Trump Officially An Insurrectionist

[bigrebnc1775]

View attachment 860949

The judge knows she would be in the wrong

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Donald Trump’s name will be on the ballot in Colorado in 2024, at least according to the latest ruling handed down by a Colorado court on Friday.

However, Judge Sarah B. Wallace also ruled that there is sufficient evidence the then-president “incited an insurrection,” and that he therefore “participated in an insurrection.”

Nonetheless, the judge determined that the language of the 14th Amendment’s Insurrection Clause did not clearly apply to the office of president, and she was unwilling to rule that he is ineligible to be a candidate for that office.

The order wasn’t exactly what either side wanted, and an appeal is expected from the plaintiffs, a group called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

It’s possible that the state Supreme Court, and in turn, the U.S. Supreme Court, could see it the same way. Both may hear the case since an appeal from either Trump or the plaintiffs (depending on the outcome) is a likely prospect.

Ultimately, SCOTUS is likely to have the last word, and their position could set a rule that will apply in every state, as well as a precedent for elected officials going forward. The Washington Post reports:



CERTIFIED: Why Trump's "victory" in Colorado may not be what he thinks

Yep, Trump is officially an insurrectionist. Sane people already knew that. What do you think?

When it goes to the Appeals court, even the FBI said it wasnt an insurrection. Maybe it is time that some of these judges be barred from law.

FBI confirms there was no insurrection on Jan. 6 - Washington Examiner

The Cambridge Dictionary defines “insurrection” as: “an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence” By that definition, there was no “insurrection” at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, according to the FBI. Reuters...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[bigrebnc1775]

When it goes to the Appeals court, even the FBI said it wasnt an insurrection. Maybe it is time that some of these judges be barred from law.

FBI confirms there was no insurrection on Jan. 6 - Washington Examiner

The Cambridge Dictionary defines “insurrection” as: “an organized attempt by a group of people to defeat their government and take control of their country, usually by violence” By that definition, there was no “insurrection” at the United States Capitol on Jan. 6, according to the FBI. Reuters...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

That's why she didn't rule it as an insurrection she did it for political points.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

View attachment 860941

Colorado Judge Finds Trump Engaged In Insurrection, But Rejects Constitutional Ballot Challenge​

Ah yes, the typical KAREN with black robes. Are you sure that isnt the HHS employee?
I tell yea, that all Marxists/Demofascists look alike, Karens and Kens.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Trump is forever officially branded as a rapist and insurrectionist.

Bwaaaaahhhhaaaa....Oh my fucking god, i just fell out of my chair, for such a stupid thing to say.

 

[BackAgain]

Donald Trump’s name will be on the ballot in Colorado in 2024, at least according to the latest ruling handed down by a Colorado court on Friday.

However, Judge Sarah B. Wallace also ruled that there is sufficient evidence the then-president “incited an insurrection,” and that he therefore “participated in an insurrection.”

Nonetheless, the judge determined that the language of the 14th Amendment’s Insurrection Clause did not clearly apply to the office of president, and she was unwilling to rule that he is ineligible to be a candidate for that office.

The order wasn’t exactly what either side wanted, and an appeal is expected from the plaintiffs, a group called Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).

It’s possible that the state Supreme Court, and in turn, the U.S. Supreme Court, could see it the same way. Both may hear the case since an appeal from either Trump or the plaintiffs (depending on the outcome) is a likely prospect.

Ultimately, SCOTUS is likely to have the last word, and their position could set a rule that will apply in every state, as well as a precedent for elected officials going forward. The Washington Post reports:



CERTIFIED: Why Trump's "victory" in Colorado may not be what he thinks

Yep, Trump is officially an insurrectionist. Sane people already knew that. What do you think?

YAWN.

Her factual decision is baseless. And her words don’t matter, anyway.

A remarkably vapid OP from Chief Shitting Bull. Not a surprise.

 

[mudwhistle]

CNN approved this before hand....it was a plot to frame Trump.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Jan 6th Committee had to coverup or ignore tons of exculpatory evidence to draw the conclusion that Trump led an insurrection:

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Pay back is coming

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Trump has been identified legally as an insurrectionist and sexual perv.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Trump has been identified legally as an insurrectionist and sexual perv.

So why did the judge violate her oath if office? She knows she lied but an idiot tds simp would believe her.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I wouldn't call it that, even though it's interesting to us political pundits. (Of course I'm talking about the insurrectionist label.)

"Participated in insurrection" = insurrectionist, I say.

 

[WorldWatcher]

"Participated in insurrection" = insurrectionist, I say.

I agree, but we are talking about the ruling.

There was a two tier question before the court, both had to be true for the Judge to rule.

1. Trump was an active part of the insurrection, AND
2. Trump could be removed under A14S3.

She found that he was an insurrectionist as part of the fact finding that needed to happen to get to the second question. She punted on the second question because who can honestly say that the Office of the President ISN'T and Officer of the United States. That doesn't make sense.

** IF ** she had found that FPOTUS#45 had not participated in the insurrection, that was it. That ended the ease. She would have never had to get to the second question. By finding that he participated in the insurrection, then that opens the door to examine the second question.

(And yes I disagree with her premise as it related to the 2nd question, the President is in fact an Officer of the United States.)

WW

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Judge ruled Trump an insurectionist.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She punted on the second question because who can honestly say that the Office of the President ISN'T and Officer of the United States. That doesn't make sense.

That's right she did. And that's right, it doesn't.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The Judge said Trump is not an officer of the federal government.

I think she is wrong.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

"Participated in insurrection" = insurrectionist, I say.

Are you calling the FBI, "Liars"?

Exclusive: FBI finds scant evidence U.S. Capitol attack was coordinated - sources

Though federal officials have arrested more than 570 alleged participants, the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

I agree, but we are talking about the ruling.

There was a two tier question before the court, both had to be true for the Judge to rule.

1. Trump was an active part of the insurrection, AND
2. Trump could be removed under A14S3.

She found that he was an insurrectionist as part of the fact finding that needed to happen to get to the second question. She punted on the second question because who can honestly say that the Office of the President ISN'T and Officer of the United States. That doesn't make sense.

** IF ** she had found that FPOTUS#45 had not participated in the insurrection, that was it. That ended the ease. She would have never had to get to the second question. By finding that he participated in the insurrection, then that opens the door to examine the second question.

(And yes I disagree with her premise as it related to the 2nd question, the President is in fact an Officer of the United States.)

WW

 

[Roy C]

View attachment 860941

Colorado Judge Finds Trump Engaged In Insurrection, But Rejects Constitutional Ballot Challenge​

Without even looking, I knew "she" would look like a man. lmao

 

[Toro]

View attachment 861488

^^^^^^^^
Mikesuxenormousblkcok is wildly jelly