problem has been getting a court to look into the numerous cases and in time to find in their favor and overturn the state decision BEFORE being certified. The courts declined, too afraid of Antifa and BLM.

Trump and his allies filed more than 40 lawsuits challenging the 2020 election results. All of them failed.

Since Donald Trump lost in November 2020, Republicans have filed dozens of lawsuits challenging the presidential election results. They've won zero.

www.businessinsider.com

A judge threw out the case, saying Trump's lawyers presented the court "with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpaid in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence." An appeal of the case also failed.

A third federal lawsuit sought to stop the Montgomery County Board of Elections from allowing voters to "cure" their ballots — a process that allows people to fix clerical errors on their ballots to make sure their votes count. Republicans abandoned the lawsuit and withdrew from the case.

The campaign sued in yet another federal case to stop Philadelphia County from counting votes without Republicans present. The judge dismissed the case after Trump's lawyers said Republican election watchers were, in fact, present.

 

[Winco]

they cheated and stole the office from?

You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

The fraud was proven long ago! The only problem has been getting a court to look into the numerous cases and in time to find in their favor and overturn the state decision BEFORE being certified. The courts declined, too afraid of Antifa and BLM.

Fact check: Courts have dismissed multiple lawsuits of alleged electoral fraud presented by Trump campaign

Following President Joe Biden’s swearing in on Jan. 20, a Facebook post shared over 6,140 times has said: “Not one court has looked at the evidence and said that Biden legally won. Not one”. This is false: state and federal judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits presented by then President...

www.reuters.com

Well Well. On Dec. 1, then-Attorney General William Barr said that the Justice Department had found no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the election

Where did Barr say he looked? You haven't found any evidence either because YOU HAVEN'T LOOKED.

What process of vetting did he use?

How did he determine that in all the massive evidence, witnesses and testimony involved, and in so short a time?

Why is it that in the hundreds of statements that Barr made as AG, that this is the ONLY ONE you take seriously or believe?

Keep the Fraud Dream Alive.
Trump is DONE.
Time to move on.

 

[Winco]

they cheated and stole the office from?

You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

The fraud was proven long ago! The only problem has been getting a court to look into the numerous cases and in time to find in their favor and overturn the state decision BEFORE being certified. The courts declined, too afraid of Antifa and BLM.

Rudy Giuliani's Bogus Election Fraud Claims - FactCheck.org

A New York court suspended Rudy Giuliani's license to practice law in that state for making "demonstrably false and misleading statements" about the 2020 presidential election results. We recap some of the bogus claims that we have previously debunked.

www.factcheck.org

As we have written, Giuliani — without providing evidence — described the lawsuit at the hearing as a part of “nationwide voter fraud” involving “at least 10 other jurisdictions.” U.S. District Judge Matthew Brann asked Trump’s lawyer, “So you are alleging fraud?” Giuliani responded, “Yes, your honor.”
But later Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor, admitted to Brann that the amended complaint did not allege fraud at all.

 

[toobfreak]

they cheated and stole the office from?

You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

The fraud was proven long ago! The only problem has been getting a court to look into the numerous cases and in time to find in their favor and overturn the state decision BEFORE being certified. The courts declined, too afraid of Antifa and BLM.

A judge threw out the case, saying Trump's lawyers presented the court "with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpaid in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence." An appeal of the case also failed.

A third federal lawsuit sought to stop the Montgomery County Board of Elections from allowing voters to "cure" their ballots — a process that allows people to fix clerical errors on their ballots to make sure their votes count. Republicans abandoned the lawsuit and withdrew from the case.

The campaign sued in yet another federal case to stop Philadelphia County from counting votes without Republicans present. The judge dismissed the case after Trump's lawyers said Republican election watchers were, in fact, present.

Thanks for all of the misinformation, half-truths, and opinions. In the one case, Trump's people had too little time to make the filing deadline and mistakes were made allowing the case to be summarily dismissed. In the other case, different rules were set forth depending on which stack of ballots yours were in--- they were separated according to party. Democrats got to repair their ballots so they were legal (when they should have been thrown out for not meeting state guidelines), while republican ballots just WERE thrown away. And in the third case, Republicans counted as "present" because they were IN THE ROOM, though kept too far away to usefully tell whether the election staff were legally doing their jobs.

But I'll give you the benefit of doubt, WINCO, that only leaves the OTHER 97 fraud cases to be proven false!

 

[Meathead]

Trump Organization and CFO are 'expected to be charged TOMORROW'

Prosecutors are expected to bring their first indictments against the Trump Organization and its chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg on Thursday.

www.dailymail.co.uk

So the hammer is about to come down on Allen Howard Weisselberg. And it is only the beginning. The charges will begin to ramp up.

Suddenly, trump will not know who these people are...

Yeah, you got him now. LOL

 

[Winco]

they cheated and stole the office from?

You have had 7 months to prove Fraud, what happened?

The fraud was proven long ago! The only problem has been getting a court to look into the numerous cases and in time to find in their favor and overturn the state decision BEFORE being certified. The courts declined, too afraid of Antifa and BLM.

You do seem like a smart man.
It is time to give up this False Claim.
It really is, it is getting far worse than Russia, Russia, Russia.

As Trump's election lawsuits fizzle, Giuliani goes to court. It doesn't get better

Rudy Giuliani offered baseless claims of fraud at a federal court hearing in Pennsylvania as President Trump's bid to reverse the election result sputtered.

www.latimes.com

During a Nov. 10 court hearing in Pennsylvania, in which they tried to persuade local officials to toss out several hundred ballots, the judge asked one of the president’s lawyers whether there was any fraud at issue.

“I am asking you a specific question, and I am looking for a specific answer,” the judge said. “Are you claiming that there is any fraud in connection with these 592 disputed ballots?

“To my knowledge, at present, no,” said the lawyer, Jonathan Goldstein. The lawsuit was eventually dismissed.