Trump was in a major fog about Hillary's bathroom habits during the debate. I don't think he ever solved what really happened. Those things must mean a lot to Trump because he used campaign time to try and find out were she went during the debate. I think that problem exists because Trump hires people to go to the bathroom for Trump.
I want my 5 seconds back for reading that dumbass post!
Says the guy sitting in front of his computer stalking Trump's twitter feed. Tissue in one hand, a new USMB thread ready to start in a separate tab. He thinks to himself "I've a 214 IQ, I can make it work this time....this time I will convince them Trump is love, Trump is life".
He then goes on to fawn like the sycophant he is and fail as would be expected to anyone not listening to the narrative (played by Charleston Heston) running through his head.





.... Little leftists are funny.... deranged sycophants, but funny!
Have you completely lost your ability to think for yourself? I'm convinced you have daddy issues and you think Trump is going to take care of you. Prove me wrong, Mr. 214.
Trump Is the Authoritarian Ruler Republicans—and Some Dems—Have Been Waiting For
Trump Is the Authoritarian Ruler Republicans—and Some Dems—Have Been Waiting For
ELECTION 2016
Trump Is the Authoritarian Ruler Republicans—and Some Dems—Have Been Waiting For
How far can a truly authoritarian leader go in America?
By John Dean /
Justia.com
August 13, 2015
Print
342 COMMENTS
Photo Credit: cspan.org
I looked closely at authoritarians in
Conservatives Without Conscience, and the information I developed and shared in 2006 is equally, if not more, relevant today. Actually, Trump is far more aggressive in his authoritarianism than his predecessors. To understand the Trump phenomenon, it is essential to appreciate political authoritarianism, as well as its limits and boundaries.
Political Authoritarians—The Followers
Americans were introduced to “the authoritarian type” in a 1951 book that was controversial from its publication:
The Authoritarian Personality by
Theodor W. Adorno,
Else Frenkel-Brunswik, and
Daniel J. Levinson. While the book had its flaws, time has also shown much of the analysis was accurate, if not prescient, in explaining this type of personality. When studying these personalities I discovered the later work of an American-born professor at the University of Manitoba, Bob Altemeyer, whose book The Authoritarian Specter updates, expands upon, and solidifies the work of Adorno’s team.
Altemeyer was extremely helpful in assisting me translate decades of academic works by social science into meaningful material for the general reader. After he saw the interest in my book, I was able to persuade Dr. Bob to summarize some of his own work for the general reader, which he posted online, and it is free. The work is entitled
The Authoritarian, and it has been visited by over a half million people. Trump’s candidacy should send more people to read it.
I am only going to briefly summarize the authoritarian types, who can be broadly broken down into “leaders” and “followers.” Starting with the followers, who are more prevalent and who are characterized by their submissiveness to established authorities, a trait that becomes combined with a general aggressiveness toward others. Altemeyer labels these followers “right-wing authoritarians,” and from his studies I developed a laundry list of characteristic and traits consistently found in these people.
Specifically, as I noted in Conservatives Without Conscience, the authoritarian followers are both men and women, who tend to be highly conventional, always and easily submissive to authority, while willing to work aggressively on behalf of such an authority. They tend to be very religious, with moderate to little education, trusting of untrustworthy authorities, prejudiced (e.g., with respect to gay marriage); they are typically mean-spirited, narrow-minded, intolerant, bullying, zealous, dogmatic, uncritical of their chosen authority, hypocritical, inconsistent, prone to panic easily, highly self-righteous, moralistic, strict disciplinarian, severely punitive; they also demand loyalty and return it, have little self-awareness, and are typically politically and economically conservative Republicans.